Categories
Alaska News Featured Juneau News juneau Juneau Local Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local

Alaska Senate advances constitutional amendment to establish education fund

By: Sean Maguire, Alaska Beacon

Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel, speaks during a joint session of the Alaska Legislature on Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (James Brooks photo/Alaska Beacon)

The Alaska Senate on Wednesday advanced a constitutional amendment that would establish a dedicated fund for public education.

If passed, lawmakers could design a new source of state revenue to go toward the fund that would be used specifically for schools. The resolution states that the Legislature could only appropriate money from the fund for public education. 

The Alaska Constitution explicitly prohibits the dedication of funds in most cases. Supporters say that prohibition was intended to give the Legislature flexibility in budgeting, and avoid mandated funds.

Bethel Democratic Sen. Lyman Hoffman said before Wednesday’s vote that education is his No. 1 priority. A dedicated education fund could be a “tremendous tool” to improve schools in Alaska, he said. Hoffman co-chairs the Senate Finance Committee which sponsored the constitutional amendment.

The Legislature last year approved an historic increase in school funding through the state’s complex formula, overriding two separate vetoes by Republican Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy. Still, advocates say that substantially more school funding is needed with school districts facing sizable budget shortfalls and decades of deferred maintenance.

Two Alaska school districts in January sued the state, arguing that Alaska’s education funding levels violate a constitutional duty to fund schools adequately. School districts across Alaska have long complained about crumbling buildings that have reached crisis level. 

Republican Sen. Bert Stedman represents Sitka, home of Mt. Edgecumbe High School, a state-run boarding school which has reported leaking roofs and buildings in disrepair. Stedman said Alaska is one of the nation’s richest states, but the condition of its schools is “kind of embarrassing.”

Surrounded by school children in the Senate’s public galleries, Stedman said that “we should be doing better for our kids.”

“Every generation needs to make a little step forward and this is our little step,” he said in support of the resolution before the final vote. 

The Alaska Senate approved the resolution on a 17-3 vote. At least 14 of 20 senators are needed to support a constitutional amendment. Two-thirds of the Alaska House of Representatives would need to vote for the same resolution to put the proposal before voters at the November election. 

All 14 members of the bipartisan Senate majority supported the constitutional amendment, alongside three minority Senate Republicans — Sens. Robert Yundt of Wasilla, Mike Cronk of Tok and James Kaufman of Anchorage.

Three minority Senate Republicans voted no: Sens. Robb Myers of North Pole, Cathy Tilton of Wasilla and George Rauscher of Sutton. 

Myers said the drafters of the Alaska Constitution sought to block the proliferation of dedicated funds, which would consume the annual budget.  

He said that establishing a dedicated fund for education “removed any sort of flexibility for the Legislature.” He said that avoiding annual debates about school funding was “not necessarily a good thing.” Education spending could effectively be “out of sight, out of mind,” he said. 

Myers said the state has numerous other priorities such as health care and natural resource management, but they would not receive the same dedicated funds. 

The resolution now advances to the House. If approved by 27 of 40 House members, it would then be placed before voters at the Nov. 3 election. A simple majority of voters is needed to approve an amendment to the Alaska Constitution.

A governor cannot block a constitutional amendment from appearing on the ballot with their veto pen. The Alaska Constitution was last amended in 2004

Categories
Alaska News Featured Juneau News juneau Juneau Local Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local

Gondola reversal puts Eaglecrest, Juneau budget under strain

NOTN- The City and Borough of Juneau is scrapping its participation in the long-planned gondola project at Eaglecrest ski area after costs ballooned from single-digit millions to an estimated $37 million, leaving the city on the hook to repay Goldbelt during an already tight budget season.

Finance Committee Chair Christine Woll said the Juneau Assembly voted Wednesday night to move forward with pulling out of its agreement with Goldbelt, which had helped finance the project. The city expects to repay about $12 million that Goldbelt invested, roughly $9 million of which has already been spent.

“We knew that increases at Eaglecrest were going to be significant over time, just because of aging infrastructure, and we knew that the public tax dollars probably couldn’t sustain paying for those increases at Eaglecrest.” Woll said, “So the vision was that by installing a gondola that could help take advantage of summer revenue from our visitor industry, we could
provide a more reliable, non-taxpayer dollar-funded income stream at Eaglecrest, but for a price tag that big, it no longer becomes something that the city has funds to invest in.”

The gondola was originally projected to cost about $7 million, later revised to around $9 million when the city and Goldbelt signed their deal, Woll said. The latest estimate, about $37 million to install, pushed the project far beyond affordability for the City.

“It’s just terrible, what a waste of money, but we’re gonna have to figure out how to pay it back.” Woll said.

The decision to cancel the project now leaves Eaglecrest in a precarious financial position. Its future budgets had assumed new income from gondola operations during the summer months.

Woll said the Assembly has directed Eaglecrest to return with a much-reduced operating budget that fits within the traditional taxpayer subsidy the ski area receives.

The gondola reversal comes as Juneau is just beginning to create it’s annual budget for FY 27.

“Ultimately, the assembly is going to have to make some hard decisions about service reductions. We’re aiming to make about $2 million more in cuts before June, when we have to pass the budget.” Said Woll.

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska’s energy leadership means American energy independence

Sunlight reflects off solar panels lining the student recreation building at the University of Alaska Fairbanks campus on June 2, 2018. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

Sunlight reflects off solar panels lining the student recreation building at the University of Alaska Fairbanks campus on June 2, 2018. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

Alaska is about to see $22 billion invested in energy production and storage over the next five years. That’s real money, real opportunity and something we shouldn’t take for granted. What we do with that investment matters far beyond Alaska.

When you have a diverse energy grid, it’s harder to disrupt and less vulnerable to foreign pressure. That’s just common sense. Alaska can offer that diversity: oil and gas, hydropower, wind, solar. But only if we build it.

We should support programs that upgrade and modernize our electric grid and energy systems. Updated systems will be more efficient and can better handle extreme weather. They’ll be more secure from hackers and foreign interference. With clean energy, we can diversify our energy portfolio to prepare for any interruptions. For Alaska’s remote communities, renewable power is the innovation we need to make sure their power needs are met reliably.

For years, Senator Murkowski has been involved in shaping federal energy policy that supports responsible development of Alaska’s resources and strengthens long-term energy security. These efforts have helped maintain Alaska’s role as a key player in energy innovation. But we have more work to do. 

Investing in a clean energy economy will result in more manufacturing jobs here at home and not outsourced to other countries like China. It will ensure we have greater control over our energy supplies in a system built in America by American workers. If we don’t build it here, someone else will build it somewhere else. Right now, China is dominating clean energy manufacturing globally. They’re winning the race to produce solar panels, batteries and wind turbines. If America wants energy independence, we can’t outsource it. We must build these technologies here using American supply chains.

For Alaska specifically, that means jobs. Good-paying manufacturing and construction work for communities that need it. Fuel-free power sources also help stabilize electricity prices. I’ve watched communities like Kodiak and Juneau manage their energy costs in ways most Alaskans can’t. Kodiak used hydropower and wind to displace millions of gallons of diesel. Juneau runs almost entirely on hydropower. The result has been some of the lowest, most predictable electricity rates in the state. When your power comes from water or geothermal or wind instead of fuel markets, families and businesses are better protected from market shocks. Recent instability tied to the conflict in Iran has underscored how quickly global fuel supplies can be disrupted, driving up oil and gas prices and reinforcing the value of reliable, locally produced renewable energy.

Modernizing Alaska’s grid is equally critical. Extreme weather, cyberattacks and foreign interference aren’t hypotheticals. Our systems need to withstand all of it. That infrastructure work pays dividends for years.

 The practical opportunities are in front of us right now. Hydropower projects like the Dixon Diversion, a 50 percent expansion of Bradley Lake, could add real, affordable, clean power to the Railbelt while Cook Inlet gas is tightening up. We have the expertise and know-how to build things in harsh environments because we’ve been doing it for decades.

An America First energy agenda doesn’t mean picking one fuel over another. It means producing every kind of energy we can here at home: oil, gas, wind, solar and hydropower. It means building and deploying these technologies in Alaska, strengthening American manufacturing and securing supply chains.

Alaskans have always believed in using what we have and building things that last. That same practical mindset should guide what we build next. More Alaska-made energy where it makes sense, more American manufacturing and more control over our own energy future. That’s not just good for Alaska. That’s good for the rest of the country, too.

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Categories
Alaska News Featured Juneau News juneau Juneau Local Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local Uncategorized

Alaska Advocates defend Roadless Rule

By: Grace Dumas

The Tongass National Forest

As the federal government advances plans to roll back Roadless Rule protections on 58 million acres of national forests, Southeast Alaska conservation advocates are racing to mobilize public opposition, warning that repealing the Roadless Rule could open the Tongass National Forest to expanded clear-cut logging and place subsistence, fisheries and tourism in peril.

Nathan Newcomer, Southeast Alaska Conservation Council (SEACC) Tongass Campaigner, said the current administration has signaled from “day one” that it intends to eliminate the federal Roadless Rule, a regulation that limits road-building and industrial development on certain undeveloped national forest lands.

“They signed an executive order to try to get rid of the Roadless Rule. The Secretary of Agriculture, Brooke Rollins, also issued a statement intending to rescind the Roadless Rule nationwide.”

Despite the administration’s push, the conservation group says public sentiment has been overwhelmingly in favor of keeping the rule.

A Notice of Intent, the first step in the rulemaking process, opened a 21-day public comment period nationwide. During that brief window, the public submitted more than 627,000 comments Newcomer said.

“Over half a million people submitted public comments. There’s a group called the Center for Western Priorities that did an analysis of those public comments, and they found that 99% of the public comments were in favor of keeping the roadless rule in place. When do you see 99% of American citizens agreeing on something? That just goes to show you that people really like the Roadless Rule.”

In 2001 when the Rule was enacted by the Clinton Administration, more than 600 public hearings were held around the nation, and the public provided more than 1.6 million comments on the Rule, more comments than any other rule in the nation’s history.

Now, Newcomer says, the government is trying to unwind those protections without holding any comparable meetings.

“They’re not holding any public meetings anywhere, not only for Alaska, but nothing down south either. So that’s why we’re organizing these public hearings, not just in Juneau, but throughout southeast.” Said Newcomer.

Juneau’s hearing was scheduled for yesterday evening at the JACC downtown.

The event featured a panel discussion with President Mike Jones of the Organized Village of Kasaan, Atagan Hood, Vice President of Alaska Youth for Environmental Action, Jamalea Martelle of Artemis National Wildlife Federation and Nicole Weston, Owner of NW Photography.

A moderator guided the conversation, about why roadless protections matter in their communities. The event then shifted into a public hearing where attendees offered testimony themselves.

“We’re going to have several videographers on hand that are going to document everything, record everybody’s public testimony, then we’re going to transcribe that testimony, and then we’re going to officially submit it to the public record once the public comment period for the draft EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) is open.”

