
Two people walk on the Tony Knowles Coastal Trail on Sept. 23, 2023, with the downtown Anchorage skyline and snowcapped peaks in the background. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)
Alaska media coverage of a highly touted and long anticipated “connector trail” in downtown Anchorage has produced a series of “feel good” stories that sing the praises of a project widely considered to be a dream come true—at least by its backers. Those include a high-powered coalition of local recreational trail advocates and elected officials at both the city and state levels.
In the words of Anchorage Park Foundation executive director Beth Nordlund, the new trail segment is “a big community accomplishment. . . . There’s really something to celebrate here.”
Articles in the Alaska Beacon, Anchorage Daily News, Alaska Public Media and Alaska’s News Source have focused on that celebration while extolling the connector’s significance.
About 1.3 miles long, this small trail segment will join the Tony Knowles Coastal Trail and Ship Creek Trail when finished in 2027, if all goes according to plan. Not only will the connector add a final piece to Anchorage’s popular 32-mile “Moose Loop,” it will also be an important piece of the much grander “Alaska Long Trail,” which is actually a network of multipurpose trails that when finally complete will stretch some 500 miles from Seward to Fairbanks and, along the way, pass through Anchorage. This “dream trail,” as Anchorage Mayor Suzanne LaFrance calls it, is expected to be a world-class pathway that rivals the famed Appalachian and Pacific Coast Trails.
All of this had the connector trail’s boosters in an excited frenzy at a ground-breaking ceremony in May. The media coverage reflected that.
But there’s a part of this story that no one in the media seems to have questioned: the price.
Connector-trail articles in local media put the price tag of this 1.3-mile segment at somewhere between $15.6 and $19 million.
YIKES was my first thought when seeing that cost estimate. Can that be true? More than $15 million for a bit more than one mile of trail? That kind of funding seems not only extravagant, but as one local letter-writer to the ADN noted, “From the outside, it appears completely fiscally irresponsible. Please help me to understand this.”
Like that letter writer, I would appreciate an explanation for what appears to be hugely excessive government spending, the majority of it state and federal funding according to media coverage, but some of it also local money.
So far, I have not seen or heard any such justification.
It is true that the connector-trail project will include a cultural “plaza” and public art installation dedicated to the Dena’ina Athabascan people who lived here long before the community of Anchorage was settled.
I’m all for that. But $15.6 million?
One reason this bothers me so much is that Anchorage has a world-class “backyard wilderness,” Chugach State Park, that is chronically underfunded and understaffed. The same Alaska Legislature that is so excited about the Alaska Long Trail has failed for decades to adequately fund the upkeep of trails and other facilities in Chugach State Park, nor has it provided enough money for a fully functioning staff.
This negligence is a long-running disgrace, as is the pittance of money annually appropriated to the entire Alaska State Parks system.
That Anchorage legislators—including some I normally support and admire—so loudly and proudly celebrate the Alaska Long Trail and its new connector trail while failing to give equal voice to Anchorage’s shamefully neglected backyard wilderness and other state parks is both maddening and disheartening to me.
Perhaps it’s simply one more example of our state’s unhealthy obsession with grandiose megaprojects, with the connector trail and its lavish funding being a symbol of that.
There’s also this to consider: millions of dollars will be spent on this short trail segment and its associated plaza, during a time when all sorts of social and cultural needs, including affordable housing, are being insufficiently addressed here in Anchorage.
No doubt some will argue that different “pots” of money are involved. I say that’s an excuse, not an explanation. Both locally and at a state level, our leaders need to reconsider their priorities.
But this Alaskan wants to know why we are spending $15.6 million for a small trail project, when there are so many other needs.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX.













