Categories
Sports Fox

With Judge’s Timeline Uncertain, Yankees Faces a Deadline Balancing Act

Three weeks ago, the Red Sox were an afterthought. They were a last-place club, facing the possibility of selling their top assets. Then Boston ripped off 15 wins in a row, tying a franchise record that dates back to Ted Williams, and suddenly the AL East looks different. Forget the Blue Jays. They’ve been lapped, dropped from the conversation entirely. The team the Yankees actually have to worry about just climbed out of the basement in dramatic fashion and is playing the best baseball in their division. The Rays sit atop the AL East at 59-42. The Yankees, at 57-45, are hanging on to a wild-card spot rather than controlling their own destiny, and the gap behind them is closing fast. The Red Sox, at 52-49, are now seven games behind the Rays and in possession of the final AL wild card spot. That’s the environment Yankees general manager Brian Cashman is operating in with the trade deadline looming. Then, there’s the elephant in the room. The uncomfortable question hanging over every move Cashman makes between now and August 3 is whether this Yankees offense is actually good enough to hang onto a playoff spot without Aaron Judge for an indefinite amount of time. Are the Yankees operating without their best player for another month, or will Cashman be forced to spend prospect capital to patch a hole that won’t close until September or October? Judge has been out since June 2 with a stress fracture in his right rib, and things have been ugly without him. The Yankees are 19-21 without Judge this season, compared to 36-23 with him. Since June 18, they’ve scored the second-fewest runs and struck out the most among any team in the majors. Their .203 batting average with runners in scoring position is ranked 27th in MLB since Judge went on the IL. Cashman isn’t dressing that up. Asked recently about the team’s performance without Judge, he acknowledged the lack of offense and how the onus falls on the rest of the lineup to pick up the slack. “Clearly, you miss him,” Cashman told reporters in Tampa earlier this month. “That’s certainly part of it. But that’s not an answer to why we’re struggling with some consistently really good players that are going into collective slumps at the same time. That has nothing to do with Aaron Judge.” The Yankees can also stop pretending Judge’s return date is close. He underwent another round of re-imaging on his fractured rib during the All-Star break, and though it showed some healing, it wasn’t enough for Judge to begin baseball activities. The slugger has to wait an indeterminate amount of time before a team of specialists gives him and the Yankees the green light to swing a bat again. Judge, for his part, has remained steadfast that he will return at some point this season. “It’s feeling better,” he said recently at Yankee Stadium. “There were a couple of weeks that were tough, where I really couldn’t do a lot. Now we’re feeling ten times better.” So, where do the Yankees go from here? At least, if Judge was healthy, his bat would help cover up some of the glaring weaknesses in the lineup. Without him, the Yankees have no choice but to address their issues. There’s an obvious hole at catcher. There’s a need for a right-handed power bat with Giancarlo Stanton out since April 24 with a nagging calf strain. And there are reinforcements needed in the bullpen. It’s hard to imagine the Yankees moving on from this trade deadline without addressing their catching problem. Yankees catchers have combined for a .180 batting average, .270 slugging percentage, and a wRC+ of 50, all of which are ranked 29th in the majors this season. Austin Wells has cratered — he’s batting .163 with an OPS+ of 48 — and the tandem behind him hasn’t been better. Cashman, at least, has stopped soft-pedaling it. “It’s an issue, clearly,” he said of the team’s backstop situation. Their realistic targets are Minnesota’s Ryan Jeffers and Colorado’s Hunter Goodman. Jeffers is a right-handed bat hitting close to .290 with a .950 OPS. He’ll be a free agent after this season. The biggest concern with Jeffers is how much his hamate fracture, which sidelined him for nearly two months this season, will continue to impact his power. Goodman, meanwhile, leads the National League in slugging (.563), has hit 31 home runs, and has been more consistent than Jeffers while also being a right-handed bat under team control through 2029. The bullpen is where things get expensive. New York had hoped to solve part of it for free, by sliding hard-throwing top prospect Carlos Lagrange into a high-leverage relief role. But Lagrange’s shoulder injury in his throwing arm shelved that plan. Since then, the reported appetite has grown far bigger than a depth arm. The Yankees have been connected to Padres closer Mason Miller, and multiple reports indicate the Yankees are willing to discuss virtually every prospect in the system except their untouchable No. 1 prospect, infielder George Lombard Jr., to get him. Their interest in Miller indicates that small moves won’t be enough if Judge doesn’t return to full strength. And it’s a real gamble, given Miller would likely cost MLB-ready outfield chips like Spencer Jones or Jasson Dominguez, precisely the kind of long-term value Cashman has spent years trying to protect. Or, perhaps a reunion with Mets reliever Luke Weaver is on the table. The Yankees have the prospect capital to be genuinely aggressive. Whether they should be, with Judge’s timeline still murky and a tight division race that’s heightening the pressure, is the harder question. Cashman has less than two weeks to answer it, and with the Red Sox surging, the Yankees’ margin for error is getting thinner.​Latest Sports News from FOX Sports

