Category: Alaska News

The latest news and information from your Alaska news station.

Chilkat Valley Community Foundation held another “People’s Choice Award “ at the Fair last weekend, and 158 people cast a vote for their favorite local nonprofit. Thank you to all these loyal supporters! By random selection, two nonprofits were each awarded a $250 CVCF grant: Four Winds Resource Center and Haines Animal Rescue Kennel. Thank you Chilkat Valley!

Cynthia Allen, for the CVCF Board

The post HARK, Four Winds Resource Center get “People’s Choice Award” appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

 The Alaska voting system dilutes party and billionaire control and elevates the importance of running for office and voting in every election. That’s great! Today in Juneau, bipartisan “majority caucuses” lead the Alaska Senate and House of Representatives. Republicans, democrats, and independents—caucusing together—are getting Alaska’s business done. The minority caucuses? Both are entirely Trump Republicans and exactly where they belong. 

Ballot Measure 2 is sort of like Trump’s SAVE-Act, only Alaska style. It would dismantle Alaska’s home-grown electoral innovation, one that constrains power-politics, parties, and billionaire backers. Maybe that’s why Senator Sullivan calls it “rigged.” In November, I will vote No on ballot measure 2. 

Besides the “ranked-choice” general election provision, the Alaska system has other important features: 1) every candidate gets into our one orderly primary election—no members-only caucus, XYZ party primary, “super-delegates”, or the proverbial “smoked-filled rooms;” 2) No “Dark Money.” Alaska requires prompt disclosure for campaign donations over $2000 and if funds are Alaskan, or originate from out-of-state. Trumpian spin-doctors now describe the Alaska system as “inherently corrupt” — a blatant falsity.

The primary election is August 18^th and a lot of names are on the ballot. Seventeen vie to be Governor, sixteen for U.S. Senate. More—not fewer—candidates are better for Alaska and America. Alaska’s system is neither “rigged” nor “inherently corrupt.” Please check out the primary ballot and plan to vote. You’ll also find Ballot Measure 1, which defines rational limits for campaign donations. 

Burl Sheldon

The post Alaska Voting System, a Winner appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Alaska is now in charge of hazardous waste regulation in the state, a task that can be made more challenging by geographic remoteness.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday officially transferred authority for hazardous waste regulation to the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. That makes Alaska the 49th state to be granted hazardous waste primacy — the term for primary responsibility for management and enforcement — over the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA.

The applicable federal law is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, or RCRA.

Before Wednesday, the last state to be granted RCRA primacy was Hawaii in 2001, according to EPA records. Now the only state without RCRA primacy is Iowa, according to the EPA.

The transfer of authority, completed with a signature ceremony, was several years in the making, said Emma Pokon, EPA’s Pacific Northwest regional administrator and a former DEC commissioner.

DEC has assembled a hazardous waste program and team and has created state regulations that became effective a year ago. The Alaska Legislature has made regular appropriations in budgets for the hazardous waste program, which is part of DEC’s Division of Environmental Health.

“The good news is that the state has been implementing the program hand-in-hand with the EPA for the last several years,” Pokon said in a brief interview. “This moment isn’t a new imposition of costs. . . They are up and running. They’re staffed up. They’re trained up.”

Lori Aldrich, the DEC staffer managing the program, is “a gem of a public servant,” Pokon added.

Hazardous waste, as defined by RCRA, include a variety of substances like solvents, petroleum refinery sludges and dioxin-containing materials. Sources range from large industrial and military facilities to individual households.

Alaska in 2023 reported 2,729 tons of RCRA-classified hazardous waste, a total that ranked 48th among states, according to the EPA. The top sources that year, which is the most recent year with data available publicly, were the Petro Star Valdez Refinery, Eielson Air Force Base and a Palmer-based environmental services company that manages such wastes as part of its operations, according to the EPA.

For Alaska, distance poses a major challenge to hazardous waste management, Pokon said.

There are no hazardous-waste disposal facilities in the state, so almost all of the collected materials have to be shipped out for proper disposal, she said. And the shipping has to be timely, she said.

“There are limitations on holding times because of the risks presented by those materials,” she said. “The logistics involved with — once you get something into the community — getting it out, pose specific special challenges.”

Challenges are exacerbated when communities are especially remote or when there are natural disasters, she said. For that reason, hazardous waste management is part of preparation for and response to events like the Mendenhall Glacier outburst floods that now affect Juneau on a nearly annual basis or the Western Alaska floods from ex-Typhoons Halong and Merbok.

The newly formed program at DEC has already been addressing those emergency response tasks, Pokon said.

“One of the great things about DEC having the program is that really it’s been their teams that have been closer to the on-the-ground issues,” she said.

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

An Alaska Native “landless” bill the state’s congressional delegation has sought for more than three decades is a Senate vote away from passing both chambers of Congress.

The version sponsored by U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, advanced to a floor vote earlier this month. Murkowski expressed optimism the legislation on behalf of five Southeast Alaska communities may finally succeed during a visit to Juneau last month for Celebration.

“I think really it is about a measure being ripe for passage, if you will,” she said in an interview. “It has taken us many years to negotiate the maps in terms of identifying parcels. As we know, when it comes to the Tongass, every acre is precious to someone. And so when you’re trying to identify areas that are perhaps outside of your immediate community, it’s challenging. What it has required is years of an open process.”

If the Alaska Native Landless Equity Act passes, the Native residents of Haines, Ketchikan, Petersburg, Tenakee and Wrangell could form urban corporations and receive land entitlements. Murkowski said the bill fulfills a promise made more than 50 years ago.

Murkowski vowed continued efforts to pass the “landless” bill on June 6 during a Celebration event. The U.S. House companion bill by Rep. Nick Begich III, R-Alaska, passed without opposition on June 2.

“I share with people who will not understand back in Washington, D.C — I share with them that perhaps the most significant honor was when I was adopted into the Deisheetaan clan,” Murkowski told the crowd inside Centennial Hall.

She said with her gifted Lingít name Aan Shaawátk’i (Lady of the Land), she bears the responsibility “to care for our land.” 

On July 16, Murkowski announced her bill had advanced to the U.S. Senate floor after passing out of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee. In 2023, a landless bill introduced by Murkowski passed out of the committee for the first time.

She said the House support in moving the legislation was significant and credited Begich for his efforts.

“We’ve been working with the communities for years now in identifying the parcels to be exchanged,” she told the Independent. “We wanted to make sure that we were working with the House to do an identical measure, so that when it advances through one body, we can try to move it through as quickly as possible.”

On Dec. 18, 1971, President Richard Nixon signed the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act into law. The law compensated Alaska Natives for the loss of lands historically used and occupied, allowing regional and village Native corporations the right to select 44 million acres of land and appropriated $962.5 million to them. 

The five Southeast Alaska Native communities were excluded from ANSCA, the largest land claims settlement in U.S. history. 

The bill directs the Department of the Interior to convey specified land to each urban corporation. DOI must also convey the subsurface estate for that land to the regional corporation for Southeast Alaska. Each community would receive 23,040 acres of federal land or “one township.” 

The land conveyed to each urban corporation must include any U.S. interest in all roads, trails, log transfer facilities, leases and appurtenances on or related to the land conveyed to the urban corporation.

The bill also allows each urban corporation to establish a settlement trust to promote the health, education, and welfare of the trust beneficiaries, and preserve the Alaska Native heritage and culture of their communities.

“This is what Native self-determination is all about,” Murkowski said. “To make that decision for themselves and for the benefit of their people.”

Alaska’s congressional delegation has introduced “landless” legislation since the early 1990s. Several legislative attempts to recognize the five communities have failed. Murkowski said the current language and circumstances make her hopeful this bill will pass the Senate. 

“Is it a perfect bill? No. Is it one that we have agreement amongst everybody as to the maps? Probably not. But is it a work product that I think we and the communities can stand behind? Absolutely,” she said. “We’re finally to that place where all of that legwork has been done.”

Murkowski said she and her staff have spent extensive time holding meetings in the impacted communities.

She noted support from environmental groups including The Nature Conservancy and The Wilderness Society, who previously opposed the bill.

“While our defense of the Tongass continues, we must correct the injustices faced by certain Native communities in Southeast Alaska,” a March letter from The Wilderness Society states in support of the House companion bill.

In contrast, Murkowski said there’s potential opposition from those who want to preserve lands in federal control.

“I will share that there are some on the other side of the aisle who have reservations about the landless bill because they philosophically disagree that land should go from the federal estate into private hands because they are looking at these areas in the Tongass and saying, ‘All of these need to be preserved, and the best way to preserve that is to keep them in — again — in the federal estate,’” Murkowski said.

She said the support from environmental groups made an impact on her colleagues.

“My observation is that when you return the land to the original stewards of the land, perhaps there’s going to be better balance there,” Murkowski said. “These are people who live and work and raise their families in these areas. Yes, they want to have jobs, but this is a place that they will call home.”

Murkowski added not all of her colleagues in Washington, D.C., understand Alaska Native cultural heritage and stewardship. 

“The best way in my view to educate is to get people up here,” she said. 

Murkowski said when this isn’t possible, leaders from the five landless communities travel to Washington, D.C., and explain why the bill’s passage is important to them. 

She said striking a balance in the Tongass National Forest has long been sought after, and the Sealaska Corp. land settlement proved it’s possible without federal control through its carbon credit program. Sealaska was established in 1972 under ANSCA.

Not all environmental groups support that argument. The Legacy Forest Defense Coalition states, “between 1971 and 2020, Sealaska clearcut nearly all old-growth forests on these lands employing some of the most environmentally destructive logging practices seen anywhere in North America.”

The coalition adds “in an instant, this legislation could condemn these lands to industrial logging and mining projects that would not be subject to public input or oversight.”

Murkowski said one way many Southeast Alaska Native communities want to use the land is by developing greater ecotourism opportunities. 

“I believe that the people who live here are ultimately the best stewards and will determine the future of the region,” she said. 

This story was originally published by the Juneau Independent.

The post Murkowski’s ‘landless’ bill advances to US Senate floor appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

People buying Juneau Symphony tickets don’t pay the city’s 5% sales tax because the organization is a nonprofit. But Executive Director Charlotte Truitt says customers won’t be the only ones paying the price if the Juneau Assembly eliminates that tax exemption.

“We estimate that implementing this ordinance, it would require approximately $2,000 to modify our bookkeeping processes,” she told the Assembly during its meeting Monday night. “And then after that we estimate our bookkeeping cost would continue to increase by approximately $500 every month.”

The symphony would collect about $12,500 in sales tax revenue for the city during the coming year, based on current sales, compared to the organization’s total compliance cost of about $8,000, Truitt said.

“We’re fortunate that we have a bookkeeper who works about 10 hours a month,” she said. “But many of the 263 nonprofits in Juneau don’t have that luxury. They rely on volunteer treasurers or bookkeepers who donate their time because they believe in a mission. They do not have retail point-of-sale systems. This ordinance asks those volunteers to take on an entirely new level of responsibility and liability. Implementing new accounting systems, modifying ticketing and bookkeeping procedures, filing returns, and maintaining compliance all require staff time and professional expertise.”

The proposal by the Assembly to repeal the tax exemption for nonprofits — unless they are government or social service organizations — was put on hold until a Sept. 2 Finance Committee meeting after similar concerns were expressed by several other nonprofit officials and supporters.

Many said the proposed change was a surprise, although it has been among a series of tax modifications Assembly members have been considering during the past couple of months while trying to address a deficit in the city’s budget.

An analysis by the city finance director in May found the nonprofit exemption could bring in more than $3 million more a year — one of the most lucrative options — but changes suggested since then could reduce that amount if more organizations remain exempt.

Bob Urata, a doctor who’s served on numerous nonprofit boards in Juneau, suggested if the Assembly repeals the sales tax exemption there should be “a threshold of maybe a million dollars in annual earned revenues before the collection requirements apply.”

“The issue isn’t whether large nonprofits should contribute,” he said. “The issue is whether the administrative burden is proportional to an organizational size and capacity.”

Other people testifying during the meeting questioned how the city would track and audit nonprofits if they had to collect sales taxes, and what organizations would be categorized as “social service” and thus still exempt from the requirement.

Current city code states the local tax exemption does not apply to pull-tab games by tribes or other nonprofits, and sales by certain city-owned entities such as Eaglecrest Ski Area and Juneau International Airport.

