We will always love Dolly Parton — and here are 20 reasons why. Continue reading…Country Music News – Taste of Country
Categories
The Top 20 Dolly Parton Songs Of All Time
Month: August 2026
Farewell to one of the most beloved country singers of all time. Continue reading…Country Music News – Taste of Country
SCORM explained in plain words: what it is, who actually needs it, and how to import a SCORM course into WordPress, including one option that’s free.
The post SCORM in WordPress: What It Is, Who Needs It, and Your Options appeared first on Themeisle Blog.
Themeisle Blog
Reviewed unveiled its 2026 Readers Choice Awards for various food-related chains. In the sandwich category, this famous sub joint came out on top.
Mashed – Fast Food, Celebrity Chefs, Grocery, Reviews
Reading Time: 2 minutes
Jenelle Evans has a long history of hurling insults at members of her own family in public forums.
But her latest comments might be her cruelest yet.
As we previously reported, criminal charges against Jenelle’s ex-husband David Eason were dismissed this week.
David had been accused of assaulting Jenelle’s eldest son, 17-year-old Jace.
The case was dropped when the plaintiffs failed to cooperate with prosecutors.
On Tuesday, Jenelle publicly commented on the controversial court decision for the first time.
“Idc about anything to do with that court case because it was drama for attention from all parts. Keep me away from all of it [shrug emoji] I’m minding my own business,” she posted on X (formerly Twitter) in response to a fan’s query about the situation, adding:
“I have 2 other kids that need my attention.”
Jenelle seemed quite dismissive about her son’s very serious allegations.
And not surprisingly, her remark was not well received:
“This might actually be one of the coldest things you’ve ever said. I’m like… actually in a bit of shock,” wrote one user, adding:
“I know you say things like this for drama and the engagement, but this really made me sad instead of angry,
“You are the drama. You are the attention seeker,” another commented.
“What your two other kids need is attention from someone who isn’t a deadbeat disgusting c–t of a mother. Your attention just brings heartache for them.
“Wait, who used the case originally for attention and sympathy on social media?” a third chimed in.
“I forget… You’re only ‘famous’ for being a selfish teen sl-t who chose d–k and drugs over your kids and NOW you don’t want attention and drama? Gtfo. I hope you’re spayed.”
Jace Evans was recently released from a mental health facility after several months of inpatient treatment.
His present whereabouts have not been disclosed, but it’s believed that Jace is living with Jenelle’s mother, Barbara Evans, who had custody of the boy for most of his upbringing.
Jace moved to Las Vegas with Jenelle last year before returning to North Carolina following a short stint with his father in Florida.
Insiders say Jace became distraught after learning that his mother had reconciled with Eason. The former couple has since separated again.
Needless to say, it’s been quite a chaotic year for Jace.
We will have further updates on this developing story as new information becomes available.
Jenelle Evans ‘Doesn’t Care’ About Son’s Abuse Allegations: … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.
The Hollywood Gossip
The reaction to a procedural ruling by the Supreme Court on Aug. 24, 2026, was immediate and sharp.
The conservative justices’ decision in the 6-3 ruling to lift a block on implementation of President Donald Trump’s March 2026 executive order imposing restrictions on mail voting had voting rights advocates and many state officials angry and alarmed. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented in the ruling, saying it would spark a “Kafkaesque nightmare” that “needlessly injects chaos and uncertainty into the upcoming midterm elections.”
The Conversation’s politics and legal affairs editor Naomi Schalit talked with Quinnipiac University election law scholar John J. Martin about the ruling and what it signals may be ahead.
What’s the background to the Supreme Court’s ruling on Aug. 24?
Back in March, President Trump issued an executive order that was meant to, in his words, maintain “public confidence in election outcomes” and “enhance election integrity” in mail and absentee voting in federal elections. There are a few provisions that were included in that executive order.
The first would require the Department of Homeland Security to maintain a state citizenship list of residents in those states who are U.S. citizens, above the age of 18, and therefore eligible to vote in federal elections. The Department of Homeland Security would share these lists with each state at least 60 days prior to each federal election.
The next provision orders the U.S. attorney general to prioritize the investigation and the prosecution of state and local election officials who issue federal ballots to ineligible voters, such as noncitizens.
Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images
Next, Trump ordered the U.S. Postal Service to devise rules that could substantially alter the ability for states to use mail and absentee ballots in federal elections. What this could look like is, for example, a requirement that a mail ballot being used in a federal election has to look a particular way.
The executive order also gives states the option to provide the Postal Service at least 60 days before a federal election a list of voters entitled to vote by mail or by absentee ballot. But that deadline conflicts with a federal rule that states must give voters the opportunity to register to vote at least 30 days prior to an election. So states might not even know 60 days prior to an election who was entitled to use an absentee or mail ballot.
Finally, the big one is that the executive order directs the U.S. Postal Service to not transmit any mail or absentee ballots from voters in federal elections who do not appear on a mail-in or absentee voter list compiled by the service, presumably based on the list being provided to it by the states, although the executive order isn’t fully clear on this.
So, if a voter isn’t on that list, the Postal Service can just ditch that person’s ballot?
The executive order tells the Postal Service that it should not transmit that ballot over mail.
But the Supreme Court did not rule on the legality of the executive order, did it?
No. A number of states sued the Trump administration pretty quickly after this executive order was issued, arguing that the president simply doesn’t have the authority to implement these policies. The states specifically asked for a preliminary injunction in federal court, which allows the court to pause the government’s actions before the case is fully resolved. The lower court ultimately issued the preliminary injunction, temporarily blocking the implementation of the executive order.
The Trump administration argued the states lacked something called standing, which requires a plaintiff to suffer an actual or imminent injury in order to bring a case in federal court. Accordingly, the preliminary injunction should not have been issued.
The Supreme Court ultimately agreed with the Trump administration and contended that because a lot of the executive order either required the states to do nothing, or had yet to be fully realized, the states’ case here was premature. They had yet to suffer an injury.
But it’s not permanent that the states do not have standing. It’s that they did not have standing at this moment until the rules to come out of this executive order had been put into effect. Is that correct?
That’s correct. So, theoretically, if the Postal Service were to propose a rule that would forbid the transmission of ballots that don’t meet their standards, and then that rule is ultimately adopted, then the states would have standing to bring this case.
The Constitution gives the states the power to administer elections. What power is the president asserting here that would legitimately allow him, or the executive, to demand these changes?
The U.S. Constitution certainly makes states the default administrators of elections, and that includes federal, state and local elections. The federal government plays some roles in regulating elections, with the Constitution allowing Congress the ability to override states’ regulations of the procedural aspects of congressional elections.
The Supreme Court has also found that Congress has some authority to regulate certain aspects of presidential elections, such as in the area of campaign finance. And under the 14th and 15th amendments, Congress has the ability to implement laws that fulfill the equal protection clause or the 15th Amendment’s prohibition against racial discrimination in elections. That’s how we get something like the Voting Rights Act. And that can apply to federal, state and local elections.
But states still remain the predominant administrator of elections.
Alex Wong/Getty Images
And the president’s role in elections?
It’s hard to find any constitutional source that backs up the idea that the president has unilateral authority to decide how elections are run, even federal elections.
Maybe the strongest argument you can make in this case is that the president has authority over officers in the executive branch of the federal government. So the president could certainly direct executive officers, such as the postmaster general, to do things or not do things. But it doesn’t mean that the president can tell these officers to just do whatever the president wants in violation of the Constitution.
This is a very long way to say that the president really doesn’t seem to have authority to be doing what he’s doing right now.
So this was a procedural decision by the Supreme Court; there’s also a similar case brought by voting rights groups that they may consider. In the end, is everybody just playing a waiting game for the substance of this executive order to get to the Supreme Court to have the Supreme Court say sorry, President Trump, you can’t do it, case closed?
The Supreme Court cannot avoid deciding this on the merits of the case.
Regardless of how and when this all proceeds, will it have an effect on upcoming midterms?
Election officials need to know how they’re supposed to manage their elections, and they need to know this months in advance. They want to know: Are we actually able to implement mail voting, or absentee voting, the way that we’ve always done it? Or is this executive order going to completely throw a monkey wrench into the process, and now we have to rethink everything, and we have to wait until we receive a list from the U.S. Postal Service confirming that the voters that we believe are entitled to these ballots are, in fact, entitled to these ballots?
And voters might be fearful that if they try to vote by mail it won’t be counted. That could discourage people from voting through a process that has made it easier and more straightforward to vote for certain segments of the population – and really everyone.
John J. Martin does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Politics + Society – The Conversation
Reading Time: 3 minutes
When McKenna West went rogue and fled to another state, she did more than break her contract.
By giving birth in Texas, the renegade gestational carrier signed the child up for a series of invasive procedures.
The baby, whose name is Rumi, underwent only the first of the open-heart surgeries.
Now, the newborn’s health is declining. The baby is in critical condition.
Rumi ‘is in critical condition’ after his first major surgery
TMZ obtained court documents pertaining to baby Rumi’s health.
Rumi’s parents, Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed, are currently battling with McKenna West over custody of their child.
At present, they have custody over their newborn.
McKenna has continued to fight, but there is a temporary restraining order against her. They have custody until a future hearing.
Unfortunately, it is in the context of this recent filing that we learn about Rumi’s sad health update.
Rumi underwent the Norwood Procedure, the first of three open-heart surgeries that could give him a chance — but not a guarantee — at reaching adulthood.
In the past 24 hours, his health has taken a dire turn.
“Serious medical developments have arisen that impact the health and safety of the child,” the parents’ filing reports.
The legal filing adds: “The child is in critical condition and being closely monitored at the hospital.”
Things are sounding grim.
Rumi’s ‘condition declined significantly’
According to the filing by Rumi’s parents, their newborn is “suffering from potential complications from the Norwood.”
The court documents reported: “Last night, the child’s condition declined significantly.”
Apparently, Rumi’s decline was so severe that doctors determined that he was “requiring re-intubation.”
Intubation is when a hose is placed through the mouth or nose to facilitate breathing, because a person is not getting enough oxygen on their own. There can be numerous causes.
In baby Rumi’s case, it seems to be a side-effect of having undergone a catastrophically traumatic open-heart surgery just days after being born. But that is when the Norwood Procedure must happen — if it happens at all.
Remember, McKenna West was a hired gestational carrier (colloquially referred to as a surrogate) for Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed.
When they learned that the fetus would be born with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Simply put, it is a malformed heart that would lead to death without a series of drastic surgical interventions.
When the parents chose to terminate, West went rogue, violating he contract and leaving for another state to give birth. (No state could “force” her to abide by the contract, but she hoped that Texas law might award her custody.)
(Side note, but some outlets are referring to Rumi as “Gabriel,” which is a little confusing. That is not his name. West called him that, but she is not his parent. If Rumi lives long enough, he can call himself whatever he likes, but Rumi is his name until that time.)
This filing in court is to ask the court to postpone the scheduled hearing. Simply put, their family is suffering in a way that they never intended, and they’re preoccupied with their newborn’s health and would like to hold off having to go to court with the woman who put them all in this predicament.
Baby Rumi’s Health Declining ‘Significantly’ 2 Weeks After McKenna West … was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.
The Hollywood Gossip
Trader Joe’s is a reliable source for premade delights and snacks, but don’t overlook it when it comes to seafood. The chain boasts a wide array of options.
Food Republic – Restaurants, Reviews, Recipes, Cooking Tips
With so many items to chose from, ordering at Cracker Barrel can sometimes be a struggle. Just order one of these dishes customers love, instead.
Food Republic – Restaurants, Reviews, Recipes, Cooking Tips
Reading Time: 2 minutes
Is Kim Richards now homeless?
A couple of years ago, it was reported that Kim had relapsed.
In short order, Kyle Richards apparently asked her to move out of the condo she’d been staying in. She even sued to force the eviction.
Now, a snapshot of a less-than-happy Kim on a park bench has fans worrying.
Is Kim Richards homeless?
TMZ has obtained a photo of Kim Richards seated on a park bench near the Santa Monica Pier.
Certain areas of Los Angeles have a sizable unhoused population.
Some are people who tried to “make it,” while others filter in from elsewhere in California in the hopes of getting access to basic public services while trying to simply survive.
Kim appears to be sitting somewhat casually on the bench while painting. She’s wearing a red outfit and a cowboy hat.
Her face looks, at best, perturbed. Some have argued that she looks downright miserable.
Kim Richards seen painting alone on a bench near Santa Monica Pier, over a year after Kyle Richards’ eviction suit had her removed from the Encino condo. pic.twitter.com/wdcGNkLQRp
— Thought Catalog (@ThoughtCatalog) August 25, 2026
(We have to remind ourselves that it is difficult to gauge someone’s mood by a single photo, let alone their quality of life.)
In 2024, Kim reportedly relapsed. It happens. Addiction and substance abuse are devastating and do not always go away after the first time seeking treatment.
Late that year, Kyle reportedly asked Kim to vacate the 2-bedroom Encino condo in which Kim had been living.
When Kim did not, Kyle filed a lawsuit to forcibly evict Kim.
Kim simply did not respond to the lawsuit, resulting in a March 2025 default judgment for her to leave. By June of last year, she was gone.
She reportedly has a home!
The good news is that Kim Richards is reportedly not homeless, despite the eviction and despite this photo setting off alarm bells across social media.
TMZ reports that she does have a home.
Apparently, despite the eviction drama, Kyle helped Kim to secure a place to live in the Santa Monica area — a spot near the beach.
Though the report does acknowledge that Kim is still experiencing “ups and downs,” it sounds like she’s near family.
(Remember, Kim is a grandmother. Her daughters still live in Los Angeles.)
Every single thing that comes out of Kim Richards’ mouth #RHOBH https://t.co/qZoT3o2Z3h pic.twitter.com/wZvOUS4bcM
— Queens of Bravo (@queensofbravo) September 11, 2023
Apparently, the initial eviction wasn’t out of anger. Quite the opposite.
Kyle was reportedly trying a “tough love” approach.
It can be extremely difficult to thread the needle between enabling someone’s addiction and driving them away — or worse. What works on one person who is experiencing addiction can backfire horribly on another.
When a loved one is suffering in this manner, they require a seemingly contradictory blend of patience and encouragement.
Kim has needed help more than once. We hope that she continues to make improvements.
Kim Richards Homeless? Fans Worry After Eviction, Miserable Park Bench Pic was originally published on The Hollywood Gossip.
The Hollywood Gossip