Categories
Politics

Jeff Bezos’ mixed bag for Mamdani

Amazon founder and billionaire Jeff Bezos endorsed a second homes tax for New York City.

BEZOS’ BLESSING: Mayor Zohran Mamdani found an unlikely supporter today for his push to raise taxes on rich property owners: Jeff Bezos, one of the wealthiest men in the world.

“The pied-à-terre tax is a fine thing for New York to do,” Bezos said in a wide-ranging interview this morning on CNBC.

The billionaire Amazon founder was referring to the new surcharge that the state — after prodding from Mamdani — is expected to levy on individuals who own secondary homes in the city worth more than $5 million. Bezos, who resides mainly in Miami, gave his thumbs up even though he owns multiple homes in the city — reportedly worth well over $5 million each — meaning he’s likely to be impacted by the new tax.

But Bezos, who ranks as the fourth richest man in the world, also had plenty of flack for the mayor and his democratic socialist philosophies.

On pied-à-terre, Bezos blasted Mamdani for releasing a social media video in which he stood outside billionaire hedge fund manager Ken Griffin’s Manhattan penthouse to tout the tax.

“To go stand in front of Ken Griffin’s house and act like he’s some kind of villain — Ken Griffin isn’t a villain,” Bezos said in the interview, which was shot inside his Florida space rocket manufacturing facility. “He hasn’t hurt anybody. He’s not hurting New York. In fact, quite the opposite. And so that piece of it isn’t right, and there was no reason to do that.”

Mamdani’s video stunt has triggered a sustained uproar from business leaders who say the video was in poor taste. They’ve also argued a pied-à-terre tax is flawed because it could drive the rich to sell their properties, depleting the local tax pool.

Griffin himself threatened to pull the plug on a $6 billion office development project in the city in response to Mamdani’s video. The mayor has since taken pains to meet with local business giants, like the chief executives of JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, though Griffin himself has so far rejected Mamdani’s entreaties for a sit-down.

While Bezos gave Mamdani an unexpected boost on the pied-à-terre front, the Amazon honcho’s gripes with the mayor went well beyond Griffin.

Mamdani has long favored raising income taxes on the rich — on both the state and federal level — arguing such hikes would create more revenue to fund services for the average person.

Bezos contends that’s nonsense and pointed to the fact that the city’s public school system spends about $44,000 on every student annually — a markedly higher sum than other major U.S. cities — with little to show for it in terms of educational outcomes.

“You could double the taxes I pay and it’s not going to help that teacher in Queens, I promise you,” said Bezos.

Instead, he said the focus should be on eliminating taxes altogether for low-income earners. “A nurse in Queens who makes $75,000 a year pays 12 — more than $12,000 a year in taxes. Does that really make sense?” he said. “So, people talk about making the tax system more progressive. How about we start by having the nurse in Queens not pay taxes?”

CNBC anchor Andrew Ross Sorkin pressed Bezos on whether billionaires like himself would need to pay more in income taxes if nurses and teachers are given a pass on their bills, given there might otherwise be a revenue shortfall. Bezos replied that is “certainly a perfectly valid policy debate.”

A spokesperson for Mamdani would not comment on Bezos’ support for the pied-à-terre tax. But responding to a CNBC clip of Bezos criticizing higher taxes on the wealthy, Mamdani wrote on X: “I know a few teachers in Queens who would beg to differ.”

Queens holds a special place in Bezos’ mind. In 2019, Amazon canceled plans to build a massive headquarters in Long Island City after progressives such as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and former Mayor Bill de Blasio fought against awarding the mega-corporation $3 billion in public subsidies for the project.

Indeed, Bezos kept coming back to Queens in his CNBC hit, even while talking about what a great career choice he believes Amazon is for working class Americans.

“Amazon, we have our entry level wage for, in Queens, is $23 an hour,” he said. “That works out to be like $52,000 a year, and this is an entry level job that doesn’t require any educational attainment. It doesn’t require any preexisting skills. We will train you. It’s actually a great first job.” Chris Sommerfeldt 

From the Capitol

State lawmakers are set to give Mayor Zohran Mamdani the authority to dissolve a commission launched by his predecessor.

ZOMBIE FIGHT: State lawmakers are expected to grant Mamdani the power to dissolve a Charter Revision Commission launched by his predecessor, providing him with a clear path to kill the controversial panel.

The new authority, set to be approved in a budget bill scheduled for a Thursday vote, will give Mamdani until June 1 to either approve or rescind the commission’s creation by former Mayor Eric Adams, two people familiar with the deal said.

The people, who were granted anonymity to discuss details of the yet-to-be released legislation, said Mamdani asked state officials to insert the language into the tax-and-spending plan. They also said Mamdani — who has for months sought a way to kill the Adams commission — is expected to use the authority to disband the panel once and for all.

Kayla Mamelak, Adams’ former press secretary who’s among several aides and political loyalists he appointed to the commission, told POLITICO on Wednesday that no one from the panel received a heads up from state lawmakers or the mayor’s administration about the new legislation.

Read more from POLITICO Pro’s Nick Reisman and Chris Sommerfeldt.

LANDFILL LATTE: A plastic cup tossed into the recycling bin at a Starbucks in Park Slope traveled 463 miles to its final resting place at Apex Landfill in Amsterdam, Ohio.

The cup’s long and winding road from eco-minded, brownstone Brooklyn to a tiny Ohio village underscores how little consumer plastic ends up getting recycled — even through a corporation that touts its sustainability cred.

The journey was tracked by Beyond Plastics, which released a report today documenting how it attached trackers to plastic cups in Starbucks recycling bins to see where they ended up. Not a single cup ended up at a recycling facility.

“When a company tells you something is being recycled and it isn’t, it doesn’t just mislead the customer, it also takes the pressure off for real solutions, which is using less plastic in the first place,” Judith Enck, president of Beyond Plastics, told reporters Wednesday.

The group, a non-profit that advocates for ending plastic pollution, is lobbying for the Packaging Reduction and Recycling Infrastructure Act to pass in Albany this session. The bill is aimed at reducing single-use packaging in New York and is sponsored by Assemblymember Deborah Glick and state Sen. Pete Harckham, both Democrats.

The cups in question are made of polypropylene, or No. 5 plastic. And while they are indeed recyclable, Beyond Plastics could only find a handful of commercial recycling operators in the country that claim to recycle post-consumer polypropylene.

Starbucks is already using fiber to-go cups in hundreds of its outposts across 14 states. The report calls on the coffee chain to use those cups nationwide. Starbucks pushed back on the report.

“Our cups are designed to be recyclable, and the ‘widely accepted for recycling’ designation reflects that,” Emily Albright, a spokesperson for Starbucks, said in a statement. “Obviously, recycling in practice also requires local community infrastructure. That’s why we work closely with others, including the recycling companies, to help expand access and help improve the system.” Mona Zhang

FROM CITY HALL

Council member Julie Won is running in the Democratic primary to succeed retiring Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez.

EYES ON AI: Council member Julie Won is rolling out legislation that would establish an artificial intelligence oversight office in the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection.

The director of the office would be responsible for investigating “allegations of the use of artificial intelligence in violation of the consumer laws” and for implementing an “outreach and education campaign to raise public awareness regarding the use of artificial intelligence to harm the rights, safety, or interests of consumers.”

The Council has long attempted to regulate AI.

Won is running for Congress in the competitive Democratic primary to succeed retiring Rep. Nydia Velázquez. As part of her campaign, she’s put out a technology policy platform focused heavily on AI and using the technology “responsibly.”

“We have to change the public sentiment from being so afraid of becoming obsolete to making sure there’s protections so that people don’t become obsolete,” Won said in a recent interview.

The debate over the path forward for AI has reshaped elections across the country — especially in the Democratic primary for retiring Rep. Jerry Nadler’s seat, where millions of dollars have poured in from groups on both sides of the regulation conversation.

There’s no indication, though, that those entities are planning to get involved in this race, where Won is up against Brooklyn Borough President Antonio Reynoso and Assemblymember Claire Valdez. Madison Fernandez

BUFFERING, PLEASE HOLD: City Council Speaker Julie Menin is planning to introduce a revised version of the “buffer zone” protest bill for educational facilities, scaling back the proposal after Mamdani vetoed the original measure in late April.

The new legislation narrows the definition of educational facilities to early childhood sites and most K-12 schools, explicitly excluding libraries, teaching hospitals and — notably — colleges and universities.

The bill, similar to the buffer zone protest bill for religious institutions, would require the NYPD to create and publicize security perimeter plans around those schools during protests. Both measures have undergone significant revisions compared to earlier versions, which initially proposed 100-foot buffer zones between protestors and the sites in question.

The changes mark a significant concession from Menin on the bill’s core scope, as she moves to address member concerns rather than attempt an override — despite saying she had the votes to do so.

“We have the ability to do an override, but to jam through an override on an issue where even members who were going to support the override had real concerns — I don’t think that’s a responsible path forward,” the speaker said. “It’s my job as speaker to build consensus.”

Changes to the school-focused bill also include replacing its original prime sponsor, Council member Eric Dinowitz, with Council member Elsie Encarnacion. Under the new version, Dinowitz will appear as second co-prime sponsor.

Menin pushed back on criticism that the revisions weaken the legislation.

“I don’t view it as a watering down. I actually view it as a strengthening,” Menin said. “It means we’re going to get more members involved in supporting this bill.”

The original proposal — part of the Council’s five-point plan to combat antisemitism — was driven in part by concerns over campus protests tied to Israel’s war in Gaza. Mamdani vetoed it in April, citing constitutional concerns and the bill’s broad definition of educational institutions, which he argued could have applied to libraries, museums and hospitals.

“The Mamdani administration has not seen the specific legislative language, and we look forward to reviewing it,” a spokesperson for the mayor said. “The Mayor believes New York City must remain a place where students can access their schools safely as well as exercise their constitutional right to protest.” Gelila Negesse

IN OTHER NEWS

CHECKERS, NOT CHESS: OpenAI is pivoting to a state-by-state lobbying strategy to shape AI regulation, aiming to build momentum as federal efforts stall. (POLITICO)

CASE NOT CLOSED: Citizens Union, a government watchdog group, is urging the Manhattan district attorney to pursue state charges against Eric Adams despite the Trump administration dropping a federal case against him. (The New York Times)

NO PLAYING AROUND: New York health officials say they are closely monitoring an Ebola outbreak in the Congo as international travel ramps up ahead of the World Cup. (Gothamist)

Missed this morning’s New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.

​Politics

Categories
Entertainment

Ray Romano Still Earns 5 Figures a Year From Sitcom Reruns; Here’s Exactly How Much …

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Last month, we learned that Lisa Kudrow earns $20 million a year from Friends residuals.

And it turns out she’s not the only sitcom star who’s still raking in five figures from work she did decades ago.

According to new reports from various outlets, Ray Romano is earning an eye-popping $18 million per year in residuals from Everybody Loves Raymond residuals, more than twenty years after the series wrapped its final episode.

Ray Romano attends Netflix's "No Good Deed" Screening & Conversation at 92NY on December 11, 2024 in New York City.
Ray Romano attends Netflix’s “No Good Deed” Screening & Conversation at 92NY on December 11, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images)

Romano continues to rake in tens of millions annually thanks to syndication and streaming for Raymond, which ended its original run back in 2005 but remains widely available on platforms such as Paramount+ and Peacock.

Not a bad deal if you can get it!

Raymond premiered in 1996 and quickly became one of television’s defining family sitcoms.

The series starred Romano as Ray Barone, a sportswriter navigating suburban life on Long Island while constantly clashing with his overbearing family.

Over the course of nine seasons, the show became a massive ratings success, ultimately earning 15 Emmy wins out of 69 nominations before coming to an end in 2005.

And the titular star was compensated accordingly.

By the show’s ninth and final season, Romano was reportedly earning nearly $2 million per episode, cementing his status as one of television’s highest-paid actors at the time.

As of 2026, Romano’s net worth reportedly sits around $200 million.

While he later appeared in projects such as the Ice Age franchise and NBC’s Parenthood, much of his long-term wealth appears to stem from one very lucrative source: those juicy Raymond royalty checks.

Of course, Romano’s enormous salary once sparked major behind-the-scenes tension on set.

Back in 2003, reports surfaced that Romano was earning approximately $1.8 million per week under a reported $40 million contract during the sitcom’s eighth season.

That revelation reportedly did not sit well with co-star Brad Garrett, who played Ray’s older brother, Robert Barone.

According to TV Insider, Garrett pushed for a salary increase after learning not only how much Romano was making, but also that Romano’s contract included royalties from reruns of older episodes.

At the time, Garrett was said to be earning roughly $160,000 per episode.

According to insiders, Garrett refused to return to work until CBS renegotiated his deal. His character was temporarily removed from the season premiere and allegedly faced the possibility of being written out entirely.

Co-stars Patricia Heaton, Doris Roberts and Peter Boyle reportedly backed Garrett during the standoff, even calling in sick in solidarity.

“Ray deserves every penny, all Brad wants is compensation commensurate with what other similarly situated actors have made in the past and are making today,” Garrett’s representative said at the time.

Ultimately, CBS negotiated with the cast, and Garrett reportedly saw his pay increase to $250,000 per episode for Season 8 and $315,000 per episode for Season 9.

As for Romano? He didn’t seem to harbor any resentment.

“When my salary came out in the papers, I knew stuff would happen,” Romano said at the time. “I’d do exactly the same thing.”

Despite the massive paychecks, Ray says he has no interest in a revival series and intends to “leave our legacy the way it is.” We guess you can afford to feel that way when you’re raking in $20 million annually!

Ray Romano Still Earns 5 Figures a Year From Sitcom Reruns; Here’s Exactly How Much … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Music

Ella Langley Reveals Growing Bucket List of Career Dreams: ‘SNL’ Appearances, Selling Out Stadiums, and More

Ella Langley has quickly become one of the fastest rising forces in country music and between her chart success and major award wins, it’s clear she isn’t slowing down anytime soon. In fact, she seems to have a constantly growing bucket list that keeps getting bigger and bigger as her career continues to soar.

Just after dropping her latest album, Dandelion, Billboard released an interview with the Woman In Music Powerhouse Award recipient, where she reveals some of her future career goals.

Photo Courtesy of Ella Langley
Photo Courtesy of Ella Langley

First on the list is to be a musical guest on SNL (Saturday Night Live) before eventually taking it a step further and hosting the show one day. The live sketch comedy and variety show that airs weekly on NBC has become known for having major celebrities guest star as hosts, make surprise cameos and even host, making it a highly sought after gig.

Numerous country music stars have appeared on the show over the years, from Luke Combs to Blake Shelton, Garth Brooks, Morgan Wallen, Dolly Parton and so many more. It’s safe to say Langley has a good shot at making her own cameo on SNL one day. But only time will tell.

If Langley were to land the rare opportunity of appearing in a skit, that could put her one step closer to crossing off another goal of getting into acting in the near future. Once again, the cross over between being a country singer and getting behind a camera is pretty common. Especially with western shows like Yellowstone, 1883, Marshals and more, which have featured a variety of singer/songwriters from the genre like Lainey Wilson, Riley Green, Tim McGraw and more.

“I’d love to start doing that in the next year.”

Another item on Langley’s list is selling out stadiums as a headliner. And not just one—she clarified that she wants to do it at “more than one” of the massive venues.

“That’s always been my goal. People in the beginning always used to ask me, ‘how far you want to take this thing?’ I guess as far as it lets me go and to me that’s a stadium. So that’s my big one,” she noted.

In terms of shows, Langley admits there are “so many” venues that she still has yet to cross off her bucket list including the iconic Red Rocks Amphitheatre.

 “I want to headline Red Rocks. I’ve opened Red Rocks, but I’ve never headlined Red Rocks.”

Ella Langley; Photo by Andrew Wendowski
Ella Langley; Photo by Andrew Wendowski

Her live shows could also be adding an extra member to the band in the future that would elevate the performance level even more. Langley says she hopes to “have a saxophone in my band.”

These are just a few of the many aspirations that the “Lovin’ Life Again” singer dreams up on a daily basis.

“I could keep going on my goals. I really think of plenty more every day. At this point I’m just going to start reaching for the stars, literally,” she added.

Over the weekend, Langley crossed off some major milestones at the ACM Awards. She walked away the most-awarded artist of the night with seven trophies, and a win in every category she was nominated in.

As she continues to collect these major awards, break records, and check off more milestones, she says she’s most excited to see how fans embrace this new chapter of her career and everything still to come.

The post Ella Langley Reveals Growing Bucket List of Career Dreams: ‘SNL’ Appearances, Selling Out Stadiums, and More appeared first on Country Now.

​Country Now

Categories
Music

Everything We Know About Cody Johnson’s Next Album, ‘Banks Of The Trinity’

Cody Johnson, aka the newest ACM Entertainer of the Year, is just a little over a month away from releasing his next album, Banks Of The Trinity. The project is set to offer a glimpse into the Texas native’s upbringing, star-studded collaborations, and deeply personal storytelling. Before it officially drops, we’ve rounded up all the details that’ve been revealed so far so fans know what to expect.

Banks Of The Trinity Release Date

Starting with the most important piece of information, the collection will be arriving June 26, 2026. When Johnson first announced the album, he unveiled the title and the cover art, both which we now know holds sentimental value to his personal journey.

Photo Courtesy of Cody Johnson
Photo Courtesy of Cody Johnson

The Title, ‘Banks of The Trinity,’ Represents A Piece Of His Childhood in Texas

He wrote, “When I heard the song “Banks Of The Trinity” for the first time, it was like a portrait flashed in my head of memories I thought I’d forgotten. It took me straight back home to Sebastopol, Texas, where I grew up on the river.”

The country star also tells Billboard that he has often heard a common misconception about himself that he “grew up working on a ranch and had horses and cows.” However, he sets the record straight saying that is not true. His parents worked “very hard” but he says they were not rich and when things got tight, they would often go down to the Trinity River to go fishing.

“When the white bass were running, we’d get pulled out of school to go catch as many white bass as we could to keep meat in the freezer.”

On that same river was the first bar that he ever snuck out to go play at age 15.

Cody Johnson - Banks Of The Trinity
Cody Johnson – Banks Of The Trinity

The album’s cover art also reflects Johnson’s childhood and hometown roots. It features an old photo of Lawrence’s Grocery Store, a place that as a kid, Johnson would ride his bike two miles down an old dirt road to just to get a cream soda and a Blue Bell ice cream bar. He would enjoy his time there, listening to conversations before heading back home with groceries.

“The man that owned the store, Hootie Lawrence — his name was Harold, but everybody called him Hootie — I wound up working two summers for him, working cows and baling hay,” Johnson told Billboard. “He taught me a lot about just being a good human being. It gives me a chance to honor what I learned there. The cover is different from anything I’ve ever done. It looks like an old Polaroid taped to the album. His son had a photo [of the store]. We had it digitized, and color corrected to match the rest of the artwork. We went out and did a photo shoot on the river and literally just went fishing for a day.”

Across the 16 Tracks, There are Two Collaborations

Once the full 16-track list for Banks Of The Trinity was revealed, fans learned that there were two very familiar names featured on songs written by Cody Johnson: Brothers Osborne and Luke Combs. The duo appears on “Fool Proof,” out now, which the “Dirt Cheap” singer says “screamed Brothers Osborne.”

“There’s not a Brothers Osborne song out there that I don’t like. I’m a huge fan, and they’re both really great guys, and I wanted them on it. So I told my band in the studio, ‘Listen, I don’t know if they’re going to be on it or not, but I really want to make this Brothers Osborne-esque.’ And then we finally heard back that they had time to do it. It was the icing on the cake for that tune.”

Combs’ feature on “Shoot The Bull” has yet to be released, but it is another very anticipated track on the project. So far, Johnson has only released three songs in advance of the full-length album: “Fool Proof,” “Hello Lonesome” and “I Want You.”

Another standout track that will arrive next month is “Bible For A Boy,” a song dedicated to Johnson’s youngest born child and only son, Jaycee Daniel born in October.

The Album Was Supposed To Arrive Sooner

Johnson revealed that his next album was originally set to drop sooner, but after taking three months off to recover from bursting his eardrum and having to undergo emergency surgery last fall, the release date was pushed. It turns out it all turned out for the best because during that time of recovery, the multi-platinum-selling artist found “some of the best songs on the album.”

Banks Of The Trinity Track Listing:

1.   Horseback

Written by Randy Montana, Wyatt McCubbin, Paul Sikes

2.   Hello Lonesome

Written by Jimmy Yeary, Seth Mosley, Matt Rogers

3.   Fool Proof (featuring Brothers Osborne)

Written by Jeff Hyde, Jason Scott, Jared Conrad

4.   Take Me Back (Leave Me There)

Written by Kelly Archer, Troy Cartwright, Pete Good

5.   Banks of the Trinity

Written by Rodney Clawson, Chris Tompkins, Josh Kear

6.   I Want You

Written by Tom Douglas, Tony Lane, Matt Rogers

7.   I Have

Written by Matt Schuster, Devin Dawson, Adam Yaron

8.   Bible For A Boy (For Jaycee)

Written by Lydia Vaughn, Beau Bailey, Josh Phillips, Joe Fox, Andrew Stoelzing

9.   Kissing A Married Woman

Written by Beau Bailey, Josh Phillips, Brock Berryhill, Cole Miracle

10. Every Man

Written by Travis Meadows, Gordie Sampson, Drew Kennedy

11. Motel Miss You

Written by Ryan Larkins, Seth Mosley, Emma-Lee

12. Shoot The Bull (featuring Luke Combs)

Written by Ray Fulcher, Casey Brown, Josh Phillips, Drew Parker

13. Cricket On A Hook

Written by Josh Phillips, Mark Holman, Jeremy Stover

14. Time Bomb

Written by Cody Johnson, Trent Willmon, Noe Quantanilla, Codrick Murphy

15. Thank Somebody Country

Written by Jordan Schmidt, Chase McGill, Trannie Anderson, Michael Hardy

16. Yippy Ty Oh Hey Hey

Written by Cody Johnson

Banks Of The Trinity will follow four highly successful studio albums from Cody Johnson, including Ain’t Nothin’ To It, Human The Double Album, and Leather, which won the 2024 CMA Album Of The Year, as well as Leather Deluxe.

He recently snagged wins for Male Artist of the Year and Entertainer of the Year at the 2026 ACM Awards on Sunday, May 17 in Las Vegas. Next up, he will return to the road on May 29 to continue his 2026 headlining tour.

The post Everything We Know About Cody Johnson’s Next Album, ‘Banks Of The Trinity’ appeared first on Country Now.

​Country Now

Categories
Music

Blake Shelton Opens Up About Powerful New Single ‘Let Him In Anyway’ and Emotional Fan Reactions [Exclusive]

Blake Shelton has had plenty of impactful songs throughout his career. With 31 No. 1 singles under his belt, he has certainly proven he knows a hit song when he hears one and his latest single, “Let Him In Anyway,” is no different. It’s a song that immediately stopped him in his tracks, and he knew it was something he wanted to record.

During an exclusive interview with Country Now backstage at the ACM Awards in Las Vegas, Shelton reflected on hearing the song for the first time, explained the early crowd reaction, and shared insight into filming the recently released music video.

A Song That Stopped Him in His Tracks

“Let Him In Anyway” was written by Zach Abend, Kyle Clark, Michael Hardy and Carson Wallace. Shelton recalls hearing the demo and instantly knowing this song hit differently.

Blake Shelton; Photo Provided
Blake Shelton; Photo Provided

“I Was Just Blown Away”: The First Time He Heard ‘Let Him In Anyway’

“The first time I heard the song… Katie at my record label sent it over to me and I was just blown away by it. At one point I thought, ‘She’s sending me this song, can I cut this or is this like the next big artist they’re about to release?’ And I was like, ‘But that sounds like HARDY on that demo.’ And it turns out obviously it was,” he explained.

The Oklahoma native recalled feeling “floored” by the message of the deeply emotional song, which explores grief, keeping faith, and the hope for mercy after losing someone you love. In the song, the narrator sends a plea to God, asking to let his friend into heaven anyway, despite an imperfect life.

As Shelton points out, the song says something that hasn’t been said, especially in this way, before.

Blake Shelton; Photo by Jamie Wendt
Blake Shelton; Photo by Jamie Wendt

“I love to be able to record a song that’s kind of an area, a subject that I haven’t covered yet. I mean, when you’ve been doing this a hundred years like I have, it’s hard to find something you haven’t said before and so this is definitely something that hasn’t been said. I don’t know that it’s ever been said in any song that I’ve ever heard before.”

Early Live Performances Spark Emotional Crowd Reactions

“Let Him In Anyway” is featured on Shelton’s latest album, For Recreational Use Only. While it is steadily climbing the charts at country radio, Shelton has already begun performing it live during his shows and admits the audience reaction has reminded him of the emotional response to his 2002 hit “The Baby.”

“The reaction in the show is exciting right now because for the most part, people at the show still haven’t heard it yet. It’s still pretty much a baby song and so you get to really see people’s first initial reaction to it and it’s fun to see these guys that are kind of these stoic dudes sitting by their wives that are bored, unaffected. ‘Why did you drag me to this show?’ By the end of the song they were crying and like looking at the ground, having to get up and walk around for a minute and that’s when you know man, we’ve got something important here because even those guys can’t pretend like they don’t care.”

Blake Shelton; Photo by Jamie Wendt
Blake Shelton; Photo by Jamie Wendt

This also marks one of the first times Shelton has openly sung about faith in this way, something he approached with his trademark humor.

“Well, I’m getting older and I’m going to die soon so I mean you better start figuring this stuff out. Might as well put it in my songs. It’s time to start getting right!”

Music Video Filmed in a Stunning Church Near Pasadena, California

Shelton paired “Let Him In Anyway” with a music video filmed in a beautiful church setting near Pasadena, California. In the visual, sunlight pours through stained glass windows while dimly lit lanterns hang above, as Shelton appears seated in the pews and also shown in the center of the church with a guitar in hand. 

While he admits music videos are no longer his favorite part of the process, he says this one stands out as something special.

“Anytime you see me in a video and you think, man, he’s really into it or whatever, I hate filming videos. I mean, I just do not enjoy the process anymore. It used to be like super exciting like ‘I’m going to make a music video!’ Now I’m like, ‘Do we really need to do a video?’

“It’s a beautiful church though, really. On a serious note, it was absolutely beautiful and it was a neat moment,” he continued. “I mean, when I walked in there, I did have that attitude of, ‘Oh my God, music video.’ And then I walked in and they had the lights coming through the stained glass and it felt like I was walking into a dream or something. It was really neat in there.”

Fans can catch Shelton performing “Let Him In Anyway” and plenty of his 30 No. 1 hits in Las Vegas on the remaining dates of his Live in Las Vegas residency at The Colosseum at Caesars Palace. He’s also scheduled to perform at CMA Fest in early June.

The post Blake Shelton Opens Up About Powerful New Single ‘Let Him In Anyway’ and Emotional Fan Reactions [Exclusive] appeared first on Country Now.

​Country Now

Categories
Music

Sadie Robertson’s Daughter’s Health Problems Revealed

After two choking episodes, Sadie Robertson Huff’s infant daughter Kit was diagnosed with a serious medical condition that required surgery. Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs

Categories
Music

Sadie Robertson’s Daughter’s Health Problems Revealed

After two choking episodes, Sadie Robertson Huff’s infant daughter Kit was diagnosed with a serious medical condition that required surgery. Continue reading…​Country Music News – Taste of Country

Categories
Sports Fox

Steelers QB Aaron Rodgers To Retire At End Of 2026 Season: ‘This Is It’

The end of Aaron Rodgers’ career finally has a date. After signing a one-year deal to rejoin the Pittsburgh Steelers on May 18, Rodgers revealed to reporters that the 2026 season will officially be his last in the NFL. “This is it,” Rodgers said on Wednesday. Rodgers, 42, made the decision after contemplating retirement this offseason. In fact, Rodgers admitted that he thought he was going to retire when Mike Tomlin stepped down as Steelers head coach this offseason. But his mind changed when the Steelers hired Mike McCarthy, who was his head coach for 13 seasons with the Green Bay Packers. “I thought that was probably it for me in Pittsburgh,” Rodgers told reporters. “But when the decision was made to hire Mike [McCarthy], I started opening my mind back up to coming back.” Rodgers and McCarthy achieved good success together in Green Bay, winning Super Bowl XLV over Pittsburgh in the 2010 season. Together, they recorded 107 wins and made nine playoff appearances. Under McCarthy’s system, Rodgers became one of the most efficient quarterbacks in NFL history. He won two of his four NFL MVP awards in 2011 and 2014 while leading Green Bay’s offense at an elite level. “It is like a [bunch of] ‘pinch me’ moments that have happened in the last few days,” Rodgers said following the Steelers’ second day of organized team activities. Rodgers already owns a Hall of Fame résumé and is widely expected to become a first-ballot inductee. He needed only 144 games to reach 300 career passing touchdowns and 193 games to hit 400, breaking records previously held by Peyton Manning and Dan Marino. He also shares the highest career passer rating in NFL history among qualified quarterbacks at 102.2. Rodgers’ 2011 season remains one of the greatest by a quarterback, as he posted a record-setting 122.5 passer rating. Rodgers is coming off a strong season in Pittsburgh, completing 65.7% of his passes for 3,322 yards, 24 touchdowns, and seven interceptions while helping lead the Steelers to an AFC North title. If he hopes to end his career with another championship run, the path through the AFC remains as difficult as ever. As for what to expect for this season, our Ralph Vacchiano predicted that the Steelers would go 8-9 in 2026 following Thursday’s schedule release. Vacchiano added that he believes that the “Steelers’ season is riding on the old shoulders of Aaron Rodgers.” “Whoever their quarterback is will immediately have a tougher challenge if Lamar Jackson and Joe Burrow can stay healthy, making the AFC North games much more of a minefield,” Vacchiano wrote. “The Steelers also have to go on the road to New England and Philadelphia, and even their trip to Jacksonville won’t be easy. Playing the NFC South and AFC South gives them plenty of soft spots in the schedule. But finishing first last season gave them their division’s toughest schedule. Given their fragile state, stuck between contending and rebuilding, that’s not much of a prize.” Vacchiano also had the Steelers drop to No. 25 in his most recent power rankings after the schedule announcement. “Seven of their last nine games are against teams projected to win 9-11 games. Aaron Rodgers’ 42-year-old body should be aching pretty good by then,” Vacchiano wrote. But the stage is now set for one final chapter in Pittsburgh under a familiar coach. When the clock finally hits triple zeros on No. 12’s career, one of the greatest careers for a quarterback in NFL history will come to an end.​Latest Sports News from FOX Sports

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska Legislature approves public opt-in retirement plans for businesses statewide

The Alaska State Capitol is seen on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Claire Stremple/Alaska Beacon)

The Alaska State Capitol is seen on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Claire Stremple/Alaska Beacon)

The state of Alaska may soon offer managed retirement accounts to businesses in the state that don’t already offer a retirement plan. 

By a 31-9 vote on Monday, the Alaska House of Representatives approved Senate Bill 21, the “Alaska Work and Save” program sponsored by Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage. 

The Senate, which approved a prior version of the bill in April, gave its final approval to the House-passed version by a 17-3 vote on Tuesday.

If enacted by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, SB 21 would require the Alaska Department of Revenue to create and administer an automatic individual retirement account program with open enrollment.

Under the program, eligible workers would have 5% of their paychecks automatically deducted and deposited into an investment account.

“Currently, 64% of businesses do not offer a retirement option for their employees, and this is a great way to retain and recruit workers,” said Rep. Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, who sponsored the bill in the House.

Costello said the ultimate goal is for Alaska to join a partnership with one or more other states that offer similar programs like Colorado’s SecureSavings program. Sixteen other states already have those programs, she said.

Alaska’s program would allow participants to also shift some of their Permanent Fund dividend into a retirement savings account. 

The Department of Revenue estimated that the state would need to spend about $660,000 to set up the program in its first year and approximately $360,000 annually, which the state would pay for with fees collected from participants statewide.

Categories
Uncategorized

When a president settles his own lawsuit to create a fund for allies, fundamental questions about justice arise

A banner featuring President Trump on the outside of the DOJ building in Washington, D.C. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Thomas Hobbes took a very dim view of rebels and insurrectionists. He believed that insurrectionists relinquish their status as citizens the moment they seek to overthrow the government and should never be rewarded for doing so.

Hobbes, one of the finest political theorists of his time, said this in his great political treatise, “Leviathan,” published in 1651 during a civil war in England and Scotland.

Hobbes would likely also take a dim view of a major development announced by the Trump administration on May 20, 2026.

The U.S. Department of Justice has established a US$1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” to be used, the AP reports, to “allow people who believe they were targeted for prosecution for political purposes, including by the Biden administration Justice Department, to apply for payouts.”

The fund, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said, offers “a lawful process for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress.”

Critics immediately charged that it might be used to compensate people involved in – some even convicted for – the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Blanche has not ruled out that possibility.

The establishment of the fund is part of a settlement agreement, in response to which President Donald Trump dropped his $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service for damages stemming from the leak of his tax returns. Those leaks, the lawsuit alleged, “caused Plaintiffs reputational and financial harm, public embarrassment, unfairly tarnished their business reputations, portrayed them in a false light, and negatively affected President Trump.”

A DOJ press release indicates the fund will provide “formal apologies and monetary relief” to those who file claims and will cease processing claims “no later than” Dec. 1, 2028. It will be run by a five-person board appointed by the attorney general, and the president will also have the power to remove board members.

