Categories
Entertainment

Kelly Osbourne Pours Heart Out in Emotional New Tribute to Late Dad

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Kelly Osbourne has released a new statement in the wake of her famous father’s death last month.

Be warned, however:

You will likely need a box of Kleenex nearby as you read through it…

Kelly Osbourne greets fans as she arrives to view tributes to the late Ozzy Osbourne as his funeral cortege travels through his home city of Birmingham on July 30, 2025 in Birmingham, England. (Photo by Leon Neal/Getty Images)

In an Instagram Stories post shared August 4, Kelly reflected on Ozzy Osbourne passing away as follows:

I’ve sat down to write this a hundred times and still don’t know if the words will ever feel like enough.. but from the bottom of my heart, thank you.

The love, support, and beautiful messages I’ve received from so many of you have truly helped carry me through the hardest moment of my life. Every kind word, every shared memory, every bit of compassion has meant more than I can ever explain.

Ozzy Osbourne, one of the most famous and successful musicians of his area, died at age 76 on July 22.

Ozzy Osbourne speaks onstage during the 2024 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony streaming on Disney+ at Rocket Mortgage Fieldhouse on October 19, 2024 in Cleveland, Ohio.
Ozzy Osbourne speaks onstage during the 2024 Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony streaming on Disney+ at Rocket Mortgage Fieldhouse on October 19, 2024 in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Dia Dipasupil/Getty Images for The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame)

Kelly continued on Monday:

“Grief is a strange thing-it sneaks up on you in waves—I will not be ok for a while-but knowing my family are not alone in our pain makes a difference. I’m holding on tight to the love, the light, and the legacy left behind.”

The 40-year old concluded her post, which included Ozzy’s song “See You on the Other Side,” thanking fans for “being there.”

The Osbournes announced their patriarch’s passing, two weeks after he performed at the Black Sabbath farewell concert in Birmingham’s Villa Park in England.

“It is with more sadness than mere words can convey that we have to report that our beloved Ozzy Osbourne has passed away this morning,” the statement read at the time. “He was with his family and surrounded by love. We ask everyone to respect our family privacy at this time.”

Ozzy Osbourne and his daughter Kelly Osbourne arrive for the 62nd Annual Grammy Awards on January 26, 2020, in Los Angeles. (Photo by VALERIE MACON / AFP)

Ozzy was laid to rest just a few days ago.

Not long before that, Kelly relayed her first message in the wake of this tragedy.

“I feel unhappy I am so sad,” the reality star wrote via Instagram. “I lost the best friend I ever had.”

Ozzy Osbourne was honored in Birmingham on July 30 with a funeral procession leading up to the Black Sabbath bridge and bench… which had become a public memorial for the singer.

His wife Sharon and his children Louis, Aimee, Kelly and Jack all attended the emotional event.

Kelly Osbourne Pours Heart Out in Emotional New Tribute to Late Dad was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Politics

The case that saved the press – and why Trump wants it gone

Donald Trump wants to restrict journalists’ ability to publish or broadcast critical stories. Mesh cube, iStock/Getty Images Plus

President Donald Trump is again attacking the American press – this time not with fiery rally speeches or by calling the media “the enemy of the people,” but through the courts.

Since the heat of the November 2024 election, and continuing into July, Trump has filed defamation lawsuits against “60 Minutes” broadcaster CBS News and The Wall Street Journal. He has also sued the Des Moines Register for publishing a poll just before the 2024 election that Trump alleges exaggerated support for Democratic candidate Kamala Harris and thus constituted election interference and fraud.

These are in addition to other lawsuits Trump filed against the news media during his first term and during his years out of office between 2021 and 2025.

At the heart of Trump’s complaints is a familiar refrain: The media is not only biased, but dishonest, corrupt and dangerous.

The president isn’t just upset about reporting on him that he thinks is unfair. He wants to redefine what counts as libel and make it easier for public officials to sue for damages. A libel suit is a civil tort claim seeking damages when a person believes something false has been printed or broadcast about them and so harmed their reputation.

Redefining libel in this way would require overturning the Supreme Court’s 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, one of the most important First Amendment legal rulings in American constitutional history

Trump made overturning Sullivan a talking point during his first campaign for president; his lawsuits now put that threat into action. And they raise the question: What happened in Sullivan, and why does it still matter?

President Donald Trump discusses U.S. libel laws on Jan. 10, 2018, calling them a ‘sham’ and a ‘disgrace’ during comments to reporters at the White House.

What Sullivan was about

As chair of a public policy institute devoted to strengthening deliberative democracy, I have written two books about the media and the presidency, and another about media ethics. My research traces how news institutions shape civic life and why healthy democracies rely on free expression.

In 1960, The New York Times published a full-page advertisement titled “Heed Their Rising Voices”. The ad, which included an appeal for readers to send money in support of Martin Luther King Jr. and the movement against Jim Crow, described brutal and unjust treatment of Black students and protesters in Montgomery, Alabama. It also emphasized episodes of police violence against peaceful demonstrations.

The ad was not entirely accurate in its description of the behavior of either protesters or the police.

It claimed, for instance, that activists had sung “My Country ’Tis of Thee” on the steps of the state capitol during a rally, when they actually had sung the national anthem. It said that “truckloads of police armed with shotguns and tear-gas” had “ringed” a college campus, when the police had only been deployed nearby. And it asserted that King had been arrested seven times in Alabama, when the real number was four.

Though the ad did not identify any individual public officials by name, it disparaged the behavior of Montgomery police.

That’s where L.B. Sullivan came in.

As Montgomery’s police commissioner, he oversaw the police department. Sullivan claimed that because the ad maligned the conduct of law enforcement, it had implicitly defamed him. In 1960 in Alabama, a primary defense against libel was truth. But since there were mistakes in the ad, a truth defense could not be raised. Sullivan sued for damages, and an Alabama jury awarded him US$500,000, equivalent to $5,450,000 in 2025.

The message to the press was clear: criticize Southern officials and risk being sued out of existence.

In fact, the Sullivan lawsuit was not an isolated incident, but part of a broader strategy. In addition to Sullivan, four other Montgomery officials filed suits against the Times.

In Birmingham, public officials filed seven libel lawsuits over Times reporter Harrison Salisbury’s trenchant reporting about racism in that city. The lawsuits helped push the Times to the edge of bankruptcy. Salisbury was even indicted for seditious libel and faced up to 21 years in prison.

Alabama officials also sued CBS, The Associated Press, the Saturday Evening Post and Ladies’ Home Journal – all for reporting on civil rights and the South’s brutal response.

Four men in suits standing together and smiling.
Montgomery, Ala., Police Commissioner L.B. Sullivan, second left, and his attorneys celebrate his $500,000 libel suit victory in a county court on Nov. 3, 1960.
Bettman/Getty Images

The Supreme Court decision

The jury’s verdict in favor of Sullivan was unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court in 1964.

Writing for the court, Justice William Brennan held that public officials cannot prevail in defamation lawsuits merely by showing that statements are false. Instead, they must prove such statements are made with “actual malice”. Actual malice means a reporter or press outlet knew their story was false or else acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

The decision set a high bar.

Before the ruling, the First Amendment’s protections for speech and the press didn’t offer much help to the press in libel cases.

After it, public officials who wanted to sue the press would have to prove “actual malice” – real, purposeful untruths that caused harm. Honest mistakes weren’t enough to prevail in such lawsuits. The court held that errors are inevitable in public debate and that protecting those mistakes is essential to keeping debate open and free.

Nonviolent protest and the press

In essence, the court ruling blocked government officials from suing for libel with ulterior motives.

King and other civil rights leaders relied on a strategy of nonviolent protest to expose injustice through public, visible actions.

When protesters were arrested, beaten or hosed in the streets, their goal was not chaos – it was clarity. They wanted the nation to see what Southern oppression looked like. For that, they needed press coverage.

If Sullivan’s lawsuit had succeeded, it could have bullied the press away from covering civil rights altogether. The Supreme Court recognized this danger.

Public officials treated differently

Another key element of the court’s reasoning was its distinction between public officials and private citizens.

Elected leaders, the court said, can use mass media to defend themselves in ways ordinary people cannot.

“The public official certainly has equal if not greater access than most private citizens to media of communication,” Justice Brennan wrote in the Sullivan ruling.

Trump is a perfect example of this dynamic. He masterfully uses social media, rallies, televised interviews and impromptu remarks to push back. He doesn’t need the courts.

Giving public officials the power to sue over news stories they dislike could well create a chilling effect on the media that undermines government accountability and distorts public discourse.

“The theory of our Constitution is that every citizen may speak his mind and every newspaper express its view on matters of public concern and may not be barred from speaking or publishing because those in control of government think that what is said or written is unwise,” Brennan wrote.

“In a democratic society, one who assumes to act for the citizens in an executive, legislative, or judicial capacity must expect that his official acts will be commented upon and criticized.”

Why Sullivan still matters

The Sullivan ruling is more than a legal doctrine. It is a shared agreement about the kind of democracy Americans aspire to. It affirms a press duty to hold power to account, and a public right to hear facts and information that those in power want to suppress.

The ruling protects the right to criticize those in power and affirms that the press is not a nuisance, but an essential part of a functioning democracy. It ensures that political leaders cannot insulate themselves from scrutiny by silencing their critics through intimidation or litigation.

Trump’s lawsuits seek to undo these press protections. He presents himself as the victim of a dishonest press and hopes to use the legal system to punish those he perceives to be his detractors.

The decision in the Sullivan case reminds Americans that democracy doesn’t depend on leaders who feel comfortable. It depends on a public that is free to speak.

The Conversation

Stephanie A. (Sam) Martin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

​Politics + Society – The Conversation

Categories
Entertainment

Denise Richards Accused of Attacking Ex’s Brother; Cops Called to Aaron …

Reading Time: 3 minutes

The divorce between Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers keeps getting uglier.

And the latest dust-up between the warring exes required intervention from law enforcement.

According to a new report from TMZ, cops were called to the home Aaron shares with his parents and siblings on Sunday after Denise showed up to the residence unannounced.

Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers arrive for the LA Premiere Of "7 Days To Vegas" at Laemmle Music Hall on September 21, 2019 in Beverly Hills, California.
Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers arrive for the LA Premiere Of “7 Days To Vegas” at Laemmle Music Hall on September 21, 2019 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Gabriel Olsen/Getty Images)

Sheriff deputies confront Denise Richards on Aaron Phypers’ property

Apparently, Denise was there to retrieve one of her dogs.

But it seems she showed up without warning, which is a problem, as she and Aaron have temporary restraining orders in place that require them to remain 100 yards apart at all times.

According to TMZ, Denise started banging on the backdoor of the house, and Aaron slipped out a different way so as not to violate the TRO.

The outlet reports that Denise was eventually allowed in the house — and that’s when things really got messy.

Aaron Phypers and Denise Richards attend American Humane's 2018 American Humane Hero Dog Awards at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on September 29, 2018 in Beverly Hills, California.
Aaron Phypers and Denise Richards attend American Humane’s 2018 American Humane Hero Dog Awards at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on September 29, 2018 in Beverly Hills, California. (Photo by Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images)

Insiders tell TMZ that Denise started “screaming at [Aaron’s] parents” and demanding that they get out of the house.

Sources say Richards then turned on Aaron’s brother and began “swinging” at him and throwing items of mail in his direction.

It’s unclear who called police, but Denise was spotted standing in the driveway conversing with three deputies.

Witnesses say she explained that she only wanted to pick up her dog and was not looking for any trouble.

Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers attend Bravo's Premiere Party For "The Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills" Season 9 And "Mexican Dynasties"at Gracias Madre on February 12, 2019 in West Hollywood, California.
Denise Richards and Aaron Phypers attend Bravo’s Premiere Party For “The Real Housewives Of Beverly Hills” Season 9 And “Mexican Dynasties”at Gracias Madre on February 12, 2019 in West Hollywood, California. (Photo by Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images)

In the end, the cops concluded that no crimes had been committed, and thus, no arrests were made.

But sources tell TMZ that Aaron and his family were “terrified and very shaken up” by the incident, and the drama particularly took a toll on Phypers’ 83-year-old mother.

Aaron and Denise married in 2018, and their marriage appeared to be a happy one — but their split has been one of the nastiest in recent memory.

Allegations have been flying in every direction, with Denise accusing Aaron of abuse and Aaron claiming that Denise is an addict who carried on a lengthy affair during their marriage.

The matter has not yet headed to court, but the division of property is likely to get messy. Aaron and Denise do not have any children together.

We’ll have further updates on this developing story as new information becomes available.

Denise Richards Accused of Attacking Ex’s Brother; Cops Called to Aaron … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

Nicki Minaj to Dez Bryant: I’ll Give You $10 Million to Fight My Husband!

Reading Time: 3 minutes

We certainly didn’t have “Nicki Minaj vs. Dez Bryant feud” on our 2025 bingo cards, but this unexpected beef is turning out to be one of the most entertaining celebrity spats in recent memory.

In fact, this situation might lead to a high-stakes boxing match between the NFL legend and Nicki’s controversial husband.

Here’s everything we know about how this mess started and where it’s going:

Nicki Minaj attends The 2019 Met Gala Celebrating Camp: Notes on Fashion at Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 06, 2019 in New York City.
Nicki Minaj attends The 2019 Met Gala Celebrating Camp: Notes on Fashion at Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 06, 2019 in New York City. (Photo by Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images)

Dez Bryant dives into Nicki Minaj’s feud with RocNation

As we’ve previously reported, Nicki has been lashing out at Jay Z, claiming, among other things, that the rapper owes her $200 million.

And what does that have to do with the NFL?

Well, Dallas Cowboys star linebacker Micah Parsons has requested a trade due to his frustration over stalled contract negotiations.

One of his complaints is that Cowboys owner Jerry Jones wants to negotiate with Parsons directly rather than meeting with his agent.

Jones cited a past incident in which Jay and Roc Nation allegedly mishandled messy contract talks during Bryant’s time with the Cowboys.

Former Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Dez Bryant walks on the field before the game between the New York Giants and the Dallas Cowboys at MetLife Stadium on September 26, 2022 in East Rutherford, New Jersey.
Former Dallas Cowboys wide receiver Dez Bryant walks on the field before the game between the New York Giants and the Dallas Cowboys at MetLife Stadium on September 26, 2022 in East Rutherford, New Jersey. (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

Jones further alleged that Dez and Roc Nation stopped taking his calls in the middle of negotiations, leading Bryant to sound off on social media:

“I DON’T THINK ITS SMART TO MENTION MY NAME I KEPT QUIET ABOUT A LOT OF UNFAIR SH-T… WE CAN HAVE STORY TIME IF THATS WHAT WE ARE DOING,” the former NFL star wrote on X (formerly Twitter).

Still with us? Okay, here’s where Nicki gets involved:

Nicki wades into tense Dallas Cowboys discourse

“How about we play a game? Every time you do a ‘Jerry Jones’ or ‘NFL’ story time, I’ll do a ‘story time’ of my own,” Ms. Minaj replied to the tweet, clearly eager for the opportunity to lash out at Jay and Roc Nation.

After Bryant jokingly replied a GIF that read, “I want to play a game,” Nicki shot back:

“All my stories will be about ROC NATION, JAYZ & THE ALLEGED RACIST DESIREE PEREZ, ROC NATION CEO. I hope you fully understand the rules. It’s your turn.”

“Look Miss Nicki, leave me out of it, I don’t want no problems, I’m a huge fan. I hope you’re having a great day,” Dez said, upon realizing that Nicki was not in a joking mood.

Minaj responded by referencing Bryant’s 2012 arrest for domestic violence. Bryant explained that he “didn’t go to jail or touch my mama,” and pointed out that Nicki’s husband, Kenneth Petty, is a registered sex offender.

Nicki Minaj and Kenneth Petty attend the Marc Jacobs Fall 2020 runway show during New York Fashion Week on February 12, 2020 in New York City.
Nicki Minaj and Kenneth Petty attend the Marc Jacobs Fall 2020 runway show during New York Fashion Week on February 12, 2020 in New York City. (Photo by Jamie McCarthy/Getty Images for Marc Jacobs)

She then suggested that “since you BEAT UR OWN MOM,” Bryant might wish to fight Petty. She even said she would pay Bryant $10 million for doing so.

From there, things escalated even further, as Bryant promptly called Nicki’s bluff and urged her to get her cash ready.

He concluded by declaring his undying loyalty to ROC Nation:

“I’ve been lied on my whole career so I’m not trying to hear all of that sh-t…I thought we was speaking facts… I don’t play all of that funny shit… and it’s ROC for life …” he wrote.

Nicki has yet to reply, possibly having realized that her husband might not fare well in a fight with an NFL legend.

We’ll have further updates on this developing story as new information becomes available.

Nicki Minaj to Dez Bryant: I’ll Give You $10 Million to Fight My Husband! was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

June Shannon is Glad Lauryn Shannon & Josh Efird Are Divorcing: ‘It Was Very …

Reading Time: 3 minutes

Mama June Shannon is happy to be losing a son-in-law.

As the family’s bombshell divorce continues to play out on Mama June: Family Crisis, viewers are seeing the family react.

June, meanwhile, is watching Josh blame her for the end of his marriage to Lauryn.

Now, almost a year after these scenes filmed, June is publicly declaring that it’s not her fault. She’s happy that it’s over, though.

June Shannon in a pink blouse.
No one was happier to see her daughter get a divorce than Mama June Shannon was. (Image Credit: WEtv)

Josh blames Mama June for his divorce

On the Friday, August 1 episode of Mama June: Family Crisis, Josh Efird spoke bluntly about his and Lauryn “Pumpkin” Shannon’s marital issues.

As we already know, the couple quietly split one year ago, in August 2024.

While Josh did tell viewers that he accepts “full responsibility” for his role in the fallen marriage, he also blames mother-in-law Mama June Shannon for playing a “big role.”

Josh began to list “the issues she was causing” in his marriage through her own personal life. Many of these are no surprise to viewers. The list goes back to 2019.

“It started with her drug addiction, which made Alana scared to live with her,” he began. Notably, he is blaming June, here, not Alana.

“And then we basically had to flee from her drug dealers wanting her money, our money, whosever money,” Josh described.

“It just seems as if no matter what we done, June’s chaos managed to follow us everywhere we went.” 

Lauryn Shannon looks down at her phone.
Despite the celebration, Lauryn “Pumpkin” Shannon has some complex feelings about her divorce. (Image Credit: WEtv)

Mama June Shannon has something to say about that

Over the weekend, Mama June Shannon took to social media to share a public response to Josh blaming her for the downfall of his marriage.

“I still have so much I need to say to Josh,” she began her Instagram caption. “Stuff that is bothering me for years.” Divorces are often a time to express long-held opinions.

“And look,” June wrote, “I’m not the reason why you’re divorce failed.”

(Like everyone does from time to time, June was writing two thoughts at once and meant marriage failed)

“Yes did I go through drug addiction most certainly,” June acknowledged.

“But even that some people need to take responsibility for the actions that they done.”

She cited: “Like I told you before Pumpkin or Josh is no saint when it comes to the cheating.”

June claimed: “They were one of those type people that would cheat in somebody to get their leg back and they would get back together. It was just a very toxic relationship and I’m glad it’s over with.”

A close-up of Mama June Shannon
Whoa! Here’s a close-up of Mama June Shannon. (Image Credit: WEtv)

DID June cause their marriage to fall apart?

We have no doubt that Mama June Shannon blowing over $1 million on drugs — mostly crack — did not help their marriage.

Suddenly finding themselves as the legal guardians of a teenager would also have taken a toll.

But, ultimately, it would take more than a nightmare of a mother-in-law (and, entertaining or not, June is a nightmare of a human being whose mistakes have ravaged the lives of her loved ones) to end a marriage.

This was Lauryn and Josh’s marriage.

That means that this is their divorce, too. Maybe June just … helped things along, a little.

June Shannon is Glad Lauryn Shannon & Josh Efird Are Divorcing: ‘It Was Very … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Entertainment

Josh Duggar: TLC Made Me Apologize for Cheating on My Wife!

Reading Time: 4 minutes

Josh Duggar would like the world to know that he isn’t really sorry for cheating on his wife about a decade ago.

As part of his latest legal motion for a new trial, the disgusting 37-year old took issue with a piece of evidence used against him in court a few years ago.

Many years ago, Duggar cheated on his wife Anna with women he met over the adultery website Ashley Madison.

Not long after this information was made public, Josh issued a lengthy apology and cited an addiction to pornography within it.

A mugshot of Josh Duggar on April 29, 2021.
In this handout photo provided by the Washington County Sheriff’s Office, former television personality on “19 Kids And Counting” Josh Duggar poses for a booking photo after his arrest April 29, 2021. (Photo Credit: Washington County Sheriff’s Office via Getty Images)

Here’s the thing, Josh now argues, though:

He had nothing to do with this mea culpa.

“In August 2015, a statement was published on the Duggar family’s Facebook page under (Josh’s) name, claiming he had secretly viewed pornography, led a double life, and been unfaithful to his wife,” Duggar explains in the aforementioned filing.

“(Josh) did not write or approve the creation of this statement, nor was he directly involved in the process leading up to its release.

“The statement was drafted and issued under immense pressure from representatives of TLC, Discovery Communications, and their legal and public relations teams.”

Now-disgraced criminal Josh Duggar sits beside wife Anna Duggar on 19 Kids and Counting.
Now-disgraced criminal Josh Duggar sits beside wife Anna Duggar on 19 Kids and Counting. (Image Credit: TLC)

Josh goes on to say this was a “corporate-driven” statement and it was issued because the Duggars faced “threats of television show cancellation and possible contractual penalties or punishment if a public confession-style statement was not released.”

Duggar said he was never even consulted about the contents or the wording of the message.

How is this relevant all this time later?

Because the statement was read in court during Duggar’s 2022 trial on charges of child pornography possession … and he claims that it was used to paint a “damaging picture of Josh’s character.

Duggar says it was “repeatedly cited to suggest a long-standing pattern of secret pornography use and moral failure.”

Josh and Anna Duggar on the now-defunct TLC reality show 19 Kids and Counting.
Josh and Anna Duggar on the now-defunct TLC reality show 19 Kids and Counting. (Image Credit: TLC)

Josh Duggar, it should be noted, admitted to having molested his own sisters when he was a teenager.

He also admitted to infidelity with partners he barely knew.

He was also found to have photos and videos of children under the age of 12 in sexually comprising positions on his work computer.

We’re pretty sure he has no character that can even be damaged, this is our point here.

Josh Duggar leaves an Arkansas courtroom alongside his wife, Anna.
Josh Duggar leaves an Arkansas courtroom alongside his wife, Anna. (Getty)

In his motion, however, Duggar aims to make it clear has “never been diagnosed with any pornography addiction” and alleges his Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were violated during his trial and says “the government’s use of a false, externally pressure, and unapproved public statement severely prejudiced the jury’s perception of Joshua Duggar.”

Maybe.

Or maybe Duggar’s own actions did that.

Ashley Madison, which is owned by Avid Life Media, is designed to help married people cheat on their spouses. Its slogan is “Life is short. Have an affair.”

Josh Duggar's Post-Conviction Mug Shot
Josh Duggar will be stuck behind federal bars for a VERY long time. No one feels sorry for him. (Image Credit: NBC)

Duggar, who is due to be released in 2032, wrote the following in 2015:

I have been the biggest hypocrite ever. While espousing faith and family values, I have secretly over the last several years been viewing pornography on the internet and this became a secret addiction and I became unfaithful to my wife.

I am so ashamed of the double life that I have been living and am grieved for the hurt, pain and disgrace my sin has caused my wife and family, and most of all Jesus and all those who profess faith in Him.

As I am learning the hard way, we have the freedom to choose to our actions, but we do not get to choose our consequences. I deeply regret all hurt I have caused so many by being such a bad example.

Josh Duggar: TLC Made Me Apologize for Cheating on My Wife! was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.

​The Hollywood Gossip

Categories
Politics

Gov. Greg Abbott’s options to force a redistricting vote are more limited than they appear

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had a message Sunday for the dozens of Democratic legislators who fled the state to derail a mega-partisan gerrymander: “This truancy ends now.”

But Abbott’s options to compel those Democrats — whose departure to Illinois and other states is preventing the state Legislature from conducting any business — to return and vote are more constrained and legally uncertain than he let on. And they may take significant time to resolve in court.

Abbott and other Texas Republicans face a hard deadline as they are preparing to adopt maps that could net the GOP five seats in the U.S. House, potentially cementing the party’s majority in Congress. Maps need to be completed before the end of the year so that election officials can prepare for the state’s March 3 primaries. The move has also prompted retaliation threats by Democratic governors in other states and roiled expectations for the 2026 elections, when Democrats hope to take the House and act as a check on President Donald Trump.

Here’s a look at the central questions as Abbott’s standoff with Texas House Democrats deepens into a monumental political and legal brawl.

Why did Texas Democrats leave the state?

Texas’ constitution requires two-thirds of the state’s 150 House members to be present to conduct business. That gives the 62-member House Democratic minority a break-glass-in-case-of-emergency option to grind the Capitol’s business to a halt even if they would be outnumbered on an up-or-down vote.

By absconding from Austin — and the state altogether — Democrats ensured that the Legislature lacked a quorum to convene for a special session called by Abbott to address redistricting. There is some recent history on this: Democrats mounted a similar effort to “break quorum” in 2021 in protest of election-related legislation. The effort ended after Democrats gradually trickled back into the state, amid a similar flurry of arrest threats and lawsuits. 

Importantly, breaking quorum is not a crime. However, if the absentee Democratic lawmakers remained in Texas, Abbott could order state troopers to haul them to the Capitol. That’s why they fled for the friendlier confines of Illinois and other blue states, where Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker and other allies have vowed to shelter them from Texas’ demands to bring them back.

What are Abbott’s legal options?

Federal laws allow states to demand the return, or “extradition,” of criminal fugitives from other states. But because breaking quorum is not illegal, Abbott can’t seek help from the courts to compel the Democrats’ return.

Instead, Abbott threatened to take another action against the absentee lawmakers: Ask Texas courts to remove them from office altogether. State law permits a Texas district court to determine whether a public official has “abandoned” his or her office, declaring it vacant — enabling the governor to set new elections to fill the empty seats.

“Come and take it,” dared state Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader, in an appearance Monday morning on CNN. Wu declared Abbott’s threat to be “all bluster.”

The governor’s threat is rooted in a nonbinding legal opinion issued in 2021 by Attorney General Ken Paxton, amid the last attempt by Democrats to break quorum. Paxton, notably, took no position on whether breaking quorum is constitutional.

The republican AG also declined to say whether fleeing Democrats could or should be removed from office. Rather, he called it a “fact question for a court” that he said was beyond the scope of his office to decide. He noted instead that he could file what are known as “quo warranto actions” in court, asking a judge to determine whether the missing lawmakers had officially vacated their seats.

How would a judge make that call? Paxton said he wasn’t certain.

“We find no constitutional provision or statute establishing an exhaustive list for why a vacancy occurs or the grounds under which an officer may be judicially removed from office,” he wrote.

How long could it take Abbott to force the Legislature back into session?

This is the most uncertain aspect of Abbott’s gambit. Paxton’s office would need to file “quo warranto” actions in various judicial districts for more than 50 fleeing lawmakers. Judges may take up these cases on different timelines and reach different conclusions, requiring appeals that could wind their way to the Texas Supreme Court.

Paxton acknowledged in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson that the timeline would be problematic.

“The challenge is that [it] wouldn’t necessarily be an immediate answer, right?” he said. “We’d have to go through the court process, and we’d have to file … in districts that are not friendly to Republicans,” Paxton said. “So it’s a challenge because every, every district would be different. We’d have to go sue in every legislator’s home district to try to execute on that idea.”

And even if Abbott and Paxton win a clean sweep in removing the Democrats from office, it would then require a time-intensive process of calling special elections to fill the vacancies — and guaranteeing that the winners of those elections also remain in the state as well.

That timing matters when the GOP-led redistricting plan is on a fixed timeline: A new map must be adopted by early December in order to be in place for the 2026 midterm cycle. That would require Democrats to remain out of state for about four months while they accumulate $500-per-day civil fines. The current special Legislative session is slated to end on Aug. 19, but Abbott could call another one.

Could the Democrats be charged with crimes?

Abbott’s letter, though sharply critical, stopped short of actually accusing Democrats of breaking the law. Rather, he suggested that if outsiders are helping them fundraise to cover their fines, they might run afoul of bribery laws.

“It would be bribery if any lawmaker took money to perform or to refuse to perform an act in the legislature,” Abbott said in a Fox News interview Monday. “And the reports are these legislators have both sought money and offered money to skip the vote, to leave the legislature, to take a legislative act.”

If Texas prosecutors in fact level any such charges, then Abbott’s authority to return them grows stronger. He could then ask courts in Texas and Illinois to seek the return of the missing lawmakers.

“I will use my full extradition authority to demand the return to Texas of any potential out-of-state felons,” he said in his Sunday statement.

Liz Crampton contributed reporting.

​Politics

Categories
Politics

Charlamagne tha God swipes at Trump after president’s criticism

Radio host Charlamagne tha God fired back at President Donald Trump, accusing the president of pushing authoritarian tactics after Trump called the radio host a “dope” in a recent social media post.

On Monday’s episode of his radio show “The Breakfast Club,” Charlamagne said Trump also failed to deliver on key campaign promises and used his show to dissect the president’s Truth Social post point by point.

“Listen, my fellow Americans, we are in a strange time right now, a time we have never seen because authoritarian strategy is being used against anyone who speaks out against this administration,” Charlamagne, whose given name is Lenard McKelvey, said.

Charlamagne drew the ire of Trump after he joined Fox News’ “My View with Lara Trump,” the president’s daughter-in-law. Charlamagne said under the new administration “the least of us are still being impacted the worst.” He also said the ongoing controversy around the release of information regarding the death of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein is driving a wedge between the GOP and its supporters.

Soon after, the president responded by calling Charlamagne a “racist sleazebag,” a criticism Charlamagne defended against on Monday.

“He called me a racist. I didn’t mention race, not one time on Lara Trump. I didn’t bring up the fact that President Trump issued an executive order directing oversight of institutions like the Smithsonian to remove or suppress narratives about systemic racism and Black history,” Charlamagne said, referring to an executive order earlier this year demanding the Smithsonian remove exhibits that divided Americans “based on race.”

Charlamagne added that he was “just talking to your base” and letting voters know Trump hasn’t kept the promises he made on the campaign trail.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Charlamagne also accused Trump of making the economy “worse” before criticizing the president’s decision to fire the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, after the latest monthly jobs report came in well under expectations.

“It’s actually hilarious to see you upset about the high unemployment rates when you let Elon Musk take a chainsaw to the federal government and fire a bunch of government workers earlier this year. You did that, President Trump, and now you’re doing exactly what the Biden administration did, trying to convince America the economy is all good when it’s not,” he said.

Still, Charlamagne said that he is actually “rooting” for Trump.

“President Trump, don’t worry about Lenard, okay, don’t worry about Charlamagne tha God. I know something I said hit a nerve and rattled you a little bit, but I don’t want you rattled,” Charlamagne said. “I want you to end wars, okay? I want you to keep the border secure. I want you to have the economy booming, okay? I want all these things to be true. I am an American. I don’t care who’s in the White House. I want America to succeed. But I need you focused, and right now you’re not focused.”

​Politics

Categories
Health

Justin Timberlake’s Lyme Disease Diagnosis Validates That Symptoms Can Be Hard To Spot

In August 2025, singer Justin Timberlake revealed his Lyme disease diagnosis. What are the signs and symptoms of this disease, and why are cases on the rise?

​Health Digest – Health News, Wellness, Expert Insights

Categories
Politics

Hochul tells Dems to play dirty

With help from Amira McKee

Gov. Kathy Hochul speaks with Texas state Rep. Mihaela Plesa during a press conference against Texas gerrymandering.

YOU STARTED IT: She wants to be the gerrymanderer-in-chief.

Gov. Kathy Hochul hosted six lawmakers from Texas at the Capitol this morning — and while gracing them with some good ol’ northern hospitality, she also effectively told the Empire State’s good government groups to go to hell.

The Texas Democrats were fleeing the Lone Star State to prevent their state Legislature from having the quorum necessary to push forward a Trump-led redistricting measure, which would give the state five more Republican congressional seats.

The visit to Hochul’s backyard showcased how the governor is playing a key role in escalating the political arms race to redraw congressional maps around the country, POLITICO’s Bill Mahoney reports.

After greeting the Texans in Albany with a breakfast of eggs, bacon and sausage, Hochul held a press conference with them in the Capitol’s Red Room — where she slammed New York’s own redistricting process for not being partisan enough and embraced the full-fledged gerrymandering of New York’s congressional districts.

“I’m tired of fighting this fight with my hand tied behind my back,” Hochul said, when asked if she would change or disband New York’s independent redistricting committee. “Republicans take over the Legislature? They can have at it. But until then, we’re in charge.”

“All due respect to the good government groups, politics is a political process,” she added.

Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie agreed: “It’s very difficult to say play fair when your opponents are playing dirty and using every toolbox to undermine democracy.”

Hochul wants legislators to start a process of approving a constitutional amendment to let New York make changes to its own congressional lines. But that’s a lengthy process and wouldn’t impact the maps any sooner than the 2028 election — even if the amendment is approved by voters and the new lines aren’t challenged in court.

“We’re sick and tired of being pushed around when other states don’t have the same aspirations that we always have,” the governor said.

Mayoral candidate and former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who authored the 2012 state constitutional language now restricting New York Democrats’ abilities to quickly respond to Texas, wasn’t totally on board with Hochul’s hardball efforts.

“I think what Texas is doing is grossly political and just gross gerrymandering and is one of the reasons why the public turns off on government,” Cuomo said at an unrelated campaign event in Manhattan. “It could also have a dramatic effect if it goes beyond Texas. But to pass it, to do it here, you would need a couple of years. … So my guess is, by the time you could actually do it, it would be irrelevant.”

The six Texas House Democrats — whose colleagues also fled to Illinois on Sunday — said today they were just stopping through Albany and planned to continue on their journey to meet with Democratic governors from other states.

They wouldn’t say where they’re headed next and refused to reveal if they plan to remain outside the Lone Star State until Aug. 19, when Texas’ special session concludes. If they don’t, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has the power to call another special session immediately after the current one to bring up the redistricting bill again.

“To run to states like New York and Illinois to protest redistricting, it’s kind of like running to Wisconsin to protest cheese. It’s just kind of outrageous,” Abbott said in response to the lawmakers Albany visit today. “New York and Illinois are two hallmark states that have already done redistricting to eliminate Republicans.”

Hochul’s naked embrace of Democratic gerrymandering in response to the Texas GOP’s own effort was condemned by New York Republicans in the state Legislature and Congress, including Rep. Elise Stefanik, who’s considering challenging Hochul for governor.

“The Worst Governor in America needs to be reminded that she conveniently forgot to tell the unlawful out-of-state radical Democrats at today’s desperate press conference that she lost not once, but TWICE in her effort to illegally draw gerrymandered lines in New York to rig our Congressional elections and suppress the will of the voters,” Stefanik said on X.

John Kaehny, executive director of the good government group Reinvent Albany, described Hochul’s move as trying to justify destroying the village to save it — which will really just undermine democracy.

“The state of New York motto is Excelsior, which means, ‘Ever Upwards,’ not, ‘We’ll Race Texas to The Bottom and Disenfranchise Large Swaths of New York Voters,’” he told Playbook. “Gerrymandering is without a doubt one of the most devastating ways to essentially nullify the votes of huge numbers of people, and that’s the opposite of democracy.” — Jason Beeferman

Mayor Eric Adams and New York City Police Commissioner Jessica Tisch announce the city's July crime statistics at the Whitman Houses, Brooklyn on August 4, 2025.

‘THE SAFEST BIG CITY’: Mayor Eric Adams touted falling crime rates today in Brooklyn, dubbing last month “the safest July in our subway system in recorded history.”

Adams, a retired NYPD captain, won his 2021 campaign in large part on the promise that he would make a pandemic-ravaged New York City safer. Now, as New Yorkers’ public safety insecurities endure, he’s returning to crime statistics — in the face of his abysmal performance in recent polls.

“New York City is grieving this week after the tragic loss of four innocent lives — including an NYPD officer — in a senseless shooting in Midtown,” Adams said in a statement. “As we mourn, we must also find ways to turn our pain into purpose; it’s the least we can do to honor the victims. While this incident will forever be a stain on our city, it happened against the backdrop of a larger, more hopeful picture — one where the brave men and women of the NYPD continue to drive down crime.”

The first seven months of 2025 saw the fewest shooting incidents and shooting victims in recorded history, according to July crime statistics put out by the NYPD today. The department’s seven major crime categories, including murder and robbery, are down 5.6 percent overall from last year.

While Adams has blamed media coverage for lingering fears over public safety, a POLITICO analysis found overall crime in the city is yet to return to pre-pandemic levels.

The mayor and NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch told reporters today that they attribute their progress, in part, to the administration’s focus on illegal gun removal and gang takedowns.

Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor who leads the field in recent polls, has offered different policy prescriptions from the mayor when it comes to policing. Their divergent views have become a centerpiece in the race in the aftermath of a mass shooting that killed an NYPD officer in Midtown Manhattan last week. Mamdani has distanced himself from his previous calls to “defund the police,” but his future with the nation’s largest police force remains a delicate matter.

Adams took aim at Mamdani today for his calls to disband the NYPD’s Strategic Response Group, the controversial unit responsible for policing protests and responding to major public disturbances — including the mass shooting.

“We just have a philosophical difference in the principles of public safety, and there’s a reason crime is down and jobs are up, and idealism collides with realism when you are saving the lives of people,” Adams said at his press conference on the stats. — Amira McKee

IF YOU PAY THEM, THEY WILL COME: Cuomo unveiled a public safety proposal of his own today — it’s designed to retain and attract more NYPD recruits.

The former governor proposed offering new recruits a $15,000 signing bonus and then layering in additional retention bonuses throughout their tenure. He floated the idea of recruiting retired cops to rejoin the force, allowing them to collect their pension and a salary. Cuomo also proposed a city-run scholarship fund that would offer a full ride to officers without a bachelor’s degree.

Sweetening the pay — which would cost $250 million over five years — and offering other perks would help the city hire 5,000 more police officers, Cuomo said.

“It’s time to build a new New York City based on what we are dealing with and what we’ve learned,” Cuomo said.

The former governor also devoted a significant portion of his press briefing to attacking Mamdani and poring over the state legislator’s past support for defunding the police. Mamdani has said during his campaign he would maintain funding for the department while creating a new Department of Community Safety that would handle tasks like mental health emergencies.

“Either you were telling the truth then or you’re telling the truth now, but you cannot justify those two statements,” Cuomo said.

The former governor further separated himself from the 33-year-old democratic socialist by proposing to expand the Strategic Response Group, a controversial NYPD unit, and continuing to have it handle protests. Mamdani has proposed disbanding the unit and creating a new one designed to respond to emergencies like the Midtown mass shooting last week. — Joe Anuta

ON YOUR RIGHT: Adams is planning to do a fireside chat next week with the conservative Manhattan Institute as he seeks support on the right for his longshot independent reelection effort.

“Governing in NYC,” a conversation between Adams and Manhattan Institute President Reihan Salam, is set for Aug. 14 at the Hilton Midtown. The prominent think tank welcomed Adams’ 2021 election as a change from the de Blasio years. But even as the institute’s scholars have written extensively about the mayor — both positively and negatively — Adams has largely kept his distance from his conservative backers.

The institute has been an intellectual force behind attacks on DEI initiatives and gender identity protections.

Adams is also mending fences with an old friend on the right, the Trump-friendly radio host Sid Rosenberg, the Daily News reported Friday.

We’ll be watching to see if newly minted Manhattan Institute fellow Danielle Sassoon shows up, after she resigned as acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, rather than comply with the Department of Justice’s order to drop the corruption case against Adams. — Jeff Coltin

STATEN ISLAND 4 MAMDANI: Democratic leaders in New York City’s most conservative borough are backing Zohran Mamdani over Andrew Cuomo. (New York Post)

NY POST TAKES LA: The New York Post will launch a new daily newspaper in Los Angeles called “The California Post” in early 2026. (Axios)

‘BASIC DECENCY’: Hochul responded to Texas Sen. Ted Cruz after he criticized her for wearing a head covering to the funeral of a slain Muslim NYPD officer. (New York Times)

Missed this morning’s New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.

​Politics