If the roadless rule is repealed, Newcomer warned, “If you get rid of protections for federal public lands, you’re talking about more large scale clear cut logging, that’s the main threat. And of course, when you start to clear cut, it’s going to have huge impacts on the wildlife, on our subsistence ways of life here in the Tongass, on the tourism, recreation economy. How many people came up on cruise ships to Juneau last year?”

Despite the scale of public opposition documented in the comment record, Newcomer said he does not believe the federal government, under current leadership, is likely to change course.

“But that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t make our voices heard and make a lot of noise and make sure that we’re all on the record saying that we don’t want this. Because there are also other elections that happen, right? And so power can shift, so it’s about demonstrating that the people care about these things, and that’s just kind of the work that I have to do, and that’s the work that we’re doing to make sure that the public’s voice is heard.”

He said he’s seen community organizing make a difference over longer timelines, even when initial decisions seemed foregone.

“Historically, Americans have said we would like to keep the Roadless Rule in place, and now this administration is trying to ram a policy through that the vast majority of us don’t want to see happen. That’s not the role of government.” Newcomer said, “Government needs to be by the people for the people. I think highlighting that is really critical, so that people understand that they have agency, Because there’s a lot going on in the world, right? And it’s really easy to get overwhelmed and to become apathetic, but you really do have agency. I’ve seen it time and time again in my life, where you might feel like the the clouds are closing in on you, and it’s getting dark and gloomy, but really, when you stand together and you speak in a solid voice in unity, it can have really powerful change. It might not happen today or tomorrow, but it could make a huge difference.”

Categories
Alaska News

U.S. Forest Service overhaul sows confusion, concern

On March 31, the U.S. Forest Service announced plans to move its headquarters from Washington, D.C., to Salt Lake City, Utah. It will also close or repurpose all nine of its regional offices, create 15 state offices, and shutter research and development facilities in more than 30 states. According to a news release, the plan is intended to make the agency more “nimble, efficient [and] effective.” Forest Service leaders told staff on a call after the announcement that no changes will be made to fire and aviation management programs or field-based operational firefighters.

Since first announcing its intent to reorganize the agency last July, the Trump administration has marketed the plan as a way to streamline Forest Service operations, with a focus on boosting timber production and communicating more closely with local communities. But during a congressional hearing and public comment period on the subject last summer, more than 80% of the 14,000 public comments submitted were negative, with many tribal representatives, conservation groups and former Forest Service staffers opposing the move. A U.S. Department of Agriculture summary of public comments included concerns that relocating Forest Service staff and further cuts to its budgets “could compromise ecological management, public access, and employee morale.” The current plan incorporates many elements of the original proposal, including the move to Salt Lake City and the closure of regional offices.

“Nobody is asking for this,” said Robert Bonnie, who oversaw the Forest Service as a Department of Agriculture undersecretary during the Obama administration. “None of the farm groups want this. No one in conservation wants this. Nobody.” To Bonnie and other former Forest Service staff, the plan, which will uproot thousands of employees, looks like it will only make the agency’s existing troubles worse, especially given the past year of deep cuts and chaos.

“This is not going to strengthen the Forest Service, it is going to weaken it,” Bonnie said. “It’s not about solving problems, it’s about blowing things up.”

None of the farm groups want this. No one in conservation wants this. Nobody.

Mary Erickson, a retired Custer Gallatin National Forest supervisor, had more questions than answers after the announcement. “I’m not going to say if it’s good or bad at this point,” she said. “It’s just such a sweeping change with no real analysis about if there would be cost savings.”

Under the new proposal, some states will have their own offices and others will be lumped together, similar to the organization of the Bureau of Land Management. This will be a new approach for the country’s 154 national forests, which have long been managed by the nine regional offices that will be shuttered or repurposed. Now, forests in Washington, Oregon, Montana, Alaska and Idaho will each be managed by their own state office. Forests in Nevada and Utah, however, will be managed together, as will forests in Colorado and Kansas.

Some Forest Service research facilities, including the Rocky Mountain Research Station in Fort Collins, Colorado, will stay open. Others, including the research station in Portland, Oregon, which is responsible for critical work on species like spotted owls, will be closed. Losing local leadership “is not going to improve the programs,” said former Forest Service wildlife biologist Eric Forsman. Forsman, who retired in 2016, studied spotted owls and red tree voles at the agency’s Forestry Sciences Laboratory in Corvallis, Oregon, which will remain in operation. “It may help budgets,” he added, “but it won’t improve the quality of the research or the amount of research that gets done.”

Erickson and others were also concerned about the plan to move high-level bureaucrats out of D.C., where the nation’s law- and policymakers reside. “I would push back on this idea that moving out of D.C. is moving closer to the people you serve. That’s not the role of the national office,” Erickson said. The national office, she added, is supposed to coordinate and create guidance based on national policy. “Forests and districts have always been the heart of local communities and local delivery.”

After talking with current and former Forest Service staffers following Tuesday’s announcement, she also worries that, at least in the short term, disarray created by the reorganization will hamstring the agency’s ability to address the complex and worsening challenges that modern forests face. Those include tree disease outbreaks, the growing wildland-urban interface and climate change-induced drought. The Forest Service is already reeling from the loss of thousands of employees during the last year, through the terminations and deferred resignations effected by the now-defunct Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

The reorganization may also lead to states playing an even bigger role in forest management, said Kevin Hood, executive director of Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics, who retired in 2025 after decades working in the Forest Service throughout the West. While local coordination isn’t bad in theory, he said, he’s concerned the new structure will be a step toward ceding the management of national forests and other public lands to states.

