Day: April 10, 2026

President Donald Trump on Friday called on Alaska voters to repeal ranked choice voting at the November election.

“The Wonderful People of Alaska desperately want to restore Free, Fair, and Honest Elections in their Great State, and get rid of their disastrous, and very fraudulent, “Ranked-Choice Voting,” Trump said on Truth Social.

An effort to repeal ranked choice voting in 2024 failed by just 737 votes. A separate repeal initiative, sponsored by figures aligned with the Alaska Republican Party, is set to appear on the 2026 general election ballot. 

Trump gave his “complete and total support” to supporters of the repeal effort, including U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan and Congressman Nick Begich, both Alaska Republicans running for reelection in November. 

The president’s post was seized on by Republican candidates for Alaska statewide office who echoed his calls to strike down the voting system.

Alaska voters narrowly approved a ballot measure in 2020 that implemented ranked choice voting for state and congressional elections, alongside open primary elections and tougher campaign finance disclosure requirements. 

Ranked-choice voting in Alaska lets voters pick candidates in order of preference rather than choosing just one. If no candidate wins a majority of first-choice votes, the lowest-ranked candidate is eliminated and those votes are redistributed until someone surpasses 50% of votes.

However, the new election system has been controversial. Opponents argue that ranked choice voting is unnecessarily complicated, while supporters say it has led to more moderate and consensus candidates elected.

Ranked voting, open primaries and the tougher campaign finance disclosure requirements would all be struck down if the 2026 ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters.

Alaska for Better Elections is a group running voter education campaigns in support of retaining ranked choice voting and open primaries. Executive Director Juli Lucky said Alaska’s election system has allowed policymakers across the political spectrum to work together without fear of challengers in partisan primaries. 

“I think Alaskans will reflect on the results we’ve seen to decide whether our system of open primaries, ranked choice voting, and the strictest campaign finance laws in the country works for them,” Lucky said by text message after Trump’s post. “Ultimately, Alaskans created and enacted this system, and Alaskans will decide whether we keep it.”

SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

The borough manager has proposed a budget for the upcoming year that would hold big-ticket spending roughly steady, but would pay for it, at least in part, with significant spending from savings. 

In one of few larger spending changes, the manager has proposed a roughly 4% bump in school funding, on top of the increase approved by the assembly last year. 

The increase, which comes out to an additional $101,000 over last year, would bring the borough’s spending on the school to $2,668,000.

That’s still short of a 12%, or $295,000, increase requested this year by superintendent Lilly Boron, said borough manager Alekka Fullerton. 

The increase in borough school spending comes as a response to shrinking state funding.

In recent weeks, Boron told state lawmakers that the district is in dire financial straits, warning of potential “insolvency” if state funding levels continue to stagnate. 

District officials in the last two years have said their top priority with new funds is to increase teacher salaries. Under a newly-negotiated collective bargaining agreement, teachers in the district will see a 5% pay bump this year, followed by a 4% and 3% increase in the two years following. 

The district’s issues, of inflation-fueled cost increases and declining state-funding, have been problems for the borough as well, Fullerton said. “We have a very lean budget already and have battled inflation in every department over the last few years,” Fullerton wrote in a letter accompanying the budget. 

For a number of reasons, it has not been easy for the borough to pull in new revenue to match increasing costs. 

Property taxes are just about tied with sales tax as the largest sources of borough revenue. Raising property tax rates, however, is politically unpopular and capped by borough code. 

This year, Fullerton’s budget would actually drop property tax rates. As written, the rate in the townsite would drop 8% from last year and the borough-wide rate would drop 11%. 

Property tax rates are often expressed in mills — the dollars taxed per $1000 of assessed value. Haines’ rates in the proposed budget, 10.09 mills in the townsite and 5.74 boroughwide, come in below the 2025 state average of 10.58 mills, according to the Office of the State Tax Assessor. 

In recent months, borough leadership has sought to increase revenues outside of direct taxation of locals. 

New revenue streams approved by the assembly include a cruise ship head-tax and zero-balance ambulance billing, each projected to bring in low-to-mid six-figure sums annually. The revenue generating effort also included the seasonal sales tax, which voters approved last year, but which remains controversial, and a potential new severance tax on exported raw materials. 

Even with these new funding sources, revenue in the proposed budget falls about $2.7 million short of spending. To close the gap, Fullerton proposes dipping into borough savings. 

That would come from a number of different savings accounts, all of which are restricted to specific types of spending except for the unrestricted areawide general fund. That general fund, the largest of the accounts, funds items like the school, library, pool, and borough administration. 