The proposed change was on Monday’s meeting agenda as a possible item for final approval by the Assembly, but Deputy Mayor Greg Smith proposed returning the ordinance to the Finance Committee for further review this fall. The delay was approved unanimously.

“I’ve heard from people, some of whom work extremely close with many nonprofits, just having found out about this like a week ago,” he said. “So it is impactful. Every conversation I have I learn more. I would like to bring it back to our committee worksession to see what people want to do.”

This story was originally published be Juneau Independent.

The post Juneau nonprofits don’t charge sales tax; the Assembly is considering changing that appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Early, in-person voting begins Monday for Alaska’s Aug. 18 state primary election, and thousands of voters have already cast absentee ballots by mail.

Regardless of when — or how — Alaskans vote, ballots will be counted starting on election day, according to a preliminary schedule provided by the Alaska Division of Elections. 

Polls close at 8 p.m. Alaska Daylight Time, and the division expects to have the first preliminary results “between 8:45 p.m. and 9 p.m.”

“There are additional results updates that follow but how many or at what time they will be published will vary,” the division said in an information packet given to reporters.

The final unofficial tally will take place Aug. 28, 10 days after election day, and the division expects to certify official results by Aug. 31.

Any recounts must be requested by Sept. 5, and any lawsuit challenging a result must be filed by Sept. 10.

Under Alaska’s election system, voters pick one candidate for each race in the primary election. The top four vote-getters, regardless of political party, advance to the general election in November. If there are four or fewer candidates in a race, all advance to the general election.

In practice since 2022, lower-finishing Republican candidates have preferred to withdraw after the primary rather than compete against another Republican.

The Valley Republican Women, a notable group from the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, are running ads this year to promote the strategy. Those ads urge Republicans to “consolidate the vote” and “don’t split the field.”

In races with many competitors, a withdrawn candidate will be replaced by another until there are four options on the ballot or no more replacements are available. Any replacements may themselves withdraw.

The deadline to withdraw after the primary is Aug. 31. 

Normally, ballots cast in person are counted on election day itself. Since 2020, votes cast in person have leaned Republican. 

It’s common for some rural Alaska precincts to not report results on election night itself.

Two years ago, for example, only 387 of 403 precincts had reported results by 1 a.m. Wednesday, the day after election day. Four years ago, four precincts needed more than four days to report results from election day.

Historically, some rural precincts have had staffing problems that prevented them from opening on election day. In 2024’s primary, two precincts failed to open, and one opened only in the afternoon. In 2022, two precincts failed to open. In both 2024 and 2022, voters in the affected places were able to cast absentee ballots instead.

Absentee ballots are counted starting on election day, but that counting process extends until Aug. 28. Under Alaska law, absentee ballots — if they are postmarked on or before Aug. 18 — can reach the Division of Elections up to 10 days after election day and still be counted.

Counting an absentee ballot requires the division to first verify the identity information on the outside of the ballot envelope. That verification process starts Aug. 11, the division said, though the ballot inside the envelope won’t be counted until at least election day.

The verification process continues after election day, with ballots added to the tally in batches. The division expects to update results on Aug. 25 and again on Aug. 28, with additional updates possible between those two dates.

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Five days after graduating from high school in 1980, my identical twin brother, Malcolm, and I boarded a plane for Alaska. We were young, restless and convinced we were heading north to make our fortune.

We had no idea Alaska would shape the rest of our lives.

Our first couple summers were spent working long shifts in a cannery, surrounded by machinery, fish slime and the constant smell of salmon. We worked close to 100 hours a week and learned quickly that Bristol Bay did not care how tired, cold or inexperienced we were. Everyone was expected to carry his or her share of the load.

We watched the fisherman, seeing that’s who we wanted to be, and moved from the cannery to the decks of fishing boats. We became deckhands, then captains and boat owners. After years of fishing under other permit holders, we purchased our own limited-entry permit and earned a place in one of the most competitive wild-salmon fisheries in the world.

That journey became the foundation of my book, The Commercial Fishermen.

The book is my personal story, but it is also a record of 45 seasons of change in Bristol Bay. During those years, I watched boats, technology, regulations and markets evolve. Fiberglass boats replaced many of the older wooden vessels. Refrigerated seawater systems improved fish quality. Satellite communication, GPS navigation and more accurate forecasting changed how fishermen operated.

But some things never changed.

The weather could still turn without warning. A calm morning could become a dangerous afternoon of six-foot chop stacked across shallow water. Engines still failed. Nets tangled. Crew members got hurt. A missed tide, a bad delivery price or a transfer to the wrong district could determine whether a fisherman made money or went home owing it.

Commercial fishing is often portrayed as an adventure, and it certainly can be. But it is also a complicated business built around uncertainty. Before catching a single fish, fishermen invest in boats, permits, nets, fuel, insurance, repairs, food, transportation and crew. Then they depend on a wild resource, regulated openings and a market price they do not control.

Bristol Bay has always felt like the Super Bowl of wild salmon. Tens of millions of sockeyes return each summer, and thousands of boats compete during short openings sometimes measured in hours. Success requires preparation, instinct and the ability to make decisions under pressure.

It also requires respect for the fish, the ocean, the regulators, the processors and the communities that make the fishery possible.

Bristol Bay is not simply an economic engine. It is a living culture shared by fishermen, cannery workers, tender crews, mechanics, pilots, local families and Alaska Native communities whose relationship with salmon extends far beyond any commercial season. The health of the fishery depends on protecting the rivers and habitat that produce these extraordinary runs.

That responsibility belongs to everyone who benefits from Bristol Bay.

Over the decades, we witnessed strikes, low prices, record runs, enforcement disputes and seasons when optimism disappeared almost as quickly as the fish. Permit values rose to nearly unimaginable levels and later dropped dramatically. Some fishermen built successful operations. Others lost boats, marriages, money or years of their lives chasing one greater season. It’s the high of gold fever and always trying to catch more. 

Yet fishermen return because Bristol Bay becomes part of them. They return for the first announcement over the radio, the sight of salmon hitting the net and the electricity that moves through the fleet when the fish arrive. They return for the friendships formed during long days and sleepless nights. They return because, for a few weeks every summer, every decision matters.

I wrote The Commercial Fishermen because these stories deserve to be preserved. Much of Alaska’s history lives not only in official records, but also in wheelhouses, net lofts, bunkhouses and conversations between fishermen waiting for the next opener.

My brother and I arrived in Alaska as teenagers looking for opportunity. We left with something more valuable: a lifetime of experiences, friendships and respect for a place that demanded everything we had to give.

My boat has been sold, but the tide keeps moving. New generations of fishermen are now writing their own Bristol Bay stories. My hope is that they will inherit not only a productive fishery, but also an understanding of the sacrifice, responsibility and community required to keep it alive.

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX.

The borough is preparing to go public in a search for offers on Port Chilkoot Dock management, pending another assembly vote next month. 

Even just a few months ago the concept of outside management at the borough’s cruise ship facility wasn’t on the radar. The borough has long owned the facility, maintained it, and in recent years has collected a head tax there from docking cruise ships. 

In late April, an international port management company, Global Ports Holding, approached the borough with an unsolicited offer. In that offer, the company proposed taking over much of the operations and costs at the dock, as well as its main revenue streams. As part of the deal, the company said they would significantly increase the number of cruise passengers landing in town. 

Following news of the Global Ports offer, two other companies, Huna Totem Corporation and Survey Point Holdings, said they would be interested in competing with Global Ports for the right to manage the facility. 

Borough staff have been in contact with Global Ports for weeks now, after the assembly two months ago asked the company to put forward an official offer with more concrete details for the body to consider. 

In some ways, it seems that process has stalled: borough manager Alekka Fullerton said Tuesday the company asked the borough to sign a non-disclosure agreement regarding the proposal, hoping to keep confidential what they said was proprietary business information that would be in a detailed offer. The municipal government, however, is subject to broad public-records laws which allow the government to keep information confidential under only a narrow set of exceptions to the law. 

A solution proposed by the borough’s attorney, Fullerton said, was to put out a general call for proposals, open to any company interested in managing the facility. Fullerton had said she was considering the idea, referred to as an RFP, or request for proposals, as early as mid-June. 

The assembly Tuesday was generally supportive of the idea and directed borough staff to draft documents for an RFP. That draft will be considered for assembly approval at its next meeting. 

Under current plans, the RFP would be somewhat open ended, and wouldn’t bind the borough to choosing the lowest bidder. As Fullerton described it at the meeting, the borough would select an option from the range of bidders. Rather than accept the submitted offer outright, the borough would then begin negotiations with that company.

“It’s a qualitative relationship we’re talking about entering,” she said. “Certainly there’s an income component in terms of how much the lease would be, but that’s just one of several components should we choose to go forward.” 

There are still outstanding questions about how to judge the quality of a deal in the first place. For instance, Global Ports has been offering an increase in passenger count, but it’s not clear whether that is seen as a positive or a negative by the community, or even the assembly itself. 

“I couldn’t put out a credible RFP today because two parties would want to bid on the same deliverable, and we don’t have a deliverable right now,” said assembly member Eben Sargent. 

“If we let these guys in… they’ll overrun us and do what they want,” assembly member Craig Loomis said. “The community should tell them what we want rather than them telling us what they want to do.” 

Global Ports may be frustrated with how the borough is planning to open negotiations with other companies. 

In a letter sent to the assembly prior to the meeting, the company said it would be amenable to participating in an RFP process, but asked for a sort of special treatment. 

“While we appreciate that the borough wishes to test the market, we respectfully submit that it would be inequitable if the investment made by (Global Ports) in creating this opportunity were simply used to establish a competitive process without any recognition of our contribution,” the letter said. 

The company proposed it be given best and final offer status, allowing it to match any “best” offer submitted by a different company. 

The assembly did seem receptive to the company’s concerns about proprietary information, and it believes an RFP process would keep information confidential until a set date when all the proposals would be unsealed. 

The assembly did not, however, vote into place or substantively discuss any measures to give Global Ports best and final offer status. 

In a brief comment on the issue, assembly member Kevin Forster said “it feels like offering a best and final offer to one entity will open us up to all sorts of legal challenges.” 

Chilkoot Moratorium 

The borough will not grant any new commercial tour permits next season in the Chilkoot Lake area, including the bridge over the Chilkoot River. The assembly voted nearly unanimously Tuesday to put into place a one-year moratorium on new permits, a measure that had been recommended by the Chilkoot Corridor Working Group. The working group, comprising representatives from user groups and government agencies, has been tasked with addressing crowding and wildlife interaction concerns at the popular tourism destination. 

Assembly member Cheryl Stickler said she supported the measure specifically because of a new state regulation banning tour operators from driving large buses into the Chilkoot Lake State Recreation Site. Critics of the regulation say it has resulted in more total vehicles and more congestion. 

“Taking a year to see how this falls out, to get our feet under us and figure out how to proceed, is a wise decision,” Stickler said. 

Assembly member Mark Smith was the only vote against the moratorium. 

Dock contingency number stays put

Assembly member Eben Sargent Tuesday proposed increasing the amount of funds set aside as contingency for Lutak Dock construction. 

The contingency number determines how much is set aside to be used in the event of cost overruns — funds not dedicated toward planned costs and construction. The borough has $26 million in total funding for the project, some of which has already been spent.

There’s been discussion for months over how large that contingency fund should be. In initial talks with the borough in November 2025, Moffatt & Nichol’s Shaun McFarlane, a borough advisor on the project, said he expected the contingency fund to be in the ballpark of 15-25% of total budget. In a memo from the same time, borough harbormaster Henry Pollan recommended a 20% contingency. 

By May, Moffatt & Nichol had revised their advised contingency number to 10%. Borough staff in turn, based off the Moffatt & Nichol number, recommended a 12% contingency because it resulted in a “round number” of $22 million in available funds, Fullerton wrote at the time. Fullerton brought that figure to the assembly on May 12, asking for assembly approval, but the assembly did not vote on the issue at the meeting. 

Sargent’s argument Tuesday was that circumstances had changed since that decision, requiring a reevaluation of the decision itself. 

Specifically, he said, the recommendations were “made by Moffatt & Nichol with erroneous information.” 

“At the time, (Moffatt & Nichol) communicated clearly they believed permitting was completely in place, which proved to be false. It was news to them this summer that they did have to communicate these amounts like pile driving to MARAD,” Sargent said. 

Delays in the timeline from unforeseen permitting, Sargent argued, could result in increased costs, specifically because construction work won’t be able to go forward until permitting is completed. 

Sargent, however, faced strong pushback from some assembly members and the borough manager who said a larger contingency — Sargent proposed 20% — would “hamstring” the project. “I’m worried that we need every cent for this project,” Fullerton said. 

Smith said Sargent’s proposal was aligned with “dark forces in the community that don’t want to see the dock done at all.”

Assembly member Gabe Thomas took a slightly different tack, saying the proper time to limit construction costs was in awarding a bid to a contractor down the line, not increasing contingency funds. 

Assembly member Kevin Forster spoke in favor of the larger contingency, calling it a way to ensure taxpayers wouldn’t be on the hook for municipal bonds to fund cost overruns. 

The final vote on increasing contingency funds to 20% was tied, with Loomis and Forster siding with Sargent. 

That put it to mayor Tom Morphet to break the tie. Morphet responded to the deadlock with a “hm” and a long pause. 

The rather momentous decision being entirely in Morphet’s hands wasn’t something he could’ve prepared for, as Sargent’s motion hadn’t been on the agenda prior to the meeting. It was proposed as direction to the manager during the manager’s report. Morphet, when pressed by Sargent as he thought about the decision, said he “wasn’t expecting to vote on this.” 

After some time deliberating, the mayor voted no, keeping the contingency at the current 12% figure. 

Sales tax on alcohol advances

Voters may decide on a new tax this October: a 2% sales tax on alcohol. The assembly narrowly introduced the measure Tuesday, with the condition it go to the voters for approval. 

Putting the tax into place is a somewhat complicated process. With the measure now introduced for consideration, the assembly will hold at least two public hearings on the new tax. Following the public hearings, the assembly will take another vote, on whether the measure goes on the ballot for the municipal election in October. 

If that passes, voters will then decide at the polls whether to approve the new tax. 

If approved in October, revenue from the tax would go into the areawide general fund, the borough’s broadest funding source, paying for services like the school. 

Assembly members Thomas, Smith, and Stickler voted against introduction — the first step in kicking off the entire approval process. The tied vote once more gave mayor Tom Morphet final say. This time, Morphet voted in favor of the motion, saying the tax “deserves a public airing.”

The post Assembly Briefs: Borough prepares to solicit offers on cruise dock, and more appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Reed Scott-Schwalbach, whose mother Stephanie Scott was a longtime Haines resident, special education teacher, dahlia flower farmer and mayor, was in town for Kaya Ramirez’s wedding. (Ramirez is Beth MacCready and Gregg Bigsby’s niece). Scott-Schwalbach attended the Southeast Alaska State Fair and did some hiking. Husband Chris Celauro did his part to support the Haines Brewing Company. The two also visited friends from Scott-Schwalbach’s childhood and summers working in classic Alaska jobs like deckhanding and being a rafting guide. As part of her 50th birthday celebration this week she’ll be backpacking with Laurie Dadourian and Mardell Gunn. 

On July 8, eight friends reunited after 10 years to raft 120 miles of the Tatshenshini River. Locals Marley Horner and Erik Stevens were joined by former residents Ben Feldman, Andrew Cardella, Tyler Ehrlich, Bryce Ehrlich, Grey Tampa and Brian Buckley for the 11-day trip. The “Long on Sausage Boys” had incredible luck with weather, campsites, and the vibes overall. A combination of former guides and college friends, the trip itself was 10 years in the making, as Bryce had applied for the permit in 2015. Horner reports that they all felt incredibly lucky that the Chilkat Guides diaspora continues to stay connected, and they thank the memory of Nels Niemi for continuing to inspire them to make trips happen. It also wouldn’t be a trip into the absolute wilderness without running into another former Haines resident (and former Chilkat Guide) Eliza Lende, on another private trip that had put in a day ahead, finally crossing paths at the last camp at Alsek Lake. 

Nancy Coleman has been to every Southeast Alaska State Fair since she was born, with the exception of a few childhood years in Ketchikan. She said her participation changes every year, this year she is working at “Grandma’s Closet,” a booth is where children might pick up the perfect tiara or tutu for their fair flair. When Coleman was about 9 yearsold she rode in a wagon at the Strawberry Festival, which pre-dates the fair, touting her as “future strawberry festival queen.” The strawberry festival was a celebration of Haines homesteader and grower of prize-winning strawberries, Charles H. Anway.  Coleman has been to a lot of fairs, and has yet to officially be named queen. Her 60+ years of attending the fair might be outdone by former Haines mayor Jan Hill. Hill proudly boasts that she’s been going to the fair since before it was the fair, too. Every. Single. Year. And since Hill reportedly has a couple more years of experience being alive that Coleman, this puts her in the running for “Person Who Has Attended the Most Local Fairs.” 

The horseshoe pitchers  showed up at the fair  in force this year. Thursday’s top three pitchers were Michael Carter, Tom Ward III, and Jeff Kellner. Friday’s top three were Eddie Mcquaid, Brady Lamb, and Charlie Lamb and Saturday’s top three were Micheal Carter, Chris Dixon, and Ezra Miller. 

After 40 years, Chip Lende has officially retired from Lutak Lumber. Lende has been running the place since March of 1986.  There have been rumors and steps toward retirement for months, but you know it’s official when the occasion is marked with complimentary beer at Haines Brewing. At the behest of wife Heather Lende, friends and neighbors gathered at the brewery last Wednesday to celebrate his hard work and contributions to the community. Chip Lende said he cannot single out a best day, after four decades in business. Every day had its challenges, pits and peaks, he said, adding that he enjoyed serving the people of the Chilkat Valley. 

Locals Sally Andersen and Michael Wald have been planning Arctic wilderness trips since the 1990s. Darsie Culbeck recently returned from one of them, a rafting expedition down the Firth River. He said the clear green water and exciting rapids were highlights. Culbeck witnessed four massive grizzly bears dining on a pile of caribou that met an untimely demise by drowning in the river. He also spotted hiking notes left by Haines legend Nels Niemi at the Nunaluk Spit emergency shelter guest book. 

Dana Perreard invited a group of eight volunteers to visit Haines from Christ United Church in New Castle, Penn. Amanda Mitcheltree is one of them. She and the group volunteered at the fair and followed it up with an open invite to help anyone in town with just about any chore. This is their first trip to Alaska and have been doing miscellaneous projects to help anyone in the community. Their group totals 29 workers spread out through Skagway, Hoonah, Kake and Haines. 

This year’s fair logging show during the fair was full of surprises. There was an unprecedented seven-way tie in the first round of the men’s axe throwing, which required an elimination round, leaving Garret Schooley as the winner. This year women also had faster times than men in the small saw event, according to emcees Mads McNeil and Jess Beattie. The thing that was not surprising was Cosmo Fudge winning the log-rolling competition for the eighth year in a row. Women’s Small Saw winner was Erika Johnson.  Jack and Jill Handbucking champs were Jack and Hannah Mason. The Women’s Ax Throw winner was Lilly Kamp.

Also of note, this year’s total for ears of corn sold by the Uglys was 1,392. They also sold more than 400 pounds of smoked pulled pork. 

The Takshanuk Ridge Run celebrated its 8th year running. Get it? 

This trail race covers approximately 11 miles with just under 5,000 feet of elevation change. The race was started when Jordan Baumgartner and Adam McMahan, trail running enthusiasts, decided to grow the Haines trail running community and get kids involved. The funds raised go to the Haines Glacier Bears cross-country running program. This year’s men’s first place winner was Tim Parr in 2:13:21. Second place was Luke Davis in 2:13:59 and third place was 15 year old Finn McMahan in 2:30:56. The woman’s first place winner was Tracy Wirak-Cassidy in 3:12:24 . Second place was a tie at 3:17:55 for Lark Olson and Ayva Reed. Third place was Genevieve Bell at 3:48:35. 

The Haines Brewery offered its parking lot to the racers as the finish line again this year. Each racer also enjoyed a frosty beer or root beer donated by the brewery. Shuttles were donated by Discover Deishú. Interesting Takshanuk Trail Run facts this year: 15-year-olds, Finn McMahan and Yoa George were the youngest runners. They have been doing this trail run since they were 11-years-old. The first place winner gets a pineapple, second place is two mangoes and third place, a watermelon. This year’s winner, Tim Parr set the new course record this year. 

The post Duly Noted: New blooms, old friends and more appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.