Tribal representatives, several of whom declined to comment for this story, voiced concerns during the July public comment process that the reorganization would lead to losses of expertise and fractured relationships. Mass staff relocations, one representative wrote, would “destroy irreplaceable knowledge about Treaty rights, forest conditions, and working relationships built over decades, and new staff unfamiliar with the land will make mistakes.”

For many people in conservation, the Forest Service reorganization feels like déjà vu, or even a recurring nightmare.

In 2019, during Trump’s first term, his administration announced a plan to move nearly all Bureau of Land Management staff out of the agency’s D.C. headquarters to Grand Junction, Colorado — then a 66,000-person city located hundreds of miles from a major airport. As with the March 31 Forest Service announcement, the administration said the change would put high-level staff closer to the mostly-Western lands they manage. Instead, many of those staff left the agency altogether, said Tracy Stone-Manning, who directed the BLM under President Joe Biden and is now president of The Wilderness Society.

In fact, by the time the Grand Junction office opened in 2020, only 41 of the 328 BLM employees expected to move West chose to do so, according to a High Country News investigation. For many, moving meant uprooting their entire family, and required a spouse to find a new job in a much smaller market.

The reorganization cost taxpayers $28 million. And the Biden administration ended up moving many high-level positions back to D.C., though it did keep some agency leaders in the Grand Junction office, which it renamed the agency’s “Western Headquarters.” John Gale, who headed the office for two years under Biden, sees merit in searching for ways to improve public-lands management. But restructuring and relocation need to be done thoughtfully and carefully to be effective, he said.

That’s because agencies lose irreplaceable institutional knowledge when people with decades of experience are forced out the door, said Stone-Manning. And while that may not have been the first Trump administration’s intention, it was indeed the outcome of the BLM reorganization. She and others expect the Forest Service to suffer the same fate, with even more dire results for the public.

“Our public lands are not being cared for the way they need to be,” she said. “And what that means is ultimately people will throw up their hands and say the federal government can’t manage them, let’s sell them off.”

We welcome reader letters. Email High Country News at editor@hcn.org or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.

This story is part of High Country News’ Conservation Beyond Boundaries project, which is supported by the BAND Foundation and the Mighty Arrow Family Foundation.

This article first appeared on High Country News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The post U.S. Forest Service overhaul sows confusion, concern appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska Senate advances constitutional amendment to establish education fund

Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel, speaks during a joint session of the Alaska Legislature on Tuesday, March 10, 2026. (James Brooks photo/Alaska Beacon)

The Alaska Senate on Wednesday advanced a constitutional amendment that would establish a dedicated fund for public education.

If passed, lawmakers could design a new source of state revenue to go toward the fund that would be used specifically for schools. The resolution states that the Legislature could only appropriate money from the fund for public education. 

The Alaska Constitution explicitly prohibits the dedication of funds in most cases. Supporters say that prohibition was intended to give the Legislature flexibility in budgeting, and avoid mandated funds.

Bethel Democratic Sen. Lyman Hoffman said before Wednesday’s vote that education is his No. 1 priority. A dedicated education fund could be a “tremendous tool” to improve schools in Alaska, he said. Hoffman co-chairs the Senate Finance Committee which sponsored the constitutional amendment.

The Legislature last year approved an historic increase in school funding through the state’s complex formula, overriding two separate vetoes by Republican Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy. Still, advocates say that substantially more school funding is needed with school districts facing sizable budget shortfalls and decades of deferred maintenance.

Two Alaska school districts in January sued the state, arguing that Alaska’s education funding levels violate a constitutional duty to fund schools adequately. School districts across Alaska have long complained about crumbling buildings that have reached crisis level. 

Republican Sen. Bert Stedman represents Sitka, home of Mt. Edgecumbe High School, a state-run boarding school which has reported leaking roofs and buildings in disrepair. Stedman said Alaska is one of the nation’s richest states, but the condition of its schools is “kind of embarrassing.”

Surrounded by school children in the Senate’s public galleries, Stedman said that “we should be doing better for our kids.”

“Every generation needs to make a little step forward and this is our little step,” he said in support of the resolution before the final vote. 

The Alaska Senate approved the resolution on a 17-3 vote. At least 14 of 20 senators are needed to support a constitutional amendment. Two-thirds of the Alaska House of Representatives would need to vote for the same resolution to put the proposal before voters at the November election. 

All 14 members of the bipartisan Senate majority supported the constitutional amendment, alongside three minority Senate Republicans — Sens. Robert Yundt of Wasilla, Mike Cronk of Tok and James Kaufman of Anchorage.

Three minority Senate Republicans voted no: Sens. Robb Myers of North Pole, Cathy Tilton of Wasilla and George Rauscher of Sutton. 

Myers said the drafters of the Alaska Constitution sought to block the proliferation of dedicated funds, which would consume the annual budget.  

He said that establishing a dedicated fund for education “removed any sort of flexibility for the Legislature.” He said that avoiding annual debates about school funding was “not necessarily a good thing.” Education spending could effectively be “out of sight, out of mind,” he said. 

Myers said the state has numerous other priorities such as health care and natural resource management, but they would not receive the same dedicated funds. 

The resolution now advances to the House. If approved by 27 of 40 House members, it would then be placed before voters at the Nov. 3 election. A simple majority of voters is needed to approve an amendment to the Alaska Constitution.