Categories
Entertainment

Caitlin Clark Article Referencing Emmett Till Case Sparks Backlash; ‘USA …

Reading Time: 3 minutes

An article criticizing the on-court behavior of WNBA star Caitlin Clark sparked major backlash today.

And the discourse surrounding the controversial USA Today piece has spread well beyond the world of sports.

The article — written by sports columnist Nancy Armour — starts with a simple enough premise:

Armour argues that Clark has engaged in strategic “flopping” and has argued with refs with the goal of receiving undeserved fouls.

Caitlin Clark attends the 2024 A Year In TIME dinner at Current at Chelsea Piers on December 11, 2024 in New York City.
Caitlin Clark attends the 2024 A Year In TIME dinner at Current at Chelsea Piers on December 11, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by Jason Mendez/Getty Images)

The article was originally titled, “Caitlin Clark’s reaction to non-calls puts other players at risk,” but the headline now reads, “Caitlin Clark’s flopping isn’t just annoying — it’s becoming dangerous.”

“The irony of the WNBA’s All-Star Game is that it’s happening this weekend in Chicago, the hometown of Emmett Till, who became an icon of the civil rights movement after his tragic murder,” Armour writes in the piece, adding:

“The local art gallery is currently hosting an exhibit imagining his life if he hadn’t been lynched.

“While it’s incumbent on the WNBA to do more to protect its players, there also should be an expectation on Clark to recognize the broader implications of her actions being weaponized.”

The use of Till’s name sparked outrage, but the claim that Clark is being supported by white supremacist groups created an even bigger uproar:

“It seems there is a white nationalist faction to Clark’s fandom that is deeply, deeply problematic, made even more so because the WNBA is made up predominantly of Black women, many of them queer,” Armour writes.

“When Clark claims fouls that don’t exist, when she goes on profanity-laced tirades at referees, those racists see her as a white woman in need of saving and take matters into their own hands.”

That assertion may be entirely true, but Armour should support such a bold claim with substantive evidence and not a mere “it seems.”

In the hours since it was published, the article has received significant criticism.

“I honestly cannot believe this made it past the editor. And I’m a Democrat. This is literally nonsense,” author Amy Siskind wrote of the piece on X (formerly Twitter).

“Even as a fan, I believe CC does complain too much and she can be overly dramatic. But that is not where Nancy Armour took this nonsense,” another commenter wrote.

“Instead, she connected two debatable basketball plays, a disgusting racist message, and the murder of Emmett Till to argue that Clark is somehow putting other players in danger. That is an enormous and irresponsible leap.”

That commenter concluded: “This article is disgusting and so is Nancy for writing it.”

The situation prompted Armour to post an explanation, reading:

“In my recent column, I made an inartful comparison with the murder of Emmett Till. I intended to connect the issues the WNBA is currently facing with its All-Star Game being hosted in Till’s hometown of Chicago.

“I obviously did not provide enough context for that. However, this point stands: There is a history in this country of perceived threats to white women being weaponized against African-Americans, and the danger that poses to Black players in the league.

“Players have been abused online and have reported receiving death threats. That has to be taken more seriously.

“I sincerely regret that my lack of appropriate context is overshadowing that important conversation and the action that needs to be taken by the WNBA to address it directly – for the benefit of ALL players.”

The current version of the article begins with disclaimer explaining that the piece has been “updated to provide further context and clarity.”

Caitlin Clark has not yet publicly responded to the controversy.

Caitlin Clark Article Referencing Emmett Till Case Sparks Backlash; ‘USA … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska elections division director defends disqualifying U.S. Senate candidate

House Judiciary committee chair Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage, and committee members Rep. Ashley Carrick, D-Fairbanks and Rep. Mia Costello, R-Anchorage, listen to Carol Beecher, director of the Alaska Division of Elections, answer questions about the division’s decision to disqualify a U.S. Senate candidate at a hearing on July 22, 2026. (Photo by Kyle Johansen for Rep. Gray’s office)

Members of the House Judiciary and State Affairs committees questioned Alaska Division of Elections director Carol Beecher on Wednesday about the state’s response to a U.S. Senate candidate with the same name as the incumbent — Dan Sullivan. It was the second investigatory hearing on the subject after elections officials failed to appear at an initial hearing in June. Alaska Lieutenant Governor Nancy Dahlstrom, who oversees the division, declined an invitation to appear.

At issue was the state’s decision to disqualify the U.S. Senate candidate Dan J. Sullivan of Petersburg and its determination that he was not a “good faith” candidate. The Alaska Supreme Court nixed that decision in late June.

Carol Beecher, the new director of the Alaska Division of Elections, answers questions from reporters on Thursday, Feb. 16, 2023. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Carol Beecher, the new director of the Alaska Division of Elections, answers questions from reporters on Thursday, Feb. 16, 2023. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)

Beecher testified for nearly two hours and defended the division’s actions from the choice to disqualify Sullivan to the choice to list him without a party affiliation on the primary ballot. She also answered questions about how 3,500 Alaskan residents received notices that they have inactive voter status pending verification of citizenship.

Since the first legislative hearing, the Sullivan from Petersburg challenged the state’s decision and the fast-tracked case reached the Alaska Supreme Court. The court upheld a lower court’s ruling that Sullivan was eligible and said the division did not have the authority to add additional eligibility requirements, like whether a candidate was acting in “good faith,” beyond what is outlined in the U.S. Constitution. 

Lawmakers raised concerns about how the division chose to list the candidates on the primary ballot. They asked Beecher about why the division chose to list the challenger as “Sullivan, Daniel J, Jr.” without his party affiliation as a registered Republican. It listed the incumbent senator as “Sullivan, Dan S.” and identified him as the incumbent and a Republican. 

The two Sullivans are among 16 candidates for the U.S. Senate seat, including Democratic former U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola, in the primary election on August 18. The top four vote-getters will advance to the general election on November 3. 

Beecher defended the division’s position that Sullivan was running with the purpose to confuse voters. She cited complaints filed by national and state Republican groups, Sullivan’s party affiliation as Republican and campaign materials as evidence of his intention to mimic the U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan and confuse Alaska voters.

“The division acted then to prevent manipulation of the ballot and to protect voters from purposeful confusion, consistent with its responsibility to maintain fair, neutral, and trustworthy elections,” she said. 

She noted that the division’s action was unprecedented, but said the situation merited such a response. “The division understood all along that this action could be challenged in court, and recognizes the court’s authority to review these important questions,” she said.

Judiciary committee chair Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage, had several questions about how the division determined Sullivan was not a “good faith” candidate. “Where is the evidence that he did this to trick voters, to mislead the voters whom we are here to protect?” he asked.

“The information that we were presented with painted for us a picture of someone who was trying to confuse the ballot,” Beecher replied. 

Gray probed the division’s criteria later in the hearing.“In your opinion, Director Beecher, what does it mean for a candidate to have a good faith intention to serve?” Gray asked.

“In my opinion, that it would be someone who actually wants to win, and is running because they want to to get the seat,” Beecher replied. “And in this situation, all of the facts that were presented to the division were that this was an individual who was not running to be what I would call a true candidate. This individual was running to confuse the ballot. It was an intentional attempt to gain access to the ballot for the purpose of confusing.”

Lawmakers also raised this issue of of how the candidate was listed on the primary ballot after the state Supreme Court ruling. The challenger was listed as “Daniel J. Sullivan, Jr.” when he has publicly stated he goes by his first name as “Dan.”

Beecher said it was a choice by the division. “And it’s a bit of first in time, first in place, that Dan Sullivan has already been on the ballot prior, as Dan Sullivan is known as Dan Sullivan,” she said, referring to the incumbent senator. “So it was simply a way to differentiate between the two.”

Rep. Genevieve Mina, D-Anchorage, asked Beecher about the division’s decision not to list Sullivan’s Republican party affiliation.

Beecher said she believes it was also within the division’s authority to do so. “Whether or not it has to be on the ballot, we believe that has been left to the discretion of the division, and in line with that, we made that determination,” she said. 

“It also could still be litigated,” Beecher added. 

Rep. Ashley Carrick, D-Fairbanks and chair of the House State Affairs Committee, said she was concerned about the precedent and the agency’s discretion to remove party information that could be informative for voters. 

“Having his party affiliation may help those voters feel like they’re more informed and directed to a candidate they would rather support,” she said. “But not having his affiliation included there seems to provide less information and be more confusing.”

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Categories
Music

Thomas Rhett Appears on the New Season of ‘Ransom Canyon’

The show just got a whole lot more country. Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs

Categories
Music

Thomas Rhett Appears on the New Season of ‘Ransom Canyon’

The show just got a whole lot more country. Continue reading…​Country Music News – Taste of Country

Categories
Music

Bryan Andrews Wants to Play Big Stages But Won’t Drop His Message

Bryan Andrews wants to play country music’s biggest stages. But if those opportunities come at the expense of his message, then he says it’s not worth it. Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs

Categories
Music

Bryan Andrews Wants to Play Big Stages But Won’t Drop His Message

Bryan Andrews wants to play country music’s biggest stages. But if those opportunities come at the expense of his message, then he says it’s not worth it. Continue reading…​Country Music News – Taste of Country

Categories
Food

This Underrated Fast Food Chain Was The First To Sell 1 Billion Burgers

One billion burgers is a lot of burgers, and you may think that number was reached only recently. Here’s the chain that managed it much further in the past.

​Food Republic – Restaurants, Reviews, Recipes, Cooking Tips

Categories
Entertainment

Connecticut Man Beats Father to Death on Camera Before Being Shot Dead By Police

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Newly released body camera footage captures the harrowing moments before a Connecticut police officer fatally shot a man who authorities say refused repeated commands to stop attacking another person with a baseball bat.

The incident unfolded on the morning of July 19 in Meriden, Connecticut, after officers responded to reports of an active domestic violence situation at a home on Sagamore Road.

According to investigators, Officer Anthony Offiaeli arrived to find 38-year-old Robert Lee Jenkins III repeatedly striking a motionless man with a baseball bat (via TMZ).

A Connecticut man allegedly beat his father to death with a baseball bat.
A Connecticut man allegedly beat his father to death with a baseball bat. (Connecticut Office of Inspector General)

Body camera footage released by the Connecticut Office of Inspector General shows Offiaeli pointing his weapon at Jenkins while repeatedly yelling, “Put the f—ing bat down!”

Authorities say the officer issued the command four times as Jenkins allegedly continued the attack. He also radioed for backup, urging responding officers to “step it up,” before opening fire.

Investigators later identified the victim as 69-year-old Robert Jenkins Jr., the suspect’s father.

According to the preliminary report, Robert Jenkins Jr. suffered catastrophic blunt-force injuries to the head and was pronounced dead at the scene. His death has been ruled a homicide.

Robert Lee Jenkins III was transported to a hospital, where he later died from multiple gunshot wounds. His death was also classified as a homicide under Connecticut’s legal definition for deaths caused by another person.

The released footage is graphic and shows the suspect continuing to swing the bat even after the officer begins firing. Reports indicate Offiaeli discharged nearly 20 rounds before the assault finally stopped.

As is standard procedure following an officer-involved shooting, Connecticut’s Office of Inspector General is investigating the use of deadly force.

A separate investigation into the underlying domestic violence homicide is being handled by Connecticut State Police.

Authorities have not released any information about what may have led to the fatal confrontation between father and son.

The body camera footage has quickly drawn widespread attention online because it documents the officer’s repeated attempts to end the attack before resorting to deadly force.

Officials have not announced when the investigations will be completed.

We will have further updates on this developing story as new information becomes available.

Connecticut Man Beats Father to Death on Camera Before Being Shot Dead By Police was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Music

Jason Aldean & Luke Bryan Release ‘Songs About Us’ Live Performance Video From Historic Sanford Stadium Show

Jason Aldean and Luke Bryan are giving fans an inside look at their history-making night at Sanford Stadium with the release of the live performance video for “Songs About Us.”

The video captures the unforgettable moment the two Georgia natives performed the song together for the first time during their sold-out concert on the University of Georgia campus on April 25.

Jason Aldean, Luke Bryan; Photo by Matt Paskert
Jason Aldean, Luke Bryan; Photo by Matt Paskert

Viewers see an epic aerial view of the estimated 63,000 fans that packed the stadium before the spotlight shines on Aldean as he delivers the song’s opening verse and chorus. Bryan stands beside him on stage, strumming his guitar before taking over the second verse.

The performance footage is interlaced with various clips filmed throughout the night, starting with the artists’ pre-show ritual, their walk through the tunnel of the stadium and onto the stage and a series of highlights from the unforgettable evening before signing off. Fans can watch the pair celebrate their friendship of nearly two decades as they share laughs, down a few drinks and perform a mix of their biggest hits.

Through it all, their voices continue to effortlessly weave together, delivering a song that feels like the perfect duet for two longtime friends. Serving as the title track of Aldean’s 12th studio album, “Songs About Us” marks a full-circle collaboration between two artists who share similar beginnings, from their Georgia roots and musical influences to the stages they played before finding success.

The sentiment behind the song runs deeper than just the music. It reflects the experiences and stories they have both spent years capturing throughout their careers, making it clear why Bryan was the perfect voice for Aldean to bring on.   

Aldean and Bryan’s friendship dates all the way back to when they were both just dreamers, rising through the country music ranks and carving out their paths in the industry. This song and their performance at Sanford Stadium serve as a remind of how far they’ve come individually and how strong their friendship has remained through it all.

The video arrives just days after Aldean celebrated earning his 32nd No. 1 hit on country radio with “Don’t Tell On Me.” He is also in the midst of his Songs About Us Tour, which is set to continue through the end of September, while Luke Bryan is busy with his Word On The Street Tour and upcoming Farm Tour shows.

The pair of artists have more opportunities for fans to catch them on the road together on their Double Down Tour 2026, including stops in Missoula, MT, San Diego, CA, Washington, DC and Las Vegas, NV.

The post Jason Aldean & Luke Bryan Release ‘Songs About Us’ Live Performance Video From Historic Sanford Stadium Show appeared first on Country Now.

​Country Now