Categories
Sports Fox

Patriots Set to Release WR Stefon Diggs Following Productive 2025 Season

Drake Maye and the New England Patriots will need to find a new top wide receiver for the 2026 season. Wide receiver Stefon Diggs has been informed by the team that he’ll be released after the start of the new league year on March 11, NFL Media reported Wednesday. Diggs later confirmed the news in a social media post. Diggs, 32, was set to receive a $6 million guaranteed roster bonus if he remained on the Patriots’ roster by March 13. New England will open up some cap space with the move, though. By releasing Diggs, the Patriots have created $16.8 million in cap space for the 2026 season, per Over The Cap. In his lone season in New England, Diggs was quite productive. He had a team-leading 85 receptions for 1,013 yards and four touchdowns. His productive campaign came a year after he suffered a season-ending ACL tear during his one season with the Houston Texans. While Diggs had a strong regular season, his play took a dip in the playoffs as the Patriots reached Super Bowl LX. He logged 14 receptions for just 110 yards and a touchdown in the Patriots’ four postseason games. Diggs also dealt with an off-field issue in his final months in New England. He was arrested in December and pleaded not guilty to felony strangulation or suffocation and misdemeanor assault and battery charges in February after he allegedly strangled his personal chef. All of that made Diggs a speculated cut candidate entering the offseason. He ranked sixth in our Greg Auman’s top 25 cut candidates story. Now, Diggs checks in at No. 26 in our top 100 free agents ranking. Diggs has been named a Pro Bowler four times in his career and has recorded at least 1,000 receiving yards in seven of the last eight seasons.​Latest Sports News from FOX Sports

Categories
Music

Remembering Joey Feek: Friends + Collaborators Share Memories

It’s been 10 years since we lost Joey Feek, but her presence in the country world still looms large. Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs

Categories
Music

Remembering Joey Feek: Friends + Collaborators Share Memories

It’s been 10 years since we lost Joey Feek, but her presence in the country world still looms large. Continue reading…​Country Music News – Taste of Country

Categories
Politics

Texas Latinos turned out in massive numbers for Democrats

Latino voters flocked to Tuesday’s Democratic primary in Texas in droves, reversing a long-running erosion for the party ahead of this year’s pivotal midterms.

The numbers were dramatic: In five different rural majority-Latino counties, more votes were cast in Tuesday’s Democratic primary than for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election.

“These very Hispanic counties are amongst the swingiest in the country, and they’re really telling us something,” said Mike Madrid, an anti-Trump GOP strategist who wrote a book about Latino voters.

The results provide some much-needed hope for Democrats that they can compete not only in Texas as they have long dreamed, but in Latino districts across the country that could determine control of the House in November. Few groups of voters have vexed Democrats in recent cycles as much as Latino voters in the Rio Grande Valley.

On Tuesday, the party started to seem like it had a way back.

The turnout surge among Hispanic and Latino voters helped power state Rep. James Talarico’s Senate primary victory over Rep. Jasmine Crockett, setting him up for a general election that has ignited Democrats’ fever dream of finally flipping Texas. In counties that are majority-Latino, Talarico won by roughly 22 points, according to preliminary results, compared to a roughly 3-point margin of victory over Crockett in the rest of the state.

It’s the latest sign that Latino voters who helped President Donald Trump return to the White House are not inherently sticking with Republicans. Democratic candidates put up strong numbers in predominantly Latino areas in gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey last November, as well as a smattering of special elections, including a state senate race in Fort Worth just last month.

But the results are especially significant because South Texas had long been an early warning sign of Democrats’ problems with Latino voters. While Latino voters swung sharply towards Trump in 2024, the party had been losing ground in the Rio Grande Valley dating back several election cycles.

A number of Rio Grande valley counties swung away from Democrats in 2020, and kept swinging right in 2024: In Zapata County, for instance, where 94 percent of the population is Hispanic, Trump won just 33 percent of the vote in 2016, but took 53 percent in 2020 and 61 percent in 2024.

On Tuesday, it was among the five counties where more voters cast ballots in the Democratic primary than voted for Harris in 2024, along with Kenedy, Jim Hogg, Reeves and Dimmit. Talarico won 55 percent of the vote across those five counties.

Republicans leaned heavily into their recent gains with Latinos as they redrew congressional maps in their favor last year, with several majority-Latino districts among those they are hoping to flip.

But some of those flips now look a lot less certain. In the newly redrawn 35th Congressional District, which stretches from San Antonio to Austin and is majority Latino, Democrats’ four-way primary drew 7,500 more voters than Republicans’ three-way contest. Both primaries are headed to a runoff in the district that Trump won by 10 points in 2024.

Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), whose district was also redrawn to be more friendly for Republicans and who faces a tough election in November even after he was pardoned by Trump in December, said Tuesday’s results were evidence that Republicans’ gains in Texas in 2024 were “not a political realignment.”

Latino voters are angry with Republicans, he said, over continued high prices and Trump’s tariffs, along with ongoing immigration enforcement that has gone beyond what voters are comfortable with.

“If ICE would have just stuck on deporting criminals, people would have been OK with that, they would have been supportive,” Cuellar said. “But the moment they started going into work sites and going after criminal records — down here in South Texas, everybody knows somebody who has been here for a while — so that has turned Hispanics against Republicans.”

Madrid, the GOP strategist, argues Latino voters have always been more of a swing group than many people recognized. With Trump in office and high prices persisting, that creates openings for Democrats, both in Texas and across the country.

“It began literally, with Liberation Day, with the tariffs,” said Madrid, the GOP strategist. “When Trump announced those, you could see Trump’s numbers dropping with Latinos precipitously.”

Democrats’ best-case scenario in Texas would mean Cuellar and Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D-Texas) both hold their districts despite the effects of redistricting, with the party flipping the nearby 15th District, where Tejano singer Bobby Pulido won a primary to face Republican Rep. Monica De La Cruz, as well as the open 35th district. In that case, Republicans’ might pick up only one seat in the state despite their aggressive gerrymander.

And while national Democrats have not identified Texas as necessary to take back the Senate, there is still hope that Talarico could become the first Democrat to win statewide in Texas in more than three decades.

Talarico’s performance with Latino voters was notable not only because of his party’s recent struggles, but also because the last Democrat to come close in a Senate race in Texas — Beto O’Rourke in 2018 — faltered with Latino voters. O’Rourke lost dozens of predominantly Latino counties in the primary, and comparatively lower turnout among Latino voters in the general election hurt his bid to unseat Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, which he lost by less than three points. O’Rourke’s struggles in the region presaged what was to come for Democrats in the Rio Grande Valley.

Talarico has campaigned hard in the region.

“Talarico’s faith-based messaging probably resonated really well, especially in a community that is heavily driven by faith,” said Kendall Scudder, chair of the Texas Democratic Party.

Scudder described Tuesday’s result as a “good first step” in retreading inroads with the community ahead of November, but said the party had to “double down” on their efforts to engage. But local Democrats, scarred by recent elections, aren’t taking a victory lap.

“It’s not the party that’s driving people to the polls. It’s the horrendous behaviors of the man in the White House and his cronies. That’s what’s driving people to the polls,” said Sylvia Bruni, chair of South Texas’ Webb County Democratic Party.

Democrats, she acknowledged, have a “prime opportunity” to win back the community against a “backdrop of abuse that our people are experiencing full force.” But she said the party still hasn’t done enough to directly engage with voters in remote, expansive counties like hers, which includes Laredo.

“I’d be the first to say to my party, you would need to do a hell of a lot more for us,” she said.

How much ground Democrats can make up in Texas may also depend on who they are facing. In the Republican primary, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) did a few points better in Latino areas than he did in the rest of the state, suggesting he might be the stronger general election candidate with Latino voters if he can survive a runoff against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. He’s run well in Latino areas of the state in the past.

“John Cornyn has been the senator for quite a while, and there’s a familiarity with South Texans,” said Daniel Garza, a Texas-based Republican strategist and president of the conservative Libre Initiative. “He’s like somebody who’s trusted, who has a lot of credibility, and who’s familiar, right? And so people are comfortable with him in that position. Paxton, not so much.”

​Politics

Categories
Entertainment

Demi Lovato & Keke Palmer Discuss Grown Men Who ‘Exploited’ Them as Teen …

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Demi Lovato has been using their voice for good for years.

Those unique challenges have helped her build a lot of wisdom.

This week, they sat down with the incomparable Keke Palmer.

Both former child stars compared notes on having dated grown men when they were teenagers, and the factors that led to that.

Demi Lovato in March on 'Baby This Is Keke Palmer'
Demi Lovato thinks back to the nostalgic highs and the cringe lows of teen stardom. (Image Credit: YouTube)

These former teen stars had very similar experiences

On the Tuesday, March 3 episode of Baby, This Is Keke Palmer, the eponymous host reflected upon the red flag age gaps of her adolescence.

“I found myself dating. I’m 15, why is my boyfriend 20?” she recalled thinking.

This remark came in retrospect, because it seemed to make sense at the time.

Her guest for this legend-to-legend conversation was Demi Lovato.

“Why was my boyfriend 30?” Demi responded, nodding in agreement. “You know what I’m saying?”

Keke very clearly knows what Demi is saying.

And so do we.

In 2010, Demi was 18 years old. Wilmer Valderrama was 30. The two began dating, only breaking up in 2016.

Demi has spoken about the highs and lows of this erstwhile relationship before — alleging violations of consent but also describing the romance as “love at first sight.”

We do have to emphasize that Valderrama’s name doesn’t come up during the chat. And, honestly, it doesn’t need to.

Keke Palmer in March on 'Baby This Is Keke Palmer'
Keke Palmer gets expressive on her show, ‘Baby, This Is Keke Palmer.’ (Image Credit: YouTube)

What brought about these situations?

Contrary to what conspiracy theorists might push, it isn’t that teenage actors are pushed to date adult men by evil puppetmasters. At least, not usually.

The unique combination of a financially successful career and unusual adolescent independence did feed into this situation, as it would for even non-famous teens.

But, as Keke suggested during the interview, both former child stares “were trying to find outlets and just a way to process” their fairly unique lives.

“Nobody our age could understand,” Demi agreed. “But then you look back in hindsight, when I turned 30 I was like, ‘That’s not OK.’”

“Girl, the moment that you realize and you get to the age that a lot of people that were around you and doing stuff,” Keke remarked.

“It’s almost a mental break that can happen because you realize you were taken advantage of,” Keke added. “‘Oh, I was being exploited.’”

It is very common for teens, even those who do not date anyone older than a classmate, to think little to nothing of an adult dating one of their classmates.

(This was even more common a couple of decades ago, before social media.)

At fifteen, you might think “gee, why would my friend date someone as ancient as 26?” Then, over a decade later, you remember that — and imagine that mindset of someone in their mid-twenties dating a high school sophomore.

“Especially if you are an older soul, too,” Demi added, clarifying: “Especially if you’re mature for your age.”

Demi Lovato and Keke Palmer in March on 'Baby This Is Keke Palmer'
Demi Lovato and Keke Palmer had similar experiences as teen stars, and they were not alone. (Image Credit: YouTube)

These two baddies both have excellent taste

This formed a natural segue into both praising Hilary Duff’s song, “Mature.” (Hilary has been popping off with new music lately.)

Remarking upon how they all had similar experiences as child stars, Demi noted that their 2022 song, “29,” was about an older partner.

(Demi was 17 and Valderrama was 29 when they first met, though the dating did not begin until Demi’s 18th birthday.)

As we already mentioned, plenty of non-celebrities — particularly women — have comparable stories about men who, at the very best, were too immature. In most cases, these are stories of men who exploited them as teens.

We’re glad that Demi and Keke are both in much better places today. We’re just so sorry that they had to pull themselves out of these places of exploitation.

Demi Lovato & Keke Palmer Discuss Grown Men Who ‘Exploited’ Them as Teen … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

How To Get A Tasty Caramelized Crust On Rump Roast

Rump roast is one of the tougher cuts of beef, but when cooked right, it’s delicious. One of the keys is a caramelized crust on the outside.

​Mashed – Fast Food, Celebrity Chefs, Grocery, Reviews

Categories
Sports Fox

Second Thoughts: INDYCAR as Support Series Makes Sense for Phoenix

Pato O’Ward loves him some INDYCAR. So it is understandable that he’s slightly frustrated ahead of the INDYCAR-NASCAR Cup weekend at Phoenix. “I’m sick and tired of INDYCAR being, like, the support race,” O’Ward told me and other INDYCAR beat reporters during his media session last Friday morning in St. Petersburg. In the same conversation, O’Ward said, “It is a good thing” and “I’m neutral,” on the opinion of whether there should be more races with INDYCAR and NASCAR Cup racing on the same weekend at the same spot. “If they added more, great. If they don’t add more, great,” O’Ward said. “I don’t really care.” If there were more, that could be a problem. Having one celebration of the two biggest U.S.-based motorsports series seems like a good move. It makes it special. And to the point O’Ward is making, maybe it would be smart to take NASCAR to a traditional INDYCAR market and have it be the support series. But that’s looking down the road. When it comes to what makes this weekend cool, it makes sense to look back. The last attempt at a NASCAR-INDYCAR weekend (sorry, Doug Boles) wasn’t all that special. O’Ward’s personal experience is from the Brickyard weekend, where INDYCAR ran Saturday on the Indianapolis Motor Speedway road course, followed by Cup the next day. My guess is that adds to his frustration. There wasn’t a great buzz about the overlap that weekend. INDYCAR’s big race at Indy is the Indianapolis 500. And Cup cars on the IMS road course didn’t generate a whole lot of juice. This weekend will be different because both series have spent decades racing at Phoenix. INDYCAR has a long history at this track. This will be the 65th race on the 1-mile oval. It hasn’t raced at Phoenix since 2018, so the fans in that area are looking forward to another competition. Hopefully, this one will be better if the upper lane can get rubbered in (they will have a specific high-lane practice Friday). INDYCAR will run laps five or six seconds faster than the Cup cars, so those drivers will offer fans something totally different than what NASCAR drivers are bringing to the weekend. And Saturday at Phoenix is typically a day that draws a decent crowd, and the expectation is that there will be a good crowd for the INDYCAR and O’Reilly Series doubleheader that follows Cup qualifying. NASCAR and INDYCAR will put on different races beyond just the speeds. INDYCAR has a rule that drivers can’t go on the apron, so that isn’t an option (it would also be very dangerous). So the great thing about this weekend is that the two series will put on quite different shows. And while Cup has the more recent tradition and has been the focus of the Phoenix market, the crowds should have a good mix of INDYCAR and NASCAR fans. “Obviously, we’re catering to a very similar crowd,” O’Ward said. “Obviously, some NASCAR people don’t watch INDYCAR, vice versa. I would love to say that I watch all forms of motor sports, but I don’t. “I don’t really keep up with what’s going on with NASCAR…I can’t tell you last time I watched the NASCAR race that we raced with them. I usually just look at how the friends are doing and look at the results…I don’t really follow it, and it’s not because I don’t care about it or anything, but usually I’m doing other things and, or traveling or whatever.” The facts are that, except for the Indianapolis 500, more people watch Cup racing than INDYCAR racing. NASCAR rode the wave of high-contact, high speeds on more intermediate ovals and strong personalities in the 1990s and 2000s to become the dominant U.S.-based racing series. As the rise of the Brickyard 400 to huge crowds to spare crowds to now more modest crowds shows, there can be an ebb and flow to the popularity of the series. The INDYCAR industry should be fine with being the support series to a NASCAR weekend. The same would go for NASCAR if it ever raced on the same weekend as Formula 1. In that instance, Cup should be cool with being the support series there. The potential exposure is great. All series, successful and not-so-successful, should look to expand their fan bases. This is how expansion works. Maybe one day, INDYCAR could be the main show on a joint NASCAR-INDYCAR doubleheader at Phoenix. The best way to get there, for the time being, is to race on Saturdays during the NASCAR weekend.​Latest Sports News from FOX Sports

Categories
Music

Urgent Recall: BBQ Sauce Could Be Deadly

A popular BBQ sauce has hit a snag, and it might be hiding in your pantry. Let’s break down what you need to know. Continue reading…​The Boot – Country Music News, Music Videos and Songs

Categories
Food

Where To Find The 9 Best Reuben Sandwiches In America

You can’t go wrong ordering a Reuben, but there are some places that just do it better. From New York to Omaha, these are the very best in the U.S.

​Food Republic – Restaurants, Reviews, Recipes, Cooking Tips

Categories
Sports Fox

Big Picture: Sonny Dykes Endorses 24-Team FCS Model as CFP Expansion Debate Grows

Before I wrapped up a recent phone conversation with TCU head coach Sonny Dykes, we visited the one of many topics reshaping the sport: Which College Football Playoff format does he actually prefer? Twelve teams? Sixteen? The Big Ten’s floated 24-team model? What I got is one of the rarest commodities in sports journalism: a straight answer. “I like the FCS model,” Dykes told me, referring to the Football Championship Subdivision, the NCAA’s second tier of Division I football. “Why in the world are we having conference championship games if they tell us conference championship games don’t matter? Why in the world would we have a game in December that doesn’t matter?” No hedging. No coach-speak. Just a head coach publicly questioning the logic of the sport’s postseason structure. And it’s a structure that’s already gaining momentum. When Dykes led TCU to the national title game in the 2022 season, 131 teams competed at the FBS level. This fall, there will be 138. The number of teams playing FBS football keeps expanding — and so does the pressure to expand the College Football Playoff, again, barely a decade after its 2014 debut. The question is no longer whether the field will grow. It’s how big it will get, and who gets to decide? Neither the Big Ten nor the SEC — the two conferences with the most voting power to extend the field — is opposed to expansion. They just don’t agree on how many teams should be included or the formula for entry. And recent history shows why that disagreement matters. Three years ago, Dykes led TCU to the four-team CFP, despite a loss in the Big 12 championship game. A year later, Florida State went 13–0, won the ACC title and was, controversially, left out of the four-team field entirely. [LET’S DEBATE: What to Keep and Change in the CFP Format] By 2025, the disconnect had only widened: ACC champion Duke did not receive an invitation to the CFP, while Oklahoma, Texas A&M, Miami, Oregon and Ole Miss received invitations without even qualifying for their respective conference title games. If that’s going to be the case in the future — and as long as Notre Dame plays football as an independent — Dykes has a solution for what the next evolution of scheduling in the sport should be. “Let’s get rid of those [conference championship] games,” he told me. “Let’s start the season a week earlier. Let’s play straight through [without bye weeks], finish in the first week of January and be done.” And that is essentially how the FCS playoff model functions. And that advantage matters. Sixteen of the last 18 FCS national championship game participants advanced by playing at home through the semifinals. And over the past decade, the top-2 seeds have filled 16 of the 20 spots in the title game. “The FCS has proven for a long time that it has a very easy model, a very sustainable model,” Dykes said. “The fact that we can’t get the two conferences that are calling the shots to agree on it is just crazy.” To him, the logic is obvious. “Why in the world would we not adopt it?” Dykes questioned. “It’s worked for a long time, and it’s like these guys want to invent the wheel, and the wheel’s been spinning for 20 years.” In the current FBS playoff model, the programs most likely to secure the top-four seeds in the CFP are also likely to be the sport’s best-funded and deepest. For teams outside the Power 4, that makes playing for a national title — or even earning an invitation to the CFP — seem almost unrealistic. “The problem is, there are now 138 teams playing Division I football,” Dykes told me. “How many of those teams really have a chance to win it? Maybe 15? That’s less than 10 percent. I mean, that’s not good. That would be like only three teams in the NFL having a shot. That’s not good for college football. “So we either need to split it up and divide it amongst the teams that are really committed to playing at the highest level, or we need to figure out a way to make it more accessible to those other teams.” The teams Dykes worries about most are those playing Group of 6 football, programs recently elevated from the FCS to FBS or schools like the one he once coached at: Louisiana Tech. In 2012, he led the Bulldogs to a No. 19 ranking in the BCS poll.”We had a really good team, but we did not have a chance to win a national championship,” Dykes told me. “It’s hard for those teams that don’t have the financial commitment. It was hard then, and it’s even much harder now in the pay-for-play era that we have.” The price of playing big-time college football has never been higher, and yet we’ve never seen more schools try to use it as a vehicle to elevate their national visibility. [CFP: Joel Klatt’s CFP Model To Help End (Most) Debates] Will the CFP field extend to 24 teams in the near future? That’s hard to say. But with most network television contracts set to expire over the next decade and the CFP reaching the conclusion of its deal, leagues will realign again. New deals will be struck between leagues and TV rights holders. College football fans will inevitably look up one day and find that the sport has changed drastically once again. And if the most prominent stakeholders don’t act soon, will that drastic change be for the better of the sport? Dykes is aware of all of this. He simply hopes the leaders of the sport do something about it sooner rather than later, before he feels like he’s lost the game he’s dedicated his life to coaching. In the Big Picture, we contextualize key moves and moments so you can instantly understand why they matter.​Latest Sports News from FOX Sports