Month: June 2026

Hundreds of sophisticated monitoring instruments will remain in place in the nation’s oceans, thanks to a National Science Foundation reversal of its plan to partially dismantle the system.

The federal agency announced on Thursday that it is dropping its plan to remove hundreds of instruments from the Ocean Observatories Initiative program.

The program encompasses more than 900 instruments monitoring ocean currents, temperatures, sea life and other conditions. Information gathered is used to analyze weather and prepare for extreme weather events, manage fisheries, record climate change and other functions. The $386 million system was installed a decade ago and was intended to last for three decades.

News that the Trump administration planned to pull out hundreds of the instruments – including those positioned in Alaska’s ocean waters – triggered outrage from scientists, the fishing industry, members of Congress from coastal states and others.

Late Wednesday, the U.S. Senate approved a bill to prohibit federal spending for decommissioning of any of the Ocean Observatories Initiative without a thorough review, including review by people and organizations using the information provided by the system

The bill was introduced and brought to the floor by Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Jeff Merkley. Called the “Saving the OOI Act,” it passed by unanimous consent.

The following day, the National Science Foundation announced the reversal of a decision that it previously classified as a mere “descoping” of the observatories network.

“The U.S. National Science Foundation appreciates the concerns raised by the range of stakeholders that have informed us they rely on data from the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI),” said a statement released by the agency. “Effective immediately, NSF will not proceed with further removal or descoping of equipment from the remaining arrays and will continue operations including planned maintenance.”

The National Science Foundation said it had already removed part of the system, called the Endurance Array, which is a number of instruments that were placed along the coasts of Oregon and Washington. But now, the agency said, “we are developing plans to redeploy the equipment after servicing.”

Murkowski, one of the prominent defenders of the Oceans Observatories Initiative, emphasized the importance of the system to Alaska, which has more coastline than the rest of the states combined, a fisheries industry worth billions of dollars annually and coastal communities vulnerable to extreme storms.

In a statement, she and Merkley said they welcomed the new decision to keep the Ocean Observatories Initiative intact.

“The National Science Foundation’s decision to leave the Ocean Observatories Initiative’s buoys in place is a massive win for coastal communities and fishermen around the country,” Murkowski said. “The data accessed through OOI is important for so many, and I’m immensely grateful that NSF listened to our calls. Today we saw the federal process at work—with the Senate quickly passing legislation and the executive branch responding to our position. I’m pleased to have partnered with Senator Merkley and a number of my colleagues to preserve this valuable system.”

Merkley said the OOI’s work is vital that he and Murkowski would continue to be champions of the initiative:  “We’ll keep fighting to ensure scientists, fishermen, and coastal communities can continue to utilize the critical data the OOI provides.”

While most of the sponsors of the bill were Democrats from coastal states, a second Republican had signed on as of Wednesday as a cosponsor: Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska.

Support from senators of both parties was important, said a statement released by the environmental group Oceana.

“We commend the bipartisan group of lawmakers who acted quickly to oppose the dismantling of this critical tool for monitoring the health of our oceans,” Oceana Senior Campaign Director Gib Brogan said in the statement. “Strong ocean science benefits everyone, and this reversal will ensure this tool continues to provide benefits for all of us for years to come.”

The post U.S. scientific instruments in oceans off Alaska and elsewhere to remain in place appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy extended his record-high veto rate Thursday by vetoing nine of the 82 bills passed by lawmakers in the second year of the 34th Alaska State Legislature.

Among the vetoed bills were measures that would have provided mental health lessons to kids in public schools, created a retirement plan for private-sector workers who don’t have one and updated the state’s corporate income tax system.

Two of the vetoed bills — one expanding the power of pharmacists and the other covering the state’s board of engineers and architects — were put into law Friday after lawmakers overrode the governor.

Dunleavy has now vetoed or attempted to veto almost one-fifth of all bills passed by the 34th Legislature. Other governors have issued more vetoes, but none have vetoed a higher proportion of bills than Dunleavy.

Pharmacists’ powers expanded

State legislators voted 43-17 on Friday to override Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 195, which gives pharmacists more authority to prescribe medicines and conduct simple medical tests. Forty votes were needed.

Rep. Genevieve Mina, D-Anchorage, spoke in favor of the override, saying the bill will enable Alaskans to get cheaper medical care from pharmacists instead of more expensive providers.

Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, offered an example: For a parent with a child suffering from strep throat after their pediatrician had closed for the day, going to an urgent care clinic might cost hundreds of dollars, and an emergency room visit could cost thousands. 

