Republicans in Georgia just proved that one thing can overcome the power of President Donald Trump’s endorsement: an endless stream of cash.
Health care executive Rick Jackson defeated Trump-backed Lt. Gov. Burt Jones in Georgia’s GOP gubernatorial primary Tuesday, with the help of over $100 million of his personal wealth.
Jones’ loss is a major upset for the president in a marquee battleground state, and it follows several high-profile Trump losses in 2022, when his candidates either lost their primaries or the general election. The result is also a rare blunder for Republican Gov. Brian Kemp, who joined Trump in endorsing Jones to be his successor ahead of Tuesday’s primary, after months of sitting on the sidelines of the race.
Remarkably, neither Trump’s nor Kemp’s widespread influence could overcome the blunt force of Jackson’s spending.
Jackson, for his part, had amassed his own support from notable figures within Georgia and beyond. His former rival Attorney General Chris Carr backed the billionaire’s campaign shortly after coming in last place in May’s primary. And two Republican senators — Ted Cruz of Texas and Rick Scott of Florida — endorsed his campaign ahead of the runoff. Cruz went as far to rally with Jackson on the eve of the runoff.
Jackson’s record-breaking spending dominated races in Georgia far beyond just the contest for governor. GOP strategists said his billions in ad spending sucked up all the political oxygen, making it more difficult for other Republicans up and down the ballot to break through in their own races.
Jackson, a Georgia native septuagenarian who often shares his story of drifting through the foster care system as a child, amassed his fortune in the health care industry. His successful bid for the GOP nomination is his first run for public office.
Over the course of the primary, Jackson faced a series of attacks from the most conservative members of Georgia’s GOP for not being sufficiently pro-Trump, primarily because he had previously donated to former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.). He later donated $1 million to one of the president’s main super PACs — but only after Trump had won the 2024 election.
Still, Jackson refashioned himself as a Trump acolyte during his campaign, often telling voters he would be the president’s “favorite governor” and questioning the veracity of Georgia’s 2020 thoroughly litigated election results.
Bunnie Xo was looking forward to giving Jelly Roll hugs and kisses forever.
The Dumb Blonde podcast host celebrated 10 years with the “Bloodline” singer just two weeks before May 9—the date Jelly… E! Online (US) – Top Stories
Love Island USA is paying tribute to one of their own.
After executive producer James Barker’s death at the age of 40, the show honored him on the June 16 episode with a touching moment of… E! Online (US) – Top Stories
Corey Feldman is on the road to recovery.
The Goonies star, 54, was met by paramedics at Los Angeles International Airport and then hospitalized June 15, following a frightening medical emergency… E! Online (US) – Top Stories
Members of the Alaska Senate’s bipartisan majority talk during a break in the Senate Finance Committee meeting on the afternoon of Tuesday, June 16, 2026. (James Brooks photo/Alaska Beacon)
Because lawmakers are meeting in a special session that ends on Friday, even a short delay could kill the bill containing the tax break. Gov. Mike Dunleavy could also call legislators back into another special session on the issue.
The Senate is led by a 14-person coalition of Republicans and Democrats. An internal rule states that 11 of the coalition’s members must agree before a bill comes to the floor.
“We are not to the point of having 11 votes to get to the floor yet,” said Sen. Jesse Kiehl, D-Juneau.
On Tuesday evening, members of the Senate majority coalition met behind closed doors to discuss their next steps.
Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak, said that while some members of the majority are willing to support the bill as currently written, others are asking for significant amendments.
Sen. Bill Wielechowski, D-Anchorage and a noted critic of the bill, said he sees several points of contention, including basic things like the length and size of the proposed tax break.
The Senate Finance Committee, which is hearing the bill, could amend it to win over some reluctant senators, but that runs the risk of making the bill unacceptable to Glenfarne, the pipeline project’s lead developer.
Glenfarne officials have said that a tax break is necessary for it to obtain the financing for a project that it publicly expects to cost as much as $54.5 billion.
Speaking to the Senate Finance Committee on Tuesday morning, Glenfarne Alaska President Adam Prestidge warned senators to not shorten the terms of that tax break.
“If there were to be a shorter-term abatement that then ended and reverted back to 20 mills, it would severely challenge the economics of the project,” he said.
Under current laws, according to an analysis by the Alaska Department of Revenue, the state of Alaska would net $29.7 billion through 2062 if the gas pipeline and supporting infrastructure are built as planned. Boroughs along the route would share another $17.3 billion.
Under the House-passed bill, the state’s take drops to $23.4 billion, a decline of $6.3 billion. Boroughs’ share of the revenue drops to $7.5 billion, a drop of $9.8 billion.
Stevens said he doesn’t expect the bill to advance from the Senate Finance Committee to a vote of the full Senate before noon Thursday, the penultimate day of the special session.
On Tuesday evening, the committee scheduled a hearing for Thursday afternoon.
Senate Finance co-chair Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel, said noon Thursday is “probably the earliest” time a bill could advance from the Finance Committee to the full Senate.
That’s a challenging timeline, said Sen. Forrest Dunbar, D-Anchorage, because lawmakers outside the finance committee can’t begin writing proposed amendments until they see what the finance committee does with the bill.
Dunbar said he doesn’t think the bill does enough to guarantee that the state’s oil revenue — the No. 2 source of general-purpose money for services and the Permanent Fund dividend — would be held harmless if the pipeline is built.
“I think the current version of the bill does not protect Alaska’s financial interests enough to get to the floor,” he said.
Sen. Jesse Bjorkman, R-Nikiski, is a member of the majority and generally supports the House-passed bill but thinks it needs some technical changes.
He’s not certain whether the majority will hold to the 11-vote rule.
If the 11-vote rule becomes a permanent obstacle, legislators who support the tax break could try to bring the bill to the floor for a vote with procedural motions. That would involve members of the majority cooperating with the six Republican members of the Senate’s all-Republican minority coalition, which has generally been supportive of the House bill.
If the bill advances to the floor and all six minority senators vote for the bill, only five majority senators would need to vote for it in order for it to pass.
Dunbar cautioned against that kind of maneuver, saying it could harm relationships between senators.
“It would make organizing another bipartisan majority less likely next year,” he said.
Gov. Mike Dunleavy has previously expressed support for Glenfarne’s positions. Thursday is the deadline for the governor to decide whether or not to veto several bills unassociated with the pipeline project.
Stevens declined to answer questions asking whether the governor’s actions on those bills could affect the majority’s decision on the pipeline project.
“Hopefully the governor’s getting the message that we want to see very few vetoes,” Stevens said.
The leaders of the House and Senate are tentatively planning a joint session on Friday morning to take up any veto overrides that lawmakers want to bring forward.
Sen. Scott Kawasaki, D-Fairbanks and a supporter of the pipeline, said no senator is explicitly saying that they will vote for the pipeline tax break if the governor allows their other bills to become law.
Still, there’s an implication in the Senate’s actions.
“Folks need to realize that if you want goodwill, you don’t veto everything that’s on the governor’s desk,” Kawasaki said.
West Wilson has delivered his summertime swansong.
One day after it was reported that the sports journalist would be exiting Summer House after three seasons, West made his final appearance on the… E! Online (US) – Top Stories
Norway marked its return to the World Cup in winning fashion with a 4-1 victory over Iraq on Tuesday night at Boston Stadium. The Norwegians have frequently been mentioned as a possible dark horse in this tournament after its perfect run through UEFA qualifying. While this game was far from perfect for them — and Iraq deserves some credit for that for their effort in the first 75 minutes — ultimately, Norway was clearly the deserved winners. With the win, Norway joins France atop the Group I table at the 2026 FIFA Men’s World Cup: 1. World Cup Haaland Was Worth The Wait Erling Haaland was one of the most eagerly anticipated players at this tournament. The Manchester City forward has accomplished everything possible at the club level. But the international side of the game is a completely different story. This is Norway’s first World Cup since 1998. The Scandinavian country has also not appeared for the European Championships since 2000. Two weeks after Euro 2000, Haaland was born and, just under 26 years later, he would bring the team back. Haaland has been exceptional for Norway, and he now has 57 goals in 51 games, but this is his first game in a major international tournament. His debut was exceptional as he scored twice in the first half help Norway pull ahead for good. The first goal was Haaland at his best when he made a run into the box that was almost impossible to stop. When a team is moving forward from a wide position, Haaland is special at making runs into the box where he can get behind just about any defense. Haaland’s second goal was all effort, as he closed down and forced a mistake. On the final goal deep into stoppage time, Haaland was pushing for the hat trick and his header eventually resulted in an own goal. With this game, Haaland showed the world that he is ready to be a force in the international game just as he is with Manchester City. The World Cup is better with him in it. 2. Norway’s Supporting Cast Was Mixed Norway’s game plan was well known coming into this game. The central midfielders try to find the wingers or fullbacks moving forward with speed into wide areas. Then the key play is to find Haaland as he makes a run up the middle towards goal. It was an extremely successful approach as Norway has historically been good in World Cup qualifying, winning all eight of its games with Haaland scoring 16 goals. Norway was particularly effective in the first half, attacking up the left side with left winger Antonio Nusa and left back David Møller Wolfe frequently finding space. Then in the 76th minute, Norway gave itself breathing room when Genoa defender Leo Østigard headed home a corner kick delivered by Martin Ødegaard, who is the captain of both Norway and Arsenal. Despite the corner kick delivery on the third goal, Ødegaard, along with Sander Berge, did not have a particularly effective first half in central midfield. This was close for the first 75 minutes as Iraq controlled the middle of the field for long stretches in the first half. After a 4-1 win, there is typically little to criticize. But for an ambitious Norwegian team, it will need to be better as elite teams await. Norway can depend on Haaland to always be good, but everything they do begins in central midfield. 3. Iraq Played Well, But Made A Huge Mistake But in this game, Iraq was prepared and made the focal point of trying to contain Ødegaard. Stopping Haaland is often impossible, so the approach is typically to try to cut off service into him or try to close passing lanes that often prevent the ball from getting out wide. For the first 75 minutes, Iraq put on a better performance than expected because of its strong play in the midfield. This was far from the case of an underdog sitting deep and bunkering to keep the score close. Iraq came to play against Norway. Amir Al-Ammari, who plays for Cracovia in Poland, had an especially strong performance as he helped in possession and in creating multiple chances. It was his assist to Ayman Hussein who pulled Iraq even in the 39th minute. But Iraq is surely asking itself the painful question of what could have been? With the score 1-1, defender Zaid Tahseen had the ball by himself wide right. Instead of playing the ball forward, he made an inexcusable error of playing the ball back to his keeper Jalal Hassan while under the pressure of an onrushing Haaland. Tasheen’s pass was too light and Hassan made an error to try to clear in the direction of Haaland. Instead, the ball went back into his own goal. Norway went on to score again on a set piece with Iraq pushing forward and the final goal came with Iraq worn down and defeated, but ultimately the error was extremely costly and things could have been different had it been avoided. 4. Norway And Iraq’s Path Forward Group I is widely considered the most difficult group at this World Cup with one of the best teams in the world in France, arguably the top team in Africa in Senegal, a Norwegian team that has many good players, and Iraq. With its two toughest games coming later, Norway needed to leave this game with three points. Four points is often considered the “magic number” to secure advancement. Three might be enough but four is likely enough to finish as one of the eight best third place teams. Norway next faces a Senegal team that should be desperate after a tough and hard-fought loss to France. It should be an excellent game. Iraq was very unlucky to be placed in a tough group where it is a heavy underdog in all three games. While it played well at times, it wasn’t close to being enough.Latest Sports News from FOX Sports
Georgia Rep. Mike Collins is the GOP’s nominee to take on incumbent Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff in one of this year’s most closely watched Senate races.
Collins, boosted by a last-minute endorsement from President Donald Trump, defeated former football coach Derek Dooley to win the runoff Tuesday. The primary had turned into a messy proxy war between popular Gov. Brian Kemp, who championed Dooley’s bid, and Trump, who called Collins a “WARRIOR and WINNER!” on Truth Social.
Republicans will now pivot to a general election battle against Ossoff, who they fear will be hard to beat in November. The Democratic incumbent has spent months stockpiling cash and commanding national attention while Collins and Dooley have been locked in a costly and bitter primary fight.
Collins’ victory over Dooley is another notch in Trump’s endorsement record. Although the president did not weigh in until after the early voting period had ended, just days before the runoff, his backing was widely expected to help propel Collins to a first-place finish.
It was a relief for Collins, whose campaign was rocked by an internal controversy recently after his top aide, Brandon Phillips — who is also at the center of a House Ethics investigation — posted a vulgar insult directed at the wife of a Dooley-aligned operative on social media.
Collins quickly rebuked the post and moved to further align himself with Trump’s political operation, bringing on several top Trump campaign veterans, including pollster Tony Fabrizio, data strategist Tim Saler and Chip Englander as a general consultant.
Jennifer Lopez ain’t your mama, but she is to kids Emme and Max.
The “On the Floor” singer—who shares the 18-year-old twins with ex-husband Marc Anthony—reflected on her “crazy” motherhood journey… E! Online (US) – Top Stories
Amanda Seyfried wanted to show Sydney Sweeney some sweetness.
As the Housemaid actress recalled, she did her best to be there for her costar after Sweeney was caught up in controversy following… E! Online (US) – Top Stories