The proposed savings draw would pull $1.1 million from the areawide general fund, which is expected to have $4.3 million in savings by the end of June 2026. 

The rest of the savings draw would largely come from the townsite-services fund and the economic development and tourism fund, each of which currently contain more than $1 million. 

The manager’s proposal is headed to the assembly, which controls final decisions on the annual tax-and-spend plan. 

Last year, the assembly approved additional spending beyond the manager’s plan for services like the school and the pool, which it could once again do this year. 

Assembly members will likely also comb through the budget to find cuts, like last year’s cancellation of a handful of new borough vehicle purchases. 

The manager has also left what she says are more political decisions to the assembly. For instance, there’s no money in her budget for non-profits or for the Freeride World Tour, which has asked to be paid $150,000 to return next year. 

The assembly’s deliberations will include three committee-of-the-whole meetings dedicated to the budget on April 21, April 28, and May 14. Then the assembly will hold public hearings on the budget on May 12 and May 26. If the budget is not passed at the May 26 meeting, the assembly will hold a third public hearing on June 9. 

According to borough charter, the assembly must pass the final budget by June 15. 

What do you want to know about the Haines Borough budget?

Help us report on the the borough’s budget by telling us how borough spending impacts you.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Message Name or

Comment or Message *

Name

Phone

Email

Submit

The post Budget Nuggets: Manager’s budget proposes spending savings to keep services steady appeared first on Chilkat Valley News.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy signed off on a supplemental budget bill that authorizes nearly $450 million in additional state spending this year. 

The budget bill covers additional costs incurred by the state this fiscal year ending in June, including funds for disaster relief, education, corrections and transportation. 

The bill was approved by the Alaska State Legislature two weeks ago. Dunleavy signed the budget on Apr. 2, and transmitted it back to the Legislature on Thursday. 

“I appreciate the Legislature’s support of these proposals,” Dunleavy said in a letter announcing his signature on the bill. “The supplemental budget I have signed into law today enables the State to meet current fiscal year responsibilities and represents prudent and fiscally responsible investments in emergency and fire response, public safety and statewide transportation needs.”

The budget includes $75 million for disaster relief to address the response to the Western Alaska storms last fall, and nearly $100 million for fire suppression, particularly in Interior Alaska. It includes $20 million for the Alaska Department of Corrections overtime expenses, as well as $70 million in time-sensitive funding for transportation — sought by the construction industry to unlock a federal match of $630 million for state construction projects.

It also includes $130 million for the Alaska Higher Education Fund which provides grants and scholarships for students, as well as $34.4 million for Medicaid and $12.8 million for other public assistance programs through the Alaska Department of Health. 

The governor’s office submitted an additional $11.6 million request, but it was submitted too late to include in the budget bill, and will be rolled into the proposal for next year’s budget. 

Additionally, the state is waiting on an appeal decision after failing a federal disparity test for education funding, and could potentially be liable for $72 million in K-12 funding for next year, according to officials with the Legislative Finance Division. 

Oil revenues still uncertain

In the Legislature, the bill was delayed this year amid ongoing debate in the House of Representatives on whether to pay for the larger than usual budget bill out of state savings — an act that requires the approval of three-quarters of legislators.

Members of the House Republican minority caucus objected to spending from a state savings account, the Constitutional Budget Reserve. After the Alaska Department of Revenue projected the state would see an additional $500 million in oil revenue due to a surge in oil prices driven by the Iran war, they argued the state would not need to pull from savings to pay its bills. 

Members of the multipartisan House majority caucus objected to the uncertainty of revenue forecasts and future oil prices, and argued for a draw from state savings to fund the budget bill immediately.

If oil-driven state revenues from now until the end of the fiscal year are not sufficient to cover the $450 million supplemental budget, then lawmakers agreed to draw from state savings. That means oil prices must average approximately $82 per barrel of oil through June for state revenue to cover spending, according to officials with the Legislative Finance Division. 

House Speaker Rep. Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham, was among legislators who supported the draw from savings several weeks ago, instead of banking on uncertain future oil revenues. On Friday, he said it seems revenues will cover the budget bill. 

“As appears now, oil prices are continuing to move in an upward trajectory, which means that the bill at the very end could be fully funded,” Edgmon said. “But there’s still a fair amount of time in front of us for oil prices to, you know, continue to be volatile.”

Edgmon said barring a dive in oil prices, he doesn’t expect another vote on drawing from the state savings this session.

“That’s pending a dramatic drop in oil prices, of course, which doesn’t seem to be on the horizon.”

SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE