Categories
Alaska News

Disappearing lakes and AI are helping scientists map Arctic permafrost thaw in near‑real time

Thermokarst ponds, or trough ponds, typically form when the ice in permafrost melts. They can also drain quickly. (Photo by Anna Liljedahl)

Thermokarst ponds, or trough ponds, typically form when the ice in permafrost melts. They can also drain quickly. (Photo by Anna Liljedahl)

Florida gets a lot of attention for its sinkholes, especially when they swallow cars and entire houses. But its sinkhole risk has nothing on Alaska’s.

Much of Alaska’s soil is permafrost – ground that remains below 32 degrees Fahrenheit (0 degrees Celsius) for at least two consecutive years. It is often rich with ice, but when that ice melts, the ground can collapse. As temperatures rise, that’s happening more often across the Arctic.

The consequences are the same as in Florida: substantial property damage as the land that buildings, roads and pipes were built on sinks.

Yet despite the high potential for damage, up-to-date maps of permafrost thaw that could help Arctic residents and community leaders prepare are often rare. To fill in the gap, our team, led by hydrologists and data scientists, created an interactive website to track permafrost thaw in near-real time across the Arctic, using a unique quality of the Arctic’s version of the sinkhole.

Clear signs of permafrost thaw

There is no way to directly measure permafrost without digging into it, but there are signs to watch for.

Thermokarst ponds like these dot the landscape on the Seward Peninsula in western Alaska. (Photo by USGS and USFS)
Thermokarst ponds like these dot the landscape on the Seward Peninsula in western Alaska. (Photo by USGS and USFS)

When ice-rich permafrost thaws, the ground surface subsides, creating what are known as thermokarst ponds – depressions that fill with water. Much of the Arctic has become dotted by ponds and lakes that formed this way, as temperatures there rise at two to three times the global average rate.

Looking at satellite imagery, it’s easy to spot these lakes. Watching how they change over time can then provide clues to how the permafrost is changing below.

When big lakes disappear overnight

Sometimes, the same process that started the sinkhole can form new stream channels that drain the lake, leaving a circular basin of bare ground behind. A lake that is several hundred meters long might have taken a millennium to form, yet permafrost thaw triggered by one unusually warm summer can completely drain the same lake in just a few hours.

When a lake abruptly disappears, that’s a strong indicator that the ice-rich permafrost has thawed. Disappearing lakes also provide a way to monitor permafrost over wide areas and track where thawing is most active.

This trough pond, created by permafrost thaw, is starting to fill in with aquatic vegetation and moss in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in northeastern Alaska.(Photo by Anna Liljedahl)
This trough pond, created by permafrost thaw, is starting to fill in with aquatic vegetation and moss in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in northeastern Alaska.
(Photo by Anna Liljedahl)

Aerial photos starting from the late 1940s and satellite imagery that became available in the 1970s have helped scientists map what the Arctic’s permafrost landscapes looked like in the past, including where its permafrost lakes were and were not.

Using artificial intelligence, scientists can then quickly analyze new images from across large swaths of the Arctic for signs of permafrost changes, such as the appearance of new ponds or the disappearance of old ones.

An international team of scientists we work with through the Permafrost Discovery Gateway has mapped and now actively monitors over 4 million lakes across the Arctic, including 70 million thermokarst ponds – also known as trough ponds – across the Alaska tundra.

Detecting signs of permafrost thaw in those landscapes can help communities plan for changes to their environment. The new maps can show where land is underlain by ice-rich permafrost, meaning bad choices for building sites, and where the frozen soil has less ice, likely indicating it’s safer for building sites.

A thermokarst permafrost landscape in the Kobuk Delta in northwestern Alaska has many lakes. (Photo by Ingmar Nitze)
A thermokarst permafrost landscape in the Kobuk Delta in northwestern Alaska has many lakes. (Photo by Ingmar Nitze)

Permafrost changes underway in 2026

The Seward and Baldwin peninsulas in northwestern Alaska are hot spots for lakes suddenly draining.

Over the past two decades, this region lost many large lakes that had covered its landscape for thousands of years. In the summer of 2018 alone, almost 200 of the region’s approximately 4,600 lakes lost more than a quarter of their area following an unusually warm winter.

This thermokarst pond drained abruptly in June 2026, leaving only a little water at one end. The yellow and red circles on the map show where lakes recently disappeared. (Images by Permafrost Discovery Gateway)
This thermokarst pond drained abruptly in June 2026, leaving only a little water at one end. The yellow and red circles on the map show where lakes recently disappeared. (Images by Permafrost Discovery Gateway)

Although winter 2025-26 was on the cold side for Alaska, this region continued to lose lake area – suggesting evidence of permafrost thaw. We found around 30 more lakes that were affected by drainage in June and July 2026.

This process happens with hundreds of lakes across the Arctic every summer, especially in June and July. However, not all lake changes are caused by permafrost thaw.

For example, it is not uncommon that lakes in floodplains and wetlands change dramatically across each season due to the abundance of snowmelt water in spring. Wildlife can also play a role. Beavers, for example, can recreate a lake after it abruptly drained by blocking the newly formed drainage channels.

Living with permafrost thaw

In the past, information about where permafrost was changing was primarily available through scientific studies published years later.

With near-real-time data available today, researchers can more closely study the processes of permafrost thaw, and communities can get up-to-date insights about the status of the permafrost before they plan new construction, and know where they’re likely to have trouble.The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska gubernatorial candidates highlight contrasting philosophies on oil and gas

The four gubernatorial candidates emerging from Alaska's open primary are gathered on the stage on Aug. 27, 2026, at the annual conference held by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. From left are Republican Bernadette Wilson, Democrat Jonathan Kreiss-Tompkins, Republican Dave Bronson and Democrat Tom Begich. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

The four gubernatorial candidates emerging from Alaska’s open primary gathered on the stage on Aug. 26, 2026 at the annual conference held by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. From left are Republican Bernadette Wilson, Democrat Jonathan Kreiss-Tompkins, Republican Dave Bronson and Democrat Tom Begich. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

At their first candidate forum since the Aug. 18 primary election, the four remaining gubernatorial hopefuls pitched visions for the state’s future that revealed sharp political divides.

Speaking at the event, held at the Alaska Oil and Gas Association’s annual conference in Anchorage, were Democrats Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins and Tom Begich and Republicans Bernadette Wilson and Dave Bronson. Kreiss-Tomkins has been leading in the still-ongoing primary election vote count, with 22.2 %, followed by Begich at 20.5%, Wilson at 10.2% and Bronson at 8.2%.

The four emerged as the top vote-getters among 17 candidates for governor. Alaska’s election system uses open, non-partisan primaries and ranked choice voting in the general election.

Kreiss-Tomkins and Begich, both former state legislators, presented mostly similar positions. Wilson, a talk-show host, and Bronson, a former Anchorage mayor, also presented largely similar positions that contrasted with the Democrats’ views.

Oil and gas taxes figured prominently in the event.

Democrat Tom Begich speaks at an Aug. 27, 2026, forum held by he Alaska Oil and Gas Association. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Democrat Tom Begich speaks at an Aug. 26, 2026, forum held by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

Both Democrats told the petroleum industry audience that they favored changes that would bring the state more revenues from oil producers. Their plans include a statewide corporate income tax on oil producers that are S corporations, also known as pass-through corporations, that currently do not pay them. 

The main company affected by such a tax would be Hilcorp, a privately held company based in Texas that is a major Alaska producer. As of 2020, Hilcorp had acquired all of BP’s Alaska assets when that oil giant left the state, and now it operates Alaska’s largest oil field in Prudhoe Bay, among others. Unlike BP, Hilcorp pays no corporate income tax to the state. Legislative leaders have been pushing to change that.

Hilcorp is also a main sponsor of the AOGA conference.

Begich said a tax on S corporations and other changes to the state’s tax system would bring in an extra $400 million to the treasury each year.

He acknowledged that the oil industry crowd might not like those changes at first. But ultimately, “it will be forward-thinking for private investment,” he said. “If we have that revenue coming in, we can improve our education system. We can improve our economy in general and make our energy significantly more affordable up here. In doing that, you’re going to attract people to this state.”

Kreiss-Tomkins said all sectors, including the oil industry, will have to contribute taxes to correct a structural deficit problem in Alaska that, for now, threatens to wipe out the state’s savings.

“I am pro-math, and math just doesn’t lie. And balancing a budget is ultimately a math problem, and I think you have to be clear-eyed about where the state is,” he said. Compromises will be needed to address that, including compromises from the oil industry, he added.

Wilson and Bronson, in contrast, said they adamantly oppose tax changes that would wring more revenue out of the oil industry.

Wilson called for deep slashes to the state budget.

Former Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson, a Republican who finished fourth in the open primary election, speaks at a gubernatorial candidate forum held on Aug. 26, 2026, by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. Next to him is former state lawmaker Jonathan Kreiss-Tompkins, a Democratic candidate who received the most votes in the open primary. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Former Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson, a Republican who finished fourth in the open primary election, speaks at a gubernatorial candidate forum held on Aug. 26, 2026, by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. Next to him is former state lawmaker Jonathan Kreiss-Tompkins, a Democratic candidate who received the most votes in the open primary. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

“We do not have a revenue problem in this state. We have a spending problem in this state,” she said. 

“The reality is we need to come into this budget, and we need to DOGE the heck out of it,” she said, referring to the mass firings and cuts imposed by the Trump administration through the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

Bronson said Alaska has made too many changes already to its oil and gas tax system, and that “changing the rules of the game and the tax structure midway through” scares off investment.

“The reality is we don’t have a whole lot of businesses that are lining up to do business with Alaska,” he said.

Both Wilson and Bronson accused the state legislature of blocking a proposed massive natural gas pipeline that would carry product from the North Slope about 800 miles to a yet-unbuilt liquefaction plant in Southcentral Alaska, known as the AKLNG project

There have been efforts over the past half century to build such a pipeline, but none have been economic. In pushing the latest version, Gov. Mike Dunleavy called the legislature into three  special sessions this summer to try to get them to approve sweeping tax concessions for the investment company now involved with the project, the Glenfarne Group. Lawmakers ultimately rejected Dunleavy’s demands.

Wilson said the Glenfarne plan pushed by Dunleavy, unlike all other plans over the past half century, made economic sense, but lawmakers blocked it.

“You had a couple of legislators specifically that are hell bent on seeing Alaska fail. That’s why you don’t have a gas line,” she said.

Bronson drew a similar conclusion.

Bernadette Wilson, a Republican candidate for governor, listens sto a question at an Aug. 27, 2026, forum held by he Alaska Oil and Gas Association. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Bernadette Wilson, a Republican candidate for governor, listens to a question at an Aug. 26, 2026, forum held by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

“We’ve got personal animosities in Juneau, and it comes down to just a few people that are shutting that project down,” he said.

Glenfarne, like Hilcorp, is a sponsor of the AOGA conference.

Kreiss-Tomkins and Begich, in turn, criticized Dunleavy, describing his policies as a major reason why Alaska has had more people leave the state than move to it for 13 consecutive years – the most ever recorded. They were particularly critical of his policies on education.

Under Dunleavy, they said, Alaska has stagnated.

“This governor has just set a record for the most number of vetoes by any governor in Alaska history since we became a state,” Kreiss-Tomkins said. “That is a sign of political failure, not political success.”

This year, Dunleavy set the record for the most vetoes by an Alaska governor in a single two-year Legislature, while the number of bills passed has also dropped significantly in recent years.

Candidates also discussed national politics at the forum. The two Republican candidates aligned themselves with President Donald Trump, and they portrayed themselves as hard-liners.

“I’m a hardcore conservative, and I’m proud of that,” said Bronson, who described the differences between candidates as stark.

“We’re at an inflection point in this country and in this state, in this election,” he said. “You can choose socialism. . .Or you can choose capitalism. That’s the choice in this race right now.

U.S. Rep. Nick Begich, R-Alaska, listens to gubernatorial candidates at an Aug. 27, 2026, forum held by he Alaska Oil and Gas Association. One of the candidate speaking was his uncle, former state Sen. Tom Begich, a Democrat. Tom Begich mentioned the family relationship during the forum. Nick Begich is running for re-election. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
U.S. Rep. Nick Begich, R-Alaska, listens to gubernatorial candidates at an Aug. 26, 2026, forum held by the Alaska Oil and Gas Association. One of the candidate speaking was his uncle, former state Sen. Tom Begich, a Democrat. Tom Begich mentioned the family relationship during the forum. Nick Begich is running for re-election. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

Wilson said the biggest danger to the state came from two of the three men who shared the stage with her.

“The greatest policy threat is, God forbid, this state elect a Democrat to this governor’s office.” she said. Wilson said Democratic Party policies regarding oil and gas “are the greatest threat to this industry.” She urged the audience to stick with Republicans and take advantage of the next two years of the Trump administration.

In contrast, the two Democrats emphasized consensus-building.

“Beyond a doubt, I disagree with Bernadette,” Begich quipped in comments directly following those by Wilson.

More broadly, Begich spoke about his approach to governing. While the governor has a responsibility to “be an advocate for the state of Alaska at all times,” including pushing back against the federal government, if necessary, that does not mean unrelenting combativeness, he said.

“What I won’t do is use the state’s power to attack people that are not even living in our state. I think that’s ridiculous,” he said.

Kreiss-Tomkins took a similar tone. He spoke of his time serving in a bipartisan coalition in the legislature that “set aside the more fringe and polarizing issues that I think often bring government and the legislature to a standstill” and prevent progress.

“That is a North Star principle for me. . .trying to find compromise, trying to work from a common-sense, common-ground agenda and get things done to move the state forward,” he said.

Ballots are still being counted, but the top four candidates for governor are unlikely to change. The Division of Elections’ primary election schedule calls for all absentee and questioned ballots to be counted within 10 days of the primary, resulting in a deadline of Aug. 28. The results are to be certified on Aug. 31, which is also the deadline for candidates to drop out.

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Categories
Alaska News Featured Juneau News juneau Juneau Local Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local

Alaska Supreme Court to rule on question of bias in ballot measure language

By-Corinne Smith, Alaska Beacon

Voters at Anchorage City Hall wait in line to cast their ballots on Nov. 4, 2024, the day before Election Day. City hall, in downtown Anchorage, was one of the designated early voting sites in the state’s largest city. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

The Alaska Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Tuesday on legal challenges brought by two groups on opposing sides of the state’s current ranked choice voting election system. The two groups of plaintiffs brought lawsuits against the Alaska Division of Elections challenging the language of a ballot measure, set to go before voters in November, abolishing the voting method along with other changes.

Ballot Measure 2, which will appear on the ballot as 24ESEG, would overhaul the state’s elections system via three major components: repeal ranked choice voting; rescind the nonpartisan, open primary system; and repeal campaign disclosure rules enacted by voters in 2020.

A Superior Court ruled in June that the state’s ballot summary was “true and impartial,” siding with the Alaska Division of Elections, overseen by Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom.

Plaintiffs have appealed that decision to the Alaska Supreme Court, which is expected to issue a fast-tracked ruling before a division deadline of Sept. 2 to print general election ballots.

The Alaska Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case challenging the Alaska Division of Elections' language of a ballot measure that would overhaul state elections on Aug. 25, 2026. (Screenshot of hearing via Gavel Alaska)
The Alaska Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case challenging the Alaska Division of Elections’ language of a ballot measure that would overhaul state elections on Aug. 25, 2026. (Screenshot of hearing via Gavel Alaska)

One group of plaintiffs are represented by attorney Scott Kendall, an author of the 2020 ballot measure implementing Alaska’s ranked choice voting and open primary system. They argued that the current ballot measure language is unclear, partisan and omits serious implications of the repeal effort.

The other group of plaintiffs, drafters of the measure, is called the “Repeal Now” campaign. The measure’s primary sponsors are Republican gubernatorial candidate Bernadette Wilson, along with former Anchorage library director Judy Eledge and former Alaska House Rep. Ken McCarty of Eagle River. 

In court, attorneys representing Repeal Now argued against the lawsuits being combined and for a series of language changes, including changing of the term “repeal,” which they say is not easily understood by voters, and the term “true source” of campaign disclosures as “inflammatory partisan suasion.” 

Under Alaska law, the division is required to prepare a ballot measure with a “true and impartial” summary of the proposed law. It must be “free from misleading tendency, whether the amplification, of omission, or of fallacy, and … must contain no partisan coloring.”

In the June ruling, a Superior Court judge found the division fulfilled its legal obligation and “if ballot summary language is true and impartial, the Court will not invalidate the language just because better language could be written.” 

On Tuesday, the division, represented by attorney Laura Fox with the Alaska Department of Law, argued that the ballot language could be edited thousands of ways, but the division fulfilled its legal duty and prepared the ballot with a “true and impartial” summary and title.  

“This case is not an editing exercise,” Fox argued. “We’re not assembled here as a big team of editors trying to polish a piece of writing by committee, as fun as that might be. Instead, the question here is just whether the summary clears the basic hurdle of being true and impartial. Because it does, the court should affirm.”

The Alaska Supreme Court justices will either uphold the lower court’s decision or order the division to revise the language. They’re expected to issue a ruling before Sept. 2 and then follow sometime later with an extended legal opinion. 

Timeline of ballot measure and legal challenges

Alaska voters narrowly rejected a similar initiative to repeal ranked choice voting in 2024. Proponents quickly restarted the campaign in 2025, collecting more than 34,000 signatures to again place the question on the ballot in 2026. The division first published the ballot language last December. 

A group of plaintiffs represented by Kendall filed a lawsuit challenging the ballot language in January. Plaintiffs include Anchorage Republican Sen. Cathy Giessel, AFL-CIO union president Joelle Hall, and former member of the Juneau Borough Assembly and vice president of Ocean Conservancy ‘Wáahlaal Gidaak Barbara Blake. They argued the ballot language was biased and inaccurate.

The division subsequently revised the ballot language in February with significant changes to the title and summary. The plaintiffs dropped the lawsuit without prejudice, according to court documents. 

In mid-February, the Repeal Now group filed a lawsuit challenging the new language, arguing “opponents got their preferred language” adding the term “repeal” three times, and the summary was not “true and impartial.”

In March, the division again revised the title of the ballot measure, adding the phrase “ending ranked-choice general elections.”

Giessel and fellow plaintiffs filed a new lawsuit, and the two suits were consolidated by the Superior Court judge in April. 

Both groups of plaintiffs filed suggested ballot language with the court, and the state filed a motion defending their ballot language. 

Court arguments

On Tuesday, Kendall argued before the Supreme Court that the ballot language should be a clear map for voters to understand what the measure does.

“But the state’s language here isn’t a map. It’s effectively an obstacle course where a voter can only understand Ballot Measure 2 by doing independent research outside the four corners of the ballot language. The state’s language is unclear, contains partisan suasion, and omits details that would give voters significant pause,” he said.

In particular, Kendall raised concerns the ballot measure does not clarify that if passed, nonpartisan or Independent voters would be excluded from voting in party primaries, unless registered with that party.  

“It fails to make clear that Ballot Measure 2 specifically empowers political parties at the stroke of a pen to make it illegal for undeclared and nonpartisans to vote in the primary election,” he said. “I think voters need to be put on notice, especially the two-thirds of voters that don’t belong to either party, that you may not be able to vote in the primary election at all.”

Kendall also argued the language related to campaign finance disclosure rules was inadequate, and fails to give details of the implications.

If passed, the measure would repeal campaign disclosure rules and limits enacted by the ballot measure passed in 2020, including rules that individuals and entities who contribute more than $2,000 to candidates or campaigns must disclose the true source, as defined by law.

Attorney Julie Pack, representing the group of plaintiffs with the Repeal Now campaign and supporting the ballot measure, argued against the use of the term “repeal” because she said campaigners collecting signatures for the ballot measure found voters were not familiar with the term. 

“Many people do not use that word on a daily basis. It’s not common parlance. It is for lawyers. It’s not for people who are not lawyers, and it’s not a term that is readily understood,” she said.

Justices pushed back, pointing out the term is in the name of their organization.

“My organization named itself before they canvassed, got all the signatures, talked to over 31,000 Alaskans, and understood that repeal is not a word that lots of people understand,” she replied. “So my client named itself before it learned that repeal is a term that’s mildly to moderately sophisticated.”

“There is no need to use words that are sophisticated,” she added. “When ‘redo,’ ‘remove,’ ‘undo,’ ‘get rid of’ are perfectly fine, and they would protect Alaskan voters’ right to know what they’re voting on.”

Pack also raised concerns with the term “true source” related to campaign finance disclosures, and argued the measure would maintain “open primaries.”

Arguing on behalf of the Division of Elections, Fox urged the justices to reject the plaintiffs arguments and affirm the lower court’s decision that the division met its legal obligations and should print the ballot measure as is.

Ballot Measure 2 as currently proposed by the Alaska Division of Elections:

An Act Restoring Political Party Primaries, Ending Ranked Choice-General Elections, and Repealing Recent Campaign Finance Laws

This Act would get rid of open primary elections, where all candidates appear on one ballot. It would also get rid of ranked-choice general elections. It would bring back political party primaries and single-choice general elections. It would also repeal certain campaign finance rules that were added by a 2020 ballot measure. 

Elections would occur as they did before open primaries and ranked choice elections. In the primary election, voters would choose a party’s ballot, unless prohibited by the party’s bylaws. They would only vote for candidates on that ballot. The winning candidates from each primary would be the party’s nominee. In the general election, voters would vote for only one candidate in each race. Party petitions, special runoff elections, and other processes would return. 

This act would repeal campaign finance rules that were passed in 2020. It would remove the limits on donations to joint campaigns for governor and lieutenant governor. It would remove limits and disclosure rules under current law, including for digital ads, out-of-state donations, undisclosed donations and the true source of donations. It would change the meaning of a campaign expenditure and remove some fines.

Should this initiative become law? 

Categories
Alaska News Featured Juneau News juneau Juneau Local Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local

Alaska to receive up to $23 million in landmark child safety settlement with Meta

By: Corinne Smith, Alaska Beacon

Meta, which owns social media platforms Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to a $17 billion multistate settlement announced on Aug. 26, 2026. Alaska is set to receive up to $23 million over the next ten years. (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Alaska is set to receive up to $23 million from Meta Platforms Inc. under a landmark $17 billion settlement agreement that would also require the company to implement a sweeping set of safety features for its social media platforms, aimed at protecting children from addictive features and harmful content.

The multistate settlement agreement was announced Wednesday that state officials are lauding as one of the biggest consumer protection settlements in history outside the Big Tobacco settlements of the 1990s.

New protections for teens, controls for parents included in Meta settlement

Time Limit: A default two-hour daily time limit that can only be turned off with a parent’s permission. Time spent scrolling on Facebook and Instagram counts toward the total.

Night mode: A default block from Meta apps between midnight and 6 a.m.

School Mode: Notifications will be muted by default between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m. During those hours, young people will no longer receive push notifications, except for direct messages and alerts about their account security or safety.

Regular Prompts: Young users will receive prompts after every 15 minutes of continuous screen time on Facebook and Instagram.

Algorithmic Feed Control:Young users will be able to choose a non-algorithmic feed — one that isn’t personalized by Meta’s recommendation system.

Autoplay Control: Young users will be able to turn off autoplay, so that content no longer automatically plays.

Hidden Likes: Young people won’t see the number of likes and reactions on posts — both their own and those from others — by default.

Disabling cosmetic surgery and extreme makeup filters: Young users will not be able to use extreme makeup filters.

Direct messaging features will be excluded from Night Mode, Time Limit and School Mode restrictions.

Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, would be ordered to pay the up to a $17.1 billion penalty to 47 states, the District of Columbia and several U.S. territories. The final settlement remains subject to approval by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where the case was filed. 

Alaska leaders praised the announcement in a statement on Wednesday. 

“As a mom of two, I can’t tell you what a relief this settlement brings to me knowing there will be better safeguards on Meta’s platform to keep teens healthy and positively engaged,” said Acting Attorney General Cori Mills. 

Gov. Mike Dunleavy called the settlement a “necessary and imperative step” to protecting children. 

“Social media promised us connection and the ability to productively engage with each other in life’s joyful and mundane moments. What social media gave us was a generation of children scarred by bullying, harassment, doom-scrolling and predation,” Dunleavy wrote. “This is a good first step towards protecting our children from online dangers, and I hope we see more actions like this in the future.”

Mills also praised the work of attorneys general across the country “regardless of political party” and their consumer protection teams for pursuing the case. “It is only through that collaboration that settlements like this are possible,” she said. “This truly is a historic moment, and I am hopeful it sets the precedent for social media platforms going forward.”

The settlement ends a high-stakes lawsuit first filed in federal court in California in 2023, where states argued that Meta purposefully designed addictive social media features in order to maximize profits, illegally collected data on children and teens, and repeatedly misled the public about the harms of social media use.

Meta denies wrongdoing, and that it has any liability to the plaintiffs.

The company agreed to the settlement, which also requires major changes to Facebook and Instagram features for young users. That includes a daily two-hour time limit and frequent prompts to restrict endless scrolling; night time blocks from midnight to 6 a.m.; muted notifications during school hours; a choice of a non-algorithmic feed that is not personally tailored by Meta; hidden social comparison features, like beauty filters and “like” features, and others.

Under the settlement agreement, Meta sought similar restrictions on its competitors, TikTok and Youtube. Meta agreed to pay out 70% of the settlement, $12.7 billion, to states initially. The company agreed to pay the remaining 30%, or $17.1 billion total, only if TikTok and Youtube agree to implement a one-hour daily limit, night mode and age assurance measures. TikTok and Youtube must also agree to pay roughly $5.3 billion in penalties to states.

Alaska is expected to receive $16 million over the next 10 years, and up to $23 million if the other social media platforms agree to the terms, according to a spokesperson with the Alaska Department of Law. 

Meta reports 3.9 billion active users on its social media apps each month, worldwide. 

The company still faces thousands of lawsuits across the country from individuals and school districts accusing them of fueling harmful content and addiction in children, and inadequate safety features.

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska to receive up to $23 million in landmark child safety settlement with Meta

Meta, which owns social media platforms Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to a $17 billion multistate settlement announced on Aug. 26, 2026. Alaska is set to receive up to $23 million over the next ten years. (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Meta, which owns social media platforms Facebook and Instagram, has agreed to a $17 billion multistate settlement announced on Aug. 26, 2026. Alaska is set to receive up to $23 million over the next ten years. (Photo by Corinne Smith/Alaska Beacon)

Alaska is set to receive up to $23 million from Meta Platforms Inc. under a landmark $17 billion settlement agreement that would also require the company to implement a sweeping set of safety features for its social media platforms, aimed at protecting children from addictive features and harmful content.

The multistate settlement agreement was announced Wednesday that state officials are lauding as one of the biggest consumer protection settlements in history outside the Big Tobacco settlements of the 1990s.

Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, would be ordered to pay the up to a $17.1 billion penalty to 47 states, the District of Columbia and several U.S. territories. The final settlement remains subject to approval by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, where the case was filed. 

Alaska leaders praised the announcement in a statement on Wednesday. 

“As a mom of two, I can’t tell you what a relief this settlement brings to me knowing there will be better safeguards on Meta’s platform to keep teens healthy and positively engaged,” said Acting Attorney General Cori Mills. 

Gov. Mike Dunleavy called the settlement a “necessary and imperative step” to protecting children. 

“Social media promised us connection and the ability to productively engage with each other in life’s joyful and mundane moments. What social media gave us was a generation of children scarred by bullying, harassment, doom-scrolling and predation,” Dunleavy wrote. “This is a good first step towards protecting our children from online dangers, and I hope we see more actions like this in the future.”

Mills also praised the work of attorneys general across the country “regardless of political party” and their consumer protection teams for pursuing the case. “It is only through that collaboration that settlements like this are possible,” she said. “This truly is a historic moment, and I am hopeful it sets the precedent for social media platforms going forward.”

The settlement ends a high-stakes lawsuit first filed in federal court in California in 2023, where states argued that Meta purposefully designed addictive social media features in order to maximize profits, illegally collected data on children and teens, and repeatedly misled the public about the harms of social media use.

Meta denies wrongdoing, and that it has any liability to the plaintiffs.

The company agreed to the settlement, which also requires major changes to Facebook and Instagram features for young users. That includes a daily two-hour time limit and frequent prompts to restrict endless scrolling; night time blocks from midnight to 6 a.m.; muted notifications during school hours; a choice of a non-algorithmic feed that is not personally tailored by Meta; hidden social comparison features, like beauty filters and “like” features, and others.

Under the settlement agreement, Meta sought similar restrictions on its competitors, TikTok and Youtube. Meta agreed to pay out 70% of the settlement, $12.7 billion, to states initially. The company agreed to pay the remaining 30%, or $17.1 billion total, only if TikTok and Youtube agree to implement a one-hour daily limit, night mode and age assurance measures. TikTok and Youtube must also agree to pay roughly $5.3 billion in penalties to states.

Alaska is expected to receive $16 million over the next 10 years, and up to $23 million if the other social media platforms agree to the terms, according to a spokesperson with the Alaska Department of Law. 

Meta reports 3.9 billion active users on its social media apps each month, worldwide. 

The company still faces thousands of lawsuits across the country from individuals and school districts accusing them of fueling harmful content and addiction in children, and inadequate safety features.

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Categories
Alaska News

Duly Noted: Year of the Horse and visiting friends

The art scene in Haines is active. Paul Wheeler says that there is about a one-year wait to be the featured artist at the Haines Brewing Co. Eight local artists,  Merrick Bochart, Rachael Juzeler, Kelly Mitchell, Amelia Nash, Andrea Nelson, Rachel Saitzyk, Melina Shields, and Kelsey Wilcox-Lovig, combined talents for this month’s show.  The group did not have strict guidelines, only the theme Year of The Horse. Rachel Saitzyk’s piece, Kawayo,is shaped from…

Continue reading — subscribe to unlock the full article.

Categories
Alaska News

Klukwan gets new teacher who doubles as principal

Klukwan principal and kindergarten through 12th grade teacher Dmitrieva “Mimi” Antal talks to students Tucker Sweet, Freyja Bailey, Rowan Grimm and Colleen McGuire on the first day of school on August 26, 2026, in Klukwan, Alaska. (Lizzy Hahn/ Chilkat Valley News)

Dmitrieva Antal, Klukwan’s new principal and kindergarten through high school teacher, is new to the school, however she is not new to the Chilkat Valley or Southeast. Antal, who grew up in the San…

Continue reading — subscribe to unlock the full article.

Categories
Alaska News

This Week in History: earthquake simulator, heating bills and a new dress code

10 Years Ago

Prepare to be shaken, not stirred as a mobile earthquake simulator will visit Haines on Sept. 26, courtesy of the Alaska Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management. It will be stationed near the Haines public safety building from about noon to 6 p.m. 

The simulator, also called the “quake cottage,” is a mobile trailer that holds four people at a time and replicates the tremors of a 7.1 magnitude earthquake.

“It’s…

Continue reading — subscribe to unlock the full article.

Categories
Alaska News

Assembly Briefs: Four tax questions on ballot, loan agreements and a new firetruck

(Lizzy Hahn/ Chilkat Valley News) Assembly members Eben Sargent, Kevin Forester and Cheryl Stickler listen to a public comment during the assembly meeting Tuesday, March 10, 2026 in Haines, Alaska

During Tuesday night’s Haines Borough assembly meeting, members unanimously voted to add two tax propositions to the ballot, discussed a moratorium on the Chilkat River walking trails and accepted Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation funding for water and sewer improvements.

Four tax questions on ballot

Continue reading — subscribe to unlock the full article.

Categories
Alaska News

Chilkat Valley Preschool announces closure

(Rashah McChesney/Chilkat Valley News) Lewis, a preschool-aged student, works with clay during an art class on Tuesday, Feb. 4, 2025, at the Klukwan school in Klukwan, Alaska.

Standing in front of the Haines Borough Assembly on Tuesday, Jessie Wuesthoff read a letter announcing the closure of the Chilkat Valley Preschool. Wuesthoff said that the decision was not made quickly or lightly. She said that over the past year, the preschool worked to find a sustainable…

Continue reading — subscribe to unlock the full article.