A governor cannot block a constitutional amendment from appearing on the ballot with their veto pen. The Alaska Constitution was last amended in 2004

The post Alaska Senate advances constitutional amendment to establish education fund appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Categories
Alaska News

School district’s needs dire, possible lifeline in legislature

As the borough’s school district warns of potential “insolvency,” higher state oil revenue has increased the likelihood of a lifeline.

For years, the state’s school funding formula has stagnated, decreasing 26% in real dollars from 2011 to 2025 if adjusted for inflation.

Last year, the legislature closed some of that gap by increasing the base state funding formula to schools by $700 per-student. But that was well under half of what would have been needed to fully return to 2011 inflation-adjusted funding levels.

Meanwhile, the Haines Borough School District’s finances remain dire, district officials warn.

In testimony to the House Education Committee earlier this month, superintendent Lilly Boron said the district may “not be able to remain solvent” absent another funding formula increase.

The lack of funding has been felt most with “uncompetitive” staff salaries, making it difficult to recruit and retain staff, superintendent Lilly Boron said in an interview this week.

The district has averaged a 40% yearly staff-turnover rate over the past five years, and has been unable to fill vacant special education and technology positions this year.

Some districts in the state have turned to foreign teachers to solve staffing shortages, and Boron said nearly all of the district’s applicants for the upcoming school year would require either an H-1B or J-1 visa. But now H-1B visas are off the table for the district due to a $100,000 per-visa fee put into place by the Trump Administration, and rural districts like Haines are not eligible to sponsor teachers under J-1 visas, Boron said.

“I think what we’re recognizing is, if you have no qualified people applying for open positions and staying in open positions, you don’t have a school,” Boron said in an interview afterward.

Operating costs are also an issue.

During last year’s budgeting process, the district initially projected an $880,000 shortfall.

After the funding formula increase and an influx of money from the borough, the district balanced its operating budget, but continued to run deficits on transportation and food service, district business manager Judy Erekson said. Currently the district has only $233,000 in its main savings account.

As funds dwindle, cuts could be particularly hard because of the Haines district’s size. Having only one school building, and often one class per grade, it’s more difficult for the district to consolidate classes than larger districts.

Boron, who was joined in Juneau by school board member Kevin Shove, is just one of many local officials that have come to the legislature to lay out their districts’ needs. In committee hearings, members of the bipartisan House and Senate majorities have expressed support for sending more money the districts’ way.

In the House Education Committee, Rep. Rebecca Himschoot, an independent from Sitka, described further education funding increases as a constitutional obligation.

The Education Committee, also co-chaired Rep. Andi Story, whose district covers the Chilkat Valley, has introduced a bill to once again raise the base funding formula.

“I am only asking the state to hold up our end of the bargain, which is to maintain a system of education open to all the children of our state,” Himschoot said.

The issue remains money to address those needs, and a governor willing to approve the spending. Last year, the funding-formula boost only went through after the legislature held a special session and assembled a supermajority vote overriding Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s veto.

That scenario remains a possibility for this year. But on the other issue — money to put toward a funding increase — the landscape has suddenly changed.

Through the past month, war with Iran has sent oil prices skyrocketing, including Alaska North Slope crude. According to the state’s Department of Revenue, that could add over a half billion dollars in tax and royalty payments to state coffers this year compared with pre-war projections.

There’s been talk of some of that unexpected cash going toward education funding, said Sen. Jesse Kiehl, whose district covers the Chilkat Valley, and a member of the powerful Senate Finance Committee, which drafts the state’s budget.

“There isn’t unlimited money from this war and the eternal tug of war over where you put it is going on,” he said this week. “But I think we invest in our kids, and there’s a group of us who are committed to that.”

Under the general umbrella of education, a number of buckets need filling.

On the one hand, there’s the House Education Committee bill, which would boost the state’s base funding formula by $630 per student to all districts in the state.

The $630 figure is the average funding needed to erase the operating deficits of the state’s five largest school districts, Himschoot said. Out of those five, Fairbanks is the only one operating in the black. But Himschoot also said the district has cut more than 300 staff since 2019 and closed seven schools to achieve that.

A funding formula boost, however, will have to compete against capital funding for school repairs and rebuilds, some of which are in dire condition. Legislators on the powerful Senate Finance Committee have pointed to schools in the state ridden with black mold, asbestos, and collapsing roofs, problems the state has ignored for decades, according to a ProPublica report earlier this year.

The school repairs would be a one-time outlay, whereas increasing the funding formula would obligate an increased annual flow of money.

“I think the legislators are struggling with revenue, and they might not want to use one-time funds to set up an expectation they can’t deliver on in two years,” Boron said. “I appreciate that, but this is the rainy day. We’re at the breaking point.”

Haines does have maintenance needs, and the district is seeking state reimbursement for roof repairs made last year. But relative to some other districts, the major needs are inside the building, primarily teacher wages and rising fixed costs.

According to data presented to legislators by the district, the cost of property insurance alone has increased 62% in the last five years.

If lawmakers do decide to get behind a funding formula boost or capital improvements at schools, both would still have to get past the governor’s desk. That could be a challenge, Kiehl said.

“I don’t think there’s been much receptiveness from the governor yet, but we continue to talk with him and his administration.”

The funding decisions will need to be finalized before May 20, when the legislature hits its adjournment deadline. Even then, a governor’s veto could leave final funding levels in flux, possibly resulting in a special session to consider a veto override.

Meanwhile, the borough’s school district will have to finalize its own budget in early May, even as state funding is uncertain.

The post School district’s needs dire, possible lifeline in legislature appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Categories
Alaska News

Exemption bill could give borough more power

The Haines Borough Administration Building, March 3, 2025. (Will Steinfeld/Chilkat Valley News)

Proposed state legislation could give borough assemblies more power to exempt specific property from taxes; lawmakers and the public disagree on how that power should be used. 

Under current state law, when municipalities like Haines implement property tax exemptions, it must be from a menu of pre-approved exemptions in state statute.

House Bill 291, introduced last month by Anchorage Republican Julie Coulombe, would remove those state restrictions, giving municipal leaders free rein to implement any exemption they choose. 

The bill would also change the approval process for new exemptions, which currently must be approved by municipal voters at the ballot. Under HB 291,  the assembly would gain the power to create exemptions by simple majority vote, so long as exemptions were below a certain threshold. As currently drafted, exemptions over the $75,000 mark for a single property would still go to the ballot. 

Rescinding exemptions, however, would still have to be done by ballot referendum. 

In initial debate at the Legislature, Coulombe has presented her bill largely as a matter of principle — increasing local control and chopping down what she sees as unnecessary state regulations. At one point in the hearing she dubbed it the “free the municipality bill.” 

“I’m always for cutting red tape,” she said. 

But her colleagues hearing the bill in committee have focused more on outcomes, what communities will do with their increased power. 

In Haines, recent history suggests an appetite for broad-based exemptions. Two years ago, residents voted by a large margin to double the size of the exemption for seniors and disabled veterans, raising the total exempt from taxes to $300,000 of a home’s assessed value. 

It’s that kind of scenario House members seem concerned about, revealing a gap between Chilkat Valley public opinion and sentiment in the Capitol. The concern in the Capitol doesn’t fall clearly along partisan lines, either. 

During a hearing last week in the House Regional and Community Affairs Committee, Sitka independent Rebecca Himschoot raised the specter of voters, for instance, putting into place a tax exemption for everyone under the age of 30. That’s not currently on the list of state-approved exemptions. But if the bill successfully eliminates the state-approval requirement, it would be fair game. 

“When you ask the voters if they want to pay more tax, the answer is no,” Himschoot said. “And yet, people want certain services.” 

On the other side of the aisle, North Pole Republican Mike Prax focused on fairness, describing tax exemptions as “how do you cheat the other guy and pass savings on to me.” 

Perhaps not surprisingly, cutting out large chunks of the tax base is more popular with taxpayers than it is with budget-makers. 

In Haines, the extra senior tax exemption has made a significant dent in borough revenue, accounting for $316,768 of lost revenue in its first year of implementation. According to data from the state tax assessor, the percentage of taxable property in Haine held by seniors is the fourth highest of any municipality in the state. 

Like some other municipal revenue challenges, it’s downstream of problems at the state level. 

The state government is required by law to reimburse Haines for half its senior exemption, the portion all municipalities are required to exempt. But the Legislature has ignored that statute and hasn’t reimbursed municipalities at all since 1997, currently totalling nearly $8 billion annually that the state owes to individual communities. 

Both sides of the debate — taxpayers and budget-makers — say there’s nuance to their position. 

Many in Haines maintain the vote to double the senior exemption was a way to protect older residents on fixed incomes. They also say it’s a matter of respect. In recent months, assembly members have faced outrage when they’ve pointed to the exemption as a factor in borough budget challenges. 

“People on our assembly want to point fingers at seniors,” former assembly member Brenda Josephson said in an interview last week. “Disrespecting our seniors and wanting to give all the money to nonprofits — it’s so contrary to everything I was taught and what people in our region believe.” Josephson was an organizer in a 2023 campaign to change property tax assessment procedures in both the borough and the state.

On the budget-maker side, some say there could be more targeted ways to protect vulnerable taxpayers. 

“The senior tax exemption is based on age, so it’s not those that need it most that are benefitting first,” said Alaska Municipal League director Nils Andreassen in an interview Thursday. “Someone else in the community is paying the difference. The mill rate is going to go up with additional exemptions.” 

Instead, Andreassen argues municipalities should implement property tax “circuit breakers,” which would offer tax breaks based on specific income thresholds. 

With senior tax exemptions already allowed in state statute and Haines municipal code, that specific debate in Haines will continue regardless of the outcome of HB 291. House Community and Regional Affairs chair Donna Mears said last week her committee will continue to hear the bill, but won’t consider advancing it this legislative session.

The post Exemption bill could give borough more power appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Categories
Alaska News

Duly Noted: Beads, burritos and Baja

The New Hope Fellowship Church has raised $35,285 for its scholarship award since 2016. Paul Rogers explained that the money has been distributed to 11 Haines students since that time. In 2024, there were no applicants, so in 2025, the church awarded two scholarships. Rogers and Sage Thomas started the recent fundraiser night by introducing the auctioneer, Dave Routh. Routh’s fast-talking description of the strawberry trifle made by Inez Gross was a good start. Other dessert auction highlights included brownie balls, grasshopper pie with Oreo crust, gluten-free cake, and an eclair cake. But the bidding for Sharon Stickel’s chocolate raspberry cheesecake with ganache topping got fairly exciting. Heather Rogers was the proxy bidder for Jim Stickler. Stickler could not attend, but trusted Rogers to make the right choices. In the end, Heather Rogers walked out with half the elaborate chocolate cheesecake. The other half was served on a freshly cut round of wood, and shared with everyone at the end of the auction. 

Duly Noted flashback to last week — perhaps you recall the educational mule trip to Baja, Mexico? Please note that Matt Whitman was on that trip. He was also hiking into the rugged terrain, sleeping under the stars, enjoying meals prepared over an open fire, and experiencing the ranchero lifestyle and cave art with the group. This Duly writer overlooked this important detail. 

Christen Price is the new pastor in town. She started in January at the Haines Christian Center.  She and her husband, retired Lieutenant Col. Russell Price, plan to be in Haines forever, as they have burial plots at Jones Point Cemetery. Christen Price says that during her husband’s career in the Army, they relocated every so often. She enjoyed living in Georgia the most, but her husband is an Alaska boy, so this is where they need to be. Since Christen Price took over in January, she says that the children’s choir has been a great source of joy for her. Price credits her worship team.  She says that all Haines kids, regardless of their church affiliation, ages 5-12 are invited to sing at 5:45 p.m. Thursdays at the Haines Christian Center. Price says that the Sunday services have included plenty of piano, bass and guitar lately. Palm Sunday included two young people playing keyboard and Easter service should have some impressive kid-powered music as well. Russell Price grew up in Haines, the son of Mary and Warren Price.

Karlie Spud has been beading up a storm. She had the opportunity to share her craft with the 11 students who were visiting Klukwan and Haines from Colorado recently. The students spent time wood carving with Jim Heaton for part of that time. Karlie Spud has known Heaton for years and jumped at the chance to teach the eager students the one-needle method of beading. Spud says that the original plan was to teach them to make a beginner project, a salmon pin. She says that most of the visiting students completed multiple projects while practicing their new skill, including some impressive earrings. She says that the students were all “living phone-free lives while in Haines,” and that might be why they accomplished so much. Spud acquired the beading supplies from Lani Hotch at the traditional art supply store in Klukwan. She says that Lani Hotch has been a beading inspiration for years. Spud has been sharing that beading tradition with her 5year-old daughter, Aaliyah Spud. She beaded with the older kids and thoroughly enjoyed their visit to the Chilkat Valley. 

Greg Podsiki is starting a 4-H program in Haines. Podsiki says that his goal is to “fill the barn at the fair.”  He says that the background checks for volunteers are the first step, and already in motion. The next step is for the adult leaders to take the online training courses. The final part of the 4-H plan is to get kids interested in joining and get some animals. 

Amy Kane had a pop-up Monday at the Brewery. She served her homemade focaccia sandwiches, chorizo burritos and individual dishes of maple-spiced secret recipe nuts. Zane and Beau Bradley helped her hustle 50 sandwiches and burritos, which sold out just as the brewery closed for the evening. Happy patrons were excited for a dinner option in town.  Kane says the stunning sunset Monday evening was the real show stopper.

Mike Ward had a mini-family reunion last week, including cousins Eileen Beedle and Dottie Shook, who visited their aunt Judy Weir, the last remaining of eight siblings in her generation.  She lives at Haines Assisted Living. On hand were Connie and Tom Ward Jr., Summer Lynch and Tom Ward III, as well as Jeanine, Dustin, and 4-year-old Harper Rumfelt. Mike Ward hosted the group at his Lighthouse Restaurant.

The post Duly Noted: Beads, burritos and Baja appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Categories
Alaska News

Alpenglow closes as lease talks collapse

Alpenglow owner Nolan Woodard talks to residents during a forum on the new beer and wine licensing laws on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2024, in Haines, Alaska. (Rashah McChesney/Chilkat Valley News )
Alpenglow owner Nolan Woodard talks to residents during a forum on the new beer and wine licensing laws on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2024, in Haines, Alaska. (Rashah McChesney/Chilkat Valley News )

On March 30, Alpenglow Woodfired Pizza – one of Haines’ few year-round restaurants – announced  it would be closing its doors.In a social media video, owner Nolan Woodard said the restaurant would close for the week but open one final time on Saturday for a combined three-year anniversary and goodbye party. 

The move came after the building owner posted a lease nonrenewal notice on the building, giving the business a month to vacate – bringing the breakdown in negotiations between Woodard and landlord Chris Thorgesen into public view. 

Woodard shared a proposed lease with the Chilkat Valley News that contained provisions he called untenable:  like one requiring him to carry a $1 million insurance policy on the building, removing a 48-hour notice requirement for entry, and allowing the landlord to seize equipment within 15 days if he fell behind on rent or violated the lease. 

“I basically said to him that I don’t feel comfortable signing an agreement that gives you the right to basically take away things that would disrupt the operation of my business.” 

Woodard said he understands repercussions for deferred payments, but “if the punishment for not paying you is something that disrupts the flow of me being able to operate my business, then I can’t pay you,” he said. “That would sink us.” 

The lease dispute accelerated a decision Woodard said he was already weighing, as the restaurant has operated at a loss each year, since he bought it in 2023.  

Community reaction

The closure drew strong reactions in the community.  Local restaurant owner and Haines Chamber of Commerce president Travis Kukull called the lease terms unethical and compared the arrangement to sharecropping in a post on Substack. 

In the post, Kukull wrote that landlords hold disproportionate power in small markets with limited commercial space. “The landlord, on the other hand, risks very little, pays no wages, and takes most of the harvest.” 

Kukull wrote that he thinks the best lease agreements are those that include the tenant’s success and are mutually beneficial. He suggested things like landlords providing funding for tenant improvements and rent being set as a percentage of business sales. 

Thorgesen commented on the post, disputing Kukull’s characterization of events and arguing that landlords also carry financial risk. 

He wrote that he does not normally “concern myself with the thoughts of sheep,” but felt compelled to respond given Kukull’s role as Chamber president. 

“You say, ‘a small, independent business like Alpenglow cannot and should never take on the risk.’ Then why should a small independent landlord? Your inherent Marxism blinds you to any true win-win relationships so long as one is the bourgeoisie,” Thorgesen wrote.  

He also disputed the idea that the landlord is offering nothing in this situation. 

“Why don’t you go and buy a crappy building spend an exorbitant amount of money fixing it up, another small fortune in throwing away the trash that had been built up for decades, and fight with bureaucratic middle-managers who don’t know the difference between bologna and mayonnaise, only so you can let someone else use your building with no recoupment of costs,” he wrote.  

In an email to the Chilkat Valley News on Wednesday, Thorgesen did not agree to an interview or address the specific lease provisions Woodard objected to. But wrote that Nolan’s three-year lease ended on the last day of March. 

“As of today, Nolan owes me $10,262.10 in back rent,” he said. “When you don’t pay your rent, people tend not to rent to you.” 

A difficult financial situation

Woodard said the lease disagreement was the immediate trigger, but that the last few years have been increasingly financially precarious. 

While his gross sales have gone up year over year, he has been struggling financially – for one thing, costs have gone up. 

“A simple example is that when I first started this business, my flour was $70-80 a bag. It’s now over $100. So I spend, on average, $300-500 a week on flour.” 

The demand hasn’t kept up, he said. “I’ve had days of summer, I’m not even kidding, where we have had $250 in sales the whole day. It doesn’t even offset the cost of the dough.” 

He’s had to rely on flexible payment arrangements with vendors, gone through periods where he couldn’t pay his staff, and said he has fallen behind on the rent. 

Former owner Olen Larson said the outcome was genuinely surprising. 

“Myself and my wife doing the cooking, my wife doing the prep, me doing the books and a dishwasher. We made that survive for the three years we owned the business and we still came out on top. We were in the green,” he said. “Yes, I saw my challenges of course – wintertime being the hardest due to the lack of tourism and lack of year-round residents.”

When they sold the business to Woodard, the couple retained a 25% minority ownership and acted as advisors from afar. 

When they sold the business to Woodard, the couple retained a 25% minority ownership.

“It must have been inflation and the economy starting to turn. I’m not too familiar with what started driving the business down as far as numbers go,” he said. 

Larson said he doesn’t know what caused the breakdown over the lease negotiations to occur but called a nearly 10-year run of a pizza restaurant in one place in Haines incredible. 

Larson said he would check in with Woodard every few months and said he never heard anything negative other than that the winter months were slow. 

“My wife and I wanted to be able to support him and the crew as much as possible so we kind of deferred payments and kept pushing payments back and back to where it would allow him to use those funds to continue to have the cash flow into the business and keep it alive.” 

Now, he said, the couple is focused on helping Woodard navigate the debt, liquidation, and closure of the business. 

The fallout

As more details about the situation became clear, particularly the revelation that Woodard owed thousands in back rent, some early reactions began to shift.

Kukull said he initially read Thorgesen’s lease proposal as more of an eviction notice. “Nobody in their right mind would propose this,” he said. 

But, he said restaurant closures are rarely driven by a single issue. Rather, they come from a combination of financial strain, operating costs and timing. 

“All of a sudden, it just spins out of control and before you know it, you’re just scrambling to cover your ass in every direction, asking people for favors you shouldn’t be asking for,” he said. 

In this specific case, he said he didn’t think people should go around looking to lay blame on any one person and that he wants people to read his column as a place where he’s advocating for a small business owner to review their leases and fight for their best case scenarios. 

“I have sympathy for [Thorgesen] as a property owner. I don’t know all of the problems he has with all of his businesses and leases. But if something’s not working for him and it’s not working for [Woodard], can we try to figure out a different option here?” he said. 

In hindsight, Kukull said, he could have offered to mediate a discussion between Woodard and Thorgesen. It could have gotten more people in the community talking about how to create a more small-business-friendly environment in Haines. 

“Stories like this are detrimental and they don’t make people want to move here, they don’t make people want to try to open a small business. It just stops everything,” he said.

Woodard said people have asked him if he would move the restaurant into another building, including two vacant commercial buildings on Main Street. 

But, he’s looked at a few and at least one needed extensive repair before he’d be able to open. “I don’t have $100,000 of repair money,” he said. 

He’s considering his options and the future is uncertain. 

“I still owe a lot of people a lot of money,” he said. “I’m not fully out yet. I still have some irons in the fire. But the way it’s currently looking, the most likely occurrence … we will liquidate the business, recoup as much as we can in terms of costs with that and then from there, make the final decision on whether or not I have to file bankruptcy. I’m trying to avoid that, but also be realistic about the fact that it might be our only option.” 

A loss for the town

One of the darkest parts of the closure of Alpenglow is that Woodard was within sight of getting a beer and wine license.

He spent the past two years working to get a beer and wine license, pushing the issue through borough meetings and state hearings before the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board approved two more licenses for Haines in February of 2025. 

Those licenses became available March 1, 2025 and Woodard said finalizing a lease was the last step needed to move forward with his application and get it in front of the licensing board this month. 

Without the lease, that effort stops short.  While it would not have guaranteed success, it could have provided some breathing room, particularly during the slow winter months.

“All of that work he’s done over the last few years is basically trash,” Kukull said. “To put that much effort into anything and he didn’t see any benefit for himself … I hope everybody’s pissed.” 

Editor’s Note: The Chilkat Valley News rents office space from Chris Thorgesen and has maintained a commercial advertising trade relationships with both Thorgesen and Alpenglow Woodfired Pizza.  

The post Alpenglow closes as lease talks collapse appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.