“This bill allows a parent to take their child to a pharmacy” and get a strep throat test, he said. 

“We have a growing number of families in Alaska that cannot afford health insurance. If they can’t take their kid to a pharmacy, they’re just not going to get treated,” he said.

Some antiabortion advocates lobbied against the bill, saying they believe the bill could allow pharmacists to more easily dispense abortion-inducing drugs.

Rep. Jamie Allard, R-Eagle River, spoke to that point, but Rep. Mike Prax, R-North Pole and a strong antiabortion advocate himself, said that information is incorrect.

Alaska law limits who may perform an abortion in the state, Prax said.

“It just simply isn’t an issue, and therefore the benefits of this bill clearly outweigh any of the risks,” he said.

Interior designers added to architecture board

Lawmakers also overrode Dunleavy’s veto of House Bill 314 by a 45-15 margin. Forty votes were needed.

A revised version of a bill Dunleavy vetoed last year, HB 314 will regulate some aspects of interior design in the state by adding them to the State Board of Architects, Engineers, and Land Surveyors. 

The bill also renewed the board’s legal authority, and when Dunleavy vetoed HB 314, it could have at least temporarily eliminated the board as a side effect. While the duties of the board would have been assumed by the Alaska Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development, lawmakers said they did not want to eliminate the board just as the state considers a state-spanning natural gas pipeline.

No extra oversight for for kids’ psychiatric facilities

Forty of the Legislature’s 60 members are needed to override the veto of a policy bill, and legislators failed to reach that threshold on three votes Friday due to the opposition of Republican lawmakers.

On House Bill 52, which would require increased oversight of youth psychiatric facilities, the vote was 36-24. The bill, from Rep. Maxine Dibert, D-Fairbanks, was introduced in response to reports of widespread problems at North Star psychiatric hospital in Anchorage.

If enacted, the bill would have required unannounced state inspections of facilities like North Star and reports on the use of physical and chemical restraints on children, among other items.

In his veto message, the governor said that while he supports oversight, he believes the bill duplicates what the state is already empowered to do.

No mental health education in public schools

Despite an impassioned speech from Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson, D-Anchorage, the Legislature declined to override Dunleavy’s veto of Senate Bill 41, which would have required the Alaska Department of Education and Early Development to draft a mental health curriculum in the same way that it has a physical education program.

Local districts would have been responsible for implementing that curriculum.

The override vote was 38-22, two votes short of what was needed.

The issue, Gray-Jackson told legislators Friday, is nothing short of a matter of life and death. 

Alaska has the highest suicide rate in the nation, she said, and “in many rural communities, suicide rates are nearly four times that the national average. Teaching our students how to recognize mental health challenges, to seek help and support one another, is one of the most basic and meaningful steps we can take to address this crisis.”

In his veto message, the governor said, “this bill places the state in the role of imposing upon school districts to mandate the development of mental health education at a time when districts are already working to meet existing requirements.”

“Decisions about sensitive classroom instruction, especially instruction involving a student’s mental and emotional health, should remain as close as possible to parents, local school boards, and communities,” he said.

Gray-Jackson lambasted that statement, saying it repeated “false” and “harmful” misinformation from “online blogs and commentators.”

“SB 41 didn’t remove parents from the conversation, it didn’t strip authority from local school boards, it didn’t replace community values with a one-size-fits-all mandate,” she said. 

“The reality is much simpler,” Gray-Jackson said. “The governor vetoed a bill with the potential to save lives in every community represented in this chamber, and I can’t emphasize that enough.”

No retirement plans for minimum-wage workers

Legislators failed by a single vote to override Dunleavy’s veto of Senate Bill 21, which would have provided state-run retirement plans for workers in businesses that do not currently offer retirement benefits.

The program under SB 21, similar to efforts already launched by other states, would have principally affected minimum-wage workers and those in small businesses. Unless they opt out, eligible workers would have had 5% of their paychecks automatically deducted and deposited into an investment account managed by the state.

In his veto message, the governor said he opposes a mandate, even with an opt-out provision.

“Although employees may opt out, the bill relies on automatic enrollment and places employers in the middle of a state-run investment program. Alaska businesses should not be required to

administer or facilitate retirement savings accounts created by the State when private retirement

and investment options are already available,” Dunleavy wrote.

The vote on an override was 39-21, with Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, casting the last and decisive vote to sustain the governor’s decision.

No updates to corporate or tobacco taxes

Of the governor’s nine vetoes, legislators declined to vote on four, permitting them to stand without a vote. 

Dunleavy vetoed two bills — House Bill 280 and Senate Bill 24 — saying that he is unwilling to approve tax changes without a comprehensive fiscal plan that brings state expenses and revenue into line over the long-term.

Both bills had been passed in different forms by prior editions of the Legislature and were also previously vetoed by Dunleavy. If SB 24 had been enacted, it would have imposed Alaska’s first tax on e-cigarette products. HB 280 would have modernized the state’s corporate income tax system, taking tax revenue for online sales from other states to the Alaska treasury by declaring that sales to Alaskans take place in Alaska, not at the location of a warehouse or computer server operated by the seller.

House Bill 23, also vetoed by the governor, would have subjected nonprofit businesses to the authority of the Alaska State Commission for Human Rights, which handles discrimination complaints against employers.

“While I support protecting Alaskans from unlawful discrimination, this bill expands the commission’s reach over nonprofit employers, including charitable, educational, and religious organizations. That expansion creates uncertainty for small community organizations and risks unnecessary administrative proceedings and litigation,” the governor wrote in his veto message.

The last of the vetoes, Senate Bill 258, would have forbidden the state from signing computer software deals that lock in the state to a particular company or limit the software to a particular geographic area.

The governor’s veto message said in part that the “bill places rigid statutory limits on how the State and political subdivisions may contract for software in a highly technical and rapidly changing marketplace.”

“Software licensing, cybersecurity requirements, cloud services, support, hosting, and pricing

models are complex and often negotiated together. Restricting those negotiations in statute could reduce flexibility, limit access to needed products, and increase costs for agencies and local governments,” he wrote.

The post Dunleavy vetoes nine bills, but Alaska lawmakers override two in special session flurry appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Elon Musk is the richest person in the world, probably the universe, though it’s always possible some unknown form of life has blasted to stratospheric economic heights in an unknown galaxy — if they even have an atmosphere or stratosphere — and reaped untold personal wealth in whatever currency they may use.

No matter, Musk is rich in dollars on Earth, where his companies sell their goods and services of electric cars, satellite internet links, rocket launches, artificial intelligence and data center services.

And he got even richer last week when SpaceX, his rocket launch and AI and satellite company, went public, joining earthly companies on the stock exchange. No matter that most of his businesses lose money — investors are eager to ride the rocket and see how high it can go.

Musk, according to numbers from respected financial news services Bloomberg, Forbes and the Associated Press, is now worth an estimated $1.1 trillion to $1.2 trillion. Close enough, since I doubt the guy needs to balance a checkbook or look over a credit card statement.

But millions of Americans do just that every month, and for good reason. They’re in debt, particularly on their credit cards. The balance owed on credit cards held by Americans reached $1.25 trillion in the first quarter of this year, according to the New York Federal Reserve Bank, up from $1.18 trillion a year ago. The $1.25 trillion is the highest first-quarter balance since the bank began measuring the data in 1999. 

No problem for those who pay their balance in full every month, but more than one in eight cards, or 13.12%, the highest level in 15 years, were at least 90 days delinquent in the first quarter of this year, according to data released last month by the New York Fed.

The Alaska Department of Labor also looked at debt and delinquencies last month, reporting the numbers in the June issue of Alaska Economic Trends, the department’s monthly magazine. “Alaska credit card debt delinquency (in 2025) has risen to its highest level in more than 20 years,” close to 10%, the department reported.

Though below the national average of 12.4% last year, Alaska’s nearly 10% delinquency rate is not comforting to the tens of thousands of people who can’t keep up with payments.

Considering the rural nature of much of the state, the remoteness of many homes and the coverage gaps in internet services, no doubt a lot of people who are behind in their credit card bills pay Elon Musk’s Starlink for satellite internet service. Ironic that Starlink raised its rates in the same month that Musk became a trillionaire.

The Wall Street Journal wanted to illustrate for readers just how far a trillion dollars would go. If you could find and stack enough pennies — remember, the U.S. Mint stopped making pennies last year because they lost money on every coin — a trillion dollars would cover the distance between Earth and the moon four times.

That got me thinking: Musk has long promoted colonizing the moon, aboard his rockets, of course. But if he really wanted to help people on Earth, as he claims he does with all of the technology and products he sells, he could use his trillion-dollar wealth to pay off the credit card delinquencies of millions of people. He’d still be worth hundreds of billions of dollars. More than enough to get him to the moon, where he would easily claim the title as the richest person there.

• Larry Persily is the publisher of the Wrangell Sentinel, which first published this column.

The post Elon Musk could put his $1 trillion to a good use appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.