Categories
Alaska News

Officials answer questions about Turnagain Arm rescue response

Officials say aviation limitations played a role in the response, but agencies involved say available aircraft were either unable or unsuitable to perform the rescue

Categories
Alaska News

WATCH: How data centers rescued a struggling central Washington community

(The Center Square) – Imagine the value of your home goes way up, but your property tax bill goes down.

Categories
Alaska News

Trump expresses frustration with NATO as Rutte praises the president

(The Center Square) – NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte met with President Donald Trump Wednesday, putting NATO on the defensive as the president has questioned the alliance’s relationship with the treaty organization.

Categories
Alaska News

Ex-fire chief sues Los Angeles mayor for defamation

(The Center Square) – The former Los Angeles fire chief is suing Mayor Karen Bass for defamation related to the devastating Palisades Fire.

Categories
Alaska News

Free vision clinic offers exams and glasses in Anchorage

A free VSP Eyes of Hope clinic at the Fairview Recreation Center is providing eye exams and prescription glasses at no cost to people without vision insurance. Open to anyone ages 5 and older, the event aims to improve access…

Categories
Alaska News

Protect Alaska fisheries from offshore drilling

Royal Dutch Shell's conical drilling unit Kulluk sits aground on the southeast shore of Sitkalidak Island, 40 miles southwest of the city of Kodiak, on Jan. 1, 2013. The Kulluk was being towed from Dutch Harbor to Everett, Wash., after a season of drilling in the Beaufort Sea. The Kulluk broke away from the two during a storm and grounded. Shell determined later that it could not salvage the Kulluk, and the company scrapped its Beaufort drilling plan that year. In 2015, it abandoned its entire Arctic offshore drilling plan. (Photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Sara Francis/U.S. Coast Guard)

Royal Dutch Shell’s conical drilling unit Kulluk sits aground on the southeast shore of Sitkalidak Island, 40 miles southwest of the city of Kodiak, on Jan. 1, 2013. The Kulluk was being towed from Dutch Harbor to Everett, Wash., after a season of drilling in the Beaufort Sea. The Kulluk broke away from the two during a storm and grounded. Shell determined later that it could not salvage the Kulluk, and the company scrapped its Beaufort drilling plan that year. In 2015, it abandoned its entire Arctic offshore drilling plan. (Photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Sara Francis/U.S. Coast Guard)

Alaska and fisheries are intrinsically linked, both economically and culturally. Alaska’s fisheries provide for communities and rural economies across the state—and they will do so sustainably, year after year, provided we take care of the ocean and rivers that support them. 

That is why Alaska should be excluded from the federal government’s latest plan for offshore drilling, called the National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program, or Five-Year Plan. It would open almost all of Alaska’s coasts to drilling and the oil spills that inevitably follow.

The National Marine Fisheries Service estimates that Alaska’s abundant waters produce more than half the fish caught off the U.S. coasts, with an average wholesale value of almost $4.5 billion a year. Indigenous communities depend on these fish stocks for subsistence, cultural practices and livelihoods. Commercial fisheries are the largest private sector employer in the state.

Early in his term, President Trump signed Executive Order 14276 titled “Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness.” It was aimed at reducing regulations that seemed overly burdensome and “modernizing” the U.S. fishing industry to increase competitiveness in world markets. To assist with this mission, an Office of Seafood was created at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and government programs currently available to farmers and ranchers are being expanded to include fishermen. In direct contradiction to that goal, our nation’s fishing grounds are now under threat from offshore oil and gas development, with Alaska squarely in the crosshairs.

The most recent part of the Five-Year Plan, the Draft Proposed Program, included almost all the Alaska coast, including the Arctic. This would offer important fishing grounds to the oil and gas industry for possible development, along with the already highly vulnerable marine ecosystems of the Beaufort and Chukchi Sea. 

Alaskans know firsthand how damaging oil spills in our waters can be. The Exxon Valdez spill in 1989 released 11 billion gallons of oil, killing billions of salmon and herring eggs, leading to the collapse of the herring fishery in 1993 and the loss of more than $166 million in income over the 20 years after the spill. Given the value of Alaska’s fisheries, the lack of in-state infrastructure to contain a spill and the wildness of Alaska’s weather, outer continental oil development is simply not worth the risk.

The prospect of offshore drilling is also unpopular in Alaska. In every comment period of this process, Native communities and state representatives have opposed the oil industry drilling in our waters. Both Alaska senators issued a statement against drilling outside of Cook Inlet. 

Alaska’s waters support the most thriving fisheries in the country, and they provide the highest quality seafood on the global market. Expanding drilling into the turbulent waters off Alaska creates an untenable risk. The next phase of the offshore drilling plan is expected soon, but there is still time for the Trump Administration to protect Alaska and remove our coasts from consideration before it’s too late.

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX.

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Categories
Alaska News

Over $10 billion U.S. taxpayer dollars spent on improper SNAP payments in 2025

(The Center Square) – U.S. states and territories made a collective $10 billion in improper payments to SNAP recipients nationwide in fiscal year 2025, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reports.

Categories
Alaska News

New law allows Alaska’s local governments to offer more property tax breaks

The Alaska State Capitol is seen on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Claire Stremple/Alaska Beacon)

The Alaska State Capitol is seen on May 18, 2026. (Photo by Claire Stremple/Alaska Beacon)

Under a new law, Alaska boroughs and cities will be able to offer property tax breaks to first-time homebuyers, new trailer parks and homeowners who convert short-term rentals into long-term rentals.

Those breaks and more are included in House Bill 13, which became law this week after Gov. Mike Dunleavy declined to veto it. Eight other bills also became law without the governor’s signature.

The new laws:

The largest of the new laws, House Bill 110, was written by Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage, to include a licensing compact that allows out-of-state social workers to practice in Alaska and meet a demand for services.

In the Senate, it was amended with four other licensing compacts — ones covering psychologists, physician assistants, doctors and emergency medical service workers. Under the terms of these multi-state compacts, someone who is licensed in one compact state can practice in other states.

The compacts give Alaska a bonus in the scoring for grants offered under a new multibillion-dollar federal program, but they could reduce the number of practitioners who live in Alaska year-round because they would more easily allow people to live outside Alaska but work here.

A similar nursing compact failed to pass the Legislature this year.

The pace of gubernatorial action is unusually fast and concentrated this year. 

Legislators are meeting in special session, and under the Alaska Constitution, the governor has “fifteen days, Sundays excepted” to act on a bill if it is sent to him while the Legislature is in session.

In addition, lawmakers have deliberately transmitted bills to the governor on a concentrated schedule that would allow them to hold veto override votes during the special session.

The bills approved Monday include six from the House and three from the Senate. 

The Senate bills were not due back until Thursday, but the governor sent letters to the Senate Secretary’s office saying that he will allow them to become law without his signature.

Two other bills have due dates Thursday. One would reduce public disclosure for some Alaska Native corporations, and another would increase regulations on businesses that provide home care for the elderly. 

Twenty-five bills are due back from the governor next week.

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX.

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska Supreme Court rejects state petition to take up Fairbanks charter school dispute

Pearl Creek Elementary Schoool is seen on June 3, 2025. The Fairbanks North Star Borough School District decided to close the school at the end of the academic year. (Photo by Yereth Rosen/Alaska Beacon)

The Alaska Supreme Court declined to take up a case that could have compelled the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District to open a charter school in August. 

The Supreme Court denied an emergency petition on Monday filed by the state and a charter school group to overturn a lower court’s decision and force the district to open the Pearl Creek STEAM charter school. Charter group advocates now say it is unlikely the contested school will open in August.

In a rare move, the Alaska Acting Attorney General Cori Mills petitioned the high court last week on behalf of the charter group to overturn the state court’s decision. 

At issue is whether the Fairbanks school district must open a charter school whose application it denied, but which was later approved by the Alaska State Board of Education. 

The Fairbanks school board last year unanimously denied the Pearl Creek STEAM charter school — focused on science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics – citing a variety of problems with the proposal and the millions in cost to the district. The charter group proposed the school at the site of Pearl Creek elementary school, which was one of three schools closed last year amid severe budget cuts.

The group behind Pearl Creek STEAM opposed the decision, arguing it had a strong proposal and community support backing the new school. The group appealed to the Alaska State Board of Education which approved the application on Apr. 29, overruling the district. The district has appealed that decision in court. The case is ongoing, and a decision is expected in October. 

Bobby Burgess, president of the Fairbanks North Star Borough School District, said by email on Tuesday the district welcomed the Alaska Supreme Court’s decision.

“Both the Superior Court’s denial of an injunction and the Supreme Court’s decision to decline additional review of that denial demonstrate that the District is acting in accordance with the law in following the administrative appeal process,” he wrote. “We look forward to seeing that process through to the end.”

With the courts’ decisions, and the district’s opposition, opening the charter school in August is highly unlikely, said Michael Kramer, an attorney for the Pearl Creek STEAM charter group. 

“Unfortunately, I think that the clock has run out to open this year,” Kramer said. “The Supreme Court was really our last chance to get them to weigh in on Monday or Tuesday in time for the teachers’ positions to be posted and comply with union bargaining agreements, as far as hiring staff.”

“I don’t want to say all is lost for this year, but every day that passes, it becomes, you know, increasingly difficult,” he added. 

The Pearl Creek STEAM charter group has maintained in court that the district should comply with the state board’s decision to approve the school, even while the district pursues an appeal.

“The Legislature has made it very clear through their statutory regime on charter schools that the state board has a final say, and once the state board approves a charter application, it doesn’t matter what the district thinks about it, they’re required by law to operate the school,” Kramer said. 

“We are still pursuing every available path forward,” said Jennifer Redmond, a Fairbanks parent and treasurer for the Pearl Creek STEAM group by text on Tuesday. 

“Since receiving the state approval in April, we have sought cooperation, including offering mediation. A delayed start remains possible,” she said. “And we remain committed to creating opportunities for students, families, and teachers while preparing to open as soon as the approval, granted by the State, is fully implemented.”  

On Monday, the group behind the Pearl Creek STEAM charter school filed two motions in court, one arguing for a reconsideration and for the Fairbanks superior court to order the district to agree to open the school.

The charter group argued the court’s decision was mistaken, and that the Fairbanks district should have been required to open the school following the state board’s decision in April. 

“The Court should have entered a declaratory judgment that the District was obligated to undertake all reasonable efforts to operate the school. This judgment could then be enforced via a contempt order if necessary,” Kramer said. 

A decision from the judge on whether to reconsider is due within ten days. 

Another motion filed Monday opposes the district’s petition for a stay, which would block the state board’s approval of the new school.

The district’s attorneys argued a stay was necessary, and in the public’s interest, “to prevent a chaotic and rushed opening of a charter school during summer vacation that does not even have a building. If forced to open a charter school in two months before classes start, the district will be irreparably harmed.”

The Pearl Creek STEAM group urged the court not to grant the stay, saying the district should not further delay opening the school but comply with the state’s approval. “Granting the District a stay at this point would just serve to further reward a flagrant and unexcused failure to abide by a mandatory legal duty,” Kramer wrote. 

A judge will decide whether to grant the district a stay, but the schedule for a decision is open-ended.  

As the court dispute continues, the commissioner with the Alaska Department of Education and Early Development, Deena Bishop, has threatened to withhold state funding from the Fairbanks district if they did not move forward with opening the school. Fairbanks school officials responded on Thursday saying in part, the district “will not be bullied” into unlawful demands.

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska’s native bumblebees are essential to our food web

A bumblebee visits shooting stars on June 21, 2023. These early bloomers flower along coastal meadows and sea cliffs. Note the pollen sac on the bee’s hind legs. (Photo by Lisa Hupp/USFWS)

Alaska’s short summers demand fast, resilient pollinators — and few species meet that challenge as well as our native bumblebees. These insects are active in cold, windy, and unpredictable weather that keeps most other pollinators grounded. Their ability to generate heat, forage in low temperatures and fly long distances makes them essential to the health of Alaska’s wild landscapes.

Bumblebees pollinate blueberries, cranberries, fireweed, lupine, geranium and many tundra plants that wildlife depend on. Without them, berry production would drop, wildflower reproduction would falter and entire food webs would feel the impact.

Unlike honeybees, which rely on large colonies and stored honey, Alaska’s bumblebees survive with small annual colonies that die back each winter. Only newly mated queens overwinter, tucked beneath moss, soil or leaf litter. In spring, each queen must start a colony from scratch — building a nest, laying eggs and foraging alone until the first workers emerge. Their thick hair, large bodies and ability to shiver their flight muscles allow them to warm up and fly when temperatures are still in the 40s. This cold‑weather resilience is why bumblebees dominate northern ecosystems.

Alaska hosts more than 20 species of bumblebees, including the Arctic bumblebee, Bombus polaris, which can forage on cold, cloudy days; Bombus balteatus, a long‑tongued specialist of deep flowers; Bombus mixtus, common in forests and meadows; and Bombus occidentalis, once widespread but now in decline in parts of its range. Each species plays a unique ecological role, and many are important indicators of environmental change.

Even in Alaska’s remote landscapes, bumblebees face pressures. Climate change is altering the timing of plant blooms, creating mismatches between flowers and pollinators. Habitat loss from development and wildfire reduces nesting and foraging areas. Pesticide exposure remains a concern, especially near agricultural or managed landscapes. Disease transmission from managed bees — including commercial colonies brought north for pollination — poses additional risks. These challenges are documented by agencies such as the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

Supporting bumblebees does not require large‑scale intervention. Protecting natural habitat, reducing pesticide use and planting native flowers can help maintain healthy populations. Home gardeners can make a difference by leaving small patches of undisturbed soil or vegetation for nesting queens and by choosing native plants that bloom from spring through fall.

Bumblebees are more than pollinators — they are keystone species. Their decline would ripple through Alaska’s ecosystems, affecting berries, wildlife and the cultural traditions tied to the land. Understanding their importance is a first step toward ensuring they remain part of Alaska’s future.

This commentary is the first in a six‑part series on Alaska’s native bees.

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX.