Categories
Entertainment

Barack Obama Says Aliens Are Real, Promptly Retracts Statement

Reading Time: 2 minutes

As though 2026 wasn’t weird enough already, aliens are once again making headlines.

Over the weekend, Barack Obama sat down for an interview with Brian Tyler Cohen, and when the topic of visitors from another planet came up, the former president made a surprising statement:

“They’re real,” Obama said with surprising nonchalance.

Former U.S. President Barack Obama arrives prior to the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump at the United States Capitol on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Donald Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th President of the United States.
Former U.S. President Barack Obama arrives prior to the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump at the United States Capitol on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Melina Mara – Pool/Getty Images)

“But I haven’t seen them, and they’re not being kept in Area 51. There’s no underground facility unless there’s this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the president of the United States,” he continued.

Cohen followed that up by asking Obama what he wanted to know first when he was elected president back in 2008.

“Where are the aliens?” Obama jokingly — we think? — replied.

So yeah, a former president stating that matter-of-factly that aliens exist is a pretty big deal, and the clip went viral for obvious reasons.

Unfortunately, it’s not quite as big a bombshell as we initially thought.

In response to the controversy over his statement, Obama took to Instagram to clarify that he was merely voicing his own theory, and he doesn’t actually know whether aliens exist.

“I was trying to stick with the spirit of the speed round, but since it’s gotten attention, let me clarify,” Obama wrote, adding:

“Statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there.

“But the distances between solar systems are so great that the chances we’ve been visited by aliens is low, and I saw no evidence during my presidency that extraterrestrials have made contact with us. Really!”

Former President Barack Obama addresses the Obama Foundation's 2024 Democracy Forum on December 05, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois.
Former President Barack Obama addresses the Obama Foundation’s 2024 Democracy Forum on December 05, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Yeah, Barack really burst a lot of people’s bubbles with that follow-up statement.

Thus far, 2026 has been a pretty big bummer, and the confirmation that aliens are real added some much-needed excitement and optimism to the social media landscape.

After months of gossip about the Obamas’ marriage, Barack was back to making headlines for cool reasons. It was like 2008 all over again!

Alas, being the mature elder statesman that he is, he felt the need to clarify his remarks once he saw that they’d been misinterpreted.

Unless he does know that aliens are real and the shady cabal dedicated to keeping them a secret pressured him into retracting his remarks!

We’re through the looking glass here, people!

Barack Obama Says Aliens Are Real, Promptly Retracts Statement was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Music

Major Smoke Detector Recall From Amazon-Sold Products

These smoke detectors are supposed to send out an alert when a fire might be happening, but there’s a major problem in the factory settings. Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs

Categories
Music

Major Smoke Detector Recall From Amazon-Sold Products

These smoke detectors are supposed to send out an alert when a fire might be happening, but there’s a major problem in the factory settings. Continue reading…​Country Music News – Taste of Country

Categories
Entertainment

Jennifer Aniston: Reconsidering Motherhood with Boyfriend Jim Curtis?

Reading Time: 3 minutes

It’s never too late, right?

For years, many did not know about Jennifer Aniston’s IVF struggles. Her fertility journey never paid off.

Historically, the beloved actress has shied away from adoption.

Apparently, her hypnotist boyfriend may be getting her to come around to the idea. Not through hypnosis, mind you.

Jennifer Aniston and boyfriend Jim Curtis.
Jim Curtis, Jennifer Aniston, Adam Sandler, and Jackie Sandler attend ELLE’s 2025 Women in Hollywood Celebration on November 17, 2025. (Photo Credit: Presley Ann/Getty Images for ELLE)

New relationship, new perspective on adoption?

According to a new report by RadarOnline, Aniston is again open to the idea of becoming a parent with boyfriend Jim Curtis.

“It was tough at first because Jim has always wanted another child,” an insider source alleged.

“And,” the insider acknowledged, “Jen’s spent years coming to terms with the fact that motherhood wasn’t in the cards for her.”

The source reported: “She genuinely had made peace with it.”

Once a person has gotten closure — with being childfree, with leaving an unwanted career, with a romantic breakup — even the suggestion of reconsidering can be painful.

The insider continued: “Now they have fallen so head over heels in love, they can’t help but talk about what it would be like to have a family together.”

According to the source: “Being with Jim has cracked something open, and made her come around to his suggestion of adopting.”

The insider claimed that “everyone is telling Jen she should do it.”

Allegedly, Aniston’s friends have been accurately telling her “that she’d be the most wonderful mom.”

The source continued: “And it’s not too late to experience motherhood for herself.”

Jennifer Aniston in September 2024.
Jennifer Aniston attends the Apple TV + Primetime Emmy Party at Mother Wolf on September 15, 2024. (Photo Credit: Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images)

Others in her life are reportedly being encouraging

“Jen has so many friends who have adopted kids,” the insider noted.

“And,” the source went on, “they’ve all told her it was the best choice they’ve ever made.”

Adoption can be controversial, with various adoptees speaking out about everything from abuse to a sense of alienation from cultural heritage to the phenomenon of white evangelicals adopting as part of a “culture war.”

It seems likely that someone growing up as Aniston’s child would be lucky enough to dodge most of those bullets.

Will she take the advice that she’s reportedly getting from loved ones?

“Jen is being cautious,” the inside source reported.

“And,” the insider went on, “says she’s not making any decisions just yet.”

According to the source: “It’s something she and Jim are openly discussing.”

The insider acknowledged that this is something “which is not a scenario anyone would have predicted a year ago.”

Well, it’s always smart to consider one’s options!

Jennifer Aniston in November 2025.
Actress Jennifer Aniston attends Elle 2025 Women in Hollywood celebration at the Four Seasons hotel in Beverly Hills, California on November 17, 2025. (Photo Credit: LISA O’CONNOR/AFP via Getty Images)

This is Aniston’s first major romance since her 2018 divorce

In case you missed our earlier reporting, Jim Curtis is Aniston’s boyfriend. They sparked romance rumors by vacationing together in July 2025.

Curtis is a hypnotist by trade. He once dated Bethenny Frankel.

He is already a parent — he has a teen son from a previous marriage.

We of course cannot verify any aspect of the couple’s alleged conversations about having a kid together.

That seems like a painful topic for Aniston, given her attempts in her 30s and 40s to become a parent. As always, we wish her the very best.

Jennifer Aniston: Reconsidering Motherhood with Boyfriend Jim Curtis? was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Music

Every Current Country Music Feud, Beef and Vendetta [UPDATED]

Which country stars are still beefing? We got it figured out (for now). Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs

Categories
Music

Every Current Country Music Feud, Beef and Vendetta [UPDATED]

Which country stars are still beefing? We got it figured out (for now). Continue reading…​Country Music News – Taste of Country

Categories
Food

The Old-School Italian Deli That’s Been An LA Staple For Over 70 Years

Los Angeles is a foodie mecca, with restaurants, cafes, and delis from cultures across the globe, but this one old-school Italian deli is a true staple.

​Food Republic – Restaurants, Reviews, Recipes, Cooking Tips

Categories
Featured Juneau News juneau Juneau Local Juneau Local Ketchikan Local News Feeds Sitka Local

Federal government may seek removal of individual Alaskans from state voter rolls

By: James Brooks, Alaska Beacon

Reject stickers await ballot envelopes Wednesday, June 15, 2022 at the Division 1 office of the Alaska Division of Elections in Juneau, Alaska during counting for Alaska’s special U.S. House primary election. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)


When the state of Alaska turned over a copy of the state’s voter rolls to the Department of Justice in December, it also signed an agreement that allows the DOJ to ask the state to put individual Alaskans on track for removal from the state’s voter list.

Officially labeled a “confidential memorandum of understanding,” the document was signed Dec. 19 by Carol Beecher, director of the Alaska Division of Elections, and U.S. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon.

Alaska is one of at least a dozen states that have signed similar documents, even as more states continue to fight the requests in court. 

In part, the document says “the Justice Department will securely notify you or your state of any voter list maintenance issues … i.e., that your state’s (list) only includes eligible voters.”

It goes on to state “that within forty-five (45) days of receiving that notice from the Justice Department of any issues … your state will clean its (list) by removing ineligible voters and resubmit the updated (list) to the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department” to confirm that the state is following federal law.

Alaska’s signed agreement was obtained by the Alaska Beacon on Tuesday via a public records request.

Beecher and Kelly Howell, chief of staff to Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom, said the agreement does not allow DOJ to purge voters — a term that means removing them from the voter roll altogether.

Instead, the DOJ’s picks, if any, would be placed on the state’s inactive voter list. Anyone on that list must provide ID and have their identity verified if they wish to vote.

People on the inactive list are also placed on the state’s path to removal, a process that takes four years according to a timeline set by federal and state law

The agreement says in part that it was “entered into at your state’s request,” but by email, Dahlstrom’s office said that isn’t correct and that the Department of Justice provided the agreement.

The lieutenant governor is in charge of Alaska’s elections, and in a cover letter dated Dec. 19, she said the memo was “entered at the request of the Department of Justice” and state law.

That law, Dahlstrom said, “allows the Division of Elections to share voters’ confidential information with a federal government agency, such as the Department of Justice, provided it uses ‘the information only for governmental purposes authorized under law.’”

If the Department of Justice were to seek faster removal of Alaskans from the voter rolls, it could violate that clause.

Responding to questions from the Beacon, the lieutenant governor’s chief of staff said the state has not received any notices from the Justice Department about problems with its voter list, that no “ineligible voters” have been removed and that the state isn’t aware of any times when Alaska’s rolls were used for “pre-litigation or litigation purposes,” as defined in the agreement.

Concerns about states’ rights being overridden

The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld the right of states to set the rules for local and state elections; changing voter rolls would represent a new expansion of powers by the Department of Justice.

Former Democratic state Sen. Tom Begich, posting about the issue on social media, said he is “outraged” by the agreement between the state and the federal government.

“That kind of federal interference threatens our constitutional right to run our own elections,” he said.

He later issued a statement calling on the Alaska Legislature to investigate the issue.

Dahlstrom, a Republican, is also a candidate for governor.

Writing in an opinion column published by the Juneau Independent on Friday, former Alaska Attorney General Bruce Botelho, a Democrat, said “it is alarming that the federal government has demanded” the copy of the voter roll with personally identifying information.

Nationally, at least 11 other states have signed agreements similar to the one signed by Alaska, according to federal court testimony in December over a lawsuit that challenged the state of California’s refusal to turn over its voter rolls to the federal government.

The text of Alaska’s agreement is almost identical to ones previously disclosed in court and by the American Civil Liberties Union in a lawsuit by the federal government against the state of Colorado.

“We will not comply with the Trump Department of Justice’s request for Coloradans’ sensitive voting information,” said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat, in December. “The DOJ can take a hike; it does not have a legal right to the information. Colorado will not help Donald Trump undermine our elections and hurt the American people.”

Nationally, the federal government has sued more than two dozen states, including Colorado, that refused to send voter rolls to the federal government.

Those states generally have provided copies of publicly available rolls, but the federal government is seeking more detailed information, including lists of personally identifying information that may include birth dates, driver’s license numbers and Social Security numbers in part or whole.

“The manner in which the Department of Justice has acted makes clear that what is at stake is not voter integrity, but voter privacy,” Botelho said.

The Justice Department has said that its requests are necessary to make sure that states are following federal laws that require them to regularly maintain their lists and keep noncitizens from voting.

The Department of Justice has been sharing the voter rolls with the Department of Homeland Security, searching for noncitizens.

As of this week, federal judges had ruled against the Department of Justice in lawsuits covering Oregon, California and Michigan. The department has not prevailed in any case so far.

In the Oregon ruling, published on Feb. 5, Judge Mustafa Kashubhai wrote that the federal government cannot be trusted about its true motives.

“When Plaintiff, in this case, conveys assurances that any private and sensitive data will remain private and used only for a declared and limited purpose, it must be thoroughly scrutinized and squared with its open and public statements to the contrary,” he wrote.

Alaska-specific implications may be broad

The national ACLU has opposed the federal government’s requests in general. When contacted Friday about the Alaska memo, the Alaska chapter of the organization said it did not have immediate comment and was still researching the issue.

The agreement between the state of Alaska and the Department of Justice could have broad consequences here. 

Days before signing the agreement, the Alaska Division of Elections disclosed that dozens of noncitizens had accidentally been registered to vote by the Alaska Department of Motor Vehicles.

Under guidelines imposed by the Trump administration, those noncitizens could be deported, because federal law strictly prohibits noncitizens from registering to vote, and appearing on a voter list prompts special review when someone is attempting to become a citizen.

The state has also criminally charged 11 American Samoa-born Alaska residents for voting in state elections. People born in American Samoa are American nationals, but not citizens, and thus are ineligible to vote.

When the Alaska Beacon reviewed Division of Elections files that were turned over to the Department of Justice last year, it found 70 people labeled as noncitizens who either voted or attempted to vote in the state between 2015 and 2025.

Those people were on the state’s inactive voter list, which was not provided to the Department of Justice.

In addition, the violent federal crackdown against noncitizens in Minnesota and other states has ensnared many American citizens, indicating that the federal action is resulting in many false positives or is targeting Americans regardless of citizenship. 

Correction: The initial version of this article incorrectly stated that the memo would allow the Department of Justice to direct the purge of individual voters. It only permits DOJ to identify Alaskans for eventual removal and does not immediately prevent them from voting.

Categories
Food

The Worst Fast Food Chocolate Milkshake Is Sold By A Struggling Chain

Many fast food restaurants offer milkshakes as a draw, but not all shakes are the same quality. This brand has the worst milkshake, and here’s why.

​Food Republic – Restaurants, Reviews, Recipes, Cooking Tips

Categories
Music

Jerry Kennedy, Legendary Guitarist + Producer, Dead at 85

The legendary guitarist and producer was responsible for some of country music’s all-time most iconic riffs. Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs