Categories
Entertainment

Floor It and Catch the Speed Cast Then and Now

Sandra Bullock, Keanu Reeves, Speed, 1994, 30th anniversaryPop quiz, hotshots: How many years has it been since Speed was blowing up at the box office?
Well, let’s see, its lead stars haven’t aged a day, so…
Wait, 32 years? Indeed, the action…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Categories
Entertainment

12 Costco Products With Price Cuts In August 2026

In August 2026, Costco is giving customers a chance at some late-summer savings with a number of price cuts across departments. Here’s what you can save on.

​Mashed – Fast Food, Celebrity Chefs, Grocery, Reviews

Categories
Alaska News

ABC Alaska News at 10 for Friday, 08/07/2026

The latest news and information from your Alaska news station.

Categories
Alaska News

Fox 4 News at 9 for Friday, 08/07/2026

The latest news and information from your Alaska news station.

Categories
Entertainment

Taylor Swift, Zendaya & More Who Kept Wedding Dress Photos Private

Zendaya, Taylor Swift, Kirsten DunstI bet you think about Taylor Swift’s wedding dress.
After all, it’s been more than two fortnights since the Grammy winner wed Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce at New York’s Madison Square…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Categories
Politics

Pete Buttigieg: Everyone’s ‘watching the state of Michigan right now’

Michigan Democrats’ scramble to unify after a brutal primary continued Friday with a preplanned rally that brought together the statewide ticket.

It also brought out Pete Buttigieg, a former and potentially future presidential candidate, whose presence helped underscore the stakes not just in November, but for 2028.

Holding the Michigan Senate seat is key to Democrats’ hopes of winning back the upper chamber. It is also a major battleground state that has now voted for President Donald Trump in two of the last three presidential elections, even as it sends Democrats like Elissa Slotkin to the Senate. Michigan is now poised to become an early presidential nominating state, giving it outsized influence on the 2028 contest.

Buttigieg laid out, in explicit terms, the broader stakes of a fractured Democratic coalition heading into the general election: “The stakes are high, and people from around the country, people from around the world, are watching the state of Michigan right now to see if we have the capability to put together that coalition to win.”

“We’re going to win because we know what it means to focus on what’s at stake, to lock arms as allies after a spirited primary, to pull together in common cause,” said Buttigieg, who stayed neutral in the state’s Senate primary, at the Michigan Democratic Party’s general election kickoff rally.

Abdul El-Sayed on Tuesday defeated Rep. Haley Stevens after a bruising primary that exposed ideological and demographic divisions within the party. He now faces Republican Rep. Mike Rogers in the general election, and he has to figure out how to pull moderate and establishment Democrats back into the fold to hold the seat.

Republicans, seeing an opening with Black and Jewish voters who broke more for Stevens, are already trying to peel away parts of the Democratic coalition. They view Michigan as one of their best pickup opportunities this cycle.

Buttigieg, who represents the party’s more moderate flank, used his remarks Friday to explicitly appeal to Democrats across the spectrum — and even some Republicans.

“Wherever you sit, in this big tent of ours, and it is a big tent, but whatever corner of that tent you think of as home, there is a set of things, and I mean big, big things, where we agree with each other, we agree with most Michiganders, and Washington and Lansing Republicans disagree with us,” he said. “That’s what’s at stake right now, and it’s not all about left, right, and center, Democrat and Republican.”

Buttigieg’s remarks — and the early unification around El-Sayed in one of the nation’s most important battlegrounds — underscores the delicate balancing act party leaders have to contend with. After a string of progressive victories through the spring, establishment Democrats in particular are trying to rally behind their new nominees without necessarily embracing every part of the politics that carried them across the finish line.

That dance showed up subtly throughout the speeches on Friday night.

Buttigieg at one point framed El-Sayed’s position as wanting “to expand affordable health care and keep more money in your pocket,” whereas Rogers “voted against the Affordable Care Act.” Buttigieg notably did not use the phrase “Medicare for All” to address one of El-Sayed’s signature progressive positions.

El-Sayed, for his part, also made an explicit effort to turn the page.

“In the spirit of unity, in the spirit of the work, in the spirit of coming together, I want to thank both of my colleagues who ran, Haley Stevens and Mallory McMorrow, for an incredible race,” he said. “Their incredible public service in the state of Michigan, and I cannot wait to see what both of them will do next.”

But he signaled that the progressive policy positions that powered his campaign would remain central to his general election stump. He reiterated his support for Medicare for All and railed against “the system of super PACs” and the millions of outside money flooding into politics.

And he sharply criticized Rogers, who, along with his fellow Republicans, have dramatically increased their attacks against El-Sayed since he won the primary, offering an early glimpse of what is likely to be a combative and divisive general election.

