Category: Entertainment

Reading Time: 2 minutes

The Lindsay Clancy murder trial may have ended in a mistrial, but the disturbing conspiracy theories surrounding the case haven’t gone away.

Now, one of the jurors who heard the evidence firsthand is pushing back against the people who continue to accuse Patrick Clancy of being responsible for the deaths of his three children.

Nick Dargie, a 25-year-old juror identified as Juror No. 10, spoke with Good Morning America about the case and said he has no doubt that Patrick was telling the truth when he called 911 after discovering what had happened inside the family’s Massachusetts home.

“I don’t believe in the conspiracy theory that [Patrick Clancy] was the one who did it,” Dargie said.

And he believes hearing that emergency call would change the minds of many people who have embraced the theory.

“I think if everyone heard that 911 call, they would change their mind,” Dargie added.

The call itself was not released outside of the courtroom. Judge William Sullivan reportedly determined that it was too disturbing to be made public.

But jurors heard it during the trial, and Dargie described the experience as something he will never forget.

“I’ll never forget [the 911 call.] That was frightening. I never heard something like that, a scream like that coming out of someone’s mouth; it’s horrifying,” he said.

Patrick discovered the bodies of his three children — Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months — after returning home from an errand in January 2023.

Lindsay ultimately admitted to killing the children, but her defense argued that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible for her actions. Prosecutors maintained that she understood what she was doing and should be held accountable.

After weeks of testimony, the jury deadlocked, resulting in a mistrial. Meanwhile, Patrick has faced an entirely different battle outside the courtroom.

Conspiracy theorists, including some public figures, have accused him of involvement in the children’s deaths despite the fact that he has never been charged in connection with the case.

Patrick, who has since remarried, has publicly forgiven Lindsay and spoken about the devastating impact of postpartum mental illness. But through his attorney, he has also made clear that he will not simply ignore the increasingly aggressive accusations against him.

His lawyer, Howard Cooper, said Patrick has faced a “relentless, escalating and destructive defamation campaign” that has put his “reputation, livelihood and life” at risk.

Even Lindsay’s own attorney, Kevin Reddington, has condemned the theories, saying Patrick’s life has been turned upside down by accusations he does not deserve.

“She knew that it was just terrible what he was going through,” Reddington told CBS this week

“She knows, and it’s readily apparent that Patrick has been set upon and his life has been turned upside down into a nightmare that he doesn’t deserve. Period. Full stop.”

After everything this family has endured, apparently, some people still haven’t gotten the message that Patrick Clancy is a victim, too.

Lindsay Clancy Juror and Lawyer Blast Patrick Clancy Conspiracy Theories: ‘He … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Long before Hailey Baldwin became Hailey Bieber, she was a model.

Nepo baby though she may be, but she’s showing that she’s more than qualified.

She is also showing a tremendous amount of skin.

In this steamy new shoot, Hailey is wearing nothing but tan lines. And she looks incredible.

Hailey Bieber is leaving nothing to the imagination

29-year-old Hailey Bieber stripped naked to model for the cover of ICE Magazine‘s third edition, “The Brazil Issue.”

(Despite its name, ICE Magazine is a magazine that centers women, and is not affiliated with the ethnic cleansing organization founded under George W. Bush that the Trump regime has deployed to terrorize American communities.)

On the cover, Hailey is lounging naked while drinking a can of Guaraná Antarctica, a local soft drink.

Her tan lines are very visible.

Beyond those, Hailey is all tan all over.

Hailey Bieber for Renell Medrano’s ICE Magazine. pic.twitter.com/rfAyMcdUpM

— Hailey Bieber Outfits (@haileysoutfits) September 8, 2026

Renell Medrano snapped these steamy photos during Carnival 2026.

(That means back in February.)

Other cover stars of the issue include Tina Kunakey and Juliana Nalú.

Just for the record, Hailey does don some clothing for other pics. The yellow bikini is not exactly hiding much.

Hailey also wore a sheer Only Hearts bra at one point. She is truly stunning.

Years ago, she was opposed to going fully nude for any photoshoot

In 2021, Hailey Bieber cited her Christian beliefs for why she would not agree to pose nude despite her modeling career.

However, she and Medrano have been friends for over a decade. Ultimately, it led to her changing her mind.

“I’m comfortable with her pushing me, photographing me differently, helping me be seen in a different way,” Hailey told the magazine.

She explained that this is “because I know she just wants me to be comfortable in myself, too.”

Hailey affirmed: “I would never have done that, shown that much, with anybody else but her.”

Hailey Bieber stars in ICE Magazine Brazil’s latest issue 🔥

[📸: @renellmedrano ] pic.twitter.com/CfiamPXi9P

— Complex (@Complex) September 8, 2026

Hailey has Brazilian heritage through her mother and grandmother.

“They really did nurture and develop my love of Brazilian culture, because that’s who they are, it’s where they come from,” she explained.

“Watching the woman who’s raising you be really comfortable in her body is something I’m very grateful for,” Hailey expressed.

She affirmed: “It always helped me embrace myself.”

A portion of the sale of each magazine goes to the Center for Immigrant and Refugee Women in São Paulo.

Hailey — who has brought in considerably more wealth than her husband — will match the total contribution. Good for her!

Hailey Bieber Bares All, Wears Nothing But Tantalizing Tan Lines was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Fall means getting back in the groove of busier mornings as families race out to work and school. These items will help ensure you make time for breakfast.

​Mashed – Fast Food, Celebrity Chefs, Grocery, Reviews

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Donald Trump really, really wants his party to emerge victorious from November’s midterm elections.

And he’s willing to shell out over a trillion dollars to make it happen.

Yes, Trump took the stage at the first-ever Republican National Committee midterm convention last night, where he made a historic (and possibly bogus) promise:

“If the Republicans win, you win with us and you get $5,000,” Trump told the crowd … just one day after he claimed to have been rescued by firefighters during 9/11.

Yes, the President of the United States just offered a payout to every American adult on the condition that his party wins a slate of state and local elections.

Many have pointed out that that’s almost certainly illegal, but the question on the minds of many Americans today has little to do with constitutionality and everything to do with plausibility.

That question: Will Trump really deliver this time? The answer: Probably not. For a number of reasons.

For starters, there are the logistics:

Trump offered no details about where the money would come from, whether Congress would need to approve the payments, or how the administration would legally distribute them. He did say the money would need to be spent in the United States.

And the potential price tag is … substantial.

Depending on who qualifies, sending $5,000 payments to hundreds of millions of Americans would cost approximately $1.35 trillion.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Wall Street Journal (@wsj)

That makes this considerably more complicated than simply announcing that Uncle Sam is sending everyone a very generous check.

Trump has floated similar ideas before. He previously promoted the concept of a $2,000 tariff-funded “dividend,” while other proposed cash payments, including a DOGE dividend, failed to become reality.

The timing of this latest promise is also worth noting.

Trump has been urging Republican voters to treat the upcoming midterm election as though he himself were up for reelection. During his convention speech, he explicitly asked Americans to “pretend that I’m on the ballot.”

The message is clear: A vote for Republicans could supposedly mean $5,000 in your pocket.

Whether that money ever actually makes it there is another question entirely.

For now, Trump has offered voters a very enticing number without providing many details about how he plans to make it happen.

But hey, at least there’s finally a campaign promise you can put a dollar amount on.

Donald Trump Promises $5,000 Check to Every American If GOP Wins Midterms: Will He … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Why don’t Henry Winkler and Tom Hanks seem to get along?

They both have long careers. They even worked together on projects — just not for many decades.

Additionally, they both have well-deserved reputations as two of the nicest, most decent men in Hollywood.

In a new interview, Winkler is opening up about how he’s still “working on” his feelings about their tension … and whether he’s open to putting the past behind them.

Henry Winkler discusses what allegedly ‘pissed off’ Tom Hanks

On the Wednesday, September 9 episode of In Depth with Graham Bensinger, acting legend Henry Winkler discussed his tense relationship with fellow acting legend Tom Hanks.

Winkler’s demeanor and body language clearly shifted as the interview brought up Hanks.

Thinking back, Winkler shared his side of things from when he was briefly director of Turner & Hooch before getting fired.

Winkler, who was at one time best known as Arthur “Fonzie” Fonzarelli on Happy Days but today is best known for smaller, beloved roles on comedy shows (and, of course, for his social media presence), recalled feeling out of his depth.

He now feels that, in his capacity as director, he over-directed … which is why his role lasted less than two weeks.

Turner & Hooch is a film from the late ’80s. It is a buddy cop film in which one of the buddies is a dog. The other is Tom Hanks’ character.

“I, at that time being insecure, I talked too much and I gave them direction,” Winkler admitted.

“I [did] what I thought was my job, and I wanted to do it over again,” he recalled, “and apparently that pissed them off.”

Winkler ended up getting fired from the directing job, and admitted that he did not handle it well.

Even so, he remains unsure where the tension in his relationship with Hanks truly originates. This was not the first intersection in their careers.

He’s ‘still working’ on how he feels about all of this

Long before Turner & Hooch, Tom Hanks was not a movie star or a household name, but merely a guest star on Henry Winkler’s claim to fame.

“We did a retrospective of ‘Happy Days,’” Winkler recalled.

These retrospective documentaries are often nostalgia bait for people who watched these shows when they aired. They can also be educational for people who enjoy television and its rich history.

“And we wanted 60 seconds of Tom Hanks in his episode,” Winkler stated diplomatically, “and we did not get permission for that.”

In other words, he’s making it clear that there appear to be hard feelings from Hanks’ camp.

Winkler admitted that he is “still working” on his “perspective” about Hanks declining to participate.

He is, however, open to mending fences if he gets the chance.

It sounds like Hanks would have to feel similarly.

We’ll admit that it’s odd to hear about two of the — famously — nicest men in the entertainment industry not getting along.

Sometimes, two good and decent people just don’t like each other. Sometimes the vibes are bad. Maybe that’s all that there is to this.

Henry Winkler Shades Tom Hanks After Decades of Feuding Between Two of the Nicest Men in … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Corie Walsh allegedly killed her 2-year-old, planned to kill her husband, and attempted to take her own life.

She is said to have already been “obsessed” with the Lindsay Clancy case.

Before and even after the deadlocked jury resulted in a mistrial, the postpartum psychosis tragedy captivated the nation.

Did that same tragedy unfold here? Is Walsh a copycat of some kind? Is something else going on?

What did Corie Walsh’s attorney say in court?

NBC 5 Chicago reported on the bail hearing for 40-year-old Corie Walsh.

She is accused of having murdered her 2-year-old son, Barrett, who died via hanging.

There, prosecutors claimed that she had made statements about “poisoning [her husband] with a drink.”

Walsh also apparently tried to take her own life, as she was found fully clothed in a bloody bathtub with wounds on her wrists and thighs.

Additionally, she was reportedly in such a delusional state that she believed that she had killed all of her children, rather than only the 2-year-old. She reportedly told investigators that her toddler was “the devil.”

It sounds like her behavior worried friends

Defense attorney Robert Kerr informed the court that Walsh is “severely mentally ill” and and should be placed in “immediate” care to prevent her from harming herself further.

Their argument is that she was in psychotic episode when she allegedly hanged her 2-year-old until he died from asphyxia.

Apparently, in the hours before this tragic killing, Walsh was spiraling, sending frantic and “confusing” messages to friends.

The messages seemed “out of character” to them, as at least some of them would presumably testify.

Some of the messages were related to the Lindsay Clancy trial during jury deliberations.

The ‘Lindsay Clancy copycat’ theory is ‘sickening’

“It was manslaughter, please I’m really freaking out,” Corie Walsh allegedly messaged on September 1.

At times, Walsh allegedly seemed to believe that Patrick Clancy, not Lindsay Clancy, had killed the couple’s children.

(This is a debunked conspiracy theory. Lindsay and her attorney do not claim this, and it has been widely debunked.)

Kerr condemned any claims of Walsh being a “Lindsay Clancy copycat” as “sickening.”

He says that she was diagnosed with “grief psychotic disorder” at the hospital, and that her husband has “unwavering” support for her.

What is the truth?

We do not know what Walsh’s true mental state was, and we do not claim to know what really happened. Three main possibilities have been floated on social media.

The first is a genuine psychotic episode. There are several signs, from the alleged murder to the alleged attempt to take her own life.

The second is that Walsh, for whatever reason, consciously and deliberately wished to commit this heinous crime, and fabricated symptoms of psychosis (and perhaps ensured that she would survive the apparent suicide attempt) in order to get away with it. This could mean deliberately copying elements of the Clancy family’s tragedy.

And the third option is that there was some other mental illness at play, one different than a psychotic episode. That one’s pretty broad. We’ve seen people float the idea that someone with rare forms of OCD might feel compelled to enact a murder similar to one described in detail on the news, but that is so rare that it boggles the mind.

(Despite apparently labeling the toddler “the devil” and “the Antichrist,” religious psychosis usually takes a different form than this, but many cases of psychosis may involve religiously inspired delusions.)

All that we truly know is that another family has endured another tragedy. It will be up the experts and the courts to determine, to the best of their ability, who if anyone is at fault.

Corie Walsh, Accused of Murdering 2-Year-Old, Was ‘Obsessed’ With Lindsay … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Moroccan Cannon and Monroe Cannon will always be Mariah Carey’s babies. 
That was made clear when the 15-year-old twins posed with the “Obsessed” singer in an adorable mirror selfie. 
Moroccan…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Reading Time: 2 minutes

One year ago today, conservative pundit Charlie Kirk was shot and killed at a speaking engagement at a college in Utah.

In the 12 months since Kirk’s death, he’s been the subject of countless thinkpieces, conspiracy theories, memes, and heated debates.

The trend shows no sign of stopping, and on the first anniversary of the tragedy, both Kirk’s supporters and critics are discussing his legacy.

Perhaps the most moving tribute came from Charlie’s widow, Erika Kirk, who wrote about her year of mourning in an article for the Salt Lake Tribune.

“Grief is strange. Time continues even when every part of you wants it to pause or, better yet, rewind. But the people we love who have passed on would not want us to spend the rest of our lives trying to rewind,” she wrote.

“At first, I needed to survive the next 15 minutes. Over time, I’ve realized that Charlie would want me to live them.”

Erika took over as CEO of Charlie’s Turning Point USA in the wake of his passing, and she’s often been criticized for exploiting the tragedy.

Many have argued that Erika’s time and attention would be better spent on her two young children.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Turning Point Action (@tpaction)

But in her article, she argues that carrying on his mission is exactly what Charlie would have wanted.

Commenters countered that he was generally opposed to the idea of working mothers.

Elsewhere on the internet, The Intercept published a piece entitled “They Tried to Make Charlie Kirk a Saint. They Made Him a Meme.”

“By elevating Kirk to a martyr and clamping down on free speech, the right assured that he would be ridiculed even in death,” columnist Katherine Krueger argues in the article.

She goes on to argue that there’s a tragic irony to the reaction, as Kirk considered himself a free speech warrior.

“President Trump and his allies almost immediately blamed Democrats and ‘the radical left,’ without evidence, for Kirk’s assassination,” Krueger writes, adding:

“At the Department of Defense, Secretary Pete Hegseth promised to investigate whether members of the armed forces were inadequately mournful and terminate them. The State Department revoked visas of noncitizens who ‘celebrated’ Kirk’s death

Even right-leaning commentators like Richard Hanania have noted that Kirk’s death did not have the unifying, “galvanizing” effect that so many conservatives anticipated.

“The truth is, Charlie Kirk helped build up the culture of conspiracism that would come to haunt his own death,” Hanania writes, noting conspiracy theories advanced by Candace Owens and other media figures.

One year on, there’s no denying that Charlie Kirk’s legacy remains complicated. But knowing how highly Kirk valued debate, perhaps his supporters can take comfort in the knowledge that he’s still being discussed every day.

One Year After Charlie Kirk’s Death His Widow and Critics Debate His Legacy was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Charlie Hunnam is more than happy to get back behind the wheel.
It’s been over 10 years since Sons of Anarchy aired its last episode, but fans are still clamoring for more—and Hunnam is poised to…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Shane Burcaw is not letting haters ruin a happy milestone. 
After he and his wife Hannah Burcaw—known on TikTok as Squirmy and Grubs—shared she was pregnant and confirmed the couple is expecting…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories