Kylie Jenner’s baby daddy, Travis Scott, arrived on the red carpet at the Vanity Fair post-Oscar party just minutes after Kylie and Timmy finished posing for photographers.
And it seems the couple was very much on his mind throughout the evening.
As Page Six reports, Travis took to his Instagram Stories to share a clip of Jordan getting emotional after he was announced as the winner.
For obvious reasons, many took this as Jordan’s way of throwing shade at Chalamet.
“Travis Scott is a professional hater. I love it,” said one user on X (formerly Twitter).
Travis Scott attends the 2026 Vanity Fair Oscar Party Hosted By Mark Guiducci at Los Angeles County Museum of Art on March 15, 2026 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Neilson Barnard/Getty Images)
“Timothee Chalamet looks miserable and Travis Scott was shading him and is there too.. help this man,” added another.
Others noted that Travis might have just been celebrating Jordan’s win, rather than throwing shade at Chalamet.
“People saying Travis Scott hating on Timothee Chalamet are y’all dumb a Black man who he’s friends with won best actor of course he’ll post it,” claimed one user.
US-French actor Timothee Chalamet and US entrepreneur Kylie Jenner attend the 98th Annual Academy Awards at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California on March 15, 2026. (Photo by Patrick T. Fallon / AFP via Getty Images)
But as Page Six points out, this would not be the first time that Travis talked a little trash about Timothee.
Back on 2023, when Timothee and Kylie first went public with their relationship, Travis released his album Utopia.
On a song titled “Meltdown,” Scott rapped about “chocolate” and “the Willy Wonka factory” before instructing an ex to try and find “another flame hot as me, b–ch.”
Timmy, of course, starred as a young Willy Wonka in the 2023 film Wonka.
We don’t know for sure if Travis intended to throw shade on Sunday night — but if he did, at least he was a lot more subtle about it this time.
When news broke that ‘The Kelly Clarkson Show’ is ending, fans quickly started asking who might replace her. But NBCUniversal has other plans. Continue reading…The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs
She claims that people involved in her directorial debut film have been working to sabotage her — and the movie itself.
Now, damning audio appears to show her PR team conspiring to portray one of the producers as a “madame” who procures sex workers for a billionaire.
On ’60 Minutes Australia,’ actress and director Rebel Wilson explained that she believes that she is the target of retaliation. (Image Credit: CBS Australia)
Every story about ‘The Deb’ is enough to make you believe in cursed productions
For over a year, The Deb has been the subject of contentious allegations.
Wilson’s directorial debut seems to have been particularly cursed. And things have now gotten worse.
The Hollywood Reporter obtained an audio recording that appears to show Wilson’s crisis PR team working on a smear campaign against Amanda Ghost, one of the film’s producers.
The audio seemingly shows Jed Wallace outlining social media strategies to badmouth Ghost on a broad scale.
Such a strategy would involve the creation of new, anonymous sites and circulating criminal allegations against the producer.
“We can’t just do, like, oh, she’s a bitch, she sucks,” the speaker in the audio, whom THR identifies as Wallace, says.
“It’s, like, it’s got to be really, really heavy,” he then suggested. “And connected to something that heavy.”
While perhaps spitballing, the idea is floated that Amanda Ghost is an “absolute madame” who procures sex workers for billionaire Len Blavatnik.
Blavatnik’s company financed The Deb.
Notably, Wilson has seemingly been at odds with Blavatnik — after one of the film’s stars, she accuses, recanted allegations against Ghost.
Under the Australian sun, Rebel Wilson explains the concept behind troubled film, ‘The Deb.’ (Image Credit: CBS Australia)
‘Amanda Ghost is a Destroyer of Worlds’ would be a great band name, actually
In addition to Wallace, another name may be familiar to those who’ve followed other recent, high-profile smear campaign stories.
The Agency Group publicist Melissa Nathan is among those receiving these instructions, the report alleges.
Some have accused Wilson of lying under oath, as she apparently denied involvement in smears against Ghost.
One little tidbit … one of the now-deleted smear sites was titled “Amanda Ghost is a Destroyer of Worlds.” Really.
6. Wilson messaged Hurley responding to a negative article on Aug 3rd: “Team, I am obviously very upset about this. You were supposed to get the negative information out about Ghost and have failed to do that… Something has to be done NOW”
Amanda Ghost’s attorney, Camille Vasquez, spoke to Entertainment Tonight after this bombshell audio was released.
“Rebel Wilson has repeatedly denied any involvement in the creation of the smear websites,” the statement began.
Vasquez continued: “Not just on television but in her sworn legal testimony.”
The statement continued: “We, however, had long suspected that she not only contributed to the malicious sites but that she was the driving force behind them.”
Vasquez concluded: “The evidence we have submitted to the court in California supports that conclusion.”
Rebel Wilson tells ’60 Minutes Australia’ that she believes that the alleged retaliation against her was not about money. (Image Credit: CBS Australia)
Maybe society could do something about this?
Wallace and Nathan and more have ties to multiple PR campaigns that had wide-reaching effects.
Should companies be allowed to accept money from one party to plant information that they know or believe to be false on social media, astroturfing hate campaigns against innocent parties?
That isn’t always how PR firms work. But there are some recent and dramatic examples showing that being how it plays out.
This whole situation sucks for everyone involved. We cannot claim to know the truth behind any of this. But crisis PR firms should probably not be how we get our information about people, right?
Surface pools on the edge of West Long Lake in the Teshekpuk Lake Special Use Area of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska are seen in this undated photo. The pools are formed by permafrost. Summer melt creates pools of water on the surface, creating thousands of sites that support wildlife. The Teshekpuk Lake area is important to subsistence harvests and had been protected from development for decades, but the Trump admininistration is now trying to sell oil leases there. (Photo by Laura McDuffie/U.S. Geological Survey Alaska Science Center)
Just six days before the Trump administration is set to open bids in the first of several oil and gas lease sales for federal territory in Arctic Alaska, critics were in court on Thursday trying to win injunctions to temporarily block some or all of the sale.
In one case, a Native organization called Grandmothers Growing Goodness and an environmental organization, The Wilderness Society, are seeking to fully prevent the scheduled March 18 sale in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska, a federal land unit stretching across Alaska’s western North Slope. The sale is offering 5.5 million acres, a larger geographic scope than most of the NPR-A lease sales held since 1999.
The Grandmothers Growing Goodness-Wilderness Society lawsuit is also seeking to overturn a new Trump administration management plan that opens 82% of the Indiana-sized reserve to oil development. Previously, only about half of the reserve was available for leasing, and several areas had protective status. Among those areas was Teshekpuk Lake and its adjacent wetlands and tundra, which provide key habitat for a caribou herd, numerous species of migratory birds, fish and other Arctic animals.
The other case, filed by an organization representing residents of Nuiqsut, is narrower.
Nuiqsut is the North Slope Inupiat village closest to existing NPR-A development. The Nuiqsut lawsuit is seeking to reinstate a program that protects an environmentally sensitive portion of the reserve that had been off-limits to oil development until the Trump administration jettisoned those protections.
The Nuiqsut lawsuit concerns a right-of-way agreement struck with the Biden administration and Nuiqsut Trilateral Inc., an organization formed by Nuiqsut’s city and tribal governments and its village for-profit Native corporation. The agreement, made final in 2024, protects about 1 million acres in the area of Teshekpuk Lake by barring leasing and other development not approved by Nuiqsut Trilateral.
In December, the Trump administration abruptly canceled that agreement, citing the potential for oil in the right-of-way area.
That cancellation, which was announced without any consultation or advance warning to the villagers, caused immediate harm, said Travis Annatoyn, an attorney for the Nuiqsut plaintiffs.
“From the moment Interior canceled the right of way, it advertised its intent to grant competing property rights on top of the subject acreage. That is an invitation to administrative and judicial chaos down the road,” Annatoyn told U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason during the day’s second hearing. “This court should foreclose that chaos by issuing a narrow injunction and stay for just the area of the right of way. We are not seeking relief across the reserve. We are not seeking relief sale-wide.”
Gleason stated her intention to issue rulings before bids are unsealed on Wednesday, Mar. 18.
She said Nuiqsut plaintiffs presented a more compelling case for a temporary injunction. That case concerns property rights, not just “more esoteric” environmental and subsistence protections.
A caribou from the Teshekpuk herd grazes on June 27, 2014, in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. The herd is named for the lake, the largest on the North Slope. The herd uses the tundra adjacent to the lake for calving. (Photo by Bob Wick/U.S. Bureau of Land Management)
“I do see that there are far greater reasons for injunction as to this preliminarily, until the merits can be fully fleshed out,” she told U.S. Justice Department attorney Paul Turcke, who argued on behalf of the Department of the Interior at both hearings.
If the Teshekpuk-area leases are sold and the case is later decided in Nuiqsut Trilateral Inc.’s favor, that could create challenges for numerous parties, Gleason said.
The right-of-way agreement stemmed from environmental and subsistence stipulations in the Biden administration’s 2023 approval of ConocoPhillips’ giant Willow project, and it was a condition of Nuiqsut residents’ endorsement of that project. Willow is set to become the North Slope’s westernmost producing oil field. Conoco Phillips expects production to start in 2029, with an eventual peak of 180,000 barrels per day.
The right-of-way agreement focused on the Teshekpuk Lake area because it is important to Inupiat subsistence food-gatherers.
Under Trump administration terms, Teshekpuk-area protections that had been in place for decades no longer exist. That auction offers some areas at Teshekpuk Lake that have never previously been open to leasing, including parts of the lake itself.
Turcke argued at Thursday’s hearing that the federal government already protects subsistence rights diligently and does not need the right-of-way agreement to do so.
He also argued that Congress has already effectively struck down the restrictions imposed by the right-of-way agreement.
That happened last year, when Congress passed the sweeping budget and tax bill called the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” he said. The bill mandated a series of at least five NPR-A lease sales to be conducted over 10 years under terms of management plan proposed by the first Trump administration.
Turcke also disputed the idea that including the Teshekpuk area in the lease sale would cause irreparable harm to the Nuiqsut plaintiffs.
“It sounds concerning when they say that their property rights could be impacted, but again, the whole property right that they’re really talking about is the ability to just leave it the way it is right now. And that’s not going to change whether leases are issued or not,” he said.
But Annatoyn said Nuiqsut residents are already suffering impacts from the administration’s actions.
“They wake up every day. They see and smell and hear the trucks going to Willow,” he said.
Both lawsuits were originally filed in U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia but transferred last month to federal court in Alaska.
If you’re finding your current kitchen design a bit lackluster, take a page from Martha Stewart’s book and incorporate vintage products to liven up your walls.
While she may not have won the award for Best Supporting Actress, Teyana Taylor is still making headlines following the 2026 Academy Awards.
Taylor, who was nominated for her role in One Battle After Another, was seen on camera confronting a man backstage at the ceremony after she alleged that he shoved her while she was attempting to move through a crowded area.
The incident reportedly took place as the cast and crew of OBAA celebrated the film’s major wins, including Best Picture.
Teyana Taylor attends the Vanity Fair Oscar Party at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) in Los Angeles on March 15, 2026. (Photo by Jean Baptiste Lacroix / AFP via Getty Images)
According to footage circulating on social media, Taylor appeared visibly upset as she addressed the man directly.
“You’re a man putting your hands on a female,” she said during the exchange. “You’re very rude.”
In the same clip, Taylor continued to explain what she believed had happened, telling those nearby that the man had shoved her while trying to control movement backstage.
“He literally shoved me,” she said, adding, “Do not touch me, do not shove me, do not push me.”
Reports indicate that the man she confronted may have been part of the event’s security team.
The alleged altercation occurred as Taylor attempted to return to the stage area after the ceremony, possibly to take photos with her castmates following their Best Picture win.
Teyana Taylor just blew up and got in a massive fight at the Oscars after “a man touched her” 👀 pic.twitter.com/DTyhdnc4rf
The backstage area of the Oscars is typically tightly controlled, with security personnel tasked with managing large crowds of nominees, presenters, and media personnel moving through narrow corridors once the show ends.
Still, Taylor made clear in the moment that she believed the interaction crossed a line.
Witnesses nearby appeared concerned as the actress raised her voice and explained what had happened, with several people attempting to understand the situation as it unfolded.
Despite the confrontation, the tense exchange did not appear to escalate further.
In this handout photo provided by The Academy, Leonardo DiCaprio and Teyana Taylor pose onstage after winning the award for Best Picture for “One Battle After Another” during the 98th Oscars at Dolby Theatre on March 15, 2026 in Hollywood, California. (Photo by Al Seib / The Academy via Getty Images)
Taylor had been one of the most buzzed-about stars of the awards season.
Her performance in this year’s best picture winner earned widespread acclaim and a number of major nominations.
While Taylor ultimately lost the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress to Amy Madigan for her work in Weapons, she joined her castmates on stage later in the night when their film won the ceremony’s top prize.
The brief but heated exchange has become one of the more widely discussed off-camera moments from an otherwise celebratory Oscars night.
Speaking with TMZ in the aftermath of the incident, Teyana was quick to downplay the whole thing.
“Security was just doing a lot. There’s always that one,” she remarked, adding:
“I just don’t tolerate disrespect — especially when it’s unwarranted and it’s unprovoked.” Nor should she!
Bunnie shared her early facelift results — and wound up apologizing to Bert Kreischer. Continue reading…The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs
