Day: April 13, 2026

The Haines Borough Assembly has a packed agenda on Tuesday. Chilkat Valley News editor Rashah McChesney sat down with local government reporter Will Steinfeld to talk more about what’s coming up on Tuesday evening. 

Rashah McChesney: It looks like several things are stacked up on the Haines Borough assembly’s agenda, what’s coming up this week? 

Will Steinfeld: Yeah, for some reason, it’s lined up in a way where we have possible final votes on some really big potential changes to how the borough functions. There’s stuff we’ve been following for a few weeks now, things like bulk or containerization – basically environmental regulations for prospective mining companies, looking at maybe a final vote on accessory dwelling units on a severance tax. So these are all big things potentially for how the borough handles heavy industry, how they handle housing, you know, really core pieces of the local economy. 

It’s possible the assembly goes ahead and takes all these final votes at Tuesday’s meeting. In that case, we would have a lot to write about for the paper, it would be a whole series of big changes. But I think it’s more likely that some of these get pushed further down the road. So far, these proposals have come in and they haven’t really been amended, even though there are controversial parts about all of them. So, I wouldn’t be surprised if assembly members in this final public hearing on these issues, present changes they want to see to make these things work. Or maybe they decide to do something like send one or all of them or a combination back to committees to get some more time and deliberation. 

Yeah, and it looked like there were maybe some indicators that something like that could happen. I was looking at a list of proposed things that assembly member Mark Smith said he wanted to see with the severance tax, for example. Is that something that you see happening with all of those measures or maybe just this one? 

I wouldn’t be surprised. I think, like you said, there’s indications for all of them. There’s, as you mentioned, assembly member Smith’s memo that he’s written up. He has a lot of detailed specific changes he’s proposing. On accessory dwelling units, I saw the borough planner, Chen Wu, had recommended it go back to the planning commission. I think because of the fact that these are such significant pieces of legislation, we’re likely to see these kinds of questions pop up, and, you know, the meeting is a finite amount of time. So, they could push these on later. 

Elsewhere on the agenda, it looks like in a couple of places, the borough is sort of dealing with higher energy costs or feedback from residents about higher energy costs. Have you seen anything about that? 

I think you need look no further than the article you wrote this week about the petition going around from the public… I guess it would maybe delay the implementation of a seasonal sales tax rate. 

The number of signatures, it’s hundreds at this point, shows how much of an impact this is making in people’s lives. So  I think there will be some pretty significant discussion at this assembly meeting of what the borough can do, if anything, to try and give people a break. 

Do you get any sense that any of the assembly members are going to be responsive to those circumstances? 

I would guess so. I think generally what you see is assembly members trying to be responsive to instances where there are public outcries of this magnitude. Sometimes it’s a ton of people showing up in person for public comment. In this case, what we’ve seen already is hundreds of people signing a petition. So I would guess that there will be some effort to do something and assembly member [Mark] Smith has already introduced a proposal before the meeting to temporarily suspend the sales tax on all fossil fuels as he’s written it. 

But there are definitely going to be challenges. The borough’s finance director, who’s also the acting borough manager right now, Jila Stewart, has written prior to this meeting that if the assembly does choose to maintain the lower seasonal sales tax rate for the rest of this year, it would have a huge impact on borough finances. It would be, by her estimate, over $1,000,000 out of the annual revenue for the borough. It would mostly come out of the specific fund that pays for things like the school and the library. And so I think even if assembly members are united in the idea that they want to give residents a break, it’s going to be a challenge figuring out how they can do that. 

One other thing that’s on the agenda that I’m curious about is final accounting of the Freeride World Tour and its coming to town and the amount of money the borough spent. I’m curious if you could tell us a little bit more about what assembly members are going to be considering. 

There’s definitely one new thing, which is, according to the manager’s report for this meeting, Freeride has actually sent a definitive proposal for how much they want the borough to pay to bring them back next year. Last year, the borough had committed $75,000 to bring them here. Now, Freeride is asking for $150,000 between the borough and potentially other local sponsors who would help contribute to that. And so at some point, the assembly is going to have to decide what they want to do with this offer. Do they take it? Do they leave it? Do they make some kind of counteroffer? 

But I think it’s part of this broader question of what Freeride is worth economically and how much the borough should be willing to spend to bring them in and see some kind of return on investment. When I was talking to people during the Freeride weekend around town, I got the sense that people really enjoyed the event and saw a lot of benefits, but also had reservations,  at least among some, about a feeling that they weren’t getting enough value for the tax dollars they were putting into the event. There’s been some public comments submitted before this upcoming meeting that echoed that. But I also know there are assembly members in the past who have spoken (about the value of the event) — I think Craig Loomis has been a really big proponent of what Freeride can offer for the economy, so there should be perspectives on both sides about how much this thing is really worth. 

The assembly meets on Tuesday, April 14 at 6:30 p.m. in the assembly chambers and on Zoom.

The post Listen: Assembly to consider severance taxes, accessory dwelling units, and the value of the Freeride World Tour appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Alaska Democrat Mary Peltola, who is mounting a high-profile challenge to Republican U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, announced on Monday that her campaign raised $8.9 million in the first quarter of the year, a record for any U.S. Senate campaign in Alaska.

The announcement, which followed a Sullivan campaign announcement last week of $2.1 million in first-quarter donations, was a sign that the hotly contested race in Alaska, considered pivotal to Senate control, will be expensive.

Peltola’s statement about the fundraising haul said 95% of the donations were in denominations of $100 or less and that donations came from all parts of Alaska.

“I’m so grateful for the support we’ve received from every single borough and census area across our state, and it’s that support that will bring us to victory this November. It’s going to take all of us, but together we’ll take on the rigged system in DC that’s hurting each and every one of these communities,” Peltola said in the statement.

Peltola, who is Yup’ik and from the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, has emphasized her rural roots in her campaign; she is currently on a tour of Western Alaska villages.

Sullivan’s campaign last week said the $2.1 million in the first-quarter fundraising added to previous donations, resulting in $7.5 million on hand for the reelection effort.

In a statement, Sullivan campaign spokesperson Nate Adams said the strong support shows that Alaskans know he delivers for Alaska: “From bolstering our Alaska-based military and Coast Guard, unleashing Alaska’s resource economy, and securing historic investments in Alaska’s healthcare system, Senator Sullivan has a proven record of results.”

Money spent on the Alaska Senate race extends far beyond direct donations to campaign. Political action committees and other groups are also spending heavily in independent efforts.

One of those organizations is the Senate Leadership Fund. That super PAC, which supports Republicans in Senate races, last week announced a $342 million national spending plan. It includes $15 million to support Sullivan.

An example of the national focus on the Peltola-Sullivan race is an online ad recently released by the National Republican Senatorial Committee. It blames Peltola for “men in women’s sports, costs through the roof, open borders,” and it ties her to former President Joe Biden.

Peltola, a former U.S. House and Alaska State Legislature member, is also getting support from outside her campaign as well.

The Senate Majority PAC, a Democratic group, is supporting Peltola and has already spent money on ads attacking Sullivan. The organization characterized Peltola as a top-tier candidate after she announced her campaign in January. Peltola’s entrance into the race in January “completely upends the campaign, putting an already unpopular and weak Dan Sullivan on his heels,” Senate Majority PAC spokesperson Lauren French said in a Jan. 12 statement.

Another group, the Anchorage-based 907 Initiative, has launched an advertising campaign targeting Sullivan. The campaign refers to him as “Yes-Man Dan” and criticizes him for consistently doing “the bidding of national party leaders. . .even when it’s bad for Alaska.” Among the examples cited by the 907 Initiative is last year’s sweeping and controversial budget and tax bill called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which Sullivan has championed as an economic boon for Alaska.

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX