Categories
Featured Juneau News Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local

Alaska airlifting hundreds from storm-devastated coastal villages

In this photo provided by the Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, Alaska Air National Guard rescue personnel conduct a search and rescue mission in Kipnuk, Alaska, on Monday, Oct. 13, 2025. (Defense Visual Information Distribution Service via AP)

AP- One of the most significant airlifts in Alaska history was underway Wednesday to move hundreds of people from coastal villages ravaged by high surf and strong winds from the remnants of Typhoon Halong last weekend, officials said.

The storm brought record water levels to two low-lying communities and washed away homes — some with people inside. At least one person was killed and two are missing. Makeshift shelters were quickly established and swelled to about 1,500 people, an extraordinary number in a sparsely populated region where communities are reachable by air or water.

The remoteness and the scale of the destruction created challenges for getting resources in place. Damage assessments have been trickling in as responders have shifted from initial search-and-rescue operations to trying to stabilize or restore basic services.

The communities of Kipnuk and Kwigillingok near the Bering Sea saw water levels more than 6 feet (1.8 meters) above the highest normal tide line. Leaders asked the state to evacuate the more than 1,000 residents in those villages, said Jeremy Zidek, a spokesperson with the state emergency management office.

Some homes cannot be reoccupied, even with emergency repairs, and others may not be livable by winter, said emergency management officials. Forecasters say rain and snow is possible in the region this weekend, with average temperatures soon below freezing.

Mark Roberts, the incident commander with the state emergency management agency, said the immediate focus was on “making sure people are safe, warm and cared for while we work with our partners to restore essential services.”

Meantime, restrooms were again working at the school in Kwigillingok, where about 350 people had sheltered overnight Tuesday, according to a state emergency management statement. “Damage to many homes is severe, and the community leadership is instructing residents not to reenter homes due to safety concerns,” it said.

About 300 evacuees were being brought to Anchorage on Wednesday, about 500 miles (805 kilometers) east of the battered coastline villages, according to the state Department of Military and Veterans Affairs. They were going to the Alaska Airlines Center, a sports and events complex with capacity for about 400, Zidek said.

Shelter space closer to home — in the southwest Alaska regional hub of Bethel — had been reaching capacity, officials said.

Zidek did not know how long the evacuation process would take and said authorities were looking for additional sheltering locations. The aim is to get people from congregate shelters into hotel rooms or dormitories, he said.

The crisis unfolding in southwest Alaska has drawn attention to Trump administration cuts to grants aimed at helping small, mostly Indigenous villages prepare for storms or mitigate disaster risks.

For example, a $20 million U.S. Environmental Protection Agency grant to Kipnuk, which was inundated by floodwaters, was terminated by the Trump administration, a move challenged by environmental groups. The grant was intended to protect to protect the boardwalk residents use to get around the community as well as 1,400 feet (430 meters) of river from erosion, according to a federal website that tracks government spending.

There was limited work on the project before the grant was ended. The village had purchased a bulldozer for shipment and briefly hired a bookkeeper, according to Public Rights Project, which represents Kipnuk.

The group said no single project was likely to prevent the recent flood. But work to remove abandoned fuel tanks and other material to prevent it from falling into the river might have been feasible during the 2025 construction season.

“What’s happening in Kipnuk shows the real cost of pulling back support that was already promised to front line communities,” said Jill Habig, CEO of Public Rights Project. “These grants were designed to help local governments prepare for and adapt to the growing effects of climate change. When that commitment is broken, it puts people’s safety, homes and futures at risk.”

Categories
Featured Juneau News Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local

In photos: Mass evacuation of Kipnuk and Kwigillingok residents begins from western Alaska

By: Corinne Smith, Alaska Beacon

Residents of Kipnuk and Kwigillingok wait in the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center’s hanger in Bethel for an evacuation flight to Anchorage on Oct 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Residents of Kipnuk and Kwigillingok began evacuating en masse on Wednesday, flying in military aircraft from their western Alaska communities which were devastated by ex-Typhoon Halong.

On Wednesday evening, the first 300 evacuees embarked on a C-17 military transport plane from Bethel to make the one-hour journey to Anchorage and emergency shelter there.

“Just devastated, feeling heartbroken, displaced,” said Jody Agimuk of Kipnuk, standing with his wife Kristin, and their five young children, waiting in line to board in the Alaska Army National Guard hangar.

Jody and Kristin Agimuk and their five young children evacuated from the community of Kipnuk after ex-Typhoon Halong. They landed in Bethel on Wednesday and were on the first large evacuation flight to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)
Jody and Kristin Agimuk and their five young children evacuated from the community of Kipnuk after ex-Typhoon Halong. They landed in Bethel on Wednesday and were on the first large evacuation flight to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

“I hope we find a place,” he said of arriving in Anchorage. “It’s hard to explain, I hope we won’t have a hard time finding a place.”

He said since the storm hit Sunday, they sheltered at their grandmother’s and one night at the local school, and evacuated on Wednesday. “It’s just hard — leaving families at home, separating with families that we were close to. People we’ve seen, people we knew, people we used to talk to, all the close relatives, it’s heartbreaking seeing people separating.” 

The rest of the village of Kipnuk is scheduled to be evacuated on Thursday, and Kwigillingok by Friday, said Lieutenant Colonel Brendan Holbrook, commander of the 207th Aviation Troop Command with the Alaska Army National Guard. 

He said roughly 500 people had been evacuated to Bethel so far out of those two villages by members of the Alaska Army National Guard and Alaska Air National Guard. The C-17 plane can only transport 300 people, so the rest would shelter in Bethel overnight and more flights would be available out to Anchorage on Thursday morning. 

“I have five aircraft, four UH-60s and CH-47 in support operations, doing evac. And we’ve been running basically 12 to 14-hour operations every day getting these people to safety,” he said.

Evacuees depart on the first C-17 military flight from Bethel to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)
Evacuees depart on the first C-17 military flight from Bethel to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

In the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel, evacuees waited, some resting on cots, as officers read lists of names and groups of 30 people at a time boarded the plane. 

Holbrook said evacuation was self-organized by community members, with families with children and elders prioritized. 

“So it was primarily Kipnuk today, if the call comes back, we can do Kwig (Kwigillingok) tomorrow,” he said “But prioritization was just who was available and ready to go. So we would go to both and whoever got on got on. Kipnuk just happened to be, they had already established a marshaling plan, so as soon as we landed, they were ready with people to just start loading.”

Those who did not get on the Wednesday evening flight were sheltering in Bethel, some in an emergency shelter across the road from the Readiness Center hanger, administered by the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation with the support from the American Red Cross. Cots, showers and meals were provided there.

Holbrook added that there is a misconception that evacuees must go to Anchorage. He said once in Bethel, regional tribal organizations like the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation are providing support for people to travel wherever they like. “If you have a place to go, another village, family, somewhere else, Y-K will help you get to where you need to go,” he said. 

Evacuees board from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok board a C17 military transport plane in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees board from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok board a C17 military transport plane in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Members of the Alaska Army National Guard and Alaska Air National Guard are assisting with the evacuation of residents, seen in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Members of the Alaska Army National Guard and Alaska Air National Guard are assisting with the evacuation of residents, seen in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Members of the Members of the Alaska Army National Guard read a list of names of evacuees to board the first flight from Bethel to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Members of the Members of the Alaska Army National Guard read a list of names of evacuees to board the first flight from Bethel to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Jody and Kristin Agimuk and their five young children evacuated from the community of Kipnuk after ex-Typhoon Halong. They landed in Bethel on Wednesday and were on the first large evacuation flight to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Jody and Kristin Agimuk and their five young children evacuated from the community of Kipnuk after ex-Typhoon Halong. They landed in Bethel on Wednesday and were on the first large evacuation flight to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Cots set up at the shelter at the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel for evacuees of ex-Typhoon Halong provided by the American Red Cross on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Cots set up at the shelter at the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel for evacuees of ex-Typhoon Halong provided by the American Red Cross on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok rest and eat dinner on Oct. 15, 2025 at an emergency shelter at the Alaska National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok rest and eat dinner on Oct. 15, 2025 at an emergency shelter at the Alaska National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees wait in line to board the first evacuation flight from Bethel to Anchorage at the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel, on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees wait in line to board the first evacuation flight from Bethel to Anchorage at the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel, on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees seen stepping out on to the runway in Bethel to board the first evacuation flight to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

A family is seen stepping out on to the runway in Bethel to board the first evacuation flight to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok were allowed to bring one bag of personal items to evacuate after ex-Typhoon Halong, seen stacked in the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel, awaiting transport to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok were allowed to bring one bag of personal items to evacuate after ex-Typhoon Halong, seen stacked in the Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel, awaiting transport to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees wait for their name to be called by members of the Alaska National Guard, for a flight from Bethel to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Evacuees wait for their name to be called by members of the Alaska National Guard, for a flight from Bethel to Anchorage on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

A Blackhawk helicopter used to evacuate residents from storm devastated communities of Kipnuk and Kwigillingok fuels up in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

A Blackhawk helicopter used to evacuate residents from storm devastated communities of Kipnuk and Kwigillingok fuels up in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel hosted an evacuation shelter for ex-Typhoon Halong storm evacuees on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Alaska Army National Guard Readiness Center in Bethel hosted an evacuation shelter for ex-Typhoon Halong storm evacuees on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Residents who evacuated from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok wait to board an evacuation flight in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Residents who evacuated from Kipnuk and Kwigillingok wait to board an evacuation flight in Bethel on Oct. 15, 2025 (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Categories
Politics

Winning with misinformation: New research identifies link between endorsing easily disproven claims and prioritizing symbolic strength

For some symbolic thinkers, an independent mind is paramount. Axel Bueckert/iStock via Getty Images Plus

Why do some people endorse claims that can easily be disproved? It’s one thing to believe false information, but another to actively stick with something that’s obviously wrong.

Our new research, published in the Journal of Social Psychology, suggests that some people consider it a “win” to lean in to known falsehoods.

We are social psychologists who study political psychology and how people reason about reality. During the pandemic, we surveyed 5,535 people across eight countries to investigate why people believed COVID-19 misinformation, like false claims that 5G networks cause the virus.

The strongest predictor of whether someone believed in COVID-19-related misinformation and risks related to the vaccine was whether they viewed COVID-19 prevention efforts in terms of symbolic strength and weakness. In other words, this group focused on whether an action would make them appear to fend off or “give in” to untoward influence.

This factor outweighed how people felt about COVID-19 in general, their thinking style and even their political beliefs.

Our survey measured it on a scale of how much people agreed with sentences including “Following coronavirus prevention guidelines means you have backed down” and “Continuous coronavirus coverage in the media is a sign we are losing.” Our interpretation is that people who responded positively to these statements would feel they “win” by endorsing misinformation – doing so can show “the enemy” that it will not gain any ground over people’s views.

When meaning is symbolic, not factual

Rather than consider issues in light of actual facts, we suggest people with this mindset prioritize being independent from outside influence. It means you can justify espousing pretty much anything – the easier a statement is to disprove, the more of a power move it is to say it, as it symbolizes how far you’re willing to go.

When people think symbolically this way, the literal issue – here, fighting COVID-19 – is secondary to a psychological war over people’s minds. In the minds of those who think they’re engaged in them, psychological wars are waged over opinions and attitudes, and are won via control of belief and messaging. The U.S. government at various times has used the concept of psychological war to try to limit the influence of foreign powers, pushing people to think that literal battles are less important than psychological independence.

By that same token, vaccination, masking or other COVID-19 prevention efforts could be seen as a symbolic risk that could “weaken” one psychologically even if they provide literal physical benefits. If this seems like an extreme stance, it is – the majority of participants in our studies did not hold this mindset. But those who did were especially likely to also believe in misinformation.

In an additional study we ran that focused on attitudes around cryptocurrency, we measured whether people saw crypto investment in terms of signaling independence from traditional finance. These participants, who, like those in our COVID-19 study, prioritized a symbolic show of strength, were more likely to believe in other kinds of misinformation and conspiracies, too, such as that the government is concealing evidence of alien contact.

In all of our studies, this mindset was also strongly associated with authoritarian attitudes, including beliefs that some groups should dominate others and support for autocratic government. These links help explain why strongman leaders often use misinformation symbolically to impress and control a population.

President Trump speaks into a microphone with various uniformed people behind him
Attempts to debunk misinformation look weak to someone who values a symbolic show of strength, while standing by a disprovable statement seems powerful.
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Why people endorse misinformation

Our findings highlight the limits of countering misinformation directly, because for some people, literal truth is not the point.

For example, President Donald Trump incorrectly claimed in August 2025 that crime in Washington D.C. was at an all-time high, generating countless fact-checks of his premise and think pieces about his dissociation from reality.

But we believe that to someone with a symbolic mindset, debunkers merely demonstrate that they’re the ones reacting, and are therefore weak. The correct information is easily available, but is irrelevant to someone who prioritizes a symbolic show of strength. What matters is signaling one isn’t listening and won’t be swayed.

In fact, for symbolic thinkers, nearly any statement should be justifiable. The more outlandish or easily disproved something is, the more powerful one might seem when standing by it. Being an edgelord – a contrarian online provocateur – or outright lying can, in their own odd way, appear “authentic.”

Some people may also view their favorite dissembler’s claims as provocative trolling, but, given the link between this mindset and authoritarianism, they want those far-fetched claims acted on anyway. The deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, for example, can be the desired end goal, even if the offered justification is a transparent farce.

Is this really 5-D chess?

It is possible that symbolic, but not exactly true, beliefs have some downstream benefit, such as serving as negotiation tactics, loyalty tests, or a fake-it-till-you-make-it long game that somehow, eventually, becomes a reality. Political theorist Murray Edelman, known for his work on political symbolism, noted that politicians often prefer scoring symbolic points over delivering results – it’s easier. Leaders can offer symbolism when they have little tangible to provide.

The Conversation

The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

​Politics + Society – The Conversation

Categories
Politics

When government websites become campaign tools: Blaming the shutdown on Democrats has legal and political risks

Screenshot of the Department of Health and Human Services homepage on Oct. 14, 2025. HHS website

For decades, federal shutdowns have mostly been budget fights. The 2025 one has become bigger than that: It’s turned into a messaging war.

Official government communications, including website banners, out-of-office email replies and autogenerated responses that denounce “Senate Democrats,” “the Radical Left” or “Democrats’ $1.5 trillion wishlist” for closing the government, mark a sharp break from past practice.

These messages are more than rhetorical escalation. Many may violate the Hatch Act, the 1939 statute that limits partisan political activity by federal employees and agencies. They also represent new tests for how far a White House can push the bounds of campaign-style messaging while also claiming to govern.

In any democracy, power lies not only in who writes the laws or signs the budgets but in who shapes the story. Communication is not an afterthought or byproduct of governance. It is one of its essential instruments. Political narrative helps citizens understand who’s responsible, who’s acting in good faith and who’s to blame.

The 2025 shutdown has turned that truth into strategy. Federal communication systems – agency websites, automated emails and public information portals – are being used to persuade rather than inform. It’s a move that is both politically risky and legally perilous.

Serve the public, not a party

The Hatch Act was passed during the Great Depression, after years of concern that federal agencies were being used improperly as political machines. Its goal was simple: to ensure that public servants worked for the American people, not for the party in power.

At its core, the Hatch Act prohibits executive branch federal employees – except for the president and vice president – from engaging in partisan political activity as part of their official duties or under their official authority. Government workers may not use their positions or public resources to influence elections, coerce individual behavior or engage in political advocacy.

The law requires federal agencies to avoid the partisan fray and focus on serving the public rather than political agendas.

The Office of Special Counsel, which enforces the law, has been clear on this point. “The purpose of the Act,” says an Office of Special Counsel guide written for federal employees, “is to maintain a federal workforce that is free from partisan political influence or coersion.” Government communication can inform, but it cannot campaign.

An email auto-reply from the Department of Education blaming the shutdown on Democrats.
An auto-reply to an email sent to the press staff at the U.S. Department of Education on Oct. 14, 2025.
CC BY

Yet the shutdown has already produced multiple potential violations:

• The Department of Education, according to a lawsuit, altered employees’ email auto-responses – without consent – to say things like “the Democrats have shut the government down.” Such changes do more than convey impartial information. They compel employees to align themselves with institutionally imposed scripts.

• Likewise, agencies including Health and Human Services and the Small Business Administration reportedly distributed or directed staff to adopt partisan out-of-office auto-replies assigning blame to Democrats.

• The Department of Housing and Urban Development posted a banner on its official website stating that the “Radical Left are going to shut down the government.”

Taken individually, each incident might provoke a Hatch Act complaint. Collectively, they amount to a systematic campaign to transform nonpartisan federal agencies into partisan political messengers.

'The radical left in Congress shut down the government' reads a banner across the US Department of Housing and Urban Development homepage, Oct. 14, 2025.
The message on the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development homepage, Oct. 14, 2025.
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Why this is unprecedented

What sets the 2025 messaging apart isn’t just its volume – it’s the scale, the coordination and the brazenness of its political targeting.

In past shutdowns, partisan spin lived mostly in press conferences and campaign talking points. Agencies themselves, even under pressure, stayed neutral.

This time, the administration is using the machinery of government to deliver partisan blame.

The timing and similarity of messages across departments seems coordinated. Housing and Urban Development posted a banner blaming Democrats the day before the shutdown began. Within hours, other agencies followed using nearly identical language.

More troubling are the reported changes to federal employees’ auto-replies without their consent.

These missives forced career civil servants, many of them furloughed, to become unwilling messengers for partisan ends. Federal agencies and their workers are supposed to serve everyone, not only those who support the party in power.

And because the watchdogs who could enforce the legal boundary are also sidelined – the Office of Special Counsel is furloughed – complaints have nowhere to go, at least for now. They simply land in unattended email inboxes.

Legal challenges and limits

Whether shutdown communications truly violate the Hatch Act – or related laws – is not yet clear. The administration could argue that it’s not campaigning but merely explaining why services are suspended. As a scholar of political communication and American democracy, I believe that defense weakens when official messages explicitly assign partisan blame or name a political party.

And not every political statement is a Hatch Act violation. The law allows employees to express views off duty or in private contexts, so long as they use their own phones and computers.

Even if the Office of Special Counsel later finds violations, harm will likely persist. Once messages are posted or auto-replies sent, their effects can’t always be undone. And because ethics officials are furloughed, too, accountability will be delayed, if it comes at all.

Some employees are likely to claim their speech rights were violated by being forced to send partisan messages. This is an argument already at the heart of the lawsuit filed by the American Federation of Government Employees against the Education Department.

A sign on a door warns people that during a partial government shutdown, the IRS office will be closed.
Doors at the Internal Revenue Service in a Seattle federal building are locked and a sign advises that the office will be closed during the 2018-2019 partial government shutdown.
AP Photo/Elaine Thompson

Why this matters

Federal agencies exist to administer laws impartially and to do so on behalf of the people.

When the government uses its own infrastructure for partisan messaging, the very neutrality on which democratic governance depends erodes. It dilutes public trust in the idea of a neutral state.

The damage also extends into the future. If the current administration succeeds in turning its administrative machinery into a political weapon, without consequence, a precedent will be created. Future presidents may be tempted to follow suit, making acceptable the use of taxpayer-funded systems as campaign tools.

And because enforcement bodies such as the Office of Special Counsel also are sidelined during a shutdown, accountability has to wait. That creates an asymmetry of power: One side gets to amplify its message through government channels in real time, while its opponents must wait for the system to restart just to file a complaint. By the time they can, the moment will have passed and the political narrative is likely to have already hardened.

Crises demand explanation, even blame. Citizens expect their leaders to tell them what went wrong. But they also expect honesty and fairness in how that story is told. The administration’s messaging strategy during this shutdown tests whether government communication remains a public service or becomes another instrument of political power.

The Conversation

Stephanie A. (Sam) Martin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

​Politics + Society – The Conversation

Categories
Entertainment

Rob Kardashian & Blac Chyna Hint That They’re Back Together (Let’s Hope …

Reading Time: 3 minutes

The world breathed a sigh of relief when Rob Kardashian and Blac Chyna finally broke up for good back in 2017.

We’re sure they don’t regret the relationship, as it yielded a daughter, Dream Kardashian, who will turn nine next month.

But things got very, very ugly between Rob and Chyna, which is why the news of their possible reconciliation has been met with a collective cringe.

Rob Kardashian and Blac Chyna arrive at her Blac Chyna Birthday Celebration And Unveiling Of Her "Chymoji" Emoji Collection at the Hard Rock Cafe on May 10, 2016 in Hollywood, California.
Rob Kardashian and Blac Chyna arrive at her Blac Chyna Birthday Celebration And Unveiling Of Her “Chymoji” Emoji Collection at the Hard Rock Cafe on May 10, 2016 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Greg Doherty/Getty Images)

Blac Chyna says her love with Rob Kardashian ‘is forever’

The trouble began with a post from Chyna, which seemed to very strongly indicate that she and Rob were back on.

“This love is forever @robkardashianofficial,” she wrote.

Yes, she tagged Rob, and she even added an infinity sign emoji for good measure.

For obvious reasons, this was widely taken as a sign that she and Rob have reignited their romance.

Rob Kardashian and Blac Chyna arrive at her Blac Chyna Birthday Celebration And Unveiling Of Her "Chymoji" Emoji Collection at the Hard Rock Cafe on May 10, 2016 in Hollywood, California.
Rob Kardashian and Blac Chyna arrive at her Blac Chyna Birthday Celebration And Unveiling Of Her “Chymoji” Emoji Collection at the Hard Rock Cafe on May 10, 2016 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Greg Doherty/Getty Images)

Rob hasn’t commented on the post, but he was quick to smash that “like” button.

And as many have pointed out, the timing makes sense, as Chyna called off her engagement to Derrick Milano in July.

If you remember the first time these two hooked up, then we probably don’t need to tell you that they should not give their relationship another chance.

Things started out promisingly enough, with Rob and Chyna going straight from casual fling to engaged and expecting a child.

(Although there was some weirdness even in the very early days, as Chyna had previously dated Tyga, who was dating Kylie Jenner at the time.)

From there, things quickly spiraled out of control, and we had a front row seat to one of the messiest celebrity splits in recent memory.

(Instagram)

Rob posted revenge porn after accusing her of infidelity. Then she sued him, and both parties traded abuse allegations.

But back in August, Chyna gushed about her co-parenting relationship with Rob in an interview with People.

“My co-parenting with Rob is 100 percent amazing. For parents that’s going through it right now, I promise you, things do get better,” Chyna said, adding:

“If you’re going through a custody battle or anything of the sort, I think the main thing for the other parent is to mind their own business.”

So the bad news is, there’s a very good chance that these two are back together.

The good news is, TMZ is reporting that this is just some sort of lame publicity stunt — which seems entirely possible, knowing these two.

We’ll keep you posted on this developing story as new information becomes available.

Rob Kardashian & Blac Chyna Hint That They’re Back Together (Let’s Hope … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes: Baby Plans Revealed!

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Are Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes really planning to have a child together?

Just a couple of years ago, they went from reading headlines to making them after their alleged workplace affair became public knowledge.

Since then, they lost their jobs at ABC. Their exes are now dating each other.

The sensational couple are now engaged. And they themselves are sharing their baby plans with the world.

T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach in December 2023.
T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach attend iHeartRadio 102.7 KIIS FM’s Jingle Ball 2023 Presented by Capital One at The Kia Forum on December 01, 2023. (Photo Credit: Jesse Grant/Getty Images for iHeartRadio)

Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes are talking about having a kid together

In January 2023, Good Morning America ousted co-hosts Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes.

While their alleged adultery is a person wrong involving only the two and their spouses, a workplace affair adds numerous complications.

Alongside the end of their careers, Robach’s marriage to Andrew Shue came to an end

So, too, ended Holmes’ marriage to Marilee Fiebig.

Just recently, Robach and Holmes announced their engagement. And that was not the end of their October surprises.

T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach on December 13, 2024.
T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach attend iHeartRadio z100’s Jingle Ball 2024 Presented By Capital One at Madison Square Garden on December 13, 2024. (Photo Credit: Arturo Holmes/Getty Images for iHeartRadio)

Though they use their Amy & T.J. podcast to do actual journalism, the couple also open up about their personal lives.

“I don’t know what’s going on, but we have talked more lately about having kids,” Holmes admitted.

“We have talked more lately about the idea of even adopting a child,” he added.

“And,” Holmes pointed out to Robach, “usually it’s me bringing it up to you.”

Robach chimed in, noting that doctors told her that she was “out of the baby-making business” in 2013, after her breast cancer diagnosis. She has been in remission for 11 years, and knows that conceiving on her own is not the only way to grow their family.

T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach at the 2022 Disney upfronts.
Amy Robach and TJ Holmes attend the 2022 ABC Disney Upfront on May 17, 2022. (Photo Credit: Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images)

Do they want a kid for the right reasons?

According to a report from RadarOnline, Amy Robach and T.J. Holmes are serious about having a kid together.

But is it for the right reasons?

“They do want a child together,” the alleged inside source confirmed.

“The most logical way would be to adopt,” the insider noted. “Although they’re exploring surrogacy, too.”

The source then claimed: “But make no mistake, everything they do is orchestrated to revamp their image.”

T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach on December 8, 2023.
T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach attend iHeartRadio z100’s Jingle Ball 2023 Presented By Capital One at Madison Square Garden on December 08, 2023. (Photo Credit: Roy Rochlin/Getty Images for iHeartRadio)

“She would love to have a little girl because she enjoys being a mother figure to T.J.’s daughter Sabine,” the insider then added.

Notably, Robach is already the mother of 20-year-old Ava and 19-year-old Annalise, both with ex-husband Tim McIntosh.

She has also publicly gushed about Sabine, who is 12.

It’s not that she doesn’t adore her own daughters.

But Robach has explained that she has enjoyed having Sabine in her life. That makes sense!

T.J. Holmes and Amy Robach at the 2024 JingeBall.
T.J. Holmes, and Amy Robach attend iHeartRadio z100’s Jingle Ball 2024 Presented By Capital One at Madison Square Garden on December 13, 2024. (Photo Credit: Craig Barritt/Getty Images for iHeartRadio)

Is this about family or image?

Still, the alleged inside source says: “It burns them that so many people see them as fame-hungry love rats who broke up two marriages.”

The insider explained: “As far as they’re concerned, their marriages were already over.” Many people say things like this.

“Now they swear their intention to expand the family is honorable,” the source admitted.

“But people know T.J. and Amy think a baby would not only improve their image,” the insider claimed, “but be great publicity as well.”

There is no proof whatsoever that Robach and Holmes are discussing having an actual child as a PR move. But it’s definitely an interesting narrative.

Amy Robach & T.J. Holmes: Baby Plans Revealed! was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

Kevin Costner ‘Furious’ Over Reports of Career and Financial Troubles, …

Reading Time: 3 minutes

There was a time — not all that long ago — when Kevin Costner reigned supreme as one of Hollywood’s most bankable talents.

These days, Costner is riding out a low point in his career, and there are concerns that he might never be back on top.

In fact, The Hollywood Reporter just dedicated an entire cover story to Costner’s recent woes, and insiders say the Oscar winner is “furious” about the negative press coverage.

Kevin Costner speaks onstage at Fanatics Fest NYC 2025 at Javits Center on June 20, 2025 in New York City.
Kevin Costner speaks onstage at Fanatics Fest NYC 2025 at Javits Center on June 20, 2025 in New York City. (Photo by Slaven Vlasic/Getty Images)

In case you weren’t aware, Costner stepped away from his starring role on Yellowstone in order to focus on his dream project: a multi-part theatrical epic about the settling of the American West.

Unfortunately, the first installment of Horizon: An American Saga tanked so badly at the box office that the second part was quietly released straight to streaming.

The debacle followed a messy divorce for Costner, one that, insiders say, was prompted at least in part by his decision to stake his financial future on the success of Horizon.

As if that weren’t bad enough, the new THR piece does not go easy on Costner, describing his reputation for being “difficult” on set as well as his “diva-like imperiousness.”

Kevin Costner attends History Channel's premiere event for "Kevin Costner's The West" at Desert 5 Spot on May 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.
Kevin Costner attends History Channel’s premiere event for “Kevin Costner’s The West” at Desert 5 Spot on May 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Randy Shropshire/Getty Images for History Channel)

The piece goes into a detail about an alleged incident in which Costner “lunged at” Yellowstone co-star Wes Bentley while the two were arguing over a scene.

“Kevin didn’t like that, and he lunged at him,” says a source who was present at the melee.

“No fists were thrown, but they were in each other’s faces, pushing and shoving and just getting hot until they had to be separated.”

“The incident with Wes was the line in the sand. Everything was different after that,” another insider tells THR.

“Everyone loved Wes and so that really made Taylor upset. Kevin and Taylor butted heads from there on out. It got very awkward.”

“It’s sad, and that’s the only thing I can think of,” says a different source who has worked with Costner for over a decade. “I think he got lost in the ether and to this day, I just don’t get it.”

Kevin Costner attends History Channel's premiere event for "Kevin Costner's The West" at Desert 5 Spot on May 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.
Kevin Costner attends History Channel’s premiere event for “Kevin Costner’s The West” at Desert 5 Spot on May 14, 2025 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Randy Shropshire/Getty Images for History Channel)

Now, a follow-up report from Page Six claims that Costner is “furious” over the THR piece and has fled Hollywood for a globe-trotting treasure-hunting trip.

“Kevin Costner is on a deep-sea diving binge to discover sunken treasure,” says one insider, adding:

“He found gold coins and emeralds recently in the Caribbean. Now he’s shopping a TV series on finding sunken treasure around the world.”

The source notes that “no one has signed on to finance” the show amid Costner’s current “cold streak.”

“He’s said to be furious over the new Hollywood Reporter story about how he’s lost the plot… He’s very angry about it,” the insider adds.

Costner has hit similar rough patches in the past, including a string of box office bombs in the mid- to late-nineties.

But can he bounce back again at age 70? Only time will tell.

Kevin Costner ‘Furious’ Over Reports of Career and Financial Troubles, … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

Did Donald Trump Clash With Erika Kirk During Medal of Freedom Ceremony?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

As we previously reported, Donald Trump awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to the late Charlie Kirk on Tuesday.

The ceremony took place on what would have been Kirk’s 32nd birthday.

The event mostly went off without a hitch, but there were some unusual moments, including one in which Charlie’s widow, Erika Kirk, felt the need to correct Trump on the nature of her husband’s character.

US President Donald Trump and Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk's widow, participate in a Medal of Freedom Ceremony for late US right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2025.
US President Donald Trump and Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, participate in a Medal of Freedom Ceremony for late US right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

The unexpected moment of tension quickly went viral with many social media users expressing confusion over the odd scene.

When addressing the crowd at last month’s Charlie Kirk memorial in Arizona, Erika described her late husband as a man who encouraged “love for our enemies and love for those who persecute us.”

Perhaps jokingly, Trump pushed back at the characterization during his address on Tuesday.

“He was able to fight people that were enemies, and he didn’t necessarily love those enemies so much,” the president said, adding:

“You know, I heard he loved his enemies, and I said, ‘Wait a minute, is that the same Charlie that I knew?’ I’m not sure. But I didn’t want to get into it.”

US President Donald Trump and Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk's widow, participate in a Medal of Freedom Ceremony for late US right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2025.
US President Donald Trump and Erika Kirk, Charlie Kirk’s widow, participate in a Medal of Freedom Ceremony for late US right-wing activist Charlie Kirk in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, on October 14, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

The comment prompted Erika to reply, “He did pray for his enemies. I saw him do it.”

The moment of tension passed quickly, but things took another strange turn shortly thereafter, when Trump revealed that he had initially wanted to postpone the ceremony but had a last-minute change of heart.

“I was going to call Erika and say, ‘Erika, could you maybe move it to Friday?’” he told the crowd.

Some observers were also taken aback by Trump’s decision to discuss his political agenda and the assassination attempt he survived last year.

Erika Kirk, wife of late conservative activist Charlie Kirk, becomes emotional as she speaks after U.S. President Donald Trump posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Charlie Kirk during a ceremony in the Rose Garden of the White House on October 14, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Erika Kirk, wife of late conservative activist Charlie Kirk, becomes emotional as she speaks after U.S. President Donald Trump posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Charlie Kirk during a ceremony in the Rose Garden of the White House on October 14, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

“I made a turn at a good time. I made a turn at a good time, I turned to the right,” Trump said.

“Charlie couldn’t believe it, actually. He said, ‘How the hell did you make that turn?’ I said, ‘I don’t know.’”

All in all, it was an unusual event that prompted questions about Trump’s relationship with both Erika Kirk and with the evangelical component of his base.

It won’t be the last time that Trump talks about Charlie Kirk — but he’ll likely try to avoid such awkwardness in future discussions.

Did Donald Trump Clash With Erika Kirk During Medal of Freedom Ceremony? was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

Britney Spears Fires Back at All Those Horrible Kevin Federline Allegations

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Britney Spears has something to say.

As you may have read about, the singer’s ex-husband Kevin Federline has a new book coming out — and it dedicates many passages to the quasi star’s relationship with Spears.

At one point, Federline claims Britney watched her sons sleep — with a knife in her hand.

At another point, Federline claims Britney cheated on him. With a woman.

(Photo by Scott Gries/ImageDirect)

In response to these allegations, a representative for Spears spoke to People Magazine this week and said the following:

“With news from Kevin’s book breaking, once again he and others are profiting off her and sadly it comes after child support has ended with Kevin.

“All she cares about are her kids, Sean Preston and Jayden James and their well-being during this sensationalism. She detailed her journey in her memoir [The Woman in Me].”

It does seem worth noting that there’s not really a denial anywhere in this statement.

Spears and Federline got married in 2004, and welcomed sons Sean Preston, 20, and Jayden James, 19, before their divorce was finalized in 2007.

Britney Spears and Kevin Federline in February 2005.
Musicians Britney Spears and Kevin Federline arrive at the 2006 Grammy Nominees party with Kanye West, hosted By Verizon Wireless and Rolling Stone Magazine at the Avalon Hollywood, on February 6, 2005. (Photo Credit: Matthew Simmons/Getty Images for Rolling Stone)

In his new memoir, Federline sais that these boys once came to him with concerns regarding their pop star mom… and did not want to spend time at her house as teenagers.

“They would awaken sometimes at night to find her standing silently in the doorway, watching them sleep — ’Oh, you’re awake?’ — with a knife in her hand,” Federline reportedly wrote in his book, according to The New York Times. “Then she’d turn around and pad off without explanation.”

Yikes, huh? If true.

Elsewhere in his book, Federline seems worried that his ex may take her own life someday, saying he believes her situation is “racing toward something irreversible” and adding:

“It’s become impossible to pretend everything’s OK. From where I sit, the clock is ticking, and we’re getting close to the 11th hour. Something bad is going to happen if things don’t change, and my biggest fear is that our sons will be left holding the pieces.”

(Photo Credit: Kevin Winter/Getty Images for iHeartMedia)

Spears has sparked endless criticism and concern for years now due to mysterious, creepy and disturbing Instagram videos.

She posts them a lot.

For his part, Federline responded to Britney’s above response by stating to Us Weekly on October 15:

“Money’s not the root of this thing. I feel like, if she has the right to tell her story, why don’t I?”

Indeed, Spears released her own memoir, The Woman in Me, in 2023.

In it, Spears wrote that Federline “took my world away from me” during their custody battle, claiming: “He knocked the breath out of me. And my family did not hold me.”

Federline’s book comes out on October 21.

He claims in various sections that Spears called Justin Timberlake the night before their wedding… mixed wine and prescription medication while pregnant … and snorted cocaine when she was still breast-feeding their two sons.

“All I really want is for her to be able to have a wonderful relationship with her children,” he told Us Weekly. “I want her to be happy, healthy and all of the things. I want nothing but greatness for her.”

Britney Spears Fires Back at All Those Horrible Kevin Federline Allegations was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Health

These Teas May Boost Heart Health And Help Lower Blood Pressure

To protect your heart, it’s important to pay attention to what you drink. For example, you can replace sugar-sweetened drinks with these heart-healthy teas.

​Health Digest – Health News, Wellness, Expert Insights