Western Watersheds Project, represented by the Western Environmental Law Center, has appealed the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) decision to revoke American Prairie’s bison grazing permits on public lands in northeastern Montana, arguing the move is legally and scientifically unjustified…
(The Center Square) – Proposed tariffs on imports from 60 economies could raise nearly $970 billion over the next decade, according to estimates released Monday by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
(The Center Square) – Bill Gates, the billionaire founder of Microsoft, will testify before the U.S. House Oversight Committee in a closed-door hearing on Wednesday over ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Post Content
Alaska Dive Search and Recovery is launching a raffle and fundraising campaign to replace underwater search equipment, aiming for a $200,000 goal supported by community donations.
A new public art project is underway at Fairbanks City Hall, featuring a mural created by Alaska Native artists. The National Science Foundation-funded initiative highlights climate adaptation, biocultural heritage, and community connections in Interior Alaska.
Two of three Ketchikan-based U.S. Coast Guard fast response cutters were recently deployed to the U.S./Mexico border, a USCG official stated in an email on Thursday.
The Coast Guard cutters John McCormick and Bailey Barco “are currently completing short-duration deployments to the United States’ southern border,” Travis Magee, a spokesperson for the U.S.Coast Guard Arctic District, said Thursday in an email to the Ketchikan Daily News.
“These operations are part of the Coast Guard’s commitment to secure the U.S. maritime border and its approaches,” Magee said.
Vessel tracking data, which is available to the public at marinetraffic.com, shows that the Bailey Barco on May 30 began traveling from Ketchikan to waters off southern California. The John McCormick on May 30 began sailing north from the port of San Diego; it returned to Ketchikan on Sunday evening.
The voyage by sea between the ports of Ketchikan and San Diego is 1,575 nautical miles in each direction, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration data shows.
Meanwhile, the Douglas Denman – the third fast response cutter homeported in Ketchikan – has remained in Southeast Alaska this month.
Both the John McCormick and Bailey Barco usually remain in coastal Alaska waters, to complete patrols with duties including search and rescue and fisheries law enforcement.
The two ships are being deployed to the U.S./Mexico border at a time when military agencies across the country are focusing assets on assisting with federal immigration law enforcement and drug interdiction efforts.
The Coast Guard is the only military branch housed within the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. USCG responsibilities include at-sea enforcement of U.S. immigration laws and policies, and detecting and interdicting contraband and illegal drug traffic.
In the three months after President Trump began his second term in office on January, 20, 2025, the USCG Pacific Area tripled its forces operating on the southern border, according to a March 2025 press release from USCG.
As the John McCormick and Bailey Barco each traveled between Ketchikan and the U.S./Mexico border last week, Southeast Alaska fishermen were participating in commercial and recreational fisheries, cruise ships were transporting visitors by the thousands, and recreational boating was ramping up.
Magee stated by email last week that while the John McCormick and Bailey Barco were “temporarily supporting critical national security missions down south, we want to assure the community that these deployments do not affect our search and rescue readiness back home.”
The Daily News reached out to several marine safety professionals in Southeast Alaska with inquiries regarding the importance of the Ketchikan-based cutters, and potential safety implications associated with their deployments to the U.S./Mexico border.
Alaska Marine Safety Education Association director Leann Cyr stated in an email to the Daily News on Friday that AMSEA leaders “do not know whether this deployment will affect search and rescue operations in Southeast Alaska.”
“Regardless, AMSEA encourages mariners to be prepared to operate safely and independently,” Cyr wrote.
“Coast Guard search and rescue services are an important part of Alaska’s maritime safety system, but safe operation begins with vessel operators through proper maintenance, attention to weather, and safety equipment and training,” Cyr said.
Marine tracking data
Maritime tracking system data, which is publicly available via marinetraffic.com, shows that the Bailey Barco traveled from Ketchikan to southern California last week, while the John McCormick returned from southern California to Ketchikan.
The Bailey Barco departed Ketchikan at about 10 a.m. May 30, according to marinetraffic.com. Early on Monday, the Bailey Barco was offshore of western Washington.
By Thursday morning, the Bailey Barco had reached a harbor in the San Pedro neighborhood of Los Angeles; on Sunday morning the ship was approaching waters off San Diego, the most recent data from marinetraffic.com shows.
Meanwhile, on the morning of May 30, the John McCormick departed San Diego and began sailing north along the west coast of California.
As of Tuesday morning, the John McCormick was offshore of Salinas, California.
On Wednesday morning, the John McCormick was offshore of Eureka, California.
On Thursday morning, the John McCormick was offshore of Aberdeen, Washington.
As of 10 a.m. Friday, the John McCormick was moored at the Port Angeles, Washington harbor. By Sunday evening the ship had returned to Ketchikan, marinetraffic.com data shows.
The 154-foot John McCormick was commissioned in Ketchikan in April of 2017, and the 154-foot Bailey Barco was commissioned in Juneau in June of 2017. The 154-foot Douglas Denman was commissioned in Ketchikan in 2022.
All three of the Sentinel-class cutters are now homeported in Ketchikan, although USCG has plans to relocate the Douglas Denman to Sitka within the next few years.
Each of the Sentinel-class cutters operates with a standard complement of 24 crew members, according to USCG information.
The post Ketchikan cutters sail for Mexico border appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.
By: James Brooks, Alaska Beacon
The firm developing the proposed trans-Alaska natural gas pipeline has proposed limiting the price for natural gas sold through the pipeline to Alaskans.
If accepted by legislators, the limit would prevent the cost of gas from rising if the pipeline costs more than expected.
The new proposal from pipeline developer Glenfarne comes as the Alaska Legislature continues meeting in a 30-day special session, considering a major tax break to support the AKLNG pipeline project. That project aims to build an 807-mile pipeline to bring natural gas from the North Slope to Cook Inlet for export and in-state use.
A price cap could resolve one sticking point in negotiations over the proposed tax break, but with half of the special session gone, a variety of other issues remain unresolved.
Those include basic elements about the tax break, including its size and length, as well as how municipal governments will be compensated for the impacts of construction, which is expected to bring as many as 12,000 new workers to the state temporarily.
The House Finance Committee is expected to begin voting on possible solutions to those issues next week.
Natural gas is the primary fuel for home heating and electricity in Southcentral Alaska, but officials estimate that by the end of the decade, local production from gas fields beneath Cook Inlet will be insufficient to meet demand.
Prices are already rising, and several gas-import projects have been proposed. The AKLNG pipeline is another possible solution, but because the pipeline and supporting infrastructure are so large, the project would need to also sell gas overseas in order to offset costs.
If the pipeline is built but no exports take place — something that could happen if the pipeline costs more to build than expected — the Alaska Department of Revenue has estimated that AKLNG gas would be much more expensive than imported gas.
In legislative hearings, that risk has caused some lawmakers to question the project.
Speaking to the Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday, Glenfarne Alaska LNG president Adam Prestidge said the company is on the verge of finalizing a firm, 30-year contract with Enstar, the largest natural gas utility in Southcentral Alaska.
That fixed-price arrangement would guarantee natural gas at no more than $16 per MMBtu, a measurement of heat capacity.
If the pipeline costs more than expected, cost overruns would not be passed on to consumers, said John Sims, Enstar’s president, when speaking to the House Finance Committee on Monday.
“Enstar’s agreement has a fixed price, and Enstar does not care if the project goes over cost. It does not impact in any way, shape, or form the price that we would be charging customers as a fixed price,” he said.
Rep. Alyse Galvin, I-Anchorage, immediately responded to Sims’ comment.
“A lot of us are very excited to say, yes, I 1,000% support this, because I want to keep low prices,” she said.
The figure given by Prestidge is equivalent to about $16.59 per thousand cubic feet of natural gas, using a standard conversion. That is cheaper than the forecast price of imports.
Dan Stickel, chief economist for the Alaska Department of Revenue, told legislators in late May that the department’s estimate for the cost of imported gas in 2033 — AKLNG’s planned completion date — “came to about $17 per thousand cubic feet price range.”
Sims told legislators on Monday that Enstar currently expects a “total, all-in cost between $16-22” per thousand cubic feet for imported gas.
Enstar’s current cost of gas is $10.80 per thousand cubic feet, but that will rise in coming years as production declines in Cook Inlet.
The $16 per MMBtu figure is a maximum, Prestidge said. If the pipeline is developed according to plan, exports would subsidize the cost of in-state gas, dropping it as low as $5 per MMBtu, he said.
Glenfarne’s $16 figure could rise with inflation, Prestidge said, but it wouldn’t be affected by cost overruns on building the pipeline.
Prestidge told the Senate Finance Committee that Glenfarne is open to applying a price cap on gas sold to other utilities and industries that might use natural gas.
“Glenfarne is supportive of language being added to any property tax bill that prohibits cost overruns on the project from being borne by either the state or the regulated ratepayers who are buying gas off the pipeline,” he said.
While a final deal between AKLNG and utilities is subject to approval by regulators, a price cap would directly address legislators’ concerns about affordability.
“I think putting that (cap) in a bill would provide a ton of reassurance, because it substantially mitigates your risk in a low-volume scenario,” said Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage.
Sen. Kelly Merrick, R-Eagle River, listened in person to Prestidge on Wednesday.
“I don’t know if $16 is the perfect cap, but it’s addressing a significant concern and protecting Alaska ratepayers,” she said.
On the same day that Prestidge discussed the price cap, he also disclosed updated cost estimates for the pipeline project, saying the first phase of the project is now expected to cost between $13.2 billion and $16.9 billion.
Building facilities needed for gas exports would raise the cost to between $44.5 billion and $54.5 billion, Glenfarne estimates.
Legislators have previously criticized a lack of updated cost estimates, saying their absence is hampering their ability to work on a tax break.
Sen. James Kaufman, R-Anchorage, said the new data and the proposed cost cap “was kind of a tipping point” in discussions.
“I think it gives us more information to do our due diligence,” said Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel and co-chair of the Senate Finance Committee.
Alaska currently levies a 2% tax on oil and gas property. Cities and boroughs are permitted to claim some or all of that tax on property within their boundaries.
To incentivize AKLNG investors, Dunleavy proposed replacing the property tax with an “alternative volumetric tax” of 6 cents per thousand cubic feet of gas shipped through the pipeline. The change would effectively result in a 90% tax break, and there would be no tax during construction, because gas isn’t yet being shipped.
The impact of the switch would be heaviest on municipalities. They would have to deal with the consequences caused by having thousands of extra people living nearby, but they would have little (or no) new tax revenue to cover the resulting costs.
The North Slope Borough funds most of its services through the petroleum property tax and has opposed Dunleavy’s proposed change.
Rep. Robyn Niayuq Frier, D-Utqiagvik, represents the North Slope. She has deep concerns about the switch to a volume-based tax and thinks Glenfarne’s new cost estimates are still too low.
“I think there are a lot of people who are having these conversations who think that there’s no way this is actually going to happen, that this is a pipe dream,” she said of the pipeline project.
The House and Senate Finance committees are considering whether to set the natural gas tax at something like 40 cents per thousand cubic feet — or higher — and how long the switch from a property tax to a volumetric tax should last.
That would reduce the size of the break that Dunleavy requested and increase the amount the state and boroughs would collect in revenue.
Dunleavy has suggested that the new tax should last the life of the project. Other legislators, including Frier and Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka, are suggesting shorter terms.
Lawmakers are also debating the size of a proposed “impact fund” that Glenfarne would provide to cover the costs that cities and boroughs would incur as thousands of workers gather to build the pipeline.
Legislators also haven’t decided what communities would be eligible for the fund or how the money would be distributed.
The House Finance Committee is scheduled to begin debating the unresolved issues on Monday and could advance a bill to the House floor as soon as the second half of next week.
The Senate could take up that measure on the week of the 15th, but with the special session ending on June 19, there’s a real risk that legislators will run out of time before they decide the multibillion-dollar issues at stake.
“We have to find a product that meets the polar opposite forces that are out there,” said Speaker of the House Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham.
“The needle’s not been threaded yet, and if we don’t get the needle threaded … I think ultimately, then the 30 day special session is — I don’t know what’s going to happen. I just, quite frankly, don’t know.”
Post Content
Respiratory diseases like measles and flu pose a much bigger threat to public health for the World Cup than does Ebola.