Whether or not Jan. 6 participants benefit, some believe that this situation creates an unavoidable appearance of self-dealing and favoritism. As a student of American law and political morality, I think there are important moral and constitutional issues implicated by the president’s suit against the IRS and the creation of the Anti-Weaponization Fund.

Some of them are straightforward; others are less so.

A man talking at a table behind a name plate, gesturing with his fingers.
Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche testified about the compensation fund during a Senate Committee on May 19, 2026, in Washington, D.C.
Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

A judge in their own cause

An obvious question is: Should taxpayer funds be given to Trump allies, in a settlement reached by the Trump-controlled DOJ as compensation for a Trump family lawsuit?

As far back as ancient Greece, philosophers like Aristotle have worried about what happens when people are called on to make judgments in cases where they are involved. Aristotle thought that the natural instinct for self-preservation meant that they would always favor themselves.

From that concern emerged what was then, and remains, an uncontroversial, bedrock moral principle.

In the Roman world, the Latin phrase “Nemo iudex in causa sua” meant “no one should be a judge in their own cause.” It recognized that anyone having a personal interest should not get to decide matters in which they are involved.

In the Englsh-speaking world, Hobbes himself reiterated that phrase as he explained some of the advantages of living in an organized society, which could supply impartial judges to resolve disputes. And in 1787, James Madison wrote, “No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause, because his interest would certainly bias his judgment, and, not improbably, corrupt his integrity.”

Commentators reacting to the Justice Department’s decision to establish an Anti-Weaponization Fund to settle the president’s claims against the IRS have drawn on these longstanding principles to criticize it, including how the DOJ, which is part of the executive branch controlled by Trump, negotiated with him to reach this settlement.

The conservative lawyer and activist Ed Whelan said, “There is a glaring conflict of interest with Trump being on both sides of the claim.” Whelan added, “It is outrageous that he and those answering to him would be deciding how the government responds to these extravagant claims.”

In testimony on May 19, 2026, before the Senate Appropriations Committee, Blanche offered a different view. He said the settlement fund was not unprecedented and likened it to a different fund, established by the Obama administration, to settle discrimination claims brought by Native American and Black farmers.

“It’s not limited to Republicans. It’s not limited to Democrats,” Blanche added. “It’s not limited to January 6th defendants. It’s limited only by the term weaponization.” Blanche promised that payments from the fund will be publicly disclosed.

Negotiating with himself

In April, Kathleen Williams, the Florida federal judge who was presiding over Trump’s lawsuit, reframed the moral issue of self-dealing as a legal one. She questioned whether the case could go on, noting “President Trump’s own remarks about this matter acknowledge the unique dynamic of this litigation.”

The remarks she referenced occurred when the president talked about the lawsuit and the prospect of negotiating with himself. “And they do say that, you know, it’s never been a case like this. Donald Trump sues the United States of America. Donald Trump becomes president, and now Donald Trump has to settle the suit.”

Williams, the judge, wrote that “it is unclear to this Court whether the Parties are sufficiently adverse to each other so as to satisfy Article III’s case or controversy requirement.” That requirement means that a court can only rule when there is a real dispute before it.

That rule is designed to prevent so-called collusive lawsuits, in which “the parties are not actually in disagreement but are cooperating” to achieve a result. Judge Williams was scheduled to hear arguments on that question on May 20, 2026. But the settlement announcement was made two days before, and, in light of it, she dismissed the case.

Back to Hobbes

Beyond the case and controversy question, the Justice Department’s actions may implicate constitutional issues.

One is whether, under the constitutional separation of powers, the executive branch has the authority to create a victim compensation fund, or whether that authority rests with Congress.

Another is whether the fund violates the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which prohibits the president from receiving any “Emolument from the United States” other than his salary.

While the new fund may not make direct payments to Trump, he may benefit from payments to family members, business associates and others who will claim to have been victimized by the Biden administration, including people prosecuted and convicted of crimes committed on Jan. 6.

Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin, a former professor of constitutional law, also contends that what the Justice Department has done violates Section 4 of the 14th Amendment, part of which states: “neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States.”

Referring to the president, Raskin argues hypothetically, “So, to the extent that he wants to give a million dollars to each of 1,600 pardoned rioters and insurrectionists, we think that that’s an unconstitutional use of money.”

That section of the 14th Amendment was designed to ensure that Confederate rebels would not receive compensation for the value of their emancipated slaves. However, in Perry v. United States, a 1935 case, the Supreme Court stated that Section 4’s “language indicates a broader connotation” beyond its Civil War context.

It seems clear that courts will soon be asked to decide whether Raskin and other legal critics are right in their assertions of a host of legal problems with the Anti-Weaponization Fund. How they will do so remains to be seen.

But, in a democracy, deciding whether the creation of the fund violates the moral maxim that no one can be a judge in his or her own cause ultimately will be up to the people.

The Conversation

Austin Sarat does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

​Politics + Society – The Conversation