“They don’t know who we fight for,” El-Sayed said. “We fight for the families barely able to put their groceries in the cart and check out, we fight for the mom who’s worried about the child care she needs to be able to work a job that barely pays enough, we fight for the folks who are afraid about what happens if they get sick. We fight for each other, and we don’t back down.”

​Politics

Categories
Entertainment

Bella Ramsey’s Cutout Top Might Be Their Boldest Look Yet

Bella RamseyForget bending the knee—Bella Ramsey is bending the rules of fashion. 
The Game of Thrones alum stepped out on the red carpet Aug. 6 in quite the unconventional look, rocking a gray cashmere bib…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Categories
Entertainment

Brandon Clarke’s Cause of Death Revealed After NBA Star Dies at 29

Brandon ClarkeNew information about Brandon Clarke’s death has been shared.
Almost three months after the veteran NBA player was found dead on May 11 in his California home, authorities have released his cause…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Categories
Alaska News

Judge upholds income tax ballot disclosure, sparks sponsor outrage

(The Center Square) – A Thurston County Superior Court judge on Friday upheld the government-drafted financial disclosure statement slated to appear on November ballots for Initiative 645, a high-profile measure seeking to repeal Washington state’s newly enacted income tax on…

Categories
Alaska News

Alaska state elections attorney says it’s OK for candidates to temporarily conceal finances

(Photo by Krisanapong Detraphiphat/Getty Images)

(Photo by Krisanapong Detraphiphat/Getty Images)

An attorney defending the Alaska Division of Elections against a lawsuit argued in state court Friday that candidates for state office are not obliged to disclose their finances when they file for office.

If that argument is upheld in court, it would upend existing practices and could end voters’ ability to examine political candidates’ personal finances in the early stages of a primary election.

The lawsuit in court on Friday was filed by the Alaska Democratic Party, which is challenging the eligibility of Jose Roel Tagle to run for Alaska House District 22. Tagle, a Republican, is the only challenger to incumbent Rep. Ted Eischeid, D-Anchorage.

The Alaska Democratic Party challenged Tagle’s eligibility after he filed a completely blank Public Officer Disclosure Form alongside his candidacy application. State law requires candidates to use that form to list all income — including Permanent Fund dividends — that a candidate and their immediate family received during the previous year.

The Division of Elections frequently rejects candidates who file no form at all.

Despite Tagle’s blank form, the Division of Elections accepted his candidacy and rejected the Democratic Party’s challenge, causing the party to file suit. 

In front of Anchorage Superior Court Judge Josie Garton, Alaska Department of Law attorney Griffin Deitz said that filing a blank form is acceptable because the relevant law gives candidates 30 days to make corrections.

“A candidate could comply — they could submit a financial disclosure, as Mr. Tagle did here, that was blank, and then if there are financial interests to be reported, could report those at a later date,” Deitz said.

This year, Alaska’s candidate filing deadline was June 1 and election day is Aug. 18. If a 30-day delay becomes common, almost half the primary campaign season could elapse before voters are informed about candidates’ personal wealth.

Garton, from the bench, asked: “Why wouldn’t every candidate file a blank form?”

Deitz appeared to briefly struggle for an answer.

“In this case — well — I couldn’t begin to guess why candidates would or wouldn’t do so,” he said. “But they have that 30 days. So the presumption that the (Division of Elections) would make in this case, Your Honor, is that the Legislature intended to provide this grace period so that people could file at the very last minute and then bring that financial disclosure into compliance before the election.”

Attorney River Sterne, representing the Alaska Democratic Party, said that position is unacceptable.

“An important thing here is that filing a totally blank POFD is the same as not filing a POFD at all,” he said, arguing that the Division of Elections should have excluded Tagle from the primary election ballot.

In written arguments before Friday, and again in court, Deitz argued that the Alaska Public Offices Commission — not the Division of Elections — is the agency that should determine whether a POFD is properly filed.

The Division of Elections does not have investigation powers, he said, and is thus unable to judge. Tagle may have no income to report, Deitz suggested.

Sterne countered that other public records clearly list Tagle as the officer of a privately held company, and there is no “de minimis” exemption for reporting shares of a privately held company if the profits are vanishingly small or nonexistent. Given that, he said, the Division of Elections could easily conclude that Tagle’s filing was incorrect.

Neither Tagle nor the Alaska Republican Party filed legal briefs in support of Tagle’s candidacy ahead of Friday’s oral argument. The party’s chair, Carmela Warfield, did not answer a phone call or email asking why not. 

Regardless of how Garton rules on the lawsuit, Tagle’s candidacy appears unlikely to proceed. As of Friday, Tagle had not amended his financial disclosure form, meaning that even under the Division of Elections’ interpretation of the law, he is beyond the 30-day grace period.

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE