Categories
Politics

The host city is doing all of the hosting, none of the headlining

For all theFIFA promotion of the World Cup’s arrival in Miami — think downtown skylines, Latin music and speedboats on Biscayne Bay — today’s quarterfinal match between Norway and England this afternoon will not, in fact, take place along the azure waters of Miami proper.

Instead, star strikers Erling Haaland and Harry Kane will duel this evening in an inland, now-suburban stadium that was once a sandy tract of land where locals would take weekend dirtbike joyrides and come to dump their trash.

The city of Miami Gardens, a predominantly Black community of 114,000 about 15 miles northeast of downtown Miami, is the true host of Florida’s World Cup experience. Since the tournament began, the city has hosted five matches at what has temporarily been rebranded Miami Stadium, with a third-place match next Saturday still to come.

As with many sporting venues in the United States, Miami Stadium was never built to be accessible to a central, walkable, downtown urban core. Instead, the site was chosen by Miami Dolphins owner Joe Robbie in 1984 as a low-income, rural and then-unincorporated alternative to the city of Miami, which wanted to raise rent on the NFL team’s stadium. Instead, Robbie signed a 99-year lease with Dade County for the stadium site, paying $1 a year.

At the time, the local populace was little enthused about the prospect of welcoming a $100 million pro sports stadium in its backyard. Despite a civil rights lawsuit from local homeowners, many of whom were Black, by 1987 the stadium opened to the public.

Nearly 40 years later, that stadium is now a major economic engine for Miami Gardens, which incorporated in 2003. The city, never a glamour destination in the region, is now host to one of the world’s largest sporting events. The Oxford Economics Company’s Tourism Economics Event Impact Calculator predicted that the World Cup would generate about $650 million in economic activity, spread across South Florida, a number that may have been optimistic.

But local leaders are hoping there are intangible benefits for a city too easily confused with its much bigger neighbor.

“It will give us an opportunity to sell our story and the city of Miami Gardens,” Mayor Rodney Harris said in a promotional video for the World Cup. “We want them to come back and visit us after FIFA is all gone … open up a business here in Miami Gardens.”

​Politics

Categories
Entertainment

Emily Blunt & John Krasinski Divorce Rumors: Here’s What We Know

Reading Time: 2 minutes

John Krasinski and Emily Blunt are an iconic couple in the entertainment industry.

The Hollywood power couple and parents of two have been facing divorce rumors lately.

Is the former Sexiest Man Alive about to be single?

Here’s what we know about where things stand between them right now.

John Krasinski and Emily Blunt in May 2026.
John Krasinski and Emily Blunt at Regal Times Square on May 15, 2026. (Photo Credit: Cindy Ord/WireImage)

Are they really divorcing?

The latest round of divorce rumors have been hounding Krasinski and Blunt.

Yes, they’ve managed to debunk — or at least, outlast — the split rumors in the past.

But when something seems almost inevitable (since all relationships end in either a breakup or death), people will always look for signs of its coming.

The Hollywood power couple has found a new way to brush off the claims that their marriage is at death’s door.

It wasn’t with a red carpet showing of affection at the 2026 Academy Awards. In fact, it involved skipping the event entirelt.

Instead of attending the Oscars, Krasinki and Blunt took their two daughters to a deeply cultured event.

As a family of four, they attended the Broadway performance of & Juliet at the Stephen Sondheim Theatre.

No, that is not a typo. The play is & Juliet.

The play — actually a jukebox musical — reimagines Shakespeare’s most famous work, but imagining a what if in which the star-crossed lovers didn’t die and got to live out their lives.

Their attendance caught the attention of the production’s official Instagram account, leading to this post:

A family outing is a pretty nice rebuttal

The official Instagram account shared a snap of the two stars, both clad in denim, posing alongside the cast.

“Emily Blunt and John Krasinski saw & Juliet on Broadway,” the caption began.

The caption succinctly concluded: “That’s all.”

In general, Broadway doesn’t need to advertise quite as much as some other institutions. If someone wants to see plays, they likely want to see it on Broadway — and either can or cannot.

But still, that’s a pretty good advertisement. Especially for what may be a lesser known musical, in the grand scheme of things.

Krasinski and Blunt met in 2008 through mutual friends. She has shared her memory of the meeting in the past.

They began dating in November of that year.

By August of 2009, the two became engaged, marrying in July of 2010.

In 2014, Krasinski and Blunt welcomed Hazel.

In 2016, they welcomed her younger sister, Violet.

Between their high profiles and how “rushed” their early relationship was, it seems likely that divorce rumors will continue to rise and fall like a field of crops with the seasons. But, for now, the rumors are just ill-informed whispers.

Emily Blunt & John Krasinski Divorce Rumors: Here’s What We Know was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

Wendy’s Vs McDonald’s: Which Chain Does Cheeseburgers The Best?

I taste tested burgers from Wendy’s and McDonald’s and compiled what I can only call a cheeseburger dossier. Here’s where you should go when a craving hits.

​Mashed – Fast Food, Celebrity Chefs, Grocery, Reviews

Categories
Entertainment

The Best Tanning Mousses That Won’t Streak, Smell Weird or Turn Orange

The Best Tanning Mousses That Won’t Streak, Smell Weird or Turn OrangeFor summer 2026, getting a flawless, sun-kissed glow no longer requires hours spent baking under the sun. Today’s at-home self-tanners have evolved significantly, making it easier than ever before…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Categories
Politics

The secret to becoming a sporting superpower

Few countries punch above their weight in sport quite like Norway.

With a population of approximately 5.6 million, it consistently produces world-class talent across soccer, athletics, winter sports, cycling, golf and tennis — a success many attribute to a distinctive model that prioritizes participation over early specialization, receives sustained public investment and benefits from a political consensus that sport should be accessible to every child.

Lubna Jaffery, Norway’s minister of culture and equality (whose portfolio includes sports) and a social-democratic politician from the governing coalition’s Labour Party, argues that approach is no accident, even in one of Europe’s wealthiest countries.

Speaking to POLITICO from Miami’s South Beach, where she had just joined thousands of Norwegian supporters in the now-famous “Viking Row,” Jaffery expanded on Norway’s emphasis on inclusiveness and play, discussed Russia’s potential reintegration to global sports — and revealed how she thinks tonight’s World Cup quarterfinal against England will play out.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Norway keeps producing world-class athletes across football, athletics, winter sports, cycling, golf, tennis. What is the secret to this — and is it the result of deliberate public policy?

Well, I think it’s the notion in Norway that when you’re young, everyone is allowed to do sports. And several sports as well. It’s not like you just do football if you’re doing football, or if you do gymnastics, you’re just doing gymnastics. A lot of the children, they’re doing several activities at the same time from quite a young age. And the competitive part of it isn’t very present at a young age — so they’re doing it mostly for fun.

I think for our government — and also for several governments before our coalition — it’s been very important that all children who want to do sports are allowed to do sports, that the pricing is reasonable and so, if you’re a part of a family that isn’t very well off, you’re also allowed to have children doing sports and also a culture of giving people the chance even though they don’t have a lot of money.

I think the playfulness in the Norwegian sporting system — that we don’t compete from a young age — is a crucial part of why we do have so many athletes doing well. Of course, it’s also due to the very, very hard work they put into it.

Many other countries pursue sporting success by specializing children earlier, spending money and placing winning as the most important thing. As international competition becomes more intense, do you think Norway can continue this development without compromising its values? 

I think it’s part of who we are as Norwegians. We want to have a playful approach to sports from quite a young age. Of course, we also have to compete and teach children how it is to be in a competition — because if you want to do this professionally, it’s something you have to learn how to do and all the feelings around being a part of the competition.

I think the philosophy is very clear. OK, you’re taking part in something that is good for you, where you make friends, which gives you the ability to learn different skills that double as life skills when you grow up. If we want to compete at the level we’re doing right now internationally, it is important to take care of the model we have in Norway where inclusiveness and playfulness is a very important part.

Norway was a strong supporter of sanctions against Russia after the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The direction of travel at the moment at the IOC and FIFA seems to be toward bringing the Russians back into competition. What do you think about that? Do you think it’s right or wrong?

We have a very long-standing tradition in Norwegian politics — including the Norwegian minister for sports — to support the Norwegian Football Federation and also the Norwegian Olympic Committee and their viewpoints.

So we are backing them, and the Norwegian standpoint is that they don’t want to allow Russian athletes to come back — but you have the different organizations that make the decisions, like the IOC and FIFA that, of course, Norwegian politicians aren’t a part of.

We can’t overrule what the sporting federation is doing, but we are supporting the national sporting federations in Norway and their viewpoints against Russia.

OK, last one. Give me a score prediction for Norway against England tonight.

Well, I think England should win this match, actually, if you look at their track record. Of course, I’m hoping for Norway, though. So I won’t give you a prediction. I think it’s going to be a hard match. I’m very nervous, but I have a good feeling.

​Politics

Categories
Entertainment

Cowboys Relied On This Survival Food In The Old West

No matter how tough they were, cowboys couldn’t subsist on true grit alone. Fortunately, they had this highly durable source of protein and carbs.

​Mashed – Fast Food, Celebrity Chefs, Grocery, Reviews

Categories
Alaska News

Lawmakers called to Capitol for weekend work with budget 11 days late

(The Center Square) – State lawmakers headed back to Harrisburg on Saturday for scheduled weekend voting sessions that appear likely to be focused on attempts to get an already late 2026-27 budget put into place.

Categories
Entertainment

Amy Schumer Proudly Shows Off C-Section Scar in New Bikini Photo

Amy Schumer attends The One Party by Uber: New York City at Pier 36 on June 12, 2026 in New York City.Amy Schumer feels pretty in her postpartum body.
The I Feel Pretty star—who shares 7-year-old Gene with ex-husband Chris Fischer—unapologetically showed off the scar she received while welcoming…
​E! Online (US) – Top Stories

Categories
Politics

Poll: Patriotism in the US, Europe and Canada, charted

What does it mean to be patriotic? It depends on a country’s politics.

Pride in one’s country is itself relatively common, according to new results from an international edition of The POLITICO Poll: Majorities of adults across the United States, United Kingdom, Spain, Canada, France and Germany all say they are proud of their country.

But that pride looks different in each country. Expressions of patriotism are shaped by a nation’s history and politics. And in a complex political moment when voters’ relationship with each other, their political parties and their countries continues to shift — and nationalist populist movements continue to rise, claiming patriotism as their own — what it means to be patriotic is evolving.

In America, the flag has become a defining feature of national pride, a symbol increasingly claimed by Donald Trump’s MAGA movement. In Canada, people find pride in their political leaders as they seek to counter Washington’s influence. And in Germany, the country’s Nazi history continues to loom over current debates about nationalism.

The survey, conducted by the independent London-based firm Public First, underscores how cultural and political debates shape subtle differences in patriotism across six major democracies of the West.

Tensions over immigration and culture have roiled Europe and the U.S., with right-wing parties often making national identity central to their political message. The symbols and rituals of patriotism also distinguish countries from one another — from debates over what students are taught in schools and whether they should be required to sing the national anthem, to differences in displays of the flag.

Here’s what stands out for each country.

Pluralities of adults in other countries — and 49 percent of Americans — say the U.S. has the most patriotic citizens. That’s partly because of its overt displays of patriotism, with Americans historically placing national flags on their lawns and outside restaurants and businesses, and leaders frequently wearing flag paraphernalia.

That embrace of the flag stands out. The U.S. flag has long been a revered symbol in the country, and most Americans (51 percent) say they own the national flag. That’s significantly more than adults in the other countries — for instance, just 22 percent of U.K. adults say they own a Union Jack and just 27 percent in France say they own a flag.

Still, the American flag has become somewhat partisan.

Trump and his MAGA movement have made patriotism and nationalism central to Republican politics, and more than 70 percent of his 2024 voters say they own an American flag. Just 44 percent of those who backed former Vice President Kamala Harris say the same. Trump voters are also more likely (52 percent) than Harris voters (33 percent) to say that displaying a national flag outside your house is considered an act of patriotism.

Near-majorities of adults in the U.S., the U.K., France, Spain and Canada say their country should be proud of its history. Germany is the outlier, due to its Nazi past.

Just 24 percent of Germans say the country should be proud of its history. A majority — 53 percent — say the country should neither be proud nor ashamed. Still, only 14 percent say Germany should be ashamed, and a 61 percent majority say they feel the country has “done enough to apologize for the bad things it did in the past” — potentially helping explain why most Germans say they feel neutral of the country’s history.

Politicians from the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party have argued that the country should reclaim a sense of national pride, including by reshaping childhood education so it involves “less Hitler,” as one version of a manifesto published by a regional branch of the party put it. Forty-one percent of voters who plan to back AfD in future elections say Germany should be proud of its history — more than double the number of total adults who say the same.

While such ideas were once considered politically fringe in Germany, they have increasingly moved into the mainstream. The AfD is in first place in national polls, in front of German Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s conservatives, and it’s even further ahead in two eastern states in which regional elections are set for September.

Amid a growing anti-incumbency backlash across the West, Canada stands out.

When asked what makes them most ashamed of their country, just 22 percent of Canadians pointed to their leaders — significantly lower than the 40 percent of Americans, 45 percent of Brits, 52 percent of the French, 43 percent of Germans and 50 percent of Spaniards.

There’s a reason for their more positive outlook on the government. Aided by Trump’s trade war and what have become routine threats to turn Canada into the “51st state,” Mark Carney, a rookie politician, managed to revive Canada’s Liberal Party and win office in April 2025 with promises to stand up to Washington while transforming the oil-rich country into an energy superpower. Carney is even popular in Western Canada — traditionally Conservative territory — thanks to pipeline promises and his rollback of Justin Trudeau-era climate policy. A recent Leger poll showed he’s more popular than any other politician in Quebec.

While the majority of adults across the European countries surveyed expressed national pride, Spaniards are on a different level. A 52 percent majority pick Spain as the best place to live, while most adults in the U.K. and France pick other countries over their own.

That showed up when we asked about pride in nationality, too: A strong 76 percent majority of adults say they are proud to be Spanish, compared with the 68 percent who are proud to be British, 71 percent who are proud to be French and 60 percent who are proud to be German.

In Spain, national pride goes beyond its politics — which has been and is still somewhat tumultuous. Spaniards are reckoning with the echoes of Francisco Franco’s decades-long dictatorship, competing pro-independence movements in regions like Catalonia and the Basque Country, and an ongoing deep dissatisfaction with the way their country is being run.

And still, they exhibit a more optimistic sense of national pride than their European counterparts, partly because of the country’s status on the world stage, through its athletic success as well as its reputation as a tourism and culture hub.

France’s national anthem, the Marseillaise, is a revered national symbol that dates back to the French Revolution.

Most adults in France, 57 percent, say children should be made to sing the national anthem in school, a view that cuts across partisan lines but is most popular among the far-right National Rally (74 percent) and the centrist Ensemble party (67 percent). Meanwhile, just 42 percent of U.K. adults, 32 percent of German adults and 26 percent in Spain say the same.

More broadly, just like the kneeling protests in the NFL provoked outrage among American conservatives, jeering and booing as a form of protest during the French national anthem at sporting events usually stokes controversy — though in France, the furor is often from across the political spectrum.

Ten years after Brexit initiated, an effort to take back control of the U.K., The POLITICO Poll suggests British attitudes toward patriotism remain somewhat pessimistic — and broadly aligned with those elsewhere in Europe.

A 46 percent plurality of adults in the U.K. say “you can’t say you’re proud to be British anymore without being judged,” about on par with the share who say the same in other European countries. Though similar shares of U.K., French and Spanish adults say their countries should be proud of their histories, similar shares of them — and German adults — also say they’re ashamed of their leaders now.

The findings suggest that while Brexit reshaped Britain’s relationship with the European Union, whether it fundamentally changed the country’s sense of national identity is more complex. Other studies have revealed a multi-year decline in U.K. adults taking pride in the country’s achievements.

POLITICO’s Tim Ross, Sue Allan, Joshua Berlinger, James Agelos and Aitor Hernández-Morales contributed to this report. 

​Politics

Categories
Politics

Norway’s other World Cup campaign: Getting Israel kicked out of soccer

Norway stands out among the historic European powers that dominate what remains of the World Cup. It has the skimpiest soccer heritage of the bunch — with a 28-year break since its last visit to the tournament — and the strongest political agenda: a continued fight to boot Israel from international soccer.

Norway’s trip to this World Cup ran through Israel, which has competed for one of Europe’s tournament slots since 1994, when boycotts from Arab and Muslim countries made it impossible for the Middle Eastern country to continue competing in the Asian Football Confederation.

When the two countries faced off in Oslo last October in a qualifying match, the Norwegian Football Federation announced that all proceeds would be donated to relief aid in Gaza. Palestinian flags, keffiyehs paired with viking hats and a massive “Let Children Live” banner swept the stands. Fans booed the playing of Israel’s national anthem.

But the Norwegian federation’s primary instrument is not advocacy from its team or fan base, but institutional pressure through federation standing and procedural respectability — an instinct reflecting the nation’s overall style and befitting its disproportionately large role at the United Nations.

Norway has been in the middle of Middle Eastern politics for a while. In 1978, the Camp David Accords set Israel on course to surrender the Sinai Peninsula and its oil fields, just before the Iranian Revolution upended regional energy politics. The United States pressed Norway to supply oil to Israel, which it did only after clearing the idea with Palestine Liberation Organization Chair Yasser Arafat, who saw the value of a Scandinavian back channel to Israeli leaders.

Norway’s tact turned itself into a distinctive intermediary: a small, energy-rich state with few Middle East ambitions of its own, clout in Washington, trust among Israelis and rapport with Palestinians. In the 1990s, the country hosted the negotiations that generated the Oslo Accords, the most significant diplomatic breakthrough toward a lasting peace. As talks failed and Israel’s occupation of Gaza and the West Bank deepened over the early 2000s, Norway pulled back from Israel.

Now Norway has brought that perspective to soccer’s governing bodies, arguing that Russia’s exclusion from the sport after its invasion of Ukraine presents a double standard that should be applied equally to Israel. The latest push for Israel’s suspension from FIFA began in 2024 by the Palestinian Football Association. It is backed by Arab and Asian football bodies, which cite atrocities in Gaza, discrimination against Arab athletes and Israel’s inclusion of football clubs that operate in illegal West Bank settlements.

Norwegian support advances the cause into the soccer’s mainstream, lending a weight and legitimacy absent among other European countries whose federations have taken a hard line against Israeli involvement. Türkiye’s position can be dismissed as predictably partisan on religious grounds, while Ireland — which has formally introduced a resolution to expel Israel and has considered boycotting matches against the country — is absent from this World Cup.

The driver of Norway’s political agenda is former national team star Lise Klaveness, a lawyer who serves on the executive committee of European confederation UEFA. She has been a voice for Nordic progressive politics within international soccer: In early 2022, Klaveness spoke to FIFA Congress about human rights, LGBTQ+ safety and transparency concerns in Qatar.

Players have been more circumspect than their leadership, but far from silent. Captain Martin Ødegaard said in early 2025 that the situation in Gaza — which that fall was subject to a peace deal negotiated in part by the United States — was “a background you can’t ignore” when playing Israel. The team’s leading goal-scorer, striker Erling Haaland, has engaged more obliquely with the subject but has not ignored it: A 2023 social media post mourned innocent children dying as attacks escalated on Gaza, and clips circulated of a 2025 video call Haaland held with a freed Israeli hostage